Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community
Showing posts with label The Who Are You Kidding Award. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Who Are You Kidding Award. Show all posts

Monday, April 4, 2022

NY POST's Karol Markowicz: End The Toddler Mandate

 

School staff and parents have spoken out against the mask mandates for the city’s youngest students.
(Kevin C. Downs for The New York Post)

Advocatz applauds the NY POST for supporting parents on the issue of masking 2-4 year olds. The policy is absurd, considering that all the Mayor is doing is showing his ego. Mayor Eric Adams was just elected a few months ago but wants everyone to see how everyone must do as he says because he's the BOSS. 

This makes no sense in a democratic society and even in a city where parents have no voice at all (we are under Mayoral control). I have heard from my sources in the pre-k classrooms that toddlers are not being forced to comply. Well, what do you say to that, Mayor Adams? Are you going to tell your friend Chancellor Banks to implement suspensions for these 2-4 year olds? 

Of course not. Are you going to send each teacher of a toddler who takes off his/her mask to a rubber room and then charge them with insubordination at a 3020-a? Possibly, in today's random disciplinary procedure mess.

See my previous post:

The "Who Are You Kidding Award" Goes To Mayor Eric Adams



Enough: New Yorkers must demand an end to Adams’ toddler mask mandate

New York has done it again. The city has managed to find the most useless, but harmful, policy possible to impose on the safest segment of the population.

On Friday, Mayor Eric Adams and his health commissioner, Ashwin Vasan, announced that children aged 2 to 4 will have to remain masked in day-care and pre-school settings. No other age group is forced to mask similarly.



On Nov. 7, 2021, I tweeted, “It would be something if the last people masked were toddlers. It would be the icing on the whole mismanaged pandemic cake.”

People pass it around as if I were prescient. But the reality is that I had seen bad health-care policy up close in New York, where the thing that made the least amount of sense in fighting COVID was what we did.

Masks for the 3-foot walk from the maĆ®tre d’ stand to the table? That’s us!

Closing (only public) schools on the teachers’ union say-so when the city hit a ridiculous 3% of positive tests, which meant that 97 healthy people tested negative for every 100 instead of the 98 of the previous day? Us again.

A vaccine mandate for a virus that spreads despite vaccination, with a special carve-out for visiting athletes and performers but not those who live here? Building indoor shacks on the sidewalk so restaurants can call it “outdoor dining”? Canceling outdoor events like New Year’s Eve in Times Square? Masking kids at public schools outdoors into winter 2022? That’s so New York.

Announcing the continuation of masking toddlers, something no other Western country did at any point in the pandemic, Vasan said, “We want to keep an eye on this latest uptick to ensure that our youngest New Yorkers remain safe, as we see an increase in cases due to the more infectious BA.2 subvariant. As we know in the past, cases and hospitalizations have risen in this vulnerable age group, in line with wider community spread, usually lagging by a couple of weeks.”

This is, simply, a lie. New York City’s “alert level” is green, “low.” COVID hospitalizations for kids under 18 are 0.5 per 100,000 and have been for months.

Meanwhile, the over-70 set is at 4.7 per 100,000, and they can traipse around the city maskless licking lampposts and snogging strangers. If it sounds like it doesn’t make sense, that’s because it doesn’t and never has. 

The commissioner absolutely knows it’s a lie. Two days earlier, he tweeted a chart showing kids under 5 with the city’s lowest case rates.

The worst part is that city attorneys responded to a lawsuit challenging the toddler mask mandate by arguing that as of April 4, “the petitioners’ children will no longer be required to wear masks in child-care settings,” so there was no danger of “immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damages.” Liars.

The judge struck down the mandate Friday — and Adams immediately said he planned to appeal.

Michael Chessa, the parents’ attorney, told me, “These mandates are anti-science, anti-child, anti-parent and, according to last week’s court decision, against the law. Each day that goes by where Mayor Adams keeps these mandates in place is a stain on his legacy.” (Ed.:In a tweet, Chessa wrote:

"Not only did he [Adams] go back on his word, he had lawyers argue "irreparable harm" to NYC if the mandate wasn't in place.")

In life, there are trade-offs. If the argument went, “Kids will mask, and we will risk them having speech and cognitive delays, because they are uniquely at risk from COVID and this is how we protect them,” that might be understandable.

Instead, toddlers will mask, they will risk speech and cognitive delays, and it will offer absolutely no protection from COVID.

Even if masks worked for the older set, which has never been proven by a study with a control group, the under-5s could never wear them correctly. This demographic is also not prioritized for vaccination because they simply don’t need it.

COVID has largely spared children. Vasan’s own data show this. We’ve known this since the early days, and yet kids continue to be targeted with imbecilic policies that have harmed them a lot and protected them not at all.

Dr. Ashwin Vasan said the city has seen “an increase in cases due to the more infectious BA.2 subvariant.”
Gabriella Bass

Vasan added, “This afternoon, we’re asking for a bit more patience and a bit of grace.”

New Yorkers should simply say no. No more patience and certainly no more grace. The commissioner doesn’t deserve it. His policies make no scientific sense, and in a saner time New Yorkers would call for his firing.

Instead of listening to bad advice and masking only the segment of the population that has never needed it, the mayor must man up and take control of his city. He’s only been in office for a few months, but this idiotic policy suggests he’s adrift.

Right the course, Mayor Adams, or we will remember you alongside Mayor William O’Dwyer. Who is that? Exactly.

Twitter: @Karol

Sunday, April 3, 2022

The "Who Are You Kidding Award" Goes To Mayor Eric Adams

 


In 2002 I created the "Who Are You Kidding Award" for all politicians anywhere who say ridiculous things that are contrary to the truth (i.e. false, in my opinion). The first winner was Joel Klein, then Dennis Walcott and then Carmen Farina (twice!), Bill De Blasio, and the NYC Department of Education. Now, we are giving the Award to NYC Mayor Eric Adams.

Mayor Adams has made, in our opinion at Advocatz, at least two (if not hundreds of others) highly public decisions in the past few days that are irrational, political, and contrary to public policy and equity for all. Remember, he is paid by us, the citizens of this wonderful city (at least I live here, on the UES).

As I am in NYC, my 4 children all attended public schools and I am an advocate for parents and NYC Department of Education employees, I 'knew' Joel Klein, the Chancellor, and he 'knew' me, as an outspoken but always diplomatic person (at least I always try to remain professional). I and my dear late friend Polo Colon spoke to the PEP when Joel was there in 2007, and we continued to speak out against injustice at the NYC DOE for 10 years after that until Polo's death in 2017. I continued.

First, on March 24, 2022, Adams removed the Covid Mandate from performers and athletes, so Kyrie Irving could play basketball. This he did after 1400++ municipal workers were fired for not getting the COVID vaccine. He stated that those folk will not be re-hired any time soon, if ever.

Second mistake: on April 1, 2022, Adams got the Toddler Mask mandate re-instated a few hours after a Staten Island Judge ruled that this Mandate was arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. Adams said, "Every decision we make is with our children's health and safety in mind."

Not.

Parents in NYC do not want their little ones aged 2-4 to wear masks. Indeed, I have been told by several sources (thank you!!!) that these kids are not wearing their masks in class, anyway. No one is enforcing these little kids to keep their masks on, and there are no punishments for taking them off. Think about it. What happens when a 2-year old dares to challenge the mask mandate. Suspended? Told to sit in the hallway? not given lunch? Now that would make a great story! 

Even for this age group, mayor Adams had a mask policy, and parents sued to stop the practice. They won. See Goldenstein v New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Index No. 85057/2022. "The relief that I'm asking for in the lawsuit is not moot," attorney Michael Chessa told ABC News. 

On Friday,  Staten Island Supreme Court Justice Ralph Porzio rescinded the requirement for the toddlers with immediate effect, declaring in a ruling that it could no longer be enforced due to its “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable” nature:


But the NYC Law Department took offense at the ruling by Judge Porzio, and Appealed the Decision to the Appellate Division, Second Department, which immediately overturned Judge Porzio's Decision and re-instated the Toddler Mask Mandate.

So, this is why Eric Adams and his NYC Law Department wins the "Who Are You Kidding Award." Mayor Adams and his lawyers do not care what is best for the toddlers nor what their parents want. Who is he kidding? 

No one.



Mayor Adams prevails in court to keep NYC school mask rule for kids under 5
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS 
APR 01, 2022  9:10 PM








The city’s youngest children must continue to wear face masks in school after an Appellate Division judge stepped in late Friday to uphold Mayor Adams’ mandate on the controversial issue — for now.

The order signed by Brooklyn-based appeals judge Paul Wooten capped a confusing set of legal developments that unfolded earlier in the day on the school mask mandate for kids younger than 5.

First, Staten Island Supreme Court Justice Ralph Porzio rescinded the requirement for the toddlers with immediate effect, declaring in a ruling that it could no longer be enforced due to its “arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable” nature.

But Adams — who previously vowed to lift the mask rule for the youngsters next week barring a COVID-19 spike — immediately appealed Porzio’s ruling. Adams cited a recent uptick in infections in the city driven by the highly contagious BA.2 omicron subvariant of the virus.

“I will continue to say to parents: You should keep your mask on your children,” Adams told reporters in a briefing at City Hall.

Appeals Judge Wooten’s order trumps that of the Staten Island Judge, and allows Adams to keep the mandate in place temporarily as the case is litigated between the administration and a parent group opposed to masking young children. Wooten scheduled a hearing for April 11 on the matter.

“Every decision we make is with our children’s health and safety in mind,” Adams wrote on Twitter after Wooten issued the stay. “Children between 2 and 4 should continue to wear their masks in school and daycare come Monday.”

Staten Island judge strikes down NYC’s mask mandate for kids under five »

Adams initially hoped to scrap the mask mandate for kids under 5 this coming Monday — but the BA.2 variant of COVID has caused him and his health experts to reassess.

At a City Hall briefing earlier in the day, Health Commissioner Ashwin Vasan declined to give a new date for when the administration may again consider allowing the toddlers to go without masks, only saying that his team is “reassessing the data every single day.”

Adams’ move infuriated parents who have demanded for weeks that he roll back the toddler requirement.

“We have unvaxxed NBA superstars able to play unmasked at Barclays Center ... yet my 4-year-old has to wear a mask,” Queens resident Daniela Jampel said, referencing Adams’ controversial decision last week to exempt professional athletes and performers from the city’s coronavirus vaccine mandates.

Some studies have shown that kids under 5 are at risk of suffering socially and educationally from mandatory masking, while at the same time being at exceedingly low risk of developing severe symptoms if they catch COVID.

Abe Shampaner, the co-owner of the Learning Tree, a preschool in Queens, said he was dismayed by Adams’ decision to appeal Porzio’s ruling and questioned why the burden of mandatory masking should be placed on the city’s youngest residents.

“The kids are the least susceptible. Our concern is that they’re going to make them wear them indefinitely,” Shampaner said. “What is the point of the mask mandate (for toddlers) when you’re letting everyone go mask free?”

With coronavirus infections on the upswing, Adams and Vasan countered that it’s critical for kids under 5 to keep their masks on since federal regulators still haven’t cleared that age group to be vaccinated.

“We want to keep an eye on this latest uptick to ensure that our youngest New Yorkers remain safe as we see an increase in cases due to the more infectious BA.2 subvariant,” said Vasan, who warned that he expects cases “to continue to rise over the next few weeks.”

According to data from the State Health Department, the city’s average test positivity rate reached 2.01% on Thursday, far lower than where levels were during January’s omicron peak, but nonetheless an increase compared to just a few weeks ago.

Other parts of the state have fared way worse from BA.2.

The Central New York region’s average test positivity rate reached an alarming 9.35% on Thursday, the data show, and some public health experts are warning that the city should brace for the potential of a similar surge. Twelve people died from the virus statewide Thursday.

Declaring that it’s time to “prepare, not panic,” Adams said at City Hall that his administration will distribute 6.3 million free at-home tests at 2,500 locations across the city in the coming weeks.

He also took aim at Republicans in Congress for their reluctance to pass a $15 billion pandemic spending package aimed at ensuring adequate supplies of testing and vaccine across the U.S.

“The obstructionists in Washington, D.C., don’t really see how important this is,” Adams said.

Adams’ decision to keep the toddler mask mandate in place contrasts with his more laissez-faire attitude toward other public health precautions.

In early March, Adams scrapped the mask mandate for all school students older than 5. Around the same time, he rescinded the vaccine mandate for indoor activities like dining, drinking and exercising — opening the door for unvaccinated people to patronize bars, restaurants and gyms.

Last week, Adams also announced exemptions from the city’s private sector vaccine mandate for unvaccinated professional athletes and entertainers so that they can play sports and perform in the Big Apple again — a policy shift that drew intense backlash across the political spectrum.

Asked at Friday’s briefing how he justifies masking kids under 5 while letting unvaccinated athletes play sports, Adams demurred: “I listen to the advice of my doctors and this is what the doctors told me to do.”

City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who for months refrained from directly criticizing the mayor, was among the chorus of critics who blasted his sports-boosting exemption last week, saying that it sent the “wrong” message as cases spike.

On Friday, the speaker announced she had tested positive for COVID — and urged New Yorkers to remember that the pandemic is not over.

“We will eventually overcome this pandemic,” the speaker wrote in a statement, “but in the meantime, I encourage everyone to remain vigilant and continue to take the necessary precautions.”
The city’s youngest children must continue to wear face masks in school after an Appellate Division judge stepped in late Friday to uphold Mayor Adams’ mandate on the controversial issue — for now.

The order signed by Brooklyn-based appeals judge Paul Wooten capped a confusing set of legal developments that unfolded earlier in the day on the school mask mandate for kids younger than 5.

Sunday, October 10, 2021

A Question To The NYC Department of Education: Who Are You Kidding When You Deny Knowing How Many Students Are Attending School?

 NYC Mayor wins a "Who Are You Kidding Award" for 2021. Bill DeBlasio, as Mayor of the City of New York,  has control over the New York City Department of Education which is out of control. Ergo, Chancellors Richard Carranza and Meisha Porter win the Award along with Mayor De Blasio. 

I gave the Award to Eric Adams in 2022:

The "Who Are You Kidding Award" Goes To Mayor Eric Adams

UPDATE: We should include NYC Chancellor David Banks. We now give the Who Are You Kidding Award to him, Mayor Eric Adams - and everyone in the offices of power in NYC 2024.

Congratulations to all!

Betsy Combier, Editor of NYC Rubber Room Reporter and Founder of The Who Are You Kidding Award.

You can reach Betsy at: betsy@advocatz.com

Mayor Bill de Blasio gives a news conference outside Phyl's Academy, Wednesday, March 24, in the Brooklyn borough
of New York. 
(Mark Lennihan/AP)

The NYC DOE is not kidding. They REALLY mean that they do not want any bad data to be made public. This might make the NYC Department of Education look bad. I mean, look worse.

Here is what I think, courtesy of Rick Kick, Editor (you should buy this book!):


I have given the "Who Are You Kidding Award" to several Chancellors:

The "Who Are You Kidding??" Award Goes To: Joel Klein, New York City Board of Education Pretender

NYC Department of Education Wins the "Who Are You Kidding Award" After Losing Gifted and Talented Entry Exams


The 2016 "Who Are You Kidding Award" Goes to Carmen Farina (for the second time) and Mayor Bill de Blasio



Betsy Combier

President and Founder, ADVOCATZ
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS 
OCT 09, 2021  4:10 AM

The new academic year’s fourth week has just ended, yet America’s largest public school system still refuses to report the number of students in attendance. Preliminary numbers are promised at the end of the month, supposedly earlier than ever before, and that the public should be grateful for getting that much data that quickly.

Really?

Every weekday, the Department of Education delivers, and Mayor de Blasio boasts about the attendance rate — 87% on Thursday — without any numerator or denominator. Is that 87% of 1.1 million students, the pre-COVID tally? Is it 87% of last year’s 960,000, which included more than 600,000 fully remote learners? Or 87% of a much smaller number? The first week of school, the DOE told us it was too early because too many families were still settling in. While there may be some volatility, it’s been a month.

Meanwhile, only Wednesday did educrats reveal the number of kids whose parents have let them get COVID tests — a critical data piece of information, since a random 10% is swabbed weekly, with results triggering partial and full classroom closures. Of roughly a half-million elementary-age students, just 192,705 have signed forms — meaning we’re getting a very incomplete picture of COVID inside schools.

While we’re on the subject, last week came news that only about 300 medically vulnerable kiddos are getting at-home learning (there’s no remote option anymore, just limited at-home instruction for at-risk kids who qualify). That’s a tiny fraction of the 3,000-5,000 Schools Chancellor Meisha Porter expected. Why have these 300 been getting just an hour a day of instruction, far less than what remote learning provided last year? The DOE says it’s rolling out longer-day, small-group instruction for some of these youngsters. Why only now, and why can’t kids get one-on-one for more than an hour a day?

The City Council is mulling bills by Mark Treyger demanding the DOE publish basic indicators. If the mayor signs it, it won’t take effect for another 30 days. New Yorkers deserve the truth now. It’s embarrassing we even have to say this.

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Carmen Farina Wins the 2015 WHO ARE YOU KIDDING? Award as the "Best Talent" the World Has, To Run the NYC DOE

Carmen Farina
Carmen Farina and her "beautiful day" in the NYC blizzard
(Love the hat, Carmen!! -B)

Working For the NYC DOE is, for the chosen few, a very good job. You can do very little work, if any at all, and get paid a lot of money.

Below you can see how good it is at the NYC DOE for a select number of people, in terms of making high salaries.

I love the press contact's comment:

“It is essential that we maintain competitive salaries to attract the best talent to help run the nation’s largest school system,” spokeswoman Devora Kaye said.
Carmen Farina is the "best talent?"

Carmen Farina: The Problem With Her Being Chancellor of the NYC School System Is.......

So, I award the "WHO ARE YOU KIDDING AWARD" for 2015 to:

Carmen Farina.

Notice of the ceremony and press event to follow.

Past winners:
The Second "Who Are You Kidding Award" Goes To Dennis Walcott

The "Who Are You Kidding??" Award Goes To: Joel Klein, New York City Board of Education Pretender

Betsy Combier, Editor
President, ADVOCATZ

Chalkbeat:

How the Department of Education’s top salaries stack up

 
 
The Department of Education’s top earner is no surprise: Chancellor Carmen FariƱa, the longtime educator at the helm of the nation’s largest school system.
Newly released pay records show that two of FariƱa’s most trusted deputies are not far behind: Dorita Gibson, FariƱa’s second in command, and Corinne Rello-Anselmi, the deputy chancellor for special education, both make more than $200,000.
Gale Reeves
But the fourth highest paid employee may come as more of a surprise. Harlem Superintendent Gale Reeves, who oversees one of the city’s 32 local districts, is set to take home $204,000 — a salary that surpasses all other members of FariƱa’s executive leadership team, including four deputy chancellors, the department’s chief finance officer, and its top lawyer.
Unlike salaries for teachers and principals, the pay for education department managers is not determined by labor contracts. Chalkbeat obtained the salary information for the majority of staff that is working centrally to support the city school system. Here’s what we learned:
All together, managerial salaries totaled $168 million for 1,500 employees in May 2015. For context, that’s only about 1 percent of what the city spends on salaries for the 133,000 teachers, principals, guidance counselors, and custodians who work directly in schools, which totaled more than $13 billion in 2013. (An extended list of the top-earners is below.)
Some managers have retained high salaries even after their responsibilities have shrunk. Reeves is the highest-profile case: Her official job title, “regional instructional supervisor,” is a relic of the Bloomberg administration, which created that high-ranking position for people managing multiple districts. That title was eliminated in a later round of restructuring, and Reeves became the superintendent of only Harlem’s District 5, a job she’s held since.
Parents in the district have clashed with Reeves for years, and began airing their frustrations publicly in recent months. In August, the district’s parent council spent much of its meeting criticizing Reeves for keeping important information about their schools from them and hiring principals without input from parents or teachers, though a few speakers defended her. Reeves did not respond to multiple emails seeking comment.
FariƱa’s salary is still relatively low. FariƱa now earns $222,000, which is less than many other big-city school chiefs make. Los Angeles’ Ramon Cortines makes $300,000, and Boston’s Tommy Chang makes $257,000, for example.
Her salary is also less than the $250,000 former Chancellor Joel Klein made during the Bloomberg administration. (FariƱa also makes an extra $199,000 in a pension earned before coming out of retirement to serve as chancellor.)
One in five central employees from the Bloomberg administration left after de Blasio took office. Just under 300 of 1,500 nonunionized employees left the department between January 2014 and May 2015. That includes the high-profile departures of top Bloomberg deputies, but is a fuller picture of the churn that came as a result of the mayoral transition — and shows that four of five managers chose to stick around.
The department’s managers have received more than $8 million in raises since 2013, records show. There are now nine people who earn more than $200,000 a year, up from four in 2013, and 821 people who make $100,000, up from 614 in 2013.
Some of those raises came from a 4.5 percent boost that de Blasio gave to eligible managers across all city agencies earlier this year — the first increase in their base pay since 2009.
Other raises came with new responsibilities. The managers with the biggest salary increases since de Blasio took office are Elizabeth Rose, now the deputy chancellor for operations, whose pay rose from $116,550 to $187,000, and Sophia Pappas, who is head of the city’s pre-kindergarten programs and whose salary rose from $115,000 to $167,321.
Other high-ranking officials who saw big raises were Anna Commitante, who now oversees curriculum and teacher training and whose pay went from $166,000 to $191,000, and Ursulina Ramirez, the chancellor’s chief of staff, whose pay rose from $163,000 to $187,000.
Department officials said salaries are determined by a combination of factors, including seniority, previous salary, and education.
“It is essential that we maintain competitive salaries to attract the best talent to help run the nation’s largest school system,” spokeswoman Devora Kaye said.