NYC Charter Schools Are Illegally Pushing Out "Difficult" Kids, Report Alleges
A children’s advocacy group has found that large numbers of NYC charter
schools are
violating state and federal law in their disciplinary practices, handing out
excessive suspensions and expulsions—often without due process—to children as
young as five.
Through Freedom of Information Law requests, Advocates for Children of New York (AFC) obtained the discipline policies of 155 out of the 183
total charter schools in NYC during the 2012-2013 school year and part of the
2013-2014 school year. Their report,
"Civil Rights Suspended," examines how those policies fail to protect
students and details some of the most egregious allegations of excessive
discipline.
Of the 164 disciplinary policies from the 155 schools (some
schools had multiple policies for different grade
levels), the report found:
1) 107 policies allowed suspensions or expulsions for any
behavior violation, no matter how minor;
2) 82 allowed suspensions or expulsions for students who were late, absent, or skipped class;
3) 133 did not include the right to written notice before a suspension took place;
4) 36 did not include the right to a hearing prior to a short-term suspension;
5) 25 did not include the right to a hearing prior to a long-term suspension;
6) 59 did not include the right to appeal a suspension or expulsion;
7) 36 did not include distinct procedures for suspending or expelling students with disabilities;
8) 52 did not include the right to alternative instruction during the full time of the suspension.
2) 82 allowed suspensions or expulsions for students who were late, absent, or skipped class;
3) 133 did not include the right to written notice before a suspension took place;
4) 36 did not include the right to a hearing prior to a short-term suspension;
5) 25 did not include the right to a hearing prior to a long-term suspension;
6) 59 did not include the right to appeal a suspension or expulsion;
7) 36 did not include distinct procedures for suspending or expelling students with disabilities;
8) 52 did not include the right to alternative instruction during the full time of the suspension.
The first finding—that students are being suspended and expelled
for behavior violations—is especially significant for students with
disabilities, says Paulina Davis, Staff Attorney with the AFC's Charter Schools
Initiative. “If you have ADHD and you can get an infraction for getting out of
your seat without permission, or calling out in class, then you’re someone who
is more likely to incur those types of infractions,” she explains.
City charter schools are not subject to the same disciplinary
regulations as public schools under the Department of Education’s Discipline
Code; instead, they are governed by the New York State Charter Schools Act and
the state constitution. They must also comply with federal law, including IDEA
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), and Goss v. Lopez, a decision
which regulates due process requirements for suspensions. The AFC report alleges that findings two through
seven violate state law, while findings four, five, and seven—those having to
do with due process and disability protections—violate federal law.
The report describes a 10-year-old boy with ADHD who was
suspended from his charter multiple times for those exact behaviors, missing
over twenty days of school. Another boy with ADHD faced expulsion after
throwing a bag of food on the floor and sweeping it up with a “bad attitude”—he had
already been suspended three times. A five-year-old girl was suspended three
times while her mother waited for her disability evaluation, then expelled for
accumulating those three suspensions.
AFC has provided legal guidance or representation to over 100
parents in charter suspensions or expulsions in the past year and a half, they
write in the report. But James Merriman, CEO of the New York City Charter
School Center, says the incidents are isolated. In a statement
issued to Gothamist,
he writes:
“No one can disagree that those policies that do not fully meet
applicable law should be amended. But it is tremendously unfair to suggest, as
AFC does, that a handful of one-sided anecdotes compiled over a long time are
any evidence that charter schools are wholesale violating civil rights laws. Based
on AFC’s own evidence, only one tenth of one percent of students in charters
have over the last 18 months lodged a complaint, a figure that strongly
suggests that what problems there may be are extremely rare, isolated and the
exception.”
In 2013, a report from the Daily News found that popular charter chain Success Academy was suspending
students at much higher rates than public schools in the same neighborhoods.
One Success Academy school in Harlem suspended 22% of its children during the
2010-11 school year, compared to a 3% suspension average for public elementary
schools in the same district.
Donna Lieberman, Executive Director of the NYCLU, says the AFC
report is "welcome, and shines a light on the structural problems in the
charter schools with regard to accountability for fairness and equity in school
discipline. The report confirms what we have been hearing for years now, and
what the governor even alluded to in his state of the state message, the
problem of schools that are engaged in pushing out difficult kids. He referred
to it as 'preening.'"
Lieberman argues that the state education department "has
an obligation to ensure that charter schools respect the right of children to
go to school, and act in accordance with the common sense principals that, when
you agree to educate a child, you can't throw them out just because they behave
like a child."
Meanwhile, the city’s public schools await an overhaul to the Department of Education’s Discipline Code, which has been
criticized repeatedly for disproportionately suspending black and Latino
children. There were 53,000 suspensions in the 2013-2014 school year, 90% of
which were given to black or Latino students. Students with disabilities are
also suspended at extremely high rates by the DOE—of the 53,000 suspensions
from 2013-2014, 36% of them were students with
disabilities.
Molly Knefel is
a freelance journalist and co-host of the political podcast Radio Dispatch.
