Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community
Showing posts with label 3020-a arbitrators. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3020-a arbitrators. Show all posts

Saturday, April 9, 2016

The 3020-a Arbitration Newswire: Digging Up The Garbage on the Vouchers Paid To Arbitrators

Welcome to the new series I am starting on the garbage that I have seen at New York City's 3020-a hearings which I have spent 13 years studying and researching. I have a Google+ Community called the Rubber Room, I have this blog and "Inside the 3020-a Teacher's Trials", and my website Parentadvocates.org, all of which have posts dealing with educators who I have worked with, researched, or heard about.
ALERT: The posts under this headline are my opinion of the facts and people whom I have seen and heard before, during, and after a 3020-a compulsory arbitration known as Education Law Section 3020-a Just Cause/Termination hearings.
David Pakter, left, with NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani
Background:
Starting in 2003 I visited teachers in the Rubber Room at 25 Chapel Street after I met former teacher (at the High School for Art and Design) David Pakter when we were both asked to be on a Cable TV Show and he told me he was in the "Rubber Room".

I said, "WHAT IS A RUBBER ROOM"?

He described the room he was in as a long space with windows on one side and tables and chairs on both sides of the room with a walkway in the middle. He said that about 70-100 teachers were sitting there on a daily basis, after they were told that they were "re-assigned" from their classrooms and schools for some kind of misconduct, or unexplained horrible event that they supposedly caused. He told me he would sneak me in, and I agreed. I wanted to see what this was all about.

The long room on the 10th floor at 25 Chapel Street in Brooklyn had two doors, one at each end. The guards (yes, there were security guards) sat at one end of the room leaving the other door unguarded. In the very end of the room was the "office" where the "Principal" sat. So, David walked me in through the second door, and I immediately befriended the principal, who would look the other way when I came in to the room from the door next to his "office". I told him that I wanted to meet the now famous 'rubber roomers' to keep them company, and I am forever grateful for his permission to do that, despite the fact that my walking around was actually prohibited by those "in control". I have no idea who at the NYC Department of Education knew I was talking with the employees imprisoned in this room, but I do know that Randi Weingarten, the UFT Reps, and NYSUT knew I was visiting on a regular basis, because UFT Reps told me. I was not working in a full-time job, so whenever I had any time, I would go to the room, call someone from the lobby, and go in, unpaid by anyone.

I started sitting with the teachers and listening to their stories, however incomplete they were, on a weekly basis, and sometimes 2-3 times per week. No one could tell me exactly why they were there, only that they were waiting for an investigation to end, and then they would be put back into their school or ordered into a compulsory arbitration called "3020-a" after the Education Law Section 3020-a which is the Law upon which these hearings were based....at least that's what the UFT and NYSUT told these prisoners of whim. Whose whim? The Gotcha Squad.

Why do I call the Rubber Roomers "prisoners of whim"? Because you never know when or if you will be charged and with what deed of horror. Every teacher, no matter which school or school district you are teaching in, now looks behind his/her back as often as he/she can, because anyone can be a target. I attended David Pakter's hearing and started the 'open and public' hearings that now are common.

Then in 2007 I was hired by Randi Weingarten to be a UFT Special Representative overseeing all eight rubber room locations; see the blog FidgetyTeach and the post titled "If You Knew Betsy...".

 I still attend 3020-a, but now (since 2011) as the paralegal, rarely as a member of the public.

The Story of the 'GOTCHA SQUAD':


Randi Weingarten
I first heard the term "Gotcha Squad" from former UFT President (now AFT President) around 2006, when I assisted her in getting teacher whistleblowers to a City Council hearing on Whistleblower protection laws, but the title for all the NYC DOE administrators/officials/attorneys became a common word, according to my memory, after I was hired by Randi to be a Special Representative at the UFT for members in need. (August 2007)

One of my first important articles for my then-new blog, NYC Rubber Room Reporter (this blog) was, not surprisingly, "The Gotcha Squad and the NYC Rubber Rooms" (first posted in 2009), followed up by many posts on the Administrative Trials Unit, ("ATU") the Teacher Performance Unit ("TPU"), and the people who are involved in the business of terminating educators. All this is background for new readers to this blog.

3020-a arbitrators are paid, for most expenses, by New York State Education Department's Teacher Tenure Unit. But the NYC DOE seems to be outside of the control and authority of NY State, and has the right to hire arbitrators from out of state. For example, they fly in to NYC the worst arbitrator on the panel, Doyle O'Connor, from Chicago, and pay for his hotel, travel, and meals.
O'Connor has been sued in Federal Court twice.

Here is a sample of his billing for one 3020-a hearing:


The public (you and me, taxpayers), paid for O'Connor to be flown in from Chicago or Michigan. 
 Really? There is no person, lawyer, non-lawyer, arbitrator or mediator (an arbitrator does not have to be an attorney, and a Representative in New York State does not have to be a lawyer, either) in New York City who can be hired to do 3020-a? I guess not.

See here, for a few of the arbitrators who are now (O'Connell is not still on the panel, he was fired after a screaming fit at DOE Attorney Jordana Shenkman) or were (Joshua Javits, who lives in Washington D.C., quit the NYC panel in 2014). I filed a Freedom of Information request for all the vouchers submitted by NYC Arbitrators from 2013 to 2015:





NYC 3020-a hearings are under the control of the New York City Department of Education, namely Dennis DaCosta and Naeemah Lamont, two extremely nasty people who walk in hearing rooms whenever they hear something they dont like about an arbitrator from the DOE Attorney doing the hearing, or they feel they must threaten the Arbitrator into doing something. I recently spoke with an arbitrator who is no longer on the panel in NYC, and this person asked me whether Dennis Da Costa was still terrorizing everyone. I have seen this first hand, and it is frightening.

If you go to February 19, 2014 in the link here, you will see Naeemah Lamont dancing. I cannot find a picture of Dennis anywhere, but his letter to 37 DOE employees about a termination decision by Lana Flame is an outrageous example of Dennis' excessive arrogance. In the letter (see below) Da Costa told the 37 people on p. 2 that they all had to stop paying the teacher because Arbitrator Lana Flame terminated her on July 5 2013 - but he sent the letter May 28, 2013, a month and a half too early. I am lucky to have obtained a copy of this fraud. Lana Flame was fired.

 The problem in NYC is that the DOE and NYSUT agreed to set up a permanent panel. Why? For speed and control. Both parties want the charged employee in the "due process" hearing out and gone, as soon as possible. For this reason, many teachers and others charged find themselves initially convinced that the NYSUT attorney has his/her focus on a proper defense against the charges, but by the time the charged employee ("Respondent") starts presenting his/her case (after the DOE rests, or end presenting their case), NYSUT usually says "oh, you can't have any witnesses", or "I'm going to keep questions for you short, and I will do closing arguments the minute you finish the few questions which I have for you".

A good arbitrator allows three-four weeks after the end of testimony to allow both sides to read the transcripts of all the witnesses, but NYSUT gets away with quickie hearings. I do not do 3020-a hearings this way, but that will be clear in a later post. Shockingly, NYSUT shares the transcripts with the Respondent after the Arbitrator's decision is rendered, rather than in a timely fashion so that the Respondent can assist in finding errors and lies. All in the name of speed.

Reform is needed!

Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Betsy Combier Asks FOIL Officer Joe BaranelloTo Clarify the Fees of $29.95/hr For F11,129


I decided that I should clarify with Records Access Officer Joe Baranello exactly what I would pay for, and who I would be hiring, (at $29.95/hr) in order to obtain the secret rules handed out at the Plenary meeting for the DOE/NYSUT/UFT folk who represent members at 3020-a:

Joe Baranello
Dear Mr. Baranello,

I am responding to your email dated March 25, 2015 in which you stated I must pay $29.95 for the preparation of digital records above two hours that relate to my request in F11,129. See my post on my blog:

Betsy Combier Files a Freedom of Information Request to Obtain the Information Given Out At The NYC DOE February 24, 2015 Secret Meeting on 3020-a Hearings


You ask what the maximum amount is that I am willing to pay to the person you hire to prepare these records and for the storage media.

 I need more information in order to give you my response:

1. I need to know the number of records responsive to my request and the amount you charge to me for full access before I decide what I am willing to pay. 

2. I also need to know exactly what records you will charge me for - emails? agenda? invitees? This meeting included several groups, NYSUT/UFT, DOE, and Arbitrators , therefore this meeting was not only for Department of Education employees. What redactions are relevant to Public Officer's Law 87? Please be specific. I also understand that you can charge me 25 cents for each page - do you add the $29.95/hr to this, and where are you authorized within the Law to do this, if you charge the $29.95/hr in addition to the $.25/page?
 
3. I need to know who the person is who will be paid by me at $29.95/hour. Please give
me this person's full name, job title, and daily duties. I also need to know whether or not there is any person willing to do those same duties at $8/, or $9/hr, and whether you sought to find any such individual, and where you posted the job description.

4. In your demand that I pay for the cost of storage media, please describe exactly what you mean by this. What is the "storage media" that I have to pay for? Please give any and all details.

5. Please describe to me what costs are involved in reproducing records that are maintained electronically.  

6. Please tell me why I have to pay a person $29.95 to forward electronic documents via email to me, as you no doubt have people on staff who are already being paid to assist you in granting FOIL requests.

7. Please describe what "internal communications" you refer to, as the February 24, 2015 meeting was not a meeting of DOE employees, but also UFT, NYSUT, and arbitration panel members.

 Please take note that I am willing to pay for the records of the meeting held by your colleague Courtenaye Jackson-Chase at Tweed at 4PM of February 24, 2015 and that I intend on writing the Committee on Open Government to ask for an opinion. I advise you not to close this request, I am simply asking questions to clarify your very vague response.

 Please reply to this email in its entirety no later than 5PM on friday, April 17, 2015, so that I can receive all the documents/emails/powerpoint/video/presentations on or before April 22, 2015.

 Thank you for your prompt response.

 Sincerely,

Betsy Combier
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
 

Sunday, October 6, 2013

The Daily News, PR Media Employed By The Department of Education, Goes After Rubber Room Teachers Again

The Daily News works for the Department of Education, remember this as you read the latest attempt by the DOE to sway public opinion their way and have the public believe that each and every person charged with 3020-a deserves to be fired. There are no facts that they - the Department and the Daily News - can rely on, so they make it up.

What Mike Bloomberg, Dennis Walcott, the major newspapers (which receive advertising dollars from Bloomberg) and all their supporting staff do, is ignore Education Law Section 3020-a where a vote in an Executive Session to determine probable cause (Education Law 3020-a(2)(a)) is required, and give the rubber ball, probable cause, to anyone who wants to play with it.

No NYC case had this vote before the charges were served on the Respondent tenured employees in this article. This means that anyone who actually "found" probable cause can charge, testify against, and conclude, that an alleged  act of misconduct or pattern of incompetency is "true". Then, the conclusion is, the allegation becomes a fact. And, the Daily News takes the conclusions of the arbitrator as fact as well. How easy is that?

For this leap of faith (from fiction to fact, allegation to evidence) to occur, there has to be a strategy in place. He it is, in my opinion:

1. The UFT and NYSUT have to agree with a clear path and/or bridge from the original fiction/violation of law to conclusion/fact/evidence.

2. The arbitrator has to put aside his/her ethics and agree with the DOE that whatever they are alleging is true and all circumstances which do not fit in are irrelevant.

3. The arbitrator has to find the DOE witnesses, whatever their ages, "credible", over the tenured Respondent, who must be found "not credible". NYSUT then tells their clients, do not have any witnesses.

4. The arbitrator, who knows that if there was no vote in Executive Session, can make any penalty he or she wants, because there is no legal basis to proceed as the arbitrator without a proper determination of probable cause and he/she has already exceeded his/her authority to hear the case.

As we all now know, without the UFT in agreement with the harmful, unlawful process of determinating probable cause with no Executive Session, the DOE could never have gotten away with 12 years of baseless 3020-a hearings; NYSUT does not oppose violations of the law, rules, and contract, and therefore "permits" by omission the introduction of documents which allow an allegation to become a fact; many arbitrators consider themselves bound to find 7-year olds "credible" over a 25+ year tenured teacher, because then they stay on the panel and make their $1400/day; and as the hearing itself is founded upon Education Law 2590 and not 3020-a(2)(a), any penalty is ok, and all arbitrators are immune to prosecution.

But most arbitrators are attorneys and should be complained about to the NYC Bar Association if a decision  is contrary to the facts or violates attorney ethics. Same goes for the Gotcha Squad attorneys. Anyone charged and penalized wrongly may appeal to the Supreme Court in an Article 75.

So, Ben and Rachel, if you did your homework, you would not be able to write about how the Department needs to fire everyone brought to 3020-a. What should happen instead, is that someone should look at the actual facts, assess the case before it is brought to 3020-a, and find a suitable resolution before the public has to spend millions of dollars on this rubber room process with the probable cause rubber ball.

Betsy Combier
Advocatz
betsy.combier@gmail.com


NYC Mayor Mike Bloomberg

City will spend $29 million on salaries, benefits of educators it can’t fire

There are 326 teachers and school administrators who have been reassigned from the classroom yet still collecting pay, the Daily News has learned. These educators are accused of abusing kids, breaking rules or being lousy at their jobs — but a controversial firing process makes it hard to terminate bad employees, education officials say.


SUSAN WATTS/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

The teachers union, led by Michael Mulgrew (pictured), was sued by the city in September for allegedly impeding the 2010 agreement to speed up the firing process and get rid of rubber rooms.



LINK
The city will spend a whopping $29 million in 2013 on the salaries and benefits of outcast educators who are deemed too dangerous or incompetent to work in public school classrooms but cannot be immediately fired, the Daily News has learned.
As of Friday, there were 326 city educators who have been reassigned away from the classroom yet were still collecting pay, a sharp rise from 2012, when 218 ousted teachers drained $22 million from city coffers, Education Department records show.
The teachers and school administrators are accused of abusing kids, breaking rules or just being lousy educators. But they're still collecting salaries because of a controversial firing process that makes it too difficult to terminate bad employees, education officials charge.
Back in 2010, Mayor Bloomberg and the city teachers union agreed to eliminate the shameful "rubber rooms" that house these expensive educational pariahs, but critics say the only difference is that today the accused teachers are spread out in spare offices across the city instead of being herded together.
Education Department officials blame the union, and say that part of the problem is that the power to fire bad teachers is in the hands of jointly appointed hearing officers. Some of the hearing officers are just too lenient, officials say.

Teachers sent to this 'rubber room' read newspapers, draw pictures and chat in October 2007.

Of 72 educators whose firing hearings were completed in 2013, just 32 were canned. Instead of being fired, the rest received fines or suspensions.
Some of the educators who dodged the firing bullet in 2013 to return to jobs in city schools include:
*Stefan Hudson, a former dean at Westinghouse High School, who grabbed, pushed, shook and slammed a student into a table. A hearing officer fined him $10,000 and required him to complete an anger management seminar at his own expense.

MARK BONIFACIO/NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Head of the American Federation of Teachers , AFT President Randi Weingarten speaks to the Daily News Editorial Board. (Mark Bonifacio/New York Daily News)

*Shenequa Duke, a Bronx special education teacher at Intermediate School 25 who used a broom to hit a late-arriving student. Despite an "apparent lack of contrition," a hearing officer merely ordered her suspended for 45 days.
*Edgar Ortiz, a teacher at Bronx Public School 73, who was arrested for patronizing a prostitute in 2012. He reported back to school the following day without notifying his superiors of the arrest as required by city rules. The hearing officer found him "remorseful" and stuck him with $7,500 fine.
Education Department officials blame the union and lenient hearing officers for leaving too many bad apples on the city payroll.
"We've worked extraordinarily hard to remove either poor-performing or grossly inappropriate educators, but special interests to protect adults over children - aim to impede the process," said agency spokesman Devon Puglia.
In September, the city filed a suit against the teachers union, claiming it is impeding the 2010 agreement to speed the firing process and eliminate the rubber rooms. But a union spokesman said the hearing officers who have the power to fire teachers serve at the pleasure of the Education Department.
"The Department of Education can and does stop using any arbitrator with whose decisions it disagrees," said union spokesman Dick Riley. "The Department of Education also has the ability to appeal arbitrators' decisions to the courts."