Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community
Showing posts with label SSHAT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SSHAT. Show all posts

Friday, October 16, 2020

NYC Chancellor Richard Carranza Sabotages the SHSAT Specialized High Schools' Admissions Test

 

                                     NYC Chancellor Richard Carranza

Every day, I read about or see for myself the way that the NYC Department of Education violates procedures to get what they want.

Take the SHSAT Specialized High Schools Admissions Test, for example. From day one of his reign as Chancellor, Richard Carranza has spoken openly about the test he hates, because too many white and Asian kids successfully achieve high scores and get into the "best" public schools in the City of New York. Ergo, the test is racist and discrimination cannot continue. He vowed then, in 2018, and does now, to end the test, and find a way to get Black and Brown kids into these schools through other means.

The COVID-19 disarray has given him, Chancellor Carranza, the chaos he needed to end the test by simply never scheduling it. If the test is not given, then no one can get into the specialized high schools.

This approach I call "doing what is right for the select few by harming everyone". The high standards for getting into the specialized high schools are there to assure gifted and talented kids from any socio-economic group, that their level of intellectual curiosity will be rewarded, and challenged. Gifted and Talented children are in the same space as other kids, that they should expect a public education that fits their needs. I believe that Chancellor Carranza does not see this, and despises kids that are in the G&T Group.

Full disclosure, two of my children were accepted to Stuyvesant. One was accepted with an IEP, and she did not ask for any accommodation such as extended time. She wanted to get in on her ability to handle the academic work, not on a separate standard. 

I believe that the test is the one truly neutral way to select students and that racial discrimination starts in kindergarten when Black and Brown students do not get a great education at their schools and cannot reach their personal best because of the curricula, staff, or teachers at their school. Fix this problem starting with kindergarten-middle schools - and school staff and administrators who do not care about the achievement of their students.

Keep politics out of schools.

Betsy Combier


Ending Specialized Test Will Hurt City Education
The Chief, Larry Cary, October 8, 2020

New York City's Principals are demanding that Governor Cuomo take control of the city's schools because of the incompetence of Chancellor Richard Carranza and the city Department of Education.

At the same time, misguided Albany legislators are carrying Carranza's water to change the law and give him complete control over the city's best high schools—Brooklyn Tech, Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, and five others—so he can eliminate the Specialized High School Admissions Test and have the unfettered right to socially engineer their admissions as he sees fit.

Carranza, who has repeatedly said he opposes any kind of enriched education in the school system, even could eliminate them as STEM schools specializing in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.

Currently, state law mandates the existence of Brooklyn Tech, Stuyvesant, and Science, as well as an unbiased competitive test to determine who gets in. The city voluntarily added the five "little" specialized high schools about 15 years ago. The DOE has the unfettered right to eliminate the use of the test at these five smaller schools but has refused to do so.

History of Success

These schools have outstanding outcomes. All eight are ranked by US News among the top 10 schools in New York State. They are ranked among the top 100 out of 25,000 high schools in the nation. Virtually every student graduates fully college-ready. Virtually all the students graduate and go on to college Two-thirds of the city's public high school students attending Harvard, Yale, and Princeton are graduates of Tech, Stuyvesant, and Science. Fourteen graduates of these three schools are recipients of the Nobel Prize, more than most nations.

By comparison, less than half of the city's public-school students score proficient or above on state annual assessment tests for math and language arts. Many graduate unprepared for college-level work. At CUNY's community colleges, 75 percent of the students, almost all public-school graduates, take at least one remedial course, and some take three.

For Black students, the situation is worse. The longer they are in the city's schools, the more their performance on the math assessment test declines. In third grade, about 12 percent of Black students score above proficient. By eighth grade, only 7.7 percent are scoring as high. About 25 percent of students never graduate high school.

The test-in schools are havens for the underprivileged: Many, if not most, students attending the big three schools come from underprivileged backgrounds, the children of working, minority, poor, and immigrant families. Many are immigrants themselves. Notably, this year's graduating class at Brooklyn Tech received over $135,000,000 in scholarships and financial aid, attesting to both their academic qualifications and their socioeconomic backgrounds.

At Brooklyn Tech, the largest high school in the nation (6,000 students), nearly two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, the metric used to measure poverty. Four-fifths are members of minority groups. Two-thirds are Asian, with students from China, Bangladesh, Korea, India, Uzbekistan, the Philippines, and beyond. About 12 percent are Black and Latino. About 20 percent are white, many from immigrant families fleeing oppression from Eastern Europe and former Soviet states. Many speak a foreign language in the home.

Fifty years ago, New York State mandated the existence of the big three STEM high schools and use of the SHSAT for admission. Each year, nearly 30,000 students take the test. The top-scoring 5,000 applicants are selected for 3,800 seats. Some decline the offer and attend schools with a less-rigorous curriculum.

These schools are under fire because some blame the test for the underrepresentation of Black and Latino students compared with the total public-school system. While no school matches the demographic percentages of the school system as a whole, frequently the academically better selective high schools, which use subjective criteria instead of the test for admissions, either mirror test-in schools for Asian representation, or are more-white and wealthier.

'Racism' Cry Stifles Debate

Calling the test racist inhibits a fair and rational debate about the issue. This is not the case. The independent company creating the test vets questions for bias. For nearly 20 years until 1994, most students at Brooklyn Tech were Black or Latino, and for many years after that, were a large part of the student body.

What changed the situation was the city's decision to systematically eliminate honors and Gifted & Talented programs in the schools serving the Black and Latino communities. Until the early 1990s, most middle schools had honors programs. Their elimination prevented high-potential students in segregated Black and Latino communities from getting the education they deserved. Today, this situation continues to prevent them from doing better on the test. We advocate changing this.

Some immediate efforts can successfully improve the demographic diversity of the schools. The Brooklyn Tech Alumni Foundation, which I head, with the financial support of National Grid, has run a pilot pipeline program for six years aimed at underrepresented middle-school students to prepare them for academic achievement and a successful test.

Our program's outcomes are better than every program run by the city. Two-thirds of participants completing the program admitted to Tech are Black, Latino, and/or female, another underrepresented group. We have urged city officials to adopt our model and scale it up, but they seem disinterested. To read our report on Creating a STEM Pipeline for Middle Schools, go to www.bths.edu/alumni/STEM_Report.pdf.

It is foolish to think the State Legislature should turn over to the city full control over these test-in schools when the city's Principals have no confidence in Chancellor Carranza's ability to even open the schools while keeping the children safe from the virus.


Mr. Cary, a Manhattan lawyer, is the president of the Brooklyn Tech Alumni Association.


Saturday, March 7, 2015

The SSHAT, or the Test For NYC's Specialized High Schools, Should Not Be Changed; How Students Apply To Take The Test Must Be Changed

I believe that the SSHAT Test should not be changed, but the procedures for taking the test must change. FYI, two of my daughters were accepted to Stuyvesant HS after taking the SSHAT. This fact does not change my opinion.

When I was President of the PTA at Booker T. Washington MS 54, the school was racially segregated and I tried to change this. I also tried to stop the misallocation of funds by the Principal. I was attacked, of course, by a group of the white parents, all of whom wanted their children to continue to receive the favors and treats of being white. Ironically, one of the parents who attacked me is the current Parent Coordinator of JHS 54, Anne Pejovich. I have a mountain of information on her duplicity to share in my book in the sad chapter of parents fighting parents who speak up.

 The DELTA Honors program fed students directly into Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Edward Murrow, Brooklyn TECH. The four other programs inside Booker T. did not permit students to take the SSHAT test. This was the problem. Let all kids who want to take the test TAKE IT. The unfairness in telling a child he/she cannot take the test simply because they are not "ready" or just "can't" is unfair and unjust. I and several other parents did a random survey of the schools in the upper west side of Manhattan by standing outside the schools after Parent visiting day, and we asked 2 questions: 1) is your child in 8th grade? 2) is your child taking the SSHAT test? The answers were surprisingly, no, they knew nothing about applying for the test or when it would be given.

DELTA was more than 90% white. The other programs at MS 54 reflected the neighborhood, mostly black or Hispanic. I live on the Upper East side, but my kids were accepted at DELTA because the former head of the program, Fred La Senna, accepted them, starting with my oldest, who had an IEP. She, and one of her sisters, wanted to go to Stuyvesant, took the test, and got in. No other school would have challenged either daughter, and Stuyvesant was the right learning environment for their learning style.

Change the way students apply to take the test, and we may begin to see more diversity in the Stuyvesant pool of incoming students. Don't change the test.

Betsy Combier
Stuyvesant High School

New Study Explores Strategies to Diversify NYC’s Specialized High Schools
Today, the NYC Department of Education announced the results of the City’s high school choice process, including data about students admitted to the City’s eight specialized schools. As in past years, Black and Latino students are starkly under-represented among those receiving offers to these elite schools. A central question is whether the schools’ admissions policy—based exclusively on the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT)—is to blame for the lack of diversity. 
 
A new brief, Pathways to an Elite Education: Exploring Strategies to Diversify NYC’s Specialized High Schools, examines students’ pathways from middle school to matriculation at a specialized high school, highlighting opportunities to intervene and improve access for underrepresented groups. The brief also simulates the effects of various admissions criteria that have been proposed as alternatives to the current SHSAT-based admissions policy, including state test score, grades, and attendance. In general, we found that these rules would increase the share of Latino, White, and female students. But, most of them would not appreciably increase the share of Black students nor reduce the concentration of offers in a small number of middle schools.
 
“The real take-away is from this study is the lack of diversity in the specialized schools is a much bigger problem than ‘to test or not to test?’” said James Kemple, the Research Alliance’s executive director. “We need to think more broadly about how to reduce inequality in New York City’s schools—identifying strategies that create opportunities for traditionally disadvantaged students will be a primary focus of the Research Alliance’s work in coming years.”

The brief is based on a working paper by the Institute for Education and Social Policy’s Sean Corcoran and the Research Alliance’s Christine Baker-Smith.
The Research Alliance for New York City Schools is a nonpartisan research center housed at the New York University Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development. The Research Alliance conducts rigorous studies on topics that matter to the city’s public schools. The organization strives to advance equity and excellence in education by providing evidence about policies and practices that promote students' development and academic success.