Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community
Showing posts with label complaints. Show all posts
Showing posts with label complaints. Show all posts

Sunday, September 12, 2021

The NYC Department of Education Refuses to Investigate Claims of Corruption and Fraud Against Former Chancellor Richard Carranza

Richard Carranza

 The corruption just keeps getting worse. We know that Richard Carranza resigned after a sob story about family COVID hardships which I doubt ever occurred. Then he moved to Texas to work for an organization he was prohibited from working for due to rules of engagement with a company that does business with the NYC DOE. Then, we find out his wife was ditched for a woman who Carranza hired for a lot of money to work for the NYC DOE in a title that is an unofficial writeoff, and Carranza never was approved by the Conflicts of Interest Board (COIB) to hire this woman, Rachel Sosa-Gonzalez, and others, in the first place. Finally, our wonderful Mayor Bill de Blasio has blocked any investigations into any of this.

Raquel Sosa-Gonzalez and Former Chancellor Richard Carranza

 But SCI's job is to do just that, and there are many stories of corrupt people being investigated while at the NYC DOE (see the case of Peter Quinn, February 22, 2021). Add this substantiated report to the others, cited in this blog - David Hay, SCI report on David HayMiosotis Ramos, Maspeth High School, etc. But Richard Buery was not given any fine. SCI Reports

DOI (Department of Investigation), what have you to say about this? Taxpayers and parents want to know....need to know...have a right to be told what happened, and whose pockets were lined other than Mr. Carranza and Rosa Sosa-Gonzalez.

Such a disgrace for the Mayor and all of us for electing him (I did not vote for him).

Betsy Combier

betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, Advocatz.com
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials

City mum on Carranza corruption complaints, no probe for affair with underling
NY POST, Conor Skelding, September 11, 2021

City investigators are not probing whether ex-Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza had an affair with a subordinate he hired — and won’t say if they are still looking into multiple corruption complaints filed previously against the former Department of Education boss.

Carranza was accused of hiring several pals from around the country for six-figure DOE jobs that were never posted publicly in 2018, the year he arrived in NYC.

Carranza is now shacked up in San Antonio, Texas, with one of those pals, Raquel Sosa. The pair met years ago in Houston, when Carranza was superintendent there and she was an elementary-school principal.

It isn’t clear just when their relationship became more than professional, but Sosa moved into Carranza’s Texas home months before she quit her DOE job in late August. She registered to vote from the Lone Star love nest on March 20, just five days after Carranza stepped down in NYC.

The city charter prohibits financial relationships, such as cohabitation, between superiors and subordinates.

Carranza, 54, is still technically married. His wife, Monique, filed for divorce in August 2020. Sosa, 47, formerly Sosa-Gonzalez, was divorced by the time she moved to New York in 2018.

When Carranza quit the top DOE job, he said he needed time to mourn relatives who died with COVID-19. Less than a month later, he took a job at an educational technology company with millions in city business, IXL Learning.

The city charter prohibits government employees from soliciting, negotiating or accepting a job at a city vendor while in city service. It also limits how former public employees working for city vendors can interact with the city.

Councilman Robert Holden (D-Queens) called for an investigation into Carranza’s job negotiations by the Conflicts of Interest Board and the Department of Investigation in April. DOI said at the time it referred the matter to the Special Commissioner of Investigation for schools, or SCI.

Holden said he also lodged a formal complaint against Carranza’s hiring of cronies — and SCI confirmed to The Post Friday that this case was closed and no action taken.

Regina Gluzmanova, an SCI rep, told The Post that “during the course of his tenure, and in the immediate aftermath, SCI received numerous complaints regarding former-Chancellor Carranza and his administration.”

She said that “certain matters” have been closed, while others may be pending. She refused to say which other matters were open.

Gluzamanova said SCI never received a complaint regarding Carranza and Sosa’s relationship, and would not be investigating it.

“SCI never received a complaint regarding Chancellor Carranza’s romantic involvement with Ms. Sosa, or anyone else for that matter, nor did any allegation of such involvement surface during the course of a previous investigation,” she added. “As Sosa and Carranza are no longer employed by the City, nor do either reside within the jurisdiction, we feel that the best use of our limited resources is to continue with the important investigations that benefit the students, families, and taxpayers of New York.”

SCI has in the past investigated ex-Department of Education employees.

“It stinks to high heaven,” Holden said, demanding that the Carranza/Sosa affair be probed. “The fact that the mayor’s not interested speaks volumes about his administration.”

A DOI rep, Diane Struzzi, refused to comment on the Carranza probes, or lack thereof, referring The Post to SCI.

A COIB rep, Chad Gholizadeh, said that confidentiality rules prohibited him from discussing complaints or investigations.

Mayor Bill de Blasio has blocked SCI investigations into Carranza, whistleblowers alleged in 2019. The mayor’s office didn’t return a request for comment.

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Francesco Portelos Files a PERB Complaint Against the UFT For three Years of Mis-Representation

Francesco has done what all individuals should do if they feel that they have been misrepresented by their UFT Representatives - file a PERB complaint.

See the post below.

By the way, if you are in, or have gone to, a 3020-a arbitration, and feel strongly that an Attorney has done something unethical, improper, or in violation of his/her attorney/client privilege, file a complaint with the Departmental Discipline Committee, NYC Bar Association, and the Committee on Professional Discipline..

You can, of course, do the 3020-a arbitration yourself "pro se", or with an assistant.

And, if an Arbitrator has, in your opinion, violated his/her mandate to be neutral, respectful, and fair, file a complaint with the  NAA.

Here is the person in charge of the National Academy of Arbitrators Complaints against an Arbitrator:

Paula Knopf Arbitrations Ltd.
4 Biggar Avenue Toronto,
Ontario Canada M6H 2N4
fax: 416-652-1516
If you want to file a complaint against an Arbitrator on the NYC 3020-a Arbitration panel who is not a member of the NAA, but is a member of the American Arbitration Association , the AAA will not take your complaint because, they say, there is a separate contract for Arbitrators who work in NYC, with the DOE.
Do I have to go into how dangerous this is?
FOIL your arbitrator's contract!!

Hold everyone who harms another person, accountable for their actions.

Betsy Combier

Portelos v UFT Leadership – Three Years

of Misrepresentation

They say “Choose your battles wisely.
I say “Leave no necessary battle unfought!
For three years my career has been under attack. My name and my reputation smeared. Those who know my story know the fight I have fought against a very corrupt system. However, even if you have read ever single character I have placed on this site, Facebook and Twitter, you still would not know everything. Especially not the fighting behind the scenes. I don’t mean just with my employer, the New York City Department of Education, but my union representatives.
Since I started teaching in 2007 I have been a member of the United Federation of Teachers  (UFT) union. I have paid a monthly fee for being a member. Do you know what else I have been paying for monthly? Roadside assistance.
In both cases I spent most of my time not needing to call either. I still paid both regardless. However, when I did have trouble with my car, I made a single call to AAA Roadside Service, and I received immediate…wait for it…assistance! I wish I could say the same for when I reached out to the UFT.
That…that right there is the difference between my union and roadside assistance. Pay either way, but one helped and the other did not.
A week ago I wrote something vague on social media about launching a “long overdue missile at 52 and it was not 52 Chambers Street” (DOE Headquarters). It was actually at 52 Broadway (UFT Headquarters).
[Disclaimer: I did not, nor do I intend to, launch any real ballistic type missiles or any such explosive or damaging weaponry. There is no need to falsely arrest me again for blogging. Once is enough. It’s a figure of speech. ]
Many UFT members do not know that if you feel retaliated against because of your union activity (grievances, chapter leader/delegate positions, asking for curriculum etc) you can file a complaint with the NYS Public Employee Relations Board (PERB). It’s free and you can find out how to file here: http://solidaritycaucus.org/how-to-file-a-perb-complaint-for-union-activity-protection/
Many members also do not know that under the Taylor law, the employee organization (union) has an obligation to fairly represent its members. Should they fail to do so, and/or act in bad faith, members can also take the union to PERB. One needs to go no further than my inbox, or this link, to see that our union needs to, nay MUST, be stronger. http://solidaritycaucus.org/repreview/
Below is my very detailed, and well documented, case against those who are paid to represent us and unfortunately do not. I dare anyone, from supporter to foe, friend or colleague, on or off the UFT payroll, or otherwise, to read these pages and tell me that I should not have engaged in this complaint. I actually believe I should have done it sooner. Based on the reactions from the many members who have already read this already, many will be following suit.
Note: This is not an attack on the UFT, nor the notion of a union. I’m a strong believer of unions and their place in defending the working class. This country was built on the labor of countless. They need protection, not corruption. Thank you to the many union representatives who work hard and do defend their members.
Francesco Portelo