Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Monday, February 21, 2022

February 22, 2022: The Numerology Guide and Synchronicity

Al Musawar magazine, 1981, on the Solar Video project

I have been thinking about the date 2/22/22. This multiple of 2s falls on a Tuesday.

That's a lot of 2s. And a Tuesday thrown in for anyone who didn't notice the first roll of the dice. What, if anything, does this mean?

I am not in any way a fanatic about numbers, planets, fate, ancient origins of words, or any of that stuff. I look at these topics as interesting, a side dish to my life rather than the entree.

Me, center, with film star Nadia Lutfi on my left in the Cairo museum

But I couldn't pass up an opportunity to look at this singular date on the calendar and wonder, what if it does mean something?

Numerology says this about the number 2: "The Numerology number 2 is known to numerologists as a supremely feminine force, one that represents both grace and power. It is cooperative, always aiming to bring peace and balance back to a relationship or situation. This Numerology number is also very sensitive -- of all the numbers, it has the strongest intuition. It is able to sense currents and feelings instinctively, then use these clues to connect with others emphatically.

At its very core the 2 in Numerology represents partnerships -- the coming together or balancing of two individual people, concepts, or things. While it holds great power over any situation, it wields it with such diplomacy and tact that the result is not control and authority, but harmony and teamwork. It is a mediator, able to see two sides of a situation in an unbiased way and guide others down the middle road."

As a twin, I grew up with "oh, there's two of you!"


My mom, Julia Elizabeth Strauss Combier Taschereau (see her wedding announcement, New York Times, June 2, 1948, above) collected books on everything - Mysticism, Rosicrucianism, Buddhism, Christianity, the metaphysical value of life and being, etc - as any intellectual would who was raised by parents who were German Jews with a lot of money and time to contemplate about things. Her father, my grandfather Samuel Strauss was a journalist and newspaperman. Her birthday was February 14, or 2/14, and I and my twin were born on 7/11. My mom volunteered for 49 years at a church in Manhattan, and every Sunday after services she took a cup of water to Central Park, only a block away, where four-leaf clovers jumped up and she put them into her cup so they wouldn't shrivel up before she was able to press them in plastic sheets when she got home. I found some too. Four leaves meant something, three leaves not so much. I think that the information that my paternal grandmother was from Ireland is irrelevant (or is it?). 

So numbers have always been interesting, just as "coincidences" are. When I was at Northwestern University, I majored in Child Psychology but minored in synchronicity (actually, English literature) because so many events seemed to be happening which altered my life in meaningful ways, yet could not be rationally linked. I always make note of cues that say "stop" what you are doing, look at this. I'm suggesting that you do too.

A belief in synchronicity must be accompanied by a certain amount of faith in knowing that you are presented with information for which there may be no factual reason and that you are being challenged to find one, or not. We human beings are always trying to find the basis for something happening in order to unravel the chaos around us and make some kind of sense of it all. Sometimes it is useful to do this, other times, not. Maybe more time should be spent on saying to yourself, "ok, this happened. Now, what do I do about it, if anything?" We each can and should give an event its' meaning but not look for "the" reason given to you by someone else. It gets complicated. Just do not accept anyone else's definition of the reason for something happening. Sure, it is fun to look at why or how, but I believe in going to "what do I do now"? "What meaning does this have for me"?

Everything we do is based upon a certain amount of faith. When we cross a busy street at a green light, we must have faith that we will not be run over by a car. When we reach the stairs and prepare to walk down them, we must have faith that we can walk without tumbling and hurting ourselves. You stop thinking about faith, but it is always there, as are the bad things that happen to good people but not for the lack of faith. I believe we just need to try to see the road less traveled on which we are being asked/compelled/directed to embark. As you can see in the NY Times' article above, the best man at my mom's wedding was NY Supreme Court Judge David W. Peck. His son, M. Scott Peck, wrote the book  "The Road Less Traveled", a book that suggests that "living a life of spiritual growth requires a loving nature and being open to new perspectives, including the helpful and mysterious force of grace. Taking the road less traveled isn't easy – it takes effort, will, and a strong sense of self-discipline."

I believe that, except I would argue that taking that road is easy. Staying on it, much harder. This book has been my guide throughout my life.

The quote below is on my Facebook page and at the top of a page on my website Parentadvocates.org:

"FAITH When we walk to the edge of all the light we have and take the step into the darkness of the unknown, we must believe that one of two things will happen. There will be something solid for us to stand on or we will be taught to fly." Patrick Overton

Christopher Wren

For instance, after I read about
Basaisa, a solar village in Egypt's Nile Delta area in the NY Times on June 11, 1978, by Christopher Wren, I tore the entire page out and put it in my desk, hoping sometime to get to this little village in Egypt to see the solar TV, a wonderful invention, and to meet Dr. Salah Arafa at the American University in Cairo. I was lucky to meet Mr. Wren and thank him in the mid-1980s.

 
At the time I was a producer of TV video programs with ABC. Every year members of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences ("NATAS")  were invited on a trip to a part of the world where a visit would be made to the television station headquarters. In November 1978 where was the trip scheduled to go?

Egypt. I "knew" I had to be on that trip.

A few minutes after taking my seat on the charter flight, I heard "Betsy, what are you doing on this plane?" I looked behind me, and there was Jimmy, my cameraman from the days when I produced the show "Cue on J", and a friend. I could not believe the coincidence, and he told me that if he had a free day during the week in Egypt, he would be glad to accompany me to the little village with his cameras, and we could do a little mini-documentary.

We got off of the plane, went to our hotel, the Mena House, across the street from the Pyramids. Quite a wonderful place.

 While everyone in my group went to the Cairo Museum, I got into a taxi and paid 25 cents to go to the American University to find Dr. Arafa. When I found his office, I took a seat and waited for him. He finally entered the room and changed my life. He spoke about setting up the solar-powered TV so that he could tell the villagers in Basaisa all about helping themselves by working together. 

Of course, his free day was Thursday, which was the exact and only free day I and Jimmy had, and we all went to Basaisa. I saw the kids watching an Egyptian program on the TV and asked Dr. Afara if he thought the solar panel on the roof of the little room could be used to power a video playback machine. I could borrow cameras from the networks. The purpose was to assist the people in producing their own programs using solar video equipment. Salah liked the idea and did not think I was crazy. He did a voice-over for my short piece on the solar TV which NBC news grabbed up when I returned to New York City. Salah remains a mentor for me.

What are the odds of going on a trip to Egypt a few weeks after reading the story of the solar village in the NY Times, having a friend on my plane with his camera equipment want to help me with a story out in the middle of nowhere in Egypt's Delta area, meeting Salah, getting the idea for a solar video project, and having such a widely-respected physics teacher at AUC believe in this far-out idea of the solar video? I don't know, zero to 100% I guess. 

I returned to NY and told my mom that I was moving to Cairo, and I did just that. I  set up a system where villagers produced videos, and we passed these on to various members of the Egyptian government who were ready and willing to allocate funding to appropriate technologies desired by the villagers themselves, with the details stated in their own voices.  I became friends with everyone in the Egyptian government after a film star, Nadia Lutfi, told me I was moving into her duplex in Garden City, Cairo because my friend Abdel Rahman Ali asked her to take care of me while he received cancer treatment in London. I would only leave my small flat near AUC if she agreed to take my two puppies rescued by me after I found them sitting under a car outside my apartment. Paula (Nadia's real name) agreed, so I moved to Garden City with the two little pups.

I was at the time enrolled in a Master's Program at NY University, the Interactive Telecommunications Masters Program, or ITP, and fortunately, Director Red Burns was interested enough to allow me to write reports on my Egyptian solar video project to complete my coursework. I wrote my Master's thesis on the application of solar video to agricultural projects in rural Egypt and received my MPS in 1984, when I left Egypt and put the self-sustaining solar video project in the capable hands of people at the American University in Cairo. The ABC Network office in London transcribed the Egyptian PAL System tapes to NTSC for free so I could play them in the US. I still have copies of these tapes. 

People say if you are open to the idea of synchronicity, a holographic universe, instances of deja vu, and similar instances of mystical occurrences, you will notice things that happen to you and choose to examine the event, person or thing a little more carefully. You may see a new path that you had never considered, or you may want to make changes to your career or life and believe that you should/could/will succeed.

Tuesday, February 22, 2022. Think about it.

Betsy Combier


Monday, February 14, 2022

Almost 1,500 New York City Employees Get Fired For Not Getting Vaccinated Against the COVID Vaccine

 

People gather for the anti-vaccine mandate protest ahead of possible termination of New York City employees due to their
vaccination status, Monday, Feb. 7, 2022, in Manhattan, New York. 
(Yuki Iwamura/AP)

UPDATE:

February 17, 2022

Supreme Court Judge Neil Gorsuch Overturns Decision By Sonia Sotomayor and Agrees To Hear Vaccine Mandate Protests From NYC Teachers

Advocatz.com

The outrageous become the impossible on Friday, when allegedly 1500 city workers were fired after they did not get vaccinated against the COVID virus.

On the issue of the 914 Department of Education employees supposedly fired on friday, anyone with tenure must have a 3020-a hearing before their jobs are taken away. No one received charges, and no one received a proper Notice that they had a right to the 3020-as arbitration.

Last week I spoke with 100+ employees who are /will be terminated, and told all those with tenure to send an email to NYSUT General Counsel Beth Norton (BNorton@uft.org) saying that they did not waive their right to a 3020-a and request a hearing pursuant to 3020-a Education Law, Section ((2)(a).

See 

The New York City 3020-a Arbitration “Teacher Trial” Is Based on Fraud, Advocatz.com, September 5, 2021

Although the process used in 3020-a arbitration in New York City is, in my opinion, unfair, employees must go through the process in order to have the right to sue the DOE after the hearing is over.  So many great and wonderful employees now gone is a tragedy from which the students of those employees may never recover. 

It's about trust, control, and money, not COVID.




People gather for the anti-vaccine mandate protest ahead of possible termination of New York City employees due to their
vaccination status, Monday, Feb. 7, 2022, in Manhattan, New York. 
(Yuki Iwamura/AP)

Nearly 1,500 NYC workers get the ax for flouting the COVID vaccine mandate

By  and , NY DAILY NEWS, February 14, 2022

Nearly 1,500 city workers lost their jobs Friday after failing to comply with a mandate that they are vaccinated for COVID — a bloodletting that included dismissals from the ranks of the NYPD, FDNY and the Department of Education.

While staggering in their sheer number, the firings were a long time in the making.

Mayor Adams’ predecessor, former Mayor Bill de Blasio, announced the vaccine mandate for city workers in October. Adams kept it in place when he took office, and by Friday, the city had hit a key milestone: for nearly 3,500 city workers, it was either time to show proof of inoculation or be sent packing.

Adams appeared to downplay the firings on Monday when the city announced the numbers, and instead of addressing them at a press conference or in a Q-and-A, he issued a written statement through a spokesperson.

“City workers served on the frontlines during the pandemic, and by getting vaccinated, they are, once again, showing how they are willing to do the right thing to protect themselves and all New Yorkers. Our goal was always to vaccinate, not terminate, and city workers stepped up and met the goal placed before them,” he said. “Out of all the new city employees who received notices two weeks ago, only two who worked last week are no longer employed by the city. I’m grateful to all the city workers who continue to serve New Yorkers and ‘Get Stuff Done’ for the greatest city in the world.”

It was not immediately clear who the two workers were that Adams referred to, or which agencies they worked for, but a spokesperson for the mayor said Monday that a total of 1,430 unvaccinated municipal employees were fired on Friday due to their refusal to comply with the mandate. Of those, 914 worked for the Education Department, 101 worked for the New York City Housing Authority and 75 worked for the Department of Correction.

The United Federation of Teachers (UFT) released a statement Monday evening disagreeing with the city’s legal authority to terminate employees based on the COVID vaccine mandate.

“The union is part of a lawsuit that would ensure that these cases go through the due process disciplinary procedures established in state law and the union contract. A hearing on this matter is scheduled for March 1, 2020 in New York State Supreme Court.”

The total number — 1,430 workers fired in a single day — is unprecedented in modern New York City history. Still, it is relatively small when bearing in mind that the city employs a workforce of more than 370,000.

The NYPD, FDNY and Sanitation Department also saw their share of employees head out the door over failing to follow the mandate, but far fewer left their ranks than from the other agencies. Thirty-six people employed by the NYPD were dismissed, 25 were forced out of the fire department and 40 were fired from the Department of Sanitation.

The departing employees fall into two categories.

The first group consists of people who were hired on or after Aug. 2, 2021. As a condition of being hired, they were required to be fully vaccinated within 45 days, but two weeks ago they were given notice that they had until last Friday to supply the city with proof of receiving a second vaccine dose.

About 1,000 city employees fell into that category, and of those, only two — apparently the ones Adams was referring to in his statement — were fired.

But far more people from the second group did receive termination notices.

That group of about 2,400 consisted of workers whose unions made a deal with the city to allow unvaccinated employees to receive health care benefits while simultaneously being on unpaid leave.

Since November, the people in that category who have remained unvaccinated have not been working or getting paid. And on Friday, 1,428 of them ran out of options when they failed to provide the city with proof of vaccination, which led to their being officially terminated.

The rest — about 40% of the 2,400 workers — have since been vaccinated and have returned to work.

Last week, Adams offered little sympathy to those who were on the firing line — though he begged to differ when it came to the term “firing.”

“We’re not firing them. People are quitting,” he said at a news conference last Thursday. “The responsibility is clear. We said it: if you’re hired, if you get this job, you have to be vaccinated. If you are not following the rules, you are making that decision.”

His and the city’s stance were backed up last week with two court rulings. In one, a Brooklyn federal judge rejected a push from anti-vaccine city workers to temporarily block the city from letting them go. In that decision, Judge Diane Gujarati declared that the anti-vaxxers had not “met their burden of demonstrating their entitlement to the extraordinary remedy of a temporary restraining order.”

In the other decision, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor turned down a request by 14 Department of Education employees who were terminated after the city denied their requests for religious exemptions to vaccination requirements.

Michael Gartland

Michael Gartland

New York Daily News

Monday, February 7, 2022

NJ Governor Murphy Will End School Mask Mandate in March

 

A student waits for First Lady Jill Biden to arrive at his classroom at the Samuel Smith
Elementary School in Burlington, N.J., March 15, 2021. 
(Anna Moneymaker/Pool via Reuters)

The turmoil may be over, for some.

Betsy Combier

New Jersey Governor to End School Mask Mandate

Democratic New Jersey Governor Philip Murphy will eliminate the state’s K-12 public school mask mandate.

Murphy, the vice-chairman of the National Governors Association, said Sunday that he would officially announce the move the following day. Under the new policy, which takes effect in mid-March, individual districts will still be permitted to implement their own mask mandates.

The policy change comes as Covid hospitalizations and cases continue to plummet and as the FDA considers authorizing a vaccine for children younger than five-years-old.

The Omicron variant has proven less lethal and more transmissible than its predecessors. Vaccinated individuals spread the variant rather efficiently, though they do not suffer severe consequences at the same rate as the unvaccinated, and the cloth masks used by much of the population have proven ineffective in containing its spread.

Most children are unvaccinated in New Jersey, but scientific studies still continue to suggest that this age group is the least likely to develop severe illness as a result of contracting the virus.

Murphy said the timing of the relaxed restrictions was intentional, as March is when warmer weather starts to roll around, allowing schools to open windows for better air circulation, he told the New York Times. 

“It isn’t July Fourth,” he said, “but it gets you into a marginally better weather period.”

While New Jersey was one of eleven states to impose K-12 mask mandates, Murphy has long acknowledged that masking would not become a permanent fixture of American life. Making them optional is a “huge step toward normalcy,” he told the Times. Students in New Jersey had been forced to wear masks since September 2020.

Murphy’s decision comes as masking wars heat up in politically divided states like Virginia, where the recently elected Republican Youngkin administration is battling rogue school districts that continue to defy the governor’s mask-mandate ban. Some parents and students have formed resistance movements in response, even in blue bulwarks like Washington state, where a group of high schoolers organized an anti-mask mandate protest with hundreds of students last week.

CAROLINE DOWNEY is a news writer for National Review Online. 


Tuesday, January 25, 2022

NY Appeals Court and NYC Mayor Adams Say That the Mask Mandate Remains

 

Mayor Eric Adams criticized the judge's ruling against the statewide school mask mandate but says
 the NYC mandate will remain.

BREAKING NEWS:

NY TIMES, January 25, 2022

New York Appeals Court Grants Stay, Allowing State to Reinstate Mask Mandate
By , National Review, January 25, 2022


New York’s indoor mask mandate for schools and other public locations will remain in effect after an appeals court judge granted a stay on Tuesday, temporarily blocking a ruling from a lower court that struck down the mandate one day earlier.

Another hearing is scheduled on the mask mandate for Friday morning. Until then, the mandate remains in effect.

“As Governor, my top priority is protecting the people of this state. These measures are critical tools to prevent the spread of COVID-19, make schools and businesses safe, and save lives,” Governor Kathy Hochul said Tuesday. “I commend the Attorney General for her defense of the health and safety of New Yorkers, and applaud the Appellate Division, Second Department for siding with common sense and granting an interim stay to keep the state’s important masking regulations in place. We will not stop fighting to protect New Yorkers, and we are confident we will continue to prevail.”

Sign outside a business in Times Square in New York City, December 15, 2021. (Carlo Allegri/Reuters)

Adams says NYC school mask mandates remain after judge shoots down Hochul rule

   NY POST, January 25, 2022


Mask mandates in New York City public schools will remain in effect, Mayor Eric Adams said Tuesday, a day after a Long Island judge ruled against Gov. Kathy Hochul’s statewide mask requirement.

During a morning radio appearance, Adams labeled the ruling “unfortunate” and said the Big Apple plans to maintain masking rules in public schools.

“I believe it’s unfortunate that it was struck down, and I believe those jurisdictions that are using it as an opportunity to remove mandates are making a big mistake. We need to follow the science, not the fears that are actually coming with this virus,” he said on 1010 WINS.

“We’re going to continue our mandates in schools.”

The state education department told The Post on Tuesday that masks are still required in schools because the Hochul administration is appealing the decision.

“The governor and state DOH have filed a Notice of Appeal and are seeking confirmation that the court’s order is stayed,” state Education Department spokesperson Emily DeSantis said in a statement. “While these legal steps occur, it is NYSED’s position that schools should continue to follow the mask rule.”

And the city Department of Education said Tuesday that the decision doesn’t apply to the five boroughs because the municipal mandate predated Hochul’s state one.

Adams, who has repeatedly declared New York City schools won’t return to remote learning, explained he considers mandating masks as a way to keep schools open.

“We believe that it’s allowing us to keep our schools open, as part of our overall safety plan,” he said. “Many people wanted schools to close, I was very clear that I was not going to close. Our children need to be in schools. It’s the safest place for children and we’re going to continue to have the mandate in place.” 

In a decision that prompted the removal of mask requirements in schools across the state, Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Thomas Rademaker on Monday threw out a Nov. 24 rule issued by state Health Commissioner Mary Bassett that prompted Hochul to order that all workers, customers and guests wear masks to slow the spread of COVID-19.

In the ruling, Rademaker said the mandate amounted to “a law that was promulgated and enacted unlawfully by an Executive branch state agency, and therefore void and unenforceable as a matter of law.” The case was brought by Michael Demetriou and 13 other parents who objected to a provision in Bassett’s rule that allowed her to order masking in “certain settings,” including schools.

In response, ABC 7 reported Tuesday that at least 20 Long Island districts will allow students and staff to attend classes without masks, including Plainedge, Massapequa, North Merrick, Smithtown, Levittown, East Meadow, Sachem, West Islip, Farmingdale, Franklin Square, Rockville Centre, Sewanhaka, Bellmore-Merrick Central High School Districts, Copiague, Carle Place, Harborfields, Commack, Connetquot, Lindenhurst, South Huntington, and Cold Spring Harbor.

Masks are still mandatory in Jericho, Baldwin, Syosset, and Catholic schools.

In Westchester, masks are now “optional” in the Harrison school district, according to an email from superintendent Louis Wool obtained by The Post.

 Even prior to the judge’s decision, Democratic leaders of the two Long Island counties in mid-December joined with dozens of Republican officials in the Empire State to refuse to enforce Hochul’s mask mandate.

On Tuesday, Adams insisted that the masking requirement isn’t a burden, pitching it as a way to keep students and teachers healthy without adding restrictions.

“Right now, we have mandates in various locations. We do it with our school children. None of those mandates are created to give people madness; they’re created to give people safety,” he said on NY1. “This is crucial. We can’t close our city down again. We must take all the steps possible to empower New Yorkers to be safe.”


Saturday, January 22, 2022

U.S. Supreme Court Blocks Biden COVID Vaccination Mandate For Large Employers

 


UPDATE:

OSHA cancels business vaccine mandate after Supreme Court loss

Biden Administration Scraps Covid-Vaccine Mandate for Large Employers

Supreme Court Blocks Biden Vaccine Rules for Large Employers

A federal judge blocked the Biden administration’s Covid-19 vaccine requirement for federal employees, the latest legal setback for the president’s push to inoculate workers.

U.S. District Judge Jeffrey V. Brown in Texas said President Biden didn’t have the broad, unilateral authority to mandate “that all federal employees consent to vaccination against Covid-19 or lose their jobs.”

The judge’s ruling Friday said that the case wasn’t about whether people should be vaccinated.

“It is instead about whether the President can, with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress, require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment,” Judge Brown, an appointee of former President Donald Trump who is based in Galveston, wrote. “That, under the current state of the law as just recently expressed by the Supreme Court, is a bridge too far.”

“Today’s decision by Judge Brown is a victory for the thousands of men and women who want to serve their government without sacrificing their individual rights,” said Marcus Thornton, president of Feds for Medical Freedom, a newly launched anti-vaccination-mandate group that challenged Mr. Biden’s executive order. Mr. Thornton works as a political officer at the State Department, according to the organization.

Mr. Biden said in September that he would require federal employees in the executive branch either to be vaccinated against Covid-19 or to receive a religious or medical exemption or else face termination.

The president also has mandated vaccination for employees of federal contractors, but those requirements have been put on hold in the lower courts, where proceedings are continuing.

Federal agencies were preparing to punish workers for failing to comply with the president’s order. The judge and Feds for Medical Freedom said the disciplining of noncompliant employees was imminent.

The Biden administration cited several statutes that it said authorized the president to issue the federal-worker mandate, including a law that says the president “may prescribe regulations for the conduct of employees in the executive branch.” It also contended that the Constitution gave the president inherent authority to set internal employment policy for the executive branch.

The administration argued that it wasn’t the court’s role to settle the dispute but said workers facing termination first had to challenge any discipline through administrative channels.

Judge Brown rejected all of those arguments, saying the Biden administration pointed to no example of a previous president invoking the power to impose medical procedures on civilian federal employees.

The judge, citing the Supreme Court’s recent rulings, said the president, without express congressional authorization, was trying to regulate federal employee conduct beyond the context of the workplace, stretching his authority too far.

“The government has offered no answer—no limiting principle to the reach of the power they insist the President enjoys,” Judge Brown wrote. “For its part, this court will say only this: however extensive that power is, the federal-worker mandate exceeds it.”

In deciding to apply his preliminary injunction nationwide, Judge Brown said he saw no practical way of limiting the scope of his order given the broad membership of the lead plaintiff.

Feds for Medical Freedom, he wrote, has “more than 6,000 members spread across every state and in nearly every federal agency.”

Appeals Court Orders The Vaccine Mandate To Move Forward, Removing The Temporary Hold


Michael Kane, et al. File Federal Case in Opposition to New York State Vaccine Mandate