NYC Rubber Room Reporter and ATR CONNECT: UFT Solidarity Member Threatens To Kill Two Federal Court Judges

Sunday, January 10, 2021

UFT Solidarity Member Threatens To Kill Two Federal Court Judges

Victor Jordan, Lydia Howrilka, Lucio Celli, Francesco Portelos, Jonathan Hinesley,
Al Leon, unknown

Opinion-Editorial from Betsy Combier:

Over the past 17 years I have been saddened to see attacks, lies, misinformation, and false charges filed by the NYC Department of Education as well as school districts around NY State against good people who dedicate their lives to educating children and young adults in New York City. By good people I mean individuals who are caring and capable teachers, counselors, tutors, advocates, and administrators, and who have high standards for their own conduct. They all are, after all, role models for young minds.

Lucio Celli

NYC Department of Education teachers Francesco Portelos, Lydia Howrilka, and Lucio Celli are not role models for anyone, in my opinion.

If you read the UFT Solidarity Mission Statement below, you may come to the same conclusion that I and many others have, namely that the Group is a hate group that destroys anyone who might in the future- or has already - challenged any member for any reason.

See UFT Solidarity's mission statement

Lydia Howrilka followed this Mission Statement and sent defamatory emails to the Principal of her school. She was fired in June 2013, then sued the Department. Principal Urena counter-sued in Federal Court. Here is what Urena's Attorney at the NYC Law Department wrote (Case 1:15-cv-01113-KAM-RER):

Lydia Howrilka

"COUNTERCLAIMS OF ARISLEYDA URENA AGAINST LYDIA HOWRILKA

As and for her Counterclaims against Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Lydia Howrilka (“Howrilka”), Arisleyda Urena (“Urena”) alleges as follows:

Preliminary Statement

1. This case was brought by Ms. Howrilka as part of a continuing campaign to retaliate against Ms. Urena after Ms. Howrilka’s termination from the Department of Education. Since her lawful termination, Ms. Howrilka has demonstrated a continuously escalating and alarming course of conduct targeting Ms. Urena and attempting to damage her, both personally and professionally by defaming her online and in email communications with anyone who will listen. These actions were designed to, and have caused Ms. Urena to suffer from severe emotional distress.

Background

2. Ms. Howrilka was a probationary teacher in the New York City public school system, working at the Academy for Language and Technology (“ALT”) in the Bronx, where Ms. Urena was the principal.

3. Ms. Howrilka experienced significant problems in her employment, as she was unable to successfully complete even the most basic of tasks for a teacher. For example, on multiple occasions, she found herself unable to handle the class and therefore decided to run out of the classroom crying, abandoning the students. At first, Ms. Urena covered for Ms. Howrilka but ultimately was instructed to write her up for her unacceptable conduct.

4. Ms. Howrilka’s behavior continued to spiral out of control until the week of the Regent’s exam when Ms. Howrilka sent a completely inappropriate email to the students, including the special education students, railing against the administration and blaming Ms. Urena. Ms. Howrilka’s actions disrupted many of the students during the already stressful Regent’s Exam week and led the teachers and staff to the collective conclusion that Ms. Howrilka was a distraction and was harmful to the students.

5. Ms. Howrilka was ultimately terminated from her position in June 2013.

6. In the wake of her termination, Plaintiff developed an unhealthy fixation on Ms.Urena, blaming Ms. Urena for Ms. Howrilka’s failures as a teacher. However, rather than address her unfounded complaints through the ordinary channels, Ms. Howrilka instead embarked on a campaign to terrorize, harass, defame, and damage Ms. Urena.

7. Where Ms. Howrilka had already begun with her completely inappropriate email to the students, she continued to escalate after her termination. She began emailing every Department of Education (“DOE”) official that she could find an email address for, all for the purpose of defaming and attacking Ms. Urena and damaging her in her profession, and imperiling her employment.

8. When she didn’t get the results she desired from her email campaign, Ms. Howrilka expanded her scope of attack to the internet, where she published numerous false and defamatory statements about Ms. Urena on various blogs. In an effort to fraudulently make it appear as if multiple people were complaining about Ms. Urena, Ms. Howrilka made liberal use of false identities. However, despite these attempts, the reality is that Ms. Howrilka was the only person complaining about Ms. Urena

....

In or around November 2014, Ms. Howrilka, under the shroud of an “anonymous contributor” wrote to the website “Don’t Tread on Educators” (dtoe.org) to nominate Ms. Urena for the “Administrators In Need Of Improvement” list.1 The resulting article, which includes lengthy quotes from Ms. Howrilka, is based entirely based on Ms. Howrilka’s defamatory statements to the blog administrator. This article contains numerous false and defamatory statements made by Ms. Howrilka against Ms. Urena.

******************************************

In 2015 I wrote about the defamatory comments made by UFT Solidarity. I looked up one Principal, Pauline Shakespeare, and printed out 250 pages of comments that hurt me to read, and I don't know Principal Shakespeare. I betcha most of the people who made the comments don't know her either.

I found out that Principals were reading the garbage about them on the UFT Solidarity site, and using the comments to charge employees at their schools. I suggested that followers of Francesco and UFT Solidarity stop posting anonymous/unproven statements on their website, which angered Francesco, Lydia, Lucio, and the gang so I became the Enemy. He not only went after me, but tried to get my husband, who works for the City of New York, into trouble (this failed). I have been able to experience mobbing first-hand, so I guess I should thank them for giving me the content for a book. See also this excellent book "Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace".

Several Staten Island parents have complained about Francesco, but as soon as they did this Francesco sent an email to all his UFT Solidarity members urging them never to give any help or support to "....students" (he named them) if these children of the parents who criticized him ended up in their class. He also placed the full name and grades of a High School student on his website when he wrote about the misconduct of the Department's VIP, Santiago Tavaras, and was investigated by the Office of Special Investigations and found guilty. He was arrested for posting an article on his website telling educators how to hack into the Department's website and raise their salary. The UFT Chapter leader from IS 49 also filed a police complaint against Francesco after Portelos threatened his girlfriend.

Portelos hacked into this blog in July 2016 and deleted all the articles about 3030-a arbitration in the right column, including the video meeting of Carmen Farina and Mike Mulgrew on February 24, 2015, which I obtained through FOIL. He then posted the information in his 3020-a Guide which really tells no one anything useful about how to win/keep their jobs.

In sum, Francesco Portelos and UFT Solidarity put all their followers in danger by urging members to file personal and defamatory "statements" about Principals in NYC - anonymously.

I met Luco Celli in the Bronx "rubber room" on the top floor of 501 Courtlandt Avenue in 2008 when I worked at the UFT as a Special Representative. I did not find him angry or abusive, just very talkative.

I saw him on my weekly visits to his rubber room until I left the UFT in 2010 when the large warehouses - the original rubber rooms - were closed by agreement between Randi Weingarten, UFT President, and former NYC DOE Chancellor Joel Klein.

I next time I heard about him was around 2014 when he became a member of the inner council of the UFT Solidarity hate group, which attacks innocent people for no reason other than retaliation for that person not wanting to do whatever they say. (see DTOE and the A.N.O.I. list) because I heard that these Principals were using the names of UFT Solidarity members to create charges for 3020-a termination. Suddenly Francesco and Lydia started their campaign of lies against me and my company Advocatz. Lucio Celli and all of UFT Solidarity were given the approval to go ahead with any bad act they could think of, and pin it on me. I have received telephone calls from UFT Solidarity "members" screaming at me for being criminally insane, based upon nothing. Tom Filoramo did this. Lucio Celli called me 16 times August 15-16 2019 both to my landline and my cell, screaming that I was a criminal, liar, and thief.

Lucio Celli's story is a sad case of an educator who is angry and bitter at the world for his HIV+ status.

On or about November 28, 2017, Lucio appeared at the Panel For Educational Policy meeting and threatened NYC Chancellor Carmen Farina by screaming "motherfucker" to her:

and on or about November 12, he sent an email to the Federal Court Administration saying that he would kill Federal judges Brian Cogan, Robert Katzman, and Margo Brodie by stabbing them to death because they are mafia:

USA-v-Celli Complaint

He was put into jail, indicted by a Grand jury, then let out on bail but only after he agreed never to use the internet. I believe he is still getting his salary from the NYC DOE of $100,000+.

On January 4, 2021, he was allowed by the Judge in Federal Criminal Court to file a Complaint. He represents the anger of UFT Solidarity.

Since 2014-2015 he has been sending emails to 50-250+ people at a time, describing the 'corruption' he has found. Over the years which followed, Lucio Celli became more and more abusive to anyone he thinks did not go along with him. anyone who denies that Lucio Celli is rational and telling the truth gets attacked and any friend of this person is attacked as well. The purpose, I believe, is to make people afraid to challenge him, and then do what he wants.

I challenged him and his mentor Francesco Portelos in 2015 when Francesco started his bully group.

See below for some of Lucio Celli's emails.

Dear Hon. Carter:

In your response to my lawsuit, you wanted the word settlement taken out of my complaint.

As you now know, my lawyer told me that the ALJ was going to be vindictive. BUT, the ALJ was the person that told me that I would win my PERB case and Mr. Drantch agreed to have me write my own settlement plan.

Please say this with me, "there is a connection between my lawyer saying ALJ would be vindictive and your request that settlement taken out of my lawsuit." The ALJ was vindictive and the word settlement was taken out of my amended complaint...you know this is interesting

Please explain your knowledge of everything, sir!
________________________________
From: Celli Lucio (08X519)
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 10:52 AM
To: Jackson-Chase Courtenaye; Solimando Karen; Kshensky Marcel; preet.bharar@usdoj.gov
Cc: Bernard Anne (79K755); Cole Richard (07X224); Stoff Michael; mmulgrew@uft.org; :; Jpovalitis@uft.org; ASepulveda@uft.org; hschoor@uft.org; jhinds@uft.org; kmagee@nysutmail.org; kalford@uft.org; rfernadez@uft.org; pfilomena@uft.org; charrison@uft.org; mescobar@uft.org; ajackson@uft.org; mborrelli@uft.org; jguevara@uft.org; lbarr@uft.org; rmantell@uft.org; sroberson@uft.org; matkinson@uft.org; Mills Rose Marie; dclark@uft.org; dmanganello@uft.org; agoldman@uft.org; alaureano@uft.org; apallott@nysutmail.org; eespert@uft.org; ssilva@uft.org; zmrick@org.org; wthompson@uft.org; wvelazquez@uft.org; jhuart@uft.org; pserrano@uft.org; brein@uft.org; pcastro@uft.org; agerard@uft.org; dalbright@uft.org; croldan@uft.org; msanto@uft.org; ymcowell@uft.org; d; patia@uft.org; ceaddy@uft.org; imunet@uft.org; rking@uft.org; jgerowitz@uft.org; Capuano John; aweinstein@uft.org; edriesen@uft.org; usmith@uft.org; wkalogeras@uft.org; mlane@uft.org; vwilson@uft.org; jgoldberg@uft.org; eperez@uft.org; mruiz@uft.org; rfreiser@uft.org; rparker@uft.org; mvaccaro@uft.org; mmanley@uft.org; jkessier@uft.org; jschwartz@uft.org; bmylite@uft.org; tdacruz@uft.org; dsmyth@uft.org; jvasques@uft.org; bzihal@uft.org; wsanchez@uft.org; ckelly@uft.org; dpenny@uft.org; srotkowitz@uft.org; dcappola@uft.org; lkohler@uft.org; rweingarten@aft.org; cfortino@nysutmail.org; Mandel Susan; &00; Laveman Gary; Laveman Gary; Fogel Stanley; Salcedo Rosa (08X519); cbattle@nyutmail.org; dstrom@aft.org; Macek Claudia (11X083); Bligen Doyle Sandra (08x519); Stewart Regina; Peeples Charles (Human Resources); Rabot Joann; Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov; mpeters@doi.nyc.gov; Richard Condon; RMendez@council.nyc.gov; GetHelp@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; District3@council.nyc.gov; Baranello Joseph; Chancellor Carmen Fariña; dklein@nysenate.gov; Helen@HelenRosenthal.com; hoylman@nysenate.go; hassellt@nysenate.gov; Lavin Patricia; BKallos@council.nyc.gov; DDromm@council.nyc.gov; sedelman@nypost.com; Panel for Educational Policy; James@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; MViverito@council.nyc.gov; BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov; ZCarter@law.nyc.gov; Santana Altagracia; Guillaume Lourdes; Weinberg Phil; Levy Odelia; hoylman@nysenate.gov; enzo0mad@aol.com; :; adam.a.stephan@abc.com; anna.phillps@nytimes.com; art.mcfarland@abc.com; kcole@11.com
Subject: RE: EEOC

not member but UFT staffers
________________________________
From: Celli Lucio (08X519)
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 10:32 AM
To: Jackson-Chase Courtenaye; Solimando Karen; Kshensky Marcel; preet.bharar@usdoj.gov
Cc: Bernard Anne (79K755); Cole Richard (07X224); Stoff Michael; mmulgrew@uft.org; :; Jpovalitis@uft.org; ASepulveda@uft.org; hschoor@uft.org; jhinds@uft.org; kmagee@nysutmail.org; kalford@uft.org; rfernadez@uft.org; pfilomena@uft.org; charrison@uft.org; mescobar@uft.org; ajackson@uft.org; mborrelli@uft.org; jguevara@uft.org; lbarr@uft.org; rmantell@uft.org; sroberson@uft.org; matkinson@uft.org; Mills Rose Marie; dclark@uft.org; dmanganello@uft.org; agoldman@uft.org; alaureano@uft.org; apallott@nysutmail.org; eespert@uft.org; ssilva@uft.org; zmrick@org.org; wthompson@uft.org; wvelazquez@uft.org; jhuart@uft.org; pserrano@uft.org; brein@uft.org; pcastro@uft.org; agerard@uft.org; dalbright@uft.org; croldan@uft.org; msanto@uft.org; ymcowell@uft.org; d; patia@uft.org; ceaddy@uft.org; imunet@uft.org; rking@uft.org; jgerowitz@uft.org; Capuano John; aweinstein@uft.org; edriesen@uft.org; usmith@uft.org; wkalogeras@uft.org; mlane@uft.org; vwilson@uft.org; jgoldberg@uft.org; eperez@uft.org; mruiz@uft.org; rfreiser@uft.org; rparker@uft.org; mvaccaro@uft.org; mmanley@uft.org; jkessier@uft.org; jschwartz@uft.org; bmylite@uft.org; tdacruz@uft.org; dsmyth@uft.org; jvasques@uft.org; bzihal@uft.org; wsanchez@uft.org; ckelly@uft.org; dpenny@uft.org; srotkowitz@uft.org; dcappola@uft.org; lkohler@uft.org; rweingarten@aft.org; cfortino@nysutmail.org; Mandel Susan; &00; Laveman Gary; Laveman Gary; Fogel Stanley; Salcedo Rosa (08X519); cbattle@nyutmail.org; dstrom@aft.org; Macek Claudia (11X083); Bligen Doyle Sandra (08x519); Stewart Regina; Peeples Charles (Human Resources); Rabot Joann; Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov; mpeters@doi.nyc.gov; Richard Condon; RMendez@council.nyc.gov; GetHelp@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; District3@council.nyc.gov; Baranello Joseph; Chancellor Carmen Fariña; dklein@nysenate.gov; Helen@HelenRosenthal.com; hoylman@nysenate.go; hassellt@nysenate.gov; Lavin Patricia; BKallos@council.nyc.gov; DDromm@council.nyc.gov; sedelman@nypost.com; Panel for Educational Policy; James@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; MViverito@council.nyc.gov; BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov; ZCarter@law.nyc.gov; Santana Altagracia; Guillaume Lourdes; Weinberg Phil; Levy Odelia; hoylman@nysenate.gov; enzo0mad@aol.com; :; adam.a.stephan@abc.com; anna.phillps@nytimes.com; art.mcfarland@abc.com; kcole@11.com
Subject: RE: EEOC

Dear Ms. Jackson-Chase:

From the manual as well:

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF RETALIATION
1. Evidence raises inference that retaliation was the cause of the challenged action;
Citing fake policies and arbitration decisions will raise suspicion

2. Respondent produces evidence of a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the challenged action; and I have numerous UFT staff members, I recorded them and I will keep those names to myself, that they do not have any knowledge of "well-known arbitration decision" or the "most famous arbitration decision." However, YOUR team cited them against me...hmmm, please say fraud with me!

Somehow or someway...WE WILL get to the truth because you have integrity!

3. Complainant proves that the reason advanced by the respondent is a pretext to hide the retaliatory motive.
________________________________
From: Celli Lucio (08X519)
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 9:37 AM
To: Jackson-Chase Courtenaye; Solimando Karen; Kshensky Marcel; preet.bharar@usdoj.gov
Cc: Bernard Anne (79K755); Cole Richard (07X224); Stoff Michael; mmulgrew@uft.org; :; Jpovalitis@uft.org; ASepulveda@uft.org; hschoor@uft.org; jhinds@uft.org; kmagee@nysutmail.org; kalford@uft.org; rfernadez@uft.org; pfilomena@uft.org; charrison@uft.org; mescobar@uft.org; ajackson@uft.org; mborrelli@uft.org; jguevara@uft.org; lbarr@uft.org; rmantell@uft.org; sroberson@uft.org; matkinson@uft.org; Mills Rose Marie; dclark@uft.org; dmanganello@uft.org; agoldman@uft.org; alaureano@uft.org; apallott@nysutmail.org; eespert@uft.org; ssilva@uft.org; zmrick@org.org; wthompson@uft.org; wvelazquez@uft.org; jhuart@uft.org; pserrano@uft.org; brein@uft.org; pcastro@uft.org; agerard@uft.org; dalbright@uft.org; croldan@uft.org; msanto@uft.org; ymcowell@uft.org; d; patia@uft.org; ceaddy@uft.org; imunet@uft.org; rking@uft.org; jgerowitz@uft.org; Capuano John; aweinstein@uft.org; edriesen@uft.org; usmith@uft.org; wkalogeras@uft.org; mlane@uft.org; vwilson@uft.org; jgoldberg@uft.org; eperez@uft.org; mruiz@uft.org; rfreiser@uft.org; rparker@uft.org; mvaccaro@uft.org; mmanley@uft.org; jkessier@uft.org; jschwartz@uft.org; bmylite@uft.org; tdacruz@uft.org; dsmyth@uft.org; jvasques@uft.org; bzihal@uft.org; wsanchez@uft.org; ckelly@uft.org; dpenny@uft.org; srotkowitz@uft.org; dcappola@uft.org; lkohler@uft.org; rweingarten@aft.org; cfortino@nysutmail.org; Mandel Susan; &00; Laveman Gary; Laveman Gary; Fogel Stanley; Salcedo Rosa (08X519); cbattle@nyutmail.org; dstrom@aft.org; Macek Claudia (11X083); Bligen Doyle Sandra (08x519); Stewart Regina; Peeples Charles (Human Resources); Rabot Joann; Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov; mpeters@doi.nyc.gov; Richard Condon; RMendez@council.nyc.gov; GetHelp@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; District3@council.nyc.gov; Baranello Joseph; Chancellor Carmen Fariña; dklein@nysenate.gov; Helen@HelenRosenthal.com; hoylman@nysenate.go; hassellt@nysenate.gov; Lavin Patricia; BKallos@council.nyc.gov; DDromm@council.nyc.gov; sedelman@nypost.com; Panel for Educational Policy; James@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; MViverito@council.nyc.gov; BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov; ZCarter@law.nyc.gov; Santana Altagracia; Guillaume Lourdes; Weinberg Phil; Levy Odelia; hoylman@nysenate.gov; enzo0mad@aol.com; :; adam.a.stephan@abc.com; anna.phillps@nytimes.com; art.mcfarland@abc.com; kcole@11.com
Subject: RE: EEOC

Ms. Jackson-Chase

If you do not answer me, I WILL ask you publicly at PEP.
________________________________
From: Celli Lucio (08X519)
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 9:30 AM
To: Jackson-Chase Courtenaye; Solimando Karen; Kshensky Marcel; preet.bharar@usdoj.gov
Cc: Bernard Anne (79K755); Cole Richard (07X224); Stoff Michael; mmulgrew@uft.org; :; Jpovalitis@uft.org; ASepulveda@uft.org; hschoor@uft.org; jhinds@uft.org; kmagee@nysutmail.org; kalford@uft.org; rfernadez@uft.org; pfilomena@uft.org; charrison@uft.org; mescobar@uft.org; ajackson@uft.org; mborrelli@uft.org; jguevara@uft.org; lbarr@uft.org; rmantell@uft.org; sroberson@uft.org; matkinson@uft.org; Mills Rose Marie; dclark@uft.org; dmanganello@uft.org; agoldman@uft.org; alaureano@uft.org; apallott@nysutmail.org; eespert@uft.org; ssilva@uft.org; zmrick@org.org; wthompson@uft.org; wvelazquez@uft.org; jhuart@uft.org; pserrano@uft.org; brein@uft.org; pcastro@uft.org; agerard@uft.org; dalbright@uft.org; croldan@uft.org; msanto@uft.org; ymcowell@uft.org; d; patia@uft.org; ceaddy@uft.org; imunet@uft.org; rking@uft.org; jgerowitz@uft.org; Capuano John; aweinstein@uft.org; edriesen@uft.org; usmith@uft.org; wkalogeras@uft.org; mlane@uft.org; vwilson@uft.org; jgoldberg@uft.org; eperez@uft.org; mruiz@uft.org; rfreiser@uft.org; rparker@uft.org; mvaccaro@uft.org; mmanley@uft.org; jkessier@uft.org; jschwartz@uft.org; bmylite@uft.org; tdacruz@uft.org; dsmyth@uft.org; jvasques@uft.org; bzihal@uft.org; wsanchez@uft.org; ckelly@uft.org; dpenny@uft.org; srotkowitz@uft.org; dcappola@uft.org; lkohler@uft.org; rweingarten@aft.org; cfortino@nysutmail.org; Mandel Susan; &00; Laveman Gary; Laveman Gary; Fogel Stanley; Salcedo Rosa (08X519); cbattle@nyutmail.org; dstrom@aft.org; Macek Claudia (11X083); Bligen Doyle Sandra (08x519); Stewart Regina; Peeples Charles (Human Resources); Rabot Joann; Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov; mpeters@doi.nyc.gov; Richard Condon; RMendez@council.nyc.gov; GetHelp@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; District3@council.nyc.gov; Baranello Joseph; Chancellor Carmen Fariña; dklein@nysenate.gov; Helen@HelenRosenthal.com; hoylman@nysenate.go; hassellt@nysenate.gov; Lavin Patricia; BKallos@council.nyc.gov; DDromm@council.nyc.gov; sedelman@nypost.com; Panel for Educational Policy; James@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; MViverito@council.nyc.gov; BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov; ZCarter@law.nyc.gov; Santana Altagracia; Guillaume Lourdes; Weinberg Phil; Levy Odelia; hoylman@nysenate.gov; enzo0mad@aol.com; :; adam.a.stephan@abc.com; anna.phillps@nytimes.com; art.mcfarland@abc.com; kcole@11.com
Subject: RE: EEOC

Dear Ms. Jackson-Chase and Ms. Atkinson:

On 11/25/ 15, Mr. Kshensky suspended my hearing and Mr. Linchinstein lied about an arbitration decision to defraud me at a grievance hearing on 10/8/2015. The grievance on 10/8/2015 dealt with an email sent by Ms. Jackson-Chase and Mr. Linchinstein lied about reading my email...he clicked that he read my email.

Please take notice from the EEOC compliance manual:

"Suspending or limiting access to an internal grievance procedure also constitutes an “adverse action.” For example, in EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges & Universities, a 29 university’s collective bargaining agreement provided for a specific internal grievance procedure leading to arbitration. The agreement further provided that this procedure could be terminated if the employee sought resolution in any other forum, such as the EEOC. The Seventh Circuit ruled that termination of the grievance process constituted an adverse employment action in violation of the anti-retaliation clause of the ADEA."

I would like an explanation of 10/8/2015 and 11/25/2015 grievance hearing because Ms. Jackson-Chase said she had integrity on 12/18/2014. Please be mindful, Ms. Jackson-Chase that you were quick to answer my question about Betsy Combier, but you, Ms. Jackson-Chase, have avoided answering anything that is related to FRAUD--this is interesting fact!!! According to Ms. Susan Edelman's article, you and your team--you wrote "you and your team" as you answered me about Betsy Combier--- spent over a million dollars to fire a teacher that falsified documents, but you and your team have falsified against me. How do you justify the actions of you and your team?

To Ms. Atkinson,
I am still waiting for the Union to address all my grievances, but I would like some sort of answer on 10/8/2015 and 11/25/2015 by the close of business on 2/12/2015

Thanks,
Lucio Celli

________________________________
From: Celli Lucio (08X519)
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:38 AM
To: Jackson-Chase Courtenaye; Solimando Karen; Kshensky Marcel; preet.bharar@usdoj.gov
Cc: Bernard Anne (79K755); Cole Richard (07X224); Stoff Michael; mmulgrew@uft.org; :; Jpovalitis@uft.org; ASepulveda@uft.org; hschoor@uft.org; jhinds@uft.org; kmagee@nysutmail.org; kalford@uft.org; rfernadez@uft.org; pfilomena@uft.org; charrison@uft.org; mescobar@uft.org; ajackson@uft.org; mborrelli@uft.org; jguevara@uft.org; lbarr@uft.org; rmantell@uft.org; sroberson@uft.org; matkinson@uft.org; Mills Rose Marie; dclark@uft.org; dmanganello@uft.org; agoldman@uft.org; alaureano@uft.org; apallott@nysutmail.org; eespert@uft.org; ssilva@uft.org; zmrick@org.org; wthompson@uft.org; wvelazquez@uft.org; jhuart@uft.org; pserrano@uft.org; brein@uft.org; pcastro@uft.org; agerard@uft.org; dalbright@uft.org; croldan@uft.org; msanto@uft.org; ymcowell@uft.org; d; patia@uft.org; ceaddy@uft.org; imunet@uft.org; rking@uft.org; jgerowitz@uft.org; Capuano John; aweinstein@uft.org; edriesen@uft.org; usmith@uft.org; wkalogeras@uft.org; mlane@uft.org; vwilson@uft.org; jgoldberg@uft.org; eperez@uft.org; mruiz@uft.org; rfreiser@uft.org; rparker@uft.org; mvaccaro@uft.org; mmanley@uft.org; jkessier@uft.org; jschwartz@uft.org; bmylite@uft.org; tdacruz@uft.org; dsmyth@uft.org; jvasques@uft.org; bzihal@uft.org; wsanchez@uft.org; ckelly@uft.org; dpenny@uft.org; srotkowitz@uft.org; dcappola@uft.org; lkohler@uft.org; rweingarten@aft.org; cfortino@nysutmail.org; Mandel Susan; &00; Laveman Gary; Laveman Gary; Fogel Stanley; Salcedo Rosa (08X519); Laboy Grismaldy (08X519); cbattle@nyutmail.org; dstrom@aft.org; Macek Claudia (11X083); Bligen Doyle Sandra (08x519); Stewart Regina; Peeples Charles (Human Resources); Rabot Joann; Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov; mpeters@doi.nyc.gov; Richard Condon; RMendez@council.nyc.gov; GetHelp@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; District3@council.nyc.gov; Baranello Joseph; Chancellor Carmen Fariña; dklein@nysenate.gov; Helen@HelenRosenthal.com; hoylman@nysenate.go; hassellt@nysenate.gov; Lavin Patricia; BKallos@council.nyc.gov; DDromm@council.nyc.gov; sedelman@nypost.com; Lucas Ida (11X542); Panel for Educational Policy; James@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; MViverito@council.nyc.gov; BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov; ZCarter@law.nyc.gov; Santana Altagracia; Guillaume Lourdes; Weinberg Phil; Levy Odelia; hoylman@nysenate.gov; enzo0mad@aol.com; sedelman@nypost.com; :; adam.a.stephan@abc.com; anna.phillps@nytimes.com; art.mcfarland@abc.com; kcole@11.com
Subject: RE: DOE lawyer lying to a PERB Judge

Dear Mr. Drantch and Ms. Battle:

I totally forgot that I had two IPhones yesterday, I am sorry. Therefore, I have a recording of yesterday's proceeding at PERB. We all know what was yesterday and I have it documented!

To Mr. Drantch,
You lied to the ALJ Blassman on March 23 about Ms. Susan Mandel, Esq. Ms. Mandel deprived me of my rights as she falsified a legal document to harm Special Education students (IEPs issue that I wrote about the other day.) I would be ashamed, if I were you or Ms. Mandel because of the legal training that you and Ms. Mandel possess. You, Ms. Battle, and ALJ Blassman had an ex parte communication prior to April 8, 2015--what was said CANNOT change. THEN, you knowingly lied to the ALJ yesterday about the fact the ALJ told you to get and send me the documents that were falsified, but the ALJ lied too yesterday--its a good thing that I pressed record! Let me remind you that we cannot change what was said once I recorded it.

To Ms. Battle,
There is conflicting information centered on the secret agreement between that Ms. Sedlmeyer (UFT) informed me about between the DOE and UFT on April 16, 2015. This agreement was to harm UFT members at administrative hearing and I was harmed at an administrative hearing because falsified documents were submitted on May 4, 2015.

1. Ms. Weingarten wanted me to handover the recording.
2. Mr. Adam Ross wrote it does not exist and to hand it over.
3. Mr. Barr wrote handover the recording in August of 2015. In October of 2015, Mr. Barr wrote it was policy of the DOE. I have it documented, when I pressed record on my phone, the DOE likes to quote fake arbitration decisions and policies.

I said that I am willing to press play for anyone, but no one told me to come and press play!!

I appreciate the opportunity to record another administrative proceeding, but PERB is a joke and corrupt. I have to be honest about what I am experienced and what i recorded.

Thanks,
Mr. Celli
________________________________
From: Celli Lucio (08X519)
Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2016 3:50 PM
To: Jackson-Chase Courtenaye; Solimando Karen; Kshensky Marcel; preet.bharar@usdoj.gov
Cc: Bernard Anne (79K755); Cole Richard (07X224); Stoff Michael; mmulgrew@uft.org; :; Jpovalitis@uft.org; ASepulveda@uft.org; hschoor@uft.org; jhinds@uft.org; kmagee@nysutmail.org; kalford@uft.org; rfernadez@uft.org; pfilomena@uft.org; charrison@uft.org; mescobar@uft.org; ajackson@uft.org; mborrelli@uft.org; jguevara@uft.org; lbarr@uft.org; rmantell@uft.org; sroberson@uft.org; matkinson@uft.org; Mills Rose Marie; dclark@uft.org; dmanganello@uft.org; agoldman@uft.org; alaureano@uft.org; apallott@nysutmail.org; eespert@uft.org; ssilva@uft.org; zmrick@org.org; wthompson@uft.org; wvelazquez@uft.org; jhuart@uft.org; pserrano@uft.org; brein@uft.org; pcastro@uft.org; agerard@uft.org; dalbright@uft.org; croldan@uft.org; msanto@uft.org; ymcowell@uft.org; d; patia@uft.org; ceaddy@uft.org; imunet@uft.org; rking@uft.org; jgerowitz@uft.org; Capuano John; aweinstein@uft.org; edriesen@uft.org; usmith@uft.org; wkalogeras@uft.org; mlane@uft.org; vwilson@uft.org; jgoldberg@uft.org; eperez@uft.org; mruiz@uft.org; rfreiser@uft.org; rparker@uft.org; mvaccaro@uft.org; mmanley@uft.org; jkessier@uft.org; jschwartz@uft.org; bmylite@uft.org; tdacruz@uft.org; dsmyth@uft.org; jvasques@uft.org; bzihal@uft.org; wsanchez@uft.org; ckelly@uft.org; dpenny@uft.org; srotkowitz@uft.org; dcappola@uft.org; lkohler@uft.org; rweingarten@aft.org; cfortino@nysutmail.org; Mandel Susan; &00; Laveman Gary; Laveman Gary; Fogel Stanley; Salcedo Rosa (08X519); Laboy Grismaldy (08X519); cbattle@nyutmail.org; dstrom@aft.org; Macek Claudia (11X083); Bligen Doyle Sandra (08x519); Stewart Regina; Peeples Charles (Human Resources); Rabot Joann; Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov; mpeters@doi.nyc.gov; Richard Condon; RMendez@council.nyc.gov; GetHelp@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; District3@council.nyc.gov; Baranello Joseph; Chancellor Carmen Fariña; dklein@nysenate.gov; Helen@HelenRosenthal.com; hoylman@nysenate.go; hassellt@nysenate.gov; Lavin Patricia; BKallos@council.nyc.gov; DDromm@council.nyc.gov; sedelman@nypost.com; Lucas Ida (11X542); Panel for Educational Policy; James@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; MViverito@council.nyc.gov; BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov; ZCarter@law.nyc.gov; Santana Altagracia; Guillaume Lourdes; Weinberg Phil; Levy Odelia; hoylman@nysenate.gov; enzo0mad@aol.com
Subject: RE: Grievnace pt 2

Dear Ms. Solimando, Ms. Atkinson, and Ms. Jackson-Chase:

I sent in a grievance on December 23, 2015 and a step 1 grievance conference has not been scheduled, thus far. This is not the first the Office of Labor Relations played this deceitful and unlawful game with me. Please see the attachment of where I promised a date, but the hearing date was never scheduled. The Office of General Counsel state that they have integrity, but has allowed hearing officers to quote policies and arbitration decisions that do not exist. The lies were just a method to rob me.
When is the date for the grievance filed on December 23, 2015?

I would appreciate a response, even if it is another lie. At this point, I do not believe a single word that is stated by anyone under the supervision of the Office of General Counsel because I have Ms. Jackson-Chase telling me to contact her because her office has integrity--recorded. Next issue are IEPs.

Thanks,
Mr. Celli.
________________________________
From: Celli Lucio (08X519)
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2016 7:13 PM
To: Jackson-Chase Courtenaye; Solimando Karen; Kshensky Marcel; Crespo Pedro
Cc: Bernard Anne (79K755); Cole Richard (07X224); Stoff Michael; mmulgrew@uft.org; :; Jpovalitis@uft.org; ASepulveda@uft.org; hschoor@uft.org; jhinds@uft.org; kmagee@nysutmail.org; kalford@uft.org; rfernadez@uft.org; pfilomena@uft.org; charrison@uft.org; mescobar@uft.org; ajackson@uft.org; mborrelli@uft.org; jguevara@uft.org; lbarr@uft.org; rmantell@uft.org; sroberson@uft.org; matkinson@uft.org; Mills Rose Marie; dclark@uft.org; dmanganello@uft.org; agoldman@uft.org; alaureano@uft.org; apallott@nysutmail.org; eespert@uft.org; ssilva@uft.org; zmrick@org.org; wthompson@uft.org; wvelazquez@uft.org; jhuart@uft.org; pserrano@uft.org; brein@uft.org; pcastro@uft.org; agerard@uft.org; dalbright@uft.org; croldan@uft.org; msanto@uft.org; ymcowell@uft.org; d; patia@uft.org; ceaddy@uft.org; imunet@uft.org; rking@uft.org; jgerowitz@uft.org; Capuano John; aweinstein@uft.org; edriesen@uft.org; usmith@uft.org; wkalogeras@uft.org; mlane@uft.org; vwilson@uft.org; jgoldberg@uft.org; eperez@uft.org; mruiz@uft.org; rfreiser@uft.org; rparker@uft.org; mvaccaro@uft.org; mmanley@uft.org; jkessier@uft.org; jschwartz@uft.org; bmylite@uft.org; tdacruz@uft.org; dsmyth@uft.org; jvasques@uft.org; bzihal@uft.org; wsanchez@uft.org; ckelly@uft.org; dpenny@uft.org; srotkowitz@uft.org; dcappola@uft.org; lkohler@uft.org; rweingarten@aft.org; cfortino@nysutmail.org; Mandel Susan; &00; Laveman Gary; Laveman Gary; Fogel Stanley; Salcedo Rosa (08X519); Laboy Grismaldy (08X519); cbattle@nyutmail.org; dstrom@aft.org; Macek Claudia (11X083); Bligen Doyle Sandra (08x519); Stewart Regina; Peeples Charles (Human Resources); Rabot Joann; Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov; mpeters@doi.nyc.gov; Richard Condon; RMendez@council.nyc.gov; GetHelp@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; District3@council.nyc.gov; Baranello Joseph; Chancellor Carmen Fariña; dklein@nysenate.gov; Helen@HelenRosenthal.com; hoylman@nysenate.go; hassellt@nysenate.gov; Lavin Patricia; BKallos@council.nyc.gov; DDromm@council.nyc.gov; sedelman@nypost.com; Lucas Ida (11X542); Panel for Educational Policy; James@pubadvocate.nyc.gov; MViverito@council.nyc.gov; BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov; ZCarter@law.nyc.gov; Santana Altagracia; Guillaume Lourdes; Weinberg Phil; Levy Odelia; hoylman@nysenate.gov; enzo0mad@aol.com
Subject: RE: Judge Blassman said that I would win the case

Dear Ms. Weingarten, Hon. Zachary Carter, and Mr. Mark Peters:

At this point, there should have been a review of the recording of March 23, 2015, which occurred at PERB. The recording had Judge Blassman and I speak about Vincent Gaglione and Susan Mandel, Esq. Attached you will find the email that I wrote on November 14, 2015. In the said email, I provided case law of an Administrative Law Judge being suspended for a similar behavior exhibited by Judge Blassman.

1. Repeated the questions as a way to convince me that the charge was not valid because I had to prove when and the intent. As the recording showed, my answers DID NOT change because I did not fall for the mental coercion used by Judge Blassman. She did not like that I kept on saying Mr. Ross’ letter to her question.

2. Then the judge and I spoke about Ms. Mandel. I stated Ms. Mandel wrote the WRONG facts into the grievance decision (falsifying a legal document and she is CULPABLE under a 1983 claim because she took two months to render the decision) and Judge Blassman said, “You can’t submit a charge because you did not like the decision.” I informed the judge that it was not the decision, but the FACT that Ms. Mandel put facts from a different decision. Judge Blassman and Ms. Mandel have legal training, so the judge knew about NYS Penal Code 175. In addition, everyone heard the explanation that Mr. Todd Drantch gave to Judge Blassman about Ms. Mandel, where did not explain anything.

Judge Blassman’s behavior was to help the Department and the UFT, and be deceitful towards me because I do not have legal training.

On April 8, 2015
Judge Blassman said, “I thought that there was going to be a settlement.” Then, the judge said that I would win the case—another deceitful tactic used by the judge— and I should write a settlement plan. Mr. Drantch clearly stated, “Yes, that’s right” to the judge, as she gave herself away about having an ex parte conversion with Ms. Battle and Mr. Drantch. Obviously, the judge, Ms. Battle of the UFT and Mr. Drantch, planned this ruse because the judge wanted to help the UFT and the DOE. (My favorite performance is where Mr. Garry Laveman and Mr. Stanley Fogel did their take on “Who’s on First?” by Abbott and Costello’s as they talked about the “most famous arbitration decision. According to Ms. Battle, this decision does not exist and I could not find the decison at NYU’s Labor Library. I asked Ms. Jackson-Chase, the way she told me to contact her, to provide me with a copy of this decision in an email and at a PEP meeting, but I know by now that her meaning of integrity resembles fraud. )

1. The judge told Mr. Drantch to get and send me the documents prior to May 4, 2015.

On April 29, 2015
Mr. Drantch wrote me an email to inform me that the Department could not provide me with a settlement because “the Department reviewed the case.” Mr. Drantch did not send me the documents and he helped, after the review of the case, Ms. Bernard commit a crime with the submission of fraudulent documents for May 4, 2015.

May 27, 2015
I sent a letter to Judge Blassman about the fraudulent documents and how they were submitted on May 4, 2015. In addition, I reminded the judge that Mr. Drantch did not obey her orders. To date, the judge has continued to help Mr. Drantch commit a crime because she has not address this issue.

Around June 6, 2015
I sent a letter to Judge Blassman asking her to compel the UFT and DOE to provide an explanation of how the fraudulent documents were submitted on May 4, 2015, and the recording of Ms. Sedlmeyer telling me that the UFT has a secret agreement with the Department to defraud teachers at administrative hearings. Ms. Battle and Mr. Drantch answered, “It is not in the rules and procedures of PERB.”

1. On Columbus Day of this year, I went to a PERB trail date and I heard, along with Mr. Francesco Portelos and others, the judge rule on a motion that is not in the rules and procedures of PERB. Yet, Judge Blassman has ignored my motion that deals with the order she told Mr. Drantch on April 8, 2015 and it is a crime—wow, just wow!

The Judge said that I would win the case that Mr. Drantch said was dismissed--strange. I never received a letter from Judge Blassman informing me that the case was dismissed and it is a case that SHE SAID that I would win. I will be in attendance on January 11, 2015, with a CD to give to the police.

What side of fraud are you on? I am beginning to think the wrong side of fraud, which is the side that helps fraud to flourish—I have to say what I feel. I have new topics and recordings that I want to start talking about now.
Sincerely,
Mr. Lucio Celli

the Department of Education's disciplinary system is broken. I have written this many times on my blog, but if an educator is guilty of something, admit it and take your punishment - reasonable punishment. The penalty must be appropriate for the misconduct, and nothing more.

Lucio Celli enzo0mad@aol.com

May 3, 2018, 11:53 PM

to Francesco, sobronxschool@gmail.com, johnathan, bruceayoung181@gmail.com, ngiovana@law.nyc.gov, me, Betsy, Betsy, Betsy, Betsy

Dear Group:

I called TRS after I was infected to be informed about disability, as I wanted to be informed for the future as my illness progressed. This was done in 2009.

I know that I am tier 4 so it is 66% and not 75%

I know that I bypass the UFT and DOE at any time and there are regulations to meet and a panel of doctors

Therefore, I could not have said that statement because I know what to do if I wanted or needed to go that route since. That screenshot was created by Peter since he sent me this screenshot and I think he needs mental exam…I begged Peter to seek professional help for being gay, and creating truths that can be verified and I TOLD HIM that I do not have the screenshot he created. He even wanted me to sue him but I thanked him for warning me about Betsy’s plan with her gang because I did not react when Betsy threw her complaint at my dad, as he told told me it was her plan at the lunch, Betsy, as soon as you add him, I will submit the motion under 35. I guess you finally figured out that you are not Peter Zucker and Mavis only thanked Peter. We are getting

This is Betsy’s racial discrimination against Italians, as she wants to paint me part of the mob by extorting money…..

I can’t believe that Betsy and Peter would create and say something that is a total lie and ANYONE can research TRS’ website for this public information— I would be ashamed to present a screenshot what can I expect from them, they bothered Mavis Shein when she was in mourning in the 9th month. Please correct me if I am wrong, but in the jewish religion the 9th month is the first time someone can visit the grave and hold service,,,, look at Doc. No 67 for one way they bothered her and Peter and Betsy are jewish.

Peter made me fear for my life but he’s blogging about his wife being afraid of me—I have Peter’s words audio recorded and he only has his lies. In my opinion, Peter is gay and needs to come out of the closet and the only person harming his wife is Peter. In my opinion, Peter is so gay that he is the guiding star for martians because his flame burns so bright

Subject: RE: FOIL Request

Dear Mr. Joseph Baranello and Mr. Zumbolo :

Under the New York Freedom of Information Law, N.Y. Pub. Off. Law sec. 84 et seq., I am requesting an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of public records of by-laws for the Panel for Educational Policy and the Appeals Process handbook. The Appeals Process handbook is attacked.
Point 1: It is my understanding that there could be a contract clause that authorizes the employer to alter by-laws or polices respecting a term and condition of employment, after giving the union notice and an opportunity to consult, but requiring the union’s consent, is a mandatory subject of negotiations. (p. 82 of the PERB reference guide attached)
Point 2: It is my understanding that there cannot be a waiver or modification of a statutory right or privilege which otherwise constitutes a term and condition of employment is mandatorily negotiable unless it is against public policy or contrary to a clear legislative intent. (p. 100 of the PERB reference guide attached)

Point 3: It is my understanding that a union cannot demand a term and condition that would have a contravention of a law. (p. 99 of the PERB reference guide attached)

Under the New York Freedom of Information Law, N.Y. Pub. Off. Law sec. 84 et seq., I am requesting an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of public records that are related to each point mentioned above. I am requesting any and all documents that the legislature modified NY PL 175 for New York City Department of Education.
On May 4, 2015, Ms. Anne Bernard submitted documents that were altered and falsified. The numbers on the rubric submitted were higher than the scores shown to be me on May 28, 214. Please take notice, Mr. Cole is CLEARLY heard saying each score. On May 4, 2015, when asked about a missing page and the whereabouts of the sheets that had Mr. Celli’s signatures, Ms. Bernard stated “We can’t speak about that now…(sigh)”
On January 11, 2016, Mr. Todd Drantch, Esq. stated to Administrative Law Judge that the Office of Appeals and Review preformed their required actions. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE; the required actions are contained in the Appeals Process handbook, which is attached. In fact, Mr. Drantch clearly stated (and I could provide an audio recording of the fact) “OAR provided Mr. Celli with the observation documents on the day of the appeal and I don’t know what Mr. Celli wants.” I understand that honesty is difficult for Mr. Drantch because law school did not teach him that concept. But, Mr. Drantch’s statement contradicts what is written in the Appeals Process handbook.
The ONLY way Mr. Drantch’s statement is truthful is if the legislature provided NYC DOE with the right to commit fraud and not adhere to the right civil servants gained under Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermills. In addition, the UFT and the DOE had to have negotiated each point mentioned above.
I would have attached the January 11, 2016 audio recording, but Mr. Zumbolo is stalling to answer my previous FOIL request about a motion for particularization by the charging party. According to ALJ Blassman it does not exist. According to PERB’s own website, the charging party has this right. I am waiting to provide Ms. Weingarten specific evidence of how the ALJ was bias. BUT NOW, I will want to attach it to embarrass Mr. Drantch for lying to ALJ Blassman as I wrote previously to Mr. Klein (Mr. Drantch broke his ethics code as a lawyer and I wanted to drive to Albany to let Mr. Klein hear the recording.)

FROM PERB
It is my understanding that anything negotiated is filed with PERB.
Under the New York Freedom of Information Law, N.Y. Pub. Off. Law sec. 84 et seq., I am requesting an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of public records that deals with the requests made above to the DOE. I am requesting the policies and procedures of when a lawyer lies to an ALJ.

If there are any fees for searching or copying these records, please inform me of the cost.

The New York Freedom of Information Law requires a response time of five business days. If access to the records I am requesting will take longer than this amount of time, please contact me with information about when I might expect copies or the ability to inspect the requested records.

If you deny any or all of this request, please cite each specific exemption you feel justifies the refusal to release the information and notify me of the appeal procedures available to me under the law.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

From: Lucio Celli <enzo0mad@aol.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: to Mr. Bharara and I truly hope that I broke federal law
To: "ksolimando@schools.nyc.gov" <KSolimando@schools.nyc.gov>, "robert.freeman@dos.ny.gov" <Robert.Freeman@dos.ny.gov>, Richard Condon <rcondon@nycsci.org>, "rweingarten@aft.org" <rweingarten@aft.org>, Mandel Susan <SMandel@schools.nyc.gov>, "dstrom@aft.org" <dstrom@aft.org>,

Guerra Charity <CGuerra7@schools.nyc.gov>, Drantch Todd <TDrantch@schools.nyc.gov>, Chancellor Carmen Fariña <NYCChancellor@schools.nyc.gov>, "lcelli@schools.nyc.gov" <LCelli@schools.nyc.gov>, "jbaranello3@schools.nyc.gov" <JBaranello3@schools.nyc.gov>, "aross@uft.org" <ARoss@uft.org>, "zcarter@law.nyc.gov" <zcarter@law.nyc.gov>, "preet.bharara@usdoj.gov" <preet.bharara@usdoj.gov>, phoebeb@childrensaidsociety.org, mpeters@doi.nyc.gov, leslie@yu.edu,

eschneiderman@ag.ny.gov, eric.lane@hofstra.edu, ecacavas@perb.ny.gov, courtenayej@childrensaidsociety.org,

cbattle@nysut.org, canelson@wcl.american.edu, bill.araiza@brooklaw.edu, anthonyr@childrensaidsociety.org,

ablassman@perb.ny.gov, JWirenius@perb.ny.gov, JORourke@perb.ny.gov, HFriedma@law.nyc.gov,

BdeBlasio@cityhall.nyc.gov, "sedelman@nypost.com" <sedelman@nypost.com>

Dear Mr. Bharara:

Attached you will hear an administrative hearing that occurred on November 2, 2016. I truly hope that I broke federal law because I want to play my audio recordings. Normally, I play it safe that I stop or erase audio recording, as I am secrectly taping. I did not do that on November 2, 2016 ….I want to sit down and ram my audio recordings down people’s throat and the audio recording deals with:

1. Cole telling me created a teacher’s evaluation system—but it is a mandatory subject of negotiation

2.      At my Louderrmill hearing … Bernard said, “Oh, we can’t speak about that” that’s all she said
3.      Mandel falsified grievance decision
4.      Blassman told me, “Oh you can’t put in for hat…” she was talking about Mandel’s decision and the special education complaint that I gave her
5.      Lavaman and Fogel said arbitration decision existed and Battle said that lied
6.      Lavin stop me from presenting evidence and stopped me from speaking (she also motioned which edited the official audio recording of my Loudermill hearing…but I made my own)
7.      Jackson-Chase confirmed that DOE sent me an edited audio recording and Chancellor Fairna was CC’ed
8.      Chancellor’s Rep (Kshenksy) and hearing officer (Linchestien) said that administration did not get notice of Jackson-Chase’s email …..the administration in question was Jackson-Chases/Farina
9.      Kshenky lied about DOE policy because he asked about my behavior of audio recording on Oct 8, 2016

I have FOIL request and NONE, and I none, of the policies or rules cited are found in the FOIL request.

I hope this works because the next stop is to curse Farina out in public to get my 3020 …I need a job but they will have to fire me because it will be the only way that I will stop. Battle/Drantch/Blassman made it personal on April 8, 2017 because I will not be ashamed or be put in a position of fear…not when I have audio recordings

NYC Rubber Room Reporter and ATR CONNECT

Sunday, January 10, 2021

UFT Solidarity Member Threatens To Kill Two Federal Court Judges

Lucio Celli enzo0mad@aol.com

No comments:

Get new posts by email:

Site Meter

Sunday, January 10, 2021

UFT Solidarity Member Threatens To Kill Two Federal Court Judges

Lucio Celli <enzo0mad@aol.com>

No comments:

Lucio Celli enzo0mad@aol.com