Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community
Showing posts with label gifted and talented programs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gifted and talented programs. Show all posts

Friday, October 1, 2021

High School Junior at Stuyvesant High School Quits and Starts Homeschooling Himself


 Stuyvesant is a fantastic school...for many students. For others, not so great.

Two of my daughters were accepted to Stuyvesant, and the school was right for one of them.

But I am a firm believer in school choice and suggest that if any parent reads about or is told to go to public school and nowhere else, ignore this. Every child is unique and has unique goals, abilities and favorite futures. No school is right for everyone. Homeschooling is right for some families, but for others, not appropriate. (see here as well) There are many resources available for anyone interested. Then there are charter and religious schools. Parents may request an Impartial Hearing to receive public funds for a private school, summer programs, and educational resources, if their child(ren) has any special needs or is Twice-Exceptional (2e). In my opinion the NYC Department of Education has no interest in setting up programs for 2e kids. I started providing representation for parents at the Impartial Hearing Office in 2001. See the Advocate Guide on the Parents Unite site and FIRE’s Chicago Statement Resources.

Those rising 8th and 9th graders who feel that a Gifted and Talented high school curriculum is what they want and is right for them should have a chance to test into the specialized high schools in New York City. (SHSAT)

Any young person from second grade and up can also take a test for the Johns Hopkins Center For Talented Youth, or the Talent Search Program they prefer. 

See here:

Talent Search Opportunities for Gifted Students

My girls did the CTY Program, and it is amazing, with career workshops, summer activities in special areas such as marine biology, archeology, etc., and a full-time mentor to answer questions. Scholarships are available.

My recommendation for all parents: look for alternatives to public school for your child. I support the opinions of Kerry McDonald:

Hi Betsy,
Two decades ago, when I was a graduate student in education policy at Harvard, I remember someone asking me what I thought of my professors and classmates. I quipped: “They respect diverse opinions; they just don’t have any.” In my experience, it was a monolith of thought regarding education policy and practice.

Sadly, education has become even more monolithic since the turn of the millennium, with diversity of thought and dissent seemingly less tolerated than before. This has been particularly problematic in higher education, and it’s been trickling down to K-12 curriculum, theory, and policy.

But there are some hopeful signs that, maybe, we can all at least get back to tolerating diverse opinions in education even if debate about these opinions may be limited.

Today I am presenting at the aptly named, Diversity of Thought in K-12 Education Conference, at the Westin Copley here in Boston. It was organized by the upstart group, Parents Unite, a Boston-based collection of parents dismayed at the emphasis on critical race theory in classrooms, and the overall climate of conformity in education. In a July article about the group, The Boston Globe noted that these parents have “mobilized to fight for ‘true diversity of thought’ in classrooms, an effort resembling those launched elsewhere in the country in the spring by conservative groups and families against what they describe as the ‘indoctrination of students with ‘woke’ ideas about race and social issues.”

Diversity of thought and tolerance for dissent are classically liberal ideas on which our nation was founded. It’s a shame that challenging current education orthodoxy is somehow painted as an attack on education by “conservative groups.”

This weekend’s conference brings together a broad cross-section of educators, activists, and parents who are pushing back against divisive, illiberal educational philosophies and policies. I am particularly excited to meet some of the people I have written about over the past year, including Paul Rossi, a math teacher at an elite Manhattan private school who came out against the school’s focus on “woke” curriculum, and Andrew Gutmann, a parent of a child in a different, but similarly swanky, New York City private school that was following the same critical race theory path.

Other speakers include Greg Lukianoff of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), an organization that has done heroic work in protecting free speech on college campuses, and Ian Rowe of 1776 Unites, a project created by civil rights activist Robert Woodson in response to The New York Times’s 1619 Project.

It is refreshing to see a grassroots movement of parents, educators, and thought leaders coming together to champion diverse opinions in education and to promote tolerance for dissent. Encouraging various viewpoints, recognizing conflicting perspectives, and debating assorted curriculum approaches and school policies can help ensure that American education is as pluralistic as America itself.

Until next week,

Kerry McDonald
Senior Education Fellow
Foundation for Economic Education

Betsy Combier

betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, Advocatz.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

New York City Student Quit Stuyvesant to School Himself. Here’s How He Did It.

Lee Hawkins | Wall Street Journal Opinion | July 7, 2021

During the pandemic, Gregory Wickham’s parents let him leave the prestigious institution to complete high school on his own

When most of the 582,000 New York Public School students who opted to take classes remotely this past academic year are required to return to school buildings in September, Gregory Wickham will be taking classes from home.


The pandemic’s disruption helped the 17-year-old high school junior persuade his parents last year to allow him to drop out of Stuyvesant High School, one of the city’s most competitive schools, and home-school himself. He will continue homeschooling his senior year.


“I knew I could learn more, and more efficiently, on my own,” Gregory said.


Gregory is one of about 43,000 students who pulled out of the city’s schools to home-school or enroll in a school elsewhere. During the 2020-21 school year, the number of students enrolled in the country’s largest school system from prekindergarten to grade 12 dropped to approximately 960,000, down about 4%, from the previous year, according to preliminary enrollment data from the city’s Department of Education.


In October, total homeschooling enrollment in New York City was 10,667, an increase of 31% over October 2019, the department said.


“My husband and I are supporting him, but I would not say that we are 100% confident that he has made the right decision,” said Gregory’s mother, Alina Adams. “At a school like Stuyvesant, the biggest value-add is from the other kids, not from the teachers or the building. The fact is, we don’t know how this is going to turn out.”


Stuyvesant didn’t respond to requests seeking comment.


Homeschooling represented 3% of students nationally in 2016, the latest figures available, compared with 88% for public and charter schools and 9% for private schools, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. After the coronavirus pandemic closed schools across the country last year, data from several states show that more parents decided to take control of their children’s curriculum and schedule.


According to a 2016 study by the National Home Education Research Institute, which conducts and collects research about homeschooling, home-schooled students scored 15 to 30 percentage points higher on standardized academic achievement tests than students in traditional schools.


Home school wasn’t a new idea for Gregory. He started lobbying his parents as a fourth-grader. He told them that he wanted to skip high school after middle school and start college at 14. Ultimately, he gained admission into Stuyvesant, which his older brother and his father had attended. He said that he maintained A grades while there. He also excelled in dance outside of school. After several months of remote instruction at his home in Manhattan following school closures in March 2020, he asked his parents if he could quit.


Ms. Adams required her son to write down the names of all of his selected textbooks and the classes he planned to take, and then present a formal “pitch” to the couple. Then, she drew up a contract of expectations which all three of them signed. High on their list of concerns was how colleges would view their son’s plan.


Ms. Adams, who is white, and her husband, who is Black, debated the idea vigorously. Gregory is among only a handful of Black students admitted each year to Stuyvesant. They worried that colleges wouldn’t take him seriously, especially as a minority student quitting his school.


“A Black man has to have twice as many degrees as a white one to even be considered for the same job,” Ms. Adams posted in a blog about her son’s homeschooling, recalling what her husband, Scott Wickham, said. “A Stuyvesant diploma will get you into any college you want. Homeschooling might make it so that you don’t get in anywhere. And then what will you have? You’ll have nothing!”


Mr. Wickham gave in, but told Gregory that he had to craft a rigorous curriculum for himself during his junior year of homeschooling to be allowed to continue it into his senior year.


Gregory found all his courses through online instruction resources such as Khan Academy, which provides courses through a portal of thousands of videos, articles, and practice problems. According to the Department of Education, state regulations require parents or guardians of home-schooled students to submit several items, including a letter of intent, an individualized home instruction plan and quarterly reports.


Leigh Bortins, of Classical Conversations, a company that offers K-12 homeschooling support to over 50,000 families, estimated that about 15% of home-schooled students asked their parents for permission to be home-schooled, as opposed to parents driving the decision.


Ms. Bortins, who said she has been in the business for 35 years, said students like Gregory are rare, “but not unheard of.” She said that many universities across the U.S. offer scholarships to home-schooled students, hoping to tap into the self-starters within the generation.


Had Gregory stayed at Stuyvesant, his course work would have included pre-calculus and algebra-based physics, he said. At home, Gregory has replaced those classes with online courses in calculus-based physics and the highest level of Advanced Placement calculus. Gregory says the homeschooling curriculum is free and he expects to pay a total of about $570 in AP exam test costs.


To round things out, he added macroeconomics and U.S. government and politics, and he is also writing for the New York School Talk education blog.


His father said that seeing how messy things were between politicians and school and union officials during the summer of 2020 made it easier for him to grant his blessing.


“There was no better time to take the risk of homeschooling and see if my son was serious about his own education,” Mr. Wickham said.


Write to Lee Hawkins at lee.hawkins@wsj.com


Corrections & Amplifications

An earlier version of this article misspelled Stuyvesant High School as Stuveysant in one instance.


Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8


Appeared in the July 8, 2021, print edition as 'Teen Quit Stuyvesant to School Himself.'

Saturday, June 5, 2021

La Guardia High School, the "FAME" School, May Take Away AP Classes

 

While LaGuardia High School students crammed last week for Advanced Placement exams, school administrators
faced a high-stakes test of their own: selling wary parents on a plan to cut down on AP courses at the famed
arts school. 
(Barry Williams/for New York Daily News)

It is indeed sad to see that the 'woke' crowd believes in taking away the diverse menu of creative, artistic expression that makes La Guardia High School such a special place for talented youth. I am very happy that this terrible plan will not be in place anytime soon:

NYC’s LaGuardia H.S. backs off plan to reduce AP courses after parent backlash

The bad word is "talented". People whose children did not get a spot at La Guardia don't want to admit to themselves or others that their child is not as "talented" as another student the same age. I have a problem with this perspective which seems to be the driving force behind public policy right now, i.e. making all kids the same in order to do away with screening of any kind. All children - all people - are unique and each individual brings something new and different to the world. I don't believe in putting anyone into a box with a label on it. 

Proponents of an opposite view to "Woke Diversity" and/or critical race theory are ready to do war as parties in the current global trend toward political intolerance.  

The new "woke" thinking conjures up ideas focused on how everyone, whether black, brown, Asian, white, Muslim, Jew Christian, or other unique characteristic is equally "talented" and should get into any school just because all kids are "equal" in their ability to sing, dance, play an instrument and/or draw, think and/or act and if you disagree, then you are a racist or something along that line. I believe this perspective only encourages a judgment that denies a person's individuality, and I can already hear readers thinking "oh, she is just a right-wing, white conservative racist" for saying this. Baloney.

We all know this just is not true.

Maybe your child is excellent at astronomy, gymnastics, languages, computers, or is interested in law, medicine and biology, and has an opportunity to shine in a school that optimizes his/her interests in those areas?

Neither La Guardia nor the Specialized High Schools are proper learning environments for every child.

The answer to this "problem" that so many parents want these hard-to-get-into schools for their child(ren) is to create many more Stuyvesant and La Guardia High Schools in every borough so that all kids can reach their personal bests, whatever they may believe these goals are.

 Betsy Combier

betsy.combier@gmail.com

Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ blog
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

Plan to reduce Advanced Placement classes at NYC’s LaGuardia High School angers students, parents

By Michael Elsen-Rooney, NY Daily News, May 31, 2021

While LaGuardia High School students crammed last week for Advanced Placement exams, school administrators faced a high-stakes test of their own: selling wary parents on a plan to cut down on AP courses at the famed arts school.

In virtual town halls, officials sketched the outlines of a plan to reduce AP courses, while expanding other types of college-level classes, in an effort to give teachers more control over curriculum and cut down on stress for students.

The plan — which school officials cautioned is not yet finalized — angered some parents and students at the Upper West Side school near Lincoln Center who say it will dilute academic rigor and disadvantage kids in college admissions at a school known for a blend of top-notch arts and demanding classes.

“I just want to take more advanced and challenging courses because I haven’t felt academically challenged in my previous classes,” said one LaGuardia junior enrolled in AP classes who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

“It looks good on her record to take AP classes,“ added the LaGuardia junior’s mother, who also asked to withhold her name. “They’re going through this whole big change in the curriculum without really listening to how the parents, teachers and students feel.”
[More Education] NYC’s LaGuardia H.S. backs off plan to reduce AP courses after parent backlash »

LaGuardia officials insisted the plan would not dilute academic rigor — on the contrary, it would allow teachers to get more creative by removing the strict requirements that come with preparing for AP exams, which are designed by the nonprofit College Board and can earn students credit at some colleges if they score high enough.

“The College Board curriculum is limiting, and doesn’t allow for students to engage in a meaningful way with material,” Derek Dubossi, an 18-year-veteran science teacher at LaGuardia told parents at last week’s virtual town hall.

“Any time we encounter a topic that piques interest … we typically spend one day and move on,” he said. “If the College Board’s mandates are no longer a factor, it would allow the AP Environmental Science course to change in a positive way while still covering some very important material.”

On the one hand, the debate is another chapter in a years-long tug of war at LaGuardia — the basis of the show and movie “Fame” — between focusing on nurturing budding artists and preparing elite students.

Many families felt the school’s previous principal, Lisa Mars — who built up an arsenal of more than 20 AP courses — prized hard-charging academics at the expense of the arts.

Her successor, Yeou-Jey Vasconcelos, took over in 2019 with a promise to support the arts and re-evaluate the curriculum — a process that culminated in last week’s recommendations.

The clash over APs at LaGuardia also reflects a growing debate citywide over the value of the courses in a system that has aggressively expanded them in recent years.

More than 400 city high schools serving over 200,000 students offer at least one AP class, and Mayor de Blasio considers the growth of AP classes a signature component of his education equity agenda.

But the expansion has also drawn criticism from some educators who say the College Board-directed classes bring too many restrictions and questionable benefits.

“We erroneously assume that AP represents the highest level of education in this country,” said Pat Sprinkle, a history teacher at the NYC Lab School for Collaborative Studies in Chelsea. “But what does that mean? How rich are those courses?”

The Lab School is moving to phase out AP classes over several years, after previously requiring them for juniors and seniors.

“We’re transitioning into our own uniquely designed courses,” said Sprinkle. “We don’t believe that a high-stakes exam is the learning environment in which students thrive. Let’s de-emphasize stress, de-emphasize tests, and let students enjoy their learning.”

A wave of elite private schools in Washington, D.C., made a similar decision to drop AP classes in 2018.

A College Board spokesman defended the value of the courses, arguing “no other advanced academic program has achieved the reach and diversity of AP” and pointing to company research suggesting even the lowest scores on AP exams help predict college success.

It’s not just the fast pace and high pressure of AP courses that have alienated some city educators.

Critics say the College Board has been slow to diversify its materials, even as the DOE ramps up its efforts to make school curriculum more culturally relevant.

There is no full AP class dedicated to African-American studies, though College Board officials say there’s one in the works, and there’s an AP “seminar” focused on the African diaspora.

One DOE central staffer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, pointed out that the AP Comparative Government restricts study to six countries. If teachers had more control, they could allow “students to select which countries they study, like where their parents are from ... that would be more culturally relevant.”

College Board spokesman Zach Goldberg vehemently disputed those characterizations, citing  Advanced Placement Program’s long-term commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.”

Goldberg noted that schools can add their own countries to the Comparative Government curriculum.

Some city educators’ frustrations with the College Board and the demands of AP courses intensified during the pandemic.

Educators and DOE officials sharply criticized a College Board rule that barred city students from using their iPads to take digital exams, despite the fact that the city DOE distributed nearly 500,000 of the tablets to tech-strapped families. The College Board said it gave out 3,000 Chromebooks to city students who needed laptops.

Some teachers and administrators also worried the demands of the tests needlessly ratcheted up pressure on students during an already challenging year. LaGuardia went as far as encouraging students to opt-out of the exams.

“We examined the value of high-stakes Advanced Placement (AP) examinations versus the prospect of putting additional stressors on our students ... as well as increasing the equity divide in our school community,” school officials told families in a January presentation obtained by the Daily News.

“We concluded that AP exams are NOT compatible with our community values during a global health crisis ... LaGuardia strongly recommends students do not take AP examinations this year,” the presentation explained.

Many LaGuardia families bristled at that guidance — and the larger plan to reduce the role of APs in the school curriculum.

“I don’t think it’s fair that the school promised this academic rigor and all of these APs when we looked at the school, and now it just feels like a bait and switch,” said Laura Beth Gilman, the mother of two LaGuardia students.

Gilman said her son has benefited from LaGuardia’s AP courses, and her older child was able to graduate college early in part because of credits he accrued through AP tests.

LaGuardia officials say they’ll replace axed classes with programs like “College Now” that can earn students credit at CUNY and some SUNY campuses, but Gilman said that doesn’t match the wider range of colleges that accept AP credits.

Students can still take AP exams in subjects where the school no longer offers a corresponding AP course, school officials say — and insist colleges won’t penalize students for curriculum changes over which they have no control.

DOE spokesman Nathaniel Styer said “providing rigorous, enriching instruction and learning experiences is the focus at all of our high schools, including LaGuardia, and the school is engaging with staff and families as they finalize their course offering catalog for next school year.”

City officials said they didn’t see evidence of a “significant decline in AP course enrollment” next year based on a survey of roughly 100 schools.

Some students are still conflicted.

Marlen Mendieta-Camaron, an 18-year-old senior at Midwood High School in Brooklyn who’s taken both College Now and AP classes, said there are pros and cons to each approach.

“There is much more flexibility to a College Now course,” she said, while “an AP course obviously has its rigor, and it’s just very high level ... it’s what colleges want.”

“I do question sometimes if it [AP] is more about memorization ... in contrast to a College Now course where I think it’s more so about applying it to the real world,” Marlen said.

“I think the beauty of having options — AP and College Now — is you have the possibility of exploring your interests,” she added.