Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community
Showing posts with label Scott Stringer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scott Stringer. Show all posts

Monday, July 19, 2021

NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer Finds NYC Education Department Errors Cost City + State $180 Million

 

New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer (Luiz C. Ribeiro/for New York Daily News)

$180 million could have helped many children with special needs. Is there no one in New York City who knows accounting and wants to work for the NYC Department of Education? Please, find someone who knows what to do with $37 Billion before all of that goes missing as well.

Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, Advocatz.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

NYC Education Department officials cost city, state $180M by not seeking federal aid for special services: comptroller audit
By , NY DAILY NEWS, July 18, 2021

Poor management by city government deprived programs for New York schoolchildren hundreds of millions of dollars in federal aid, an audit by city Comptroller Scott Stringer found.

The shortfall came because Department of Education officials didn’t submit all the paperwork to secure more than $155 million in reimbursement for some speech, occupational and physical therapy sessions, Stringer’s auditors found.

The Education Department missed out on at least another $25 million by never requesting reimbursement for other services, the auditors say.

Half of the roughly $180 million city Education Department officials left on the table would have gone to the state under federal rules, with the remaining $90 million flowing to the city coffers, auditors said.

“This is money that could be in our classrooms supporting our children when they need it most,” said Stringer in a statement. “This mismanagement is unacceptable, and the DOE must improve its process to capture every last dollar eligible for reimbursement.”

DOE officials vigorously disputed Stringer’s findings.

The officials say Stringer overstated the amount of federal money the city would have obtained by including the 50% that would have gone to state government. Department of Education Chief Administrative Officer Lauren Siciliano said Stringer is holding the department to a standard that is “neither fair nor reasonable.”

Stringer’s office argued that since DOE is responsible for submitting all the reimbursement claims, it was appropriate to note the total amount the agency missed out on recouping, even if half of it would have gone to the state.

To claim money for special education services from Medicaid — the federal insurance program that covers medical costs for low-income people — school districts must compile reams of paperwork, including doctor referrals, evidence that therapists are licensed, consent from families to apply for reimbursement, and notes documenting therapy sessions.

Auditors said the DOE conducted roughly 6.8 million individual therapy sessions during the 2018-19 school year for which it could’ve claimed reimbursement.

But the Education Department was missing at least one element of the necessary paperwork for about 1.6 million of those therapy sessions, depriving the agency of up to $155 million in potential reimbursements, auditors said.
The most common piece of missing documentation was a referral from a doctor, auditors found.

The DOE has a team of in-house doctors that writes referrals for occupational and physical therapy, and agency officials said they try to deploy those doctors based on need. Stringer’s auditors advised the DOE to hire more doctors.

Stringer’s auditors found other holes in the DOE’s procedures.

In roughly one-fourth of the cases the auditors analyzed, the DOE failed to submit evidence that the provider had an appropriate license to claim federal reimbursement. The comptroller’s office recommended a “comprehensive review” to determine which therapists need to obtain or update their credentials.

Scores of disabled students in private schools also receive DOE-funded therapy that is eligible for federal reimbursement — but the city does not always make sure the private schools provide the paperwork needed for the city to get federal reimbursement, the auditors found.

Stringer’s auditors said city education officials need to strictly enforce the expectation that private schools create their own referrals from doctors.
Another problem, Stringer’s auditors found, was a shortfall in the consent forms collected from students’ families.

A DOE spokeswoman countered that claim, saying the agency collects consent from 85% of families, “one of the best collection rates in the country on a form that is voluntary for families to complete and return.”

In one pointed back-and-forth, auditors dinged DOE officials for failing to take advantage of a Medicaid program that reimburses districts for psychological counseling.

The DOE frequently provides students therapy that meets the Medicaid definition for “psychological counseling” — but fails to classify the sessions as such on students’ Individual Education Plans, auditors said.

The department says many of those counseling sessions are not eligible for federal reimbursement, and that changing recommendations on students’ IEPs would amount to “focus[ing] on revenue rather than the student’s needs.”.

But Stringer’s report says that’s “patently untrue,” and that the oversight cost the city up to $2.4 million in federal money during the 2018-19 school year.

The DOE has long struggled with Medicaid reimbursement. Stringer’s office found in 2014 the DOE lost out on $356 million in unclaimed funds over the course of three years.

The agency ramped up its efforts in 2013, and Medicaid reimbursement revenues shot up from roughly $18 million in 2016 to $97 million in 2019, before falling some during the pandemic, the report found.

The Education Department now has an office dedicated to overseeing Medicaid reimbursement requests, though it employs only five people, according to the audit.

DOE officials argued that recouping every possible dollar of Medicaid reimbursement likely would require big spending outlays on new systems and staff.

“We reject this audit’s suggestions that prioritize bureaucratic procedures over New York City families,” said Education Department spokeswoman Katie O’Hanlon. “We have already implemented many of this report’s recommendations and will continue to work towards maximizing all reimbursements as appropriate, but not ahead of the needs of students.”

Tuesday, July 6, 2021

NYC Comptroller Scott Stringer Sues Mayor de Blasio For Overriding City Procurement Practices in Violation of City Charter

 

New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer (left) and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (right) (David Wexler for
 New York Daily News / Jefferson Siegel/New York Daily News)

Ok, here we go.

How many other cities in the US can watch their City government unravel at the demand of the City Comptroller?

 Betsy Combier

betsy.combier@gmail.com

Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ blog
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials


NYC Comptroller Stringer sues Mayor de Blasio over COVID contracting practices, cites ‘alarming’ findings

by Michael Gartland, Daily News, July 6, 2021

City Comptroller Scott Stringer is suing Mayor de Blasio for extending the use of emergency COVID-era procurement practices that have allowed the mayor to forego scrutiny in order to push through city contracts — a move Stringer says has led to a fundamental lack of transparency.

On March 17, 2020, during the height of the COVID pandemic, de Blasio signed an executive order giving himself the power to override some city procurement guidelines, in effect suspending Stringer’s oversight authority over some contracts.

The practice has allowed de Blasio and his administration to push through contracts without Stringer looking over their shoulder, a power afforded to the comptroller through the city charter.

Stringer, who recently conceded defeat in his run for mayor, has complained about de Blasio’s use of emergency procurement powers periodically during the pandemic, but on Tuesday took the more drastic step of filing a lawsuit in state Supreme Court demanding that Hizzoner stop bypassing his oversight now that the city and state have ended many of the restrictions associated with COVID.

“The action of this executive order is a flagrant violation of the charter and an insult to the fundamentals of good government, and that’s why we’re going to court,” Stringer said Tuesday at a press conference just steps from City Hall. “We must re-establish the checks and balances that protect taxpayers.”

In court papers filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, Stringer’s legal team described the “prolonged suspension” of his powers as having “eviscerated the comptroller’s ability to provide checks and balances against misuse, mismanagement, waste and fraud in contracts.”

Stringer said he is suing to also get access to “full documentation for the more than 1,500 contracts” that the city registered “without transparency during the pandemic.”

“His rationale at the time was that the city just didn’t have time for accountability. And now, 15 months later, the city has entered into more than $6.9 billion in contracts without charter-mandated oversight,” Stringer said, referring to de Blasio. “My office has examined some of these contracts, and the findings are alarming.”

According to Stringer, millions have been spent on supplies that “never materialized,” ventilators that “were never delivered,” and protective N95 masks that were not actually N95s.

“Even though Gov. Cuomo has ended the New York State emergency and even though the mayor himself has revoked many of the pandemic-related executive orders, the mayor has extended these procurement emergency powers more than 100 times, including as recently as last week,” Stringer noted.

Team de Blasio said the suspension of Stringer’s power was justified, though, and chalked the lawsuit up to Stringer seeking attention after his disappointing City Hall run.

“During the greatest challenge our city has ever faced, emergency procurements have saved lives, period,” de Blasio spokesman Bill Neidhardt said. “The comptroller is clearly trying to use this lawsuit to keep himself in the headlines after his failed mayoral bid.”

Stringer said the lawsuit isn’t really about him or de Blasio, though — that it’s about leaving a clearer financial picture for the next mayor and comptroller, both of whom will be sworn in next January.

“I’ll be damned if we’re going to walk out on December 31st with $7 billion truly unaccounted for,” he said. “That’s why we’re here today. This is not a place where I want to be. I want to be able to continue to do my work — not end up in Supreme Court.”

Saturday, July 22, 2017

NYC Comptroller Cites The NYC Department of Education For Not Accounting For Thousands of Missing Computers, Tablets and Laptops


I would add to the quote above: "...or for stealing public property."

If public funds have paid for 50 computers to be given to your school, who is to point the finger at you, the principal/AP if you take one home? No one. I am not saying that all principals have thought about doing this, but I am saying that there are principals who have taken public property for themselves, or others.

See Stuart Possner's case. and,

Five NYC Department of Education Former and Current DOE Network Leaders Exposed For Violating P-Card Rules

There are many more.

On Thursday July 20, 2017 City Councilman Ruben Wills was convicted of public corruption:
City Councilman Convicted of Stealing Thousands in Public Funds
I wonder how MS226 Principal Rushell White feels about that.

MS 226 Principal Rushell White Key Words: Checks From Ruben Wills


Did Rushell White get the $750 handbag made by Louis Vuitton? People I spoke to at MS 226 say yes, she did.

Or, if a member of your staff asks where a missing computer (or two or three) may be, you, as the principal can charge him/her with taking it, and if this person doesn't have tenure, he/she can be discontinued immediately following the 60-day notice; or, if this person has tenure, then it is time for a 3020-a, with other charges padding the list of Specifications to make sure the person is terminated.

So you, principal/AP/favored staff member dont have to worry about anything. Just enjoy your spanking new computer.

Parents and non-staff members are also sometimes on the take:
Stuyvesant High School Parents' Association is Cited For Financial Fraud and Discrimination

or in danger because they say something:
Booker T. Washington Middle School 54, Grievance Brings Retaliation

How many teachers have been told suddenly that they are re-assigned, and must leave the building, leaving all their stuff accumulated over many years, in their classrooms, never to be seen again. Sometimes the property of the re-assigned gets put into a room where staff can go through the items and take what they want.

If this happens, go to the police, make a complaint. Pronto. Then tell the Principal you need your stuff, and go to the UFT and tell them .

Betsy Combier
 betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

Scott Stringer
In a sample of just nine locations, DOE failed to account for almost 35 percent of machines
Over 1,800 computers, tablets, and other technology were missing from sampled schools
(New York, NY) – A new Comptroller Stringer investigation has found the New York City Department of Education is missing more than 1,800 computers, laptops, and tablets, while more than 3,500 were not properly accounted for. In a sample of just eight schools and one agency office, the Comptroller found 35 percent of approximately 14,000 machines were not properly accounted for.
The follow-up audit released today comes two and a half years after a December 2014 audit by Comptroller Stringer that highlighted how the DOE could not locate 1,817 computers and identified another nearly 400 laptops and tablets that were sitting in storage, unopened and unused.
The Comptroller’s new investigation today revealed that the DOE has made no real progress in managing its technology inventory in the years since. Auditors found:
  • An additional 1,816 laptops, computers, and tablets are now missing—from just nine DOE locations audited;
  • 3,541 devices that were or should have been at those nine locations were not listed in DOE’s inventory — increasing the risk that DOE equipment can be stolen undetected; and
  • The DOE continues to maintain the same decentralized inventory records for its technology equipment that were found inaccurate two and a half years ago and remain so.
“I’m calling on the DOE to do a top-to-bottom review of all of its computers, laptops, and monitors. When we should be preparing our kids for the great age of technology, when coding is changing the world, the DOE is losing and misplacing its tech equipment. This isn’t just a massive mess – it’s wrong. When laptops and tablets go missing, or are stored in closets gathering dust, children and teachers are let down. The ineptitude by the bureaucracy is resulting in wasted resources, and it undermines our ability to prepare our children for the future,” New York City Comptroller Scott M. Stringer said. “The DOE has known about these problems since we audited this very issue over two years ago – and the agency has made no real progress in addressing them. We constantly hear the same excuses from the agency – that monitoring is in place, that systems are functioning the way they should, and that the public should trust that everything is fine. As this audit once again shows, taxpayer dollars are exposed to waste, fraud, or abuse – and it’s coming at our kids’ expense. This has to change.”
Between July 2014 and March 2016, the DOE entered into $209.9 million worth of contracts for computers, laptops, monitors, and tablets with Apple, Lenovo, and CDW Government, LLC. The items purchased through these three contracts included:
  • Desktops computers that cost between $332 and $2,290;
  • Laptops that cost between $167 and $2,339;
  • Tablets that cost between $251 and $900; and
  • Computer monitors that cost between $94 and $452.
Comptroller Stringer’s December 2014 audit found that the DOE was unable to properly manage its technology hardware due in large part to its decentralized inventory system. Today’s follow-up audit found that those failures have continued.
Currently, more than 2,000 individual “site administrators” across the school system are responsible for maintaining and updating their own computer inventories, which are never reconciled with the DOE’s central purchasing database or its Asset Management System (AMS). As a result, the DOE has no way of knowing whether all of the items it purchased are properly accounted for at school locations. These systemic failures expose the City to an increased risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.
In the earlier audit, the Comptroller recommended the DOE establish a centralized inventory system — possibly through the existing AMS database, which already contains information on hardware purchased by the DOE. Today’s follow-up audit showed the results of DOE’s rejection of that and other recommendations — still more missing and unused equipment — and revealed that the DOE had not even tried to find 1,090 of the 1,817 computers that were identified as missing in the December 2014 audit.
Findings from the follow-up audit include:
The DOE’s records remain inaccurate and incomplete
The DOE failed to properly account for 4,993 of its 14,329 pieces of computer hardware — or 34.9 percent of the total — at the nine sampled sites. Of those 4,993 items:
  • Auditors looked for — but DOE was unable to produce — 1,816 pieces of computer hardware during physical inspections; and
  • Auditors found that 3,541 pieces of computer hardware were not listed in the locations’ inventory records.
No centralized system for monitoring inventory
The previous audit recommended that the DOE revise its Standard Operating Procedures to record all computer hardware purchases in AMS and ensure that annual inventory counts are conducted and reconciled with the information in AMS. Yet, the DOE continues to refuse to implement that recommendation, citing costs, despite the potential for fraud and wasteful spending.
The DOE did not monitor recordkeeping procedures at schools and administrative sites
DOE fails to ensure that its inventory records are accurate and complete. The Department’s unmonitored, decentralized inventory system — in which site administrators from each of DOE’s 2,278 sites are responsible for maintaining and updating inventory records — are never checked against central databases of purchases. This puts computer hardware at a higher risk of being lost, stolen, and wasted.
The DOE accounted for only 12.9% of the items that were previously identified as missing
In today’s audit, the DOE accounted for only 234 of the 1,817 missing pieces of computer hardware identified in the previous audit — or 12.9 percent. The findings are broken down below.
  • The DOE reported that it did not attempt to locate 1,090 computer items, most of which were listed in AMS as “location unknown.”
  • Of the remaining 727 pieces of missing hardware identified in the 2014 audit, the DOE reported that it had located 353 items at eight sites.
  • However, when the Comptroller’s office attempted to inspect 188 of those items at two of the sites, DOE could account for only 69 of them, or 36.7 percent.
    • The DOE claimed it had identified 162 of the missing items at the sampled DOE administrative office, but when auditors visited, they only found 69 of them.
    • Although the DOE claimed that 26 pieces of computer hardware were located at a single school, the DOE did not provide the auditors with access to that school to verify their claims.
The DOE did not provide schools and other decentralized sites with sufficient guidance and support to ensure compliance with its inventory guidelines
During interviews with DOE staff at nine sampled sites, auditors were told that they were not aware of — and did not receive access to — inventory training, AMS data, and other vendor inventory services, all of which should have been in place to help properly track computer equipment.
To address the issues that were identified in the earlier audit and the persistent problems uncovered in the follow-up audit, the Comptroller’s office issued 19 recommendations, emphasizing the need for the DOE to establish a single centralized system for monitoring its hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of  computer hardware.


New York Schools Faulted Again for Failing to Keep Track of Computers

Three years ago, an audit by the New York City comptroller’s office found that because of “grossly inaccurate” record-keeping, the city’s Education Department could not account for 1,817 computers it owned.

On Wednesday, Scott M. Stringer, the comptroller, issued a follow-up audit and said things had not improved. Mr. Stringer rebuked the department for its “ineptitude” in keeping track of computers and tablets it had bought for schools and offices.

The recommendations the comptroller’s office made in 2014 included creating a centralized inventory system for computers and tablets and routinely monitoring record-keeping procedures at schools and department offices to ensure that their inventories were accurate. Neither recommendation was adopted. The department said maintaining a centralized inventory was not practical.

For the latest audit, the comptroller’s office examined the computer inventory at eight schools and one administrative office. The comptroller’s office found that 4,993 out of 14,329 pieces of computer hardware at those locations were not properly accounted for, and that 1,816 pieces were not found by the auditors at all. At Fort Hamilton High School in Brooklyn, for example, more than one in five pieces of computer hardware listed in purchasing records, school inventory records and other city documents were not physically accounted for.

As for the 1,817 computers that were unaccounted for in the earlier audit, the comptroller’s office said the department had accounted for 234, or 13 percent.

“We constantly hear the same excuses from the agency — that monitoring is in place, that systems are functioning the way they should and that the public should trust that everything is fine,” Mr. Stringer said in a statement. “As this audit once again shows, taxpayer dollars are exposed to waste, fraud or abuse — and it’s coming at our kids’ expense.”

The Education Department criticized the new audit, saying its findings were “fundamentally flawed and unreliable.” The department faulted the comptroller’s office for relying on the department’s Asset Management System, which is primarily used to track hardware warranty and service data, as a central inventory of hardware that had been bought.

The comptroller’s office noted that the department had instructed schools to use data from the Asset Management System as a basis for creating and updating their own inventory records.

The new audit covered the two years from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016. The department bought more than $200 million worth of computers and tablets during that period.

Nearly 2,000 technology devices for students are missing

Sunday, August 14, 2016

NYC DOE Lost $Millions in Federal Medicaid Funds For Special Education. Fire Carmen Farina. Now.

From 1996 when I started in the public schools of NYC with my oldest daughter who had an IEP, I have studied the abominable actions of the NYC DOE as it denies special education services to children who need these services to succeed. I became a parent advocate and do Impartial Hearings to undo this damage for all parents.

Then while working for the UFT 2007-10 and after, I have seen the abominable actions taken by the NYC DOE to silence special education teachers, paras, and other employees when they ask the question: "Where's the money?" If the employee is not tenured, he/she gets discontinued for some made up reason. If the employee has tenure, he/she gets charged with 3020-a and the DOE makes up reasons to fire him/her.

Below is a post on the newest scream coming from Scott Stringer about the loss of Federal Medicaid funds. He has been in the know about this for at least 14 years, and all I can see that he has done about it is get his name in the papers, possibly to set up a run for Mayor.

Someone, do something, dont just talk about it.

Start with firing Carmen Farina.

Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, The NYC Public Voice
Carmen Farina, NYC DOE Chancellor
Below is the latest article re-posted here from my website Parentadvocates.org
NYC Failed To Secure Hundreds of Millions of Federal Medicaid Funds For Special Education
The New York City Department of Education (DOE) failed to recoup $356 million in federal Medicaid funds for special education services between FY12 and FY14 and is projected to lose out on $310 million more in reimbursement through FY18, Comptroller Scott M. Stringer revealed in a new analysis released today. "This is not new news. We have heard about the NYC DOE doing the same thing for almost 3 years. When will this change? NYC Chancellor Carmen Farina must be fired." writes Betsy Combier, Editor           
http://www.parentadvocates.org/graphics/spacer.gif
http://www.parentadvocates.org/graphics/spacer.gif
   

   
http://www.parentadvocates.org/graphics/spacer.gif
Scott Stringer
The failures of the NYC Department of Education in the area of special education are appalling, not only in terms of getting Federal Medicaid funds, but in getting children their special services and in keeping the licensed special education teachers in the classroom. This is not new news. We have heard about the NYC DOE doing the same thing for more than 3 years. When will this change?

See my posts in 2004:
NYC UFT Gives an Overview of the 'Special Education Mess'

A Question For Carmen Farina, NYC Chancellor: Where is the Money?

Special Education in New York City Does Not Exist; Ed Officials Mislead the Public and Discard the Kids
(2004)

New York City Ed Department Cited by Audit as Defrauding Federal Government
(2005)

Get the picture? And Chancellor Carmen Farina was Deputy Chancellor during the Bloomberg/Klein years, until she was forced out

Chancellor Carmen Farina must be fired.

Betsy Combier, Editor


COMPTROLLER SCOTT M. STRINGER FINDS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FAILED TO SECURE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF FEDERAL MEDICAID FUNDS FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION

NEW YORK, NY – The New York City Department of Education (DOE) failed to recoup $356 million in federal Medicaid funds for special education services between FY12 and FY14 and is projected to lose out on $310 million more in reimbursement through FY18,Comptroller Scott M. Stringer revealed in a new analysis released today.

“The Department of Education’s ineffectiveness in claiming Medicaid reimbursements for special education has resulted in millions of dollars being ‘left on the table’, forcing City taxpayers to pick up the tab,” Comptroller Stringer said. “To put this in perspective, the funds we’ve missed out on in the past two years are more than the entire UPK budget for FY15. It’s time for DOE to come up with a real plan to secure our federal reimbursement for mandated services that support our most vulnerable students.”

The Comptroller’s analysis shows a steep decline in DOE Medicaid reimbursements beginning in FY06, when it realized $17 million in reimbursements compared to an average of $110 million in the previous ten years. The drop in reimbursement can be attributed to new processes put in place after a series of federal audits determined the City and State had received over $1 billion in Medicaid funds from claims that should have been “disallowed.”

In July 2009, the Department of JusticeOffice of the Inspector GeneralCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services and New York State reached a settlement in which the State agreed to return $539.75 million to the federal government, $100 million of which would be paid back by New York City. Since the settlement, New York State has made its own claiming rules for school districts more restrictive as a way to avoid potential future clawbacks, since the State is responsible for fifty percent of the districts’ Medicaid costs.

According to DOE’s own estimates, the City’s success in securing these dollars is not projected to improve in the near future. The current budget adjusted Medicaid reimbursements downward from FY15 through FY18 by a cumulative $310 million. If that stands, the City would lose out $666 million in total federal funding over a seven-year span.
Comptroller Stringer made several recommendations to improve DOE’s claims process and ensure City dollars are not replacing federal funding:
DOE must clarify its claims process so that it can recoup its spending on Medicaid eligible special education services;
A joint City, State and federal taskforce should be established in order for DOE to maximize the return on its Medicaid eligible spending; and
The state and federal governments must come through on their financial responsibilities to New York City children by cutting the red tape and bureaucracy that stands in the way of DOE being reimbursed for mandated services.
To read the full report, click here.

SEE:

Advocates For Children

Thousands of New York City Students Deprived of Special-Education Services, Report Says

From 2014:

EXCLUSIVE: School officials lose $356M in special education funds over sloppy accounting
NY DAILY NEWS, August 22, 2014
LINK

City public schools lost $356 million during the past three years in federal Medicaid payments for special education services because city and state officials failed to properly apply for reimbursement, the Daily News has learned.

“Red tape and bureaucracy should not stand in the way of (the city) being reimbursed for the vast array of services provided,” city Controller Scott Stringer said in a report obtained by The News.

As a result, between 2012 and this year, the city Department of Education kept shifting funds originally slated for books, supplies and other general costs to pay for those special education services, Stringer said.

And unless officials reform their practices quickly, the school system will miss out on another $310 million from Medicaid over the next four years — for an astonishing total loss of $666 million.

“That’s just unacceptable,” Stringer said. “There’s no excuse for leaving so much money on the table.”

Under federal law, Medicaid provides 100% reimbursement to state and local school districts for special education services such as speech, occupational and physical therapy, counseling, evaluations of students, and pupil transportation.

Each school district, however, must first pay for the service, then provide extensive documentation to its state education department, which in turn applies to Medicaid for reimbursement. After Washington approves the money, the states and local districts get to split the payments between them.

But over the past few years, United Federation of Teachers President Mike Mulgrew and other school system labor leaders have warned that New York City, unlike other school districts in the state, keeps botching its documentation of special education expenditures.

Stringer’s report appears to back that up. He found the city has collected only a tiny fraction of the Medicaid money it should have.

In the fiscal year that ended June 30, for example, the Department of Education initially expected to receive $117 million from Medicaid for services to 170,000 special education pupils. Instead, it has received just $2.2 million, and billed for only another $180,000.

Department of Education officials say they’ve been working hard to improve the Medicaid billing system they inherited from the Bloomberg  years.

“We are confident that our . . . corrective action plan, along with additional actions the DOE has taken since last December, will result in increased Medicaid revenue this fiscal year and in the future,” department spokeswoman Devora Kaye said

Betsy Combier Speaks Out on the Constitutional Mess Created by Mayoral Control of the New York City Board of Education (2008)

New York City Special Education Problems Persist, Says UFT VP, City Council Speaker, and everyone else


Saturday, April 12, 2014

Arts Education is Missing in NYC Low-Income Neighborhoods, Says Comptroller Scott Stringer


Scott Stringer
 Maybe Carmen Farina could contribute money from the Annenberg Challenge From The Arts and Center For Arts Education?

Carmen Farina

Betsy Combier

Arts Education Lacking in Low-Income Areas of New York City, Report Says

LINK

New York City’s comptroller plans to release a report on Monday quantifying what student advocates have long suspected: that many public schools in the city do not offer any kind of arts education, and that the lack of arts instruction disproportionately affects low-income neighborhoods.

With a mayor and a schools chancellor at the beginning of their terms, the comptroller, Scott M. Stringer, said he hoped the report would push the city to dedicate more money to art teachers and classrooms and become more transparent about how arts education resources are distributed across the schools. The report, using Education Department data, shows that 20 percent of public schools lack any arts teachers, including roughly one out of seven middle and high schools, even though state law requires arts instruction for middle and high school students.

“We treat arts classroom space the way we treat janitorial space — it’s just expendable. And it shouldn’t be,” Mr. Stringer said in an interview on Sunday, noting that instruction in the arts is associated with higher student grades and rates of college enrollment. “This is not a toolshed or a closet; this is where the next great artist or musician is going to happen.”

The shortage is disproportionately acute in low-income areas like the South Bronx and central Brooklyn, according to the report. More than 42 percent of the schools that do not have state-certified arts teachers are clustered in those areas.

Mr. Stringer said supplying a full-time, state-certified art teacher to every school that does not have one would cost about $26 million, which represents about a tenth of a penny for every dollar spent by the Education Department.

Between 2006 and 2013, spending on arts supplies and equipment dropped by 84 percent, the report said. When money is tight, arts education is often one of the first subjects to be sidelined, the report noted. It said the trend had accelerated as schools focused more on meeting accountability standards, shifting their resources from subjects seen as nonessential, like arts, to preparation for English and math tests. Arts, in the report, includes both visual and performing arts.

That conclusion is likely to add fuel to the backlash against accountability testing, which under the previous mayor, Michael R. Bloomberg, was used to help determine public schools’ progress and whether they should be closed. After the previous comptroller, John C. Liu, found in 2011 that city schools were not providing enough physical education, principals blamed the pressure to dedicate already-scarce resources to test preparation.

Already, elected officials have responded by softening the emphasis on student test scores. State legislators limited the amount of time schools could spend on test preparation as part of this year’s budget deal, and the new mayor, Bill de Blasio, opposes Mr. Bloomberg’s focus on test scores.

“We’ve spent so much time over the last 10 years teaching to the test, and lost in the shuffle was arts teachers, arts curriculum and arts space,” Mr. Stringer said.

Mr. Stringer is calling for the Education Department to include information about schools’ art teachers, classrooms and partnerships with cultural organizations — or their lack — in the school progress reports that the city issues every year. The progress reports list other measurements, like student test scores and attendance rates, and under Mr. Bloomberg they played a large role in determining which schools would be closed.

To allow parents to see what arts instruction schools are offering, the comptroller’s website will feature a searchable database of the data in the report, Mr. Stringer said. A similar drive for transparency led the City Council to pass legislation in December requiring the city to disclose such data regularly.

The report also recommends putting financing for arts instruction on a separate budget line and expanding partnerships between the city’s cultural organizations and its schools. And the report calls for the school system to preserve the amount of space dedicated to arts instruction when schools are co-located with other public or charter schools.

With charter schools given generous space guarantees in public school buildings in the state budget, such a “no net loss” policy may prove tricky, but Mr. Stringer insisted that it was important enough that it should be nonnegotiable.

The report garnered an enthusiastic response from Carmen Fariña, the new schools chancellor, some of whose former students have recalled studying art history in her class. “We will work to provide schools with the support they need to offer dedicated art classes that our students deserve,” she said in a statement.

She, in turn, received a vote of confidence from Eric G. Pryor, the executive director of the Center for Arts Education, which has pushed the city to provide more arts education financing.

“With new city leadership committed to equity, and a new chancellor who understands the importance of arts instruction, we now have an excellent opportunity to ensure students receive the well-rounded education promised to them by state law,” he said in a statement.

Saturday, January 25, 2014

On the issue of Retaliation, the Investigators of OSI, SCI, and OEO, and Why It Is Important to Fight