Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Monday, January 13, 2014

Mayor Mike's Legacy: PS 106: The Worst School In New York City

I don't think too many people will argue with the title that NY POST stellar reporter Sue Edelman gave PS 106 in Sunday's paper (January 12, 2014).
I'm wondering if we should even consider this entity a "school". Time to fire Principal Marcella Sills and find out what Dorita Gibson knew about this school all these years....
Betsy Combier
 

No books, no clue at city’s worst school

This principal runs a school of “no.”
Students at PS 106 in Far Rockaway, Queens, have gotten no math or reading and writing books for the rigorous Common Core curriculum, whistleblowers say.
The 234 kids get no gym or art classes. Instead, they watch movies every day.
“The kids have seen more movies than Siskel and Ebert,” a source said.
The school nurse has no office equipped with a sink, refrigerator or cot.
The library is a mess: “Nothing’s in order,” said a source. “It’s a junk room.”
No substitutes are hired when a teacher is absent — students are divvied up among other classes.
A classroom that includes learning-disabled kids doesn’t have the required special-ed co-teacher.
About 40 kindergartners have no room in the three-story brick building. They sit all day in dilapidated trailers that reek of “animal urine,” a parent said; rats and squirrels noisily scamper in the walls and ceiling.
Modal Trigger
NO GYM OR ART: With no phys-ed or art classes, students are left to watch movies, including “Alvin and the Chipmunks” and “Fat Albert.”




NO SPACE: Without enough space in the main brick building, kindergartners are taught in what sources say are rat-infested trailers.

Principal Marcella Sills is a frequent no-show; The Post found she missed every day of school last week but one.Photo: J.C. Rice
And the principal — Marcella Sills, who joined PS 106 nine years ago — is a frequent no-show, sources say.
Sills did not come to school last Monday. On Tuesday, she showed up at 3:30 p.m.
On Wednesday, The Post found her at home in Westbury, LI, all day before emerging at 2:50 p.m. — school dismissal time. Wearing a fur coat, she took her BMW for a spin.
She showed up at school Thursday, but not Friday.
When Sills, 48, does go to work, it’s rarely before 11 a.m. — and often hours later, say sources familiar with her schedule.
“She strolls in whenever she wants,” one said.
The school hasn’t had a payroll secretary in years.
A Department of Education spokesman said Sills was required to report her absences and tardiness to District 27 Superintendent Michelle Lloyd-Bey but would not say whether Sills did so last week.
Lloyd-Bey did not return a call. Sills hung up on a reporter.
When she is out, an assistant principal is left in charge. Yet Sills, who gets a $128,207 salary, also pockets overtime pay — $2,900 for 83 hours in 2011, the latest available records show.
“This school is a complete s- -thole, but nobody in a position of power comes to investigate. No one cares,” a community member said.
PS 106 families hope their cries for attention bring newly installed Schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña to the rescue, saying they can’t recall any prior DOE leader visiting the remote school.
She would find it sinking, they say.
The isolated building sits a block and a half from the beach, surrounded by vacant, weed-choked lots, the road behind it strewn with trash bags and broken TVs.
The floods of Hurricane Sandy in October 2012 wrecked a hangar-like annex, called the Early Childhood Academy, which housed pre-K, kindergarten and first and second grades. It has not been repaired.
Two kindergarten classes moved into “temporary classroom units” in the yard. The other children moved into the main building, forcing some classes to squeeze into small offices and storage rooms. The pre-K class sits in the auditorium, but has to move to the cafeteria during the movies.
Kids in several grades said that last week they watched “Fat Albert,” “Alvin and the Chipmunks” and “Monsters, Inc.,” but did not relish the downtime.
“I like gym. I like to draw,” said Charm Russell, 10, who added her peers are too restless and bored to watch the screen. “They’re always making noise, and there’s nothing entertaining going on. No art, no gym, no music class.”
More alarming, the teachers have gotten no curricula since Sandy. Last February, the DOE announced several new options, including “Go Math” for grades K-5, and “ReadyGen” or the state Education Department’s “Core Knowledge” for English language arts. The books cover the Common Core standards, skills that kids should master at each level.
But five months into the school year, PS 106 classes still don’t have the books or teacher’s guides.
“They have no reading program, no math program,” a source said, adding Sills blames outside administrators for not sending materials.
Teachers muddle through by printing out worksheets they find online, buying their own copy paper.
The DOE gave no explanation for the missing curricula but said it’s “working with the school to provide students with physical education.”
A spokesman denied the trailers are rat-infested.
Staffers won’t speak up or even file a grievance with their union because Sills will retaliate, a source said.
Parents wonder if higher-ups know what’s going on.
“Why don’t they get on them? I don’t understand that,” said Michael Moore, father of a second-grader.
Another father, Roland Legions, added. “They’re not doing right by the kids.”
One mom said she couldn’t get a meeting with Sills to discuss concerns. Another said Sills is “just not professional.”
“She should be here,” the mom said. “How is she going to run the school if she’s not here?”
PS 106 is allocated $2.9 million to serve a low-income population with 98 percent of its students eligible for free lunches. As a Title 1 school, it gets extra federal funds, but community members say they’ve never seen a budget tracking the income and spending.

Worst principal forced poor kids to pay for bizarre bash


LINK

Kids at Queens’ notorious “School of No” have been forced to pay for a bizarre fifth-grade party at which their principal makes them dress up as little brides and grooms, The Post has learned — as the DOE announce that it would probe conditions at the school.
PS 106’s fur-clad principal, Marcella Sills — who is known for frequently being absent — has for at least the past three years orchestrated an annual prom at a posh rental hall.
She has required parents to pay more than $110 per child for the shindig.
The girls must rent little white dresses that look like bridal gowns, and the boys must attend in tuxedos, sources told The Post.

The kids, many of whom live below the poverty line, must foot the bill for the strange get-ups, which Sills personally picks out at stores such as Men’s Wearhouse and David’s Bridal, parents and ex-teachers said.
Sills, meanwhile, sets herself up as the belle of the ball — donning her own long, white bridal-type gown for the event, which was held last June at Russo’s on the Bay in Howard Beach. The outfit comes complete with elbow-length white gloves, witnesses said.
“It’s absurd,” said one former teacher at the crumbling Far Rockaway school.
“This is a school where children are given a free breakfast and free lunch, and you’re asking them to pay money for a lavish, unnecessary event.”

As the school put on a yearly formal ball, kids don’t have basic school necessities. “Some children didn’t have materials because their parents couldn’t afford them,” a former teacher said. “It was a struggle and a fight to get crayons, pencils and a notebook.”
Sills could not be reached for comment.
The school struggles to provide basic classroom supplies and actual instruction, said former teachers and students.

It became known as the “School of No” because it provides no gym, no art classes, no textbooks covering the Common Core standards and no proper nurse’s office.
Staff described PS 106 as a dysfunctional campus with rat-infested instruction trailers.
Sills often doesn’t show up. Last week, she missed every school day but one. Nevertheless, she managed to rule in absentia through fear and retaliation, sources said.

She cuts quite a figure, when she does appear. She arrives in a BMW wearing expensive fur coats. She makes a base $128,000 salary. “She’s evil,” former PS 106 teacher Patricia Walsh said. “She finds pleasure in ruining people’s lives.”

“She’s been getting away with it for years,” said Silaka Cox, an NYU freshman who graduated from PS 106 on Sills’ watch.

After reading The Post’s report on the school, schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña on Sunday announced an investigation into what she called “deeply troubling” revelations.
Fariña said she is sending her second-in-command, Deputy Chancellor Dorita Gibson, to the school Monday morning “to review the situation at PS 106 and determine what is going on there.”

FARINA SENDS DEPUTY
LINK
Chancellor Carmen Fariña will dispatch a top deputy to a Queens school said to be in dire straits — just a day after the New York Post first reported the conditions.
On Sunday morning, the Post published an exposé about conditions at P.S. 106 in Far Rockaway, Queens. There, the newspaper reported, no Common Core materials have arrived; damages from Superstorm Sandy are not repaired;  students watch movies instead of having gym or art classes; and Principal Marcella Sills rarely shows up.
“This school is a complete s- -thole, but nobody in a position of power comes to investigate. No one cares,” a community member told the Post.
That will change on Monday, according to a statement that Fariña sent Sunday evening. She called the report “deeply troubling” and said she would dispatch Deputy Chancellor Dorita Gibson to the school Monday morning to investigate.
Here’s Fariña’s full statement:
Today’s report about conditions at P.S. 106 in Far Rockaway is deeply troubling.  I spoke with the Mayor today, and am sending Deputy Chancellor Dorita Gibson to the school Monday morning to review the situation at P.S. 106 and determine what is going on there.  The Deputy Chancellor will report back her findings as soon as possible, including an analysis of conditions, and recommendations on any needed corrective action.  What was reported in today’s news account is unacceptable, and if true will be immediately addressed.  Serving our children comes first and is our most urgent priority.

City ignored pleas to ax ‘lunatic’ principal

http://nypost.com/2014/01/19/city-ignored-teachers-pleas-to-ax-lunatic-principal-since-05/

by Sue Edelman
They knew.
Teachers begged city officials to investigate “School of No” Principal Marcella Sills soon after she started in 2005 — citing her constant tardiness, harassment of staff and extravagant spending on parties while the school lacked books, pencils and paper.
“Get rid of her before it’s too late,” a 2007 letter urged District 27 Superintendent Michelle Lloyd-Bey, who oversees Queens principals.
Letters describe Sills as a tyrant and “rude lunatic administrator” who spurred an exodus of excellent teachers and failed to provide basic student supplies and services while handsomely furnishing her own office and squandering funds on catering and decorations.
“You need to examine Ms. Sills’ inability to lead,” says a 2006 letter from a “concerned teacher” to top Department of Education officials, including Carmen Fariña — now the city’s newly installed chancellor — and then-Chancellor Joel Klein. “Teacher morale is at an all-time low.”
A 2006 letter to Special Commissioner of Investigation Richard Condon — with copies to then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Klein and other officials — said Sills “comes in late on a daily basis” and does not record her absences, but calls staffers at home if they call in sick.
Modal Trigger
ABOUT TIME! PS 106 finally gets a UPS shipment of schoolbooks last week — including “What Your Kindergartner Needs to Know” — after a Post exposé revealed a dearth of supplies at the Queens school.Photo: J.C. Rice
The Post revealed last week that Sills for years has arrived hours late, and often failed to show, school sources said. Over the previous week, Sills missed all but one day.
The Far Rockaway school had no math or English textbooks for the rigorous new Common Core curriculum, no gym or art classes — kids watched movies instead — and no nurse’s office. Kindergartners sit in trailers that reeked of animal urine.
Fariña sent a deputy to inspect the school last week but has not publicly acknowledged any specific problems, citing only “significant room for organizational improvement.”
Last week, kids suddenly had gym and art. Dozens of boxes of books were delivered, including the grade-by-grade series, aimed at parents, starting with “What your Kindergartner Needs to Know.”
Condon has launched a probe.
Former teachers gave The Post 10 letters sent since 2005 to Condon, Klein, Lloyd-Bey, Fariña and former Queens Superintendent Kathleen Cashin — now a member of the state Board of Regents. Most of the letters are anonymous, because the teachers feared retaliation by Sills. Some kept a “harassment log.”
The teachers also showed more than two dozen letters and e-mails to reps at the United Federation of Teachers, including then-President Randi Weingarten, now a national union president, but said even she could not help.
Among the complaints, a 2006 letter to Condon, copied to Bloomberg and DOE officials, says Sills threw an elaborate buffet lunch for staff as a “thank you” but asked teachers to sign forms stating — falsely — that they attended a “professional development” workshop. A spokesman for Condon said last week he had no findings to report.
The letter also describes a “fifth-grade extravaganza,” including a dance at El Caribe banquet space, a Broadway show and dinner at a trendy Manhattan restaurant — at an estimated cost of $24,000. Parents had to cough up $90 each.
It was also alleged Sills used a grant from the Alvin Ailey Dance Studio to pay herself overtime, even as school aides went without OT because the school budget had run out of money.
A 2006 letter to Klein called Sills “vicious,” saying she “humiliated” children who were emotionally disturbed and punished school aides who complained about “unsafe, deplorable conditions” in the cafeteria.
Sills, 48, was a graduate of the DOE’s “Leadership Academy,” which trains principals, and had little teaching experience. Insiders said she lacked literacy skills, noting her invitation to a Nov. 23, 2005, holiday buffet “in honor of my gradutitude” to employees, including “security personel” and “custodially staff members.”
Sills ruled by threats and intimidation, ex-staffers complained. She “yells at a volume that resounds throughout the building, slams doors and uses foul language,” a 2006 letter to Condon claims.
That letter also accuses Sills of racism: “She has hired only black teachers and has targeted white teachers and a secretary.” Many left or were forced out.
One former teacher charged that Sills fabricated several observations, rated her “unsatisfactory” and then forged her signature on the documents.
Another red flag was raised in 2009, when the family of a girl student filed a $2 million negligence suit charging staff failed to stop beatings and a sex assault and that Sills did not report the incidents. The family’s lawyer, Adam Thompson, told The Post the city has yet to produce a single witness for deposition. The city Law Department declined to comment.
The DOE would not answer questions on PS 106 or Sills.

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Are Public School Video Cameras Necessary or Effective?


What Do Cameras Cure? System Gets Own Scrutiny

Years and millions later, some officials question whether public school security cameras are effective.
City Limits
Now in the fourth year of citywide operation, the New York City public school video surveillance program continues full steam ahead even as many parents, advocates, elected officials and students raise serious questions about the system's effectiveness and transparency.
By the end of 2008, more than 300 middle and high schools in 130 buildings will be equipped with some 6,000 cameras belonging to the Department of Education's $120 million Internet Protocol Digital Video Surveillance (IPDVS) system,(see here also) intended to help reduce violence in public schools. Although school officials consider IPDVS a success, problems have cropped up with both its technical workings and people's ability to gain access to the footage. Meanwhile, oversight from City Council, which passed a law amending the City Charter to authorize camera installation in Nov. 2004, has been uneven at best. A mandated review by DOE and the NYPD – which are jointly responsible for school safety – was completed in May, but City Councilman Peter F. Vallone, Jr., who chairs Council's Public Safety Committee, has not shared it with other committee members. City Councilman David Yassky, the only member of the Public Safety Committee to request the report, needed the help of Speaker Christine Quinn's staff earlier this month to obtain a copy.
Delivered to Quinn, Vallone and Councilman Robert Jackson, who chairs the Education Committee, the report outlines the state of camera installation in schools slated for IPDVS systems. A heavily redacted version of the report was obtained by City Limits via the Freedom of Information Law, with even the list of schools slated for camera installation withheld for fear of “endanger[ing] the life or safety of the children, employees, and others at the school sites,” according to Elizabeth Fine, general counsel to the City Council. However, the list is available on pages C-54 to C-58 of the DOE's 2005-2009 Five-Year Capital Plan. It's unclear what the DOE-NYPD review contains, as city officials say there has been no thorough evaluation or analysis of the camera system's effectiveness or impact on school security.
School safety has been a flashpoint of late in New York City, as evidenced by an all-day City Council hearing on the issue this fall. Suspensions and misconduct arrests of students are rising, and there is a steady volume of complaints against school safety agents. Though the Mayor's Management Report issued in September says school violence declined in fiscal year 2007, an audit by the Comptroller the same month accused DOE of underreporting school violence. DOE maintains the audit is out of date.
Local lawmakers, advocates, and civil libertarians see an explicit need for comprehensive oversight policies for the deployment and use of cameras in a school setting. Education Chair Jackson, who is skeptical about camera usage and supports their use only in select schools with a demonstrated need, is aware of difficulties faced by parents trying to obtain video and advocates greater supervision. “There needs to be greater transparency and clear rules governing the handling, storage, and access to footage,” Jackson said. “Also, there needs to be accountability for holding the data recorded by IPDVS.”
IPDVS was designed by DOE and the School Construction Authority in 2003 as a “major initiative to provide schools with state-of-the-art video surveillance systems,” according to the redacted oversight report, and first implemented in July 2004 – months before the project was actually given the green light by Council. The system is funded by $119.9 million from the DOE's five-year capital plan for fiscal years 2005-2009, with an additional $8 million provided by City Council and the borough presidents. Schools with existing camera systems were to be retrofitted, and standard specifications for all new schools included plans for video monitoring.
The system is a “hybrid,” in which video recorded by analog cameras is converted to digital format. Feeds are watched live at the schools by school safety agents, who are uniformed NYPD employees. It's also sent over a network to the DOE central office next to City Hall; the footage is stored there as well as in on-site servers in schools, according to Robert Weiner, the DOE director of planning, research and development. Weiner says servers were designed to have the storage capacity to retain video for 60 days, but acknowledged that in practice their capacity is too “finite” to guarantee that. The footage is intended for use as an investigative tool and deterrent to bad behavior, but is predominantly used as evidence in student misconduct hearings.
Video surveillance is becoming more common across the country – an estimated 30 million cameras are installed nationwide – and public schools are prime sites for installation. In Demarest, N.J., video feeds from cameras in public schools are streamed live to the local police department. In Nashville, facial recognition software was installed on digital cameras in the city's public school system. Here, DOE says facial recognition software is not being used, but the capacity for future installation is there.
“The rules governing camera use and access need to be more clearly developed and delineated,” said Councilman John Liu, a member of the Education Committee. An outspoken critic of the school safety regime, Liu supports the use of cameras in schools for security purposes, with adequate regulations and safeguards for privacy. The councilman compared video surveillance to DNA testing, another crime-fighting technology that has prompted calls for tighter regulation. “Intuitively, the technology seems to be foolproof,” Liu said. “The issue is how the evidence is handled.”
Gone Missing
Footage recorded by school cameras is supposed to be equally available to education officials and students if it will be introduced as evidence in misconduct cases. According to the General Education Suspension Notice sent home with suspended children, students and their parents have “the right to view and obtain in person at the school a copy of any video recording of the incident if the school shows you or your child a video recording of the incident prior to the suspension and/or the school intends to introduce the video recording at the hearing.”
However, these regulations are not always followed to the letter. Nelson Mar, senior staff attorney at the Bronx office of Legal Services of New York, often handles misconduct and suspension cases where IPDVS footage is used as evidence. In a number of instances, Mar has been unable to obtain footage from the school because it has been erased, was never stored, or incorrect footage was provided by DOE.
In one case from Oct. 2006, Sky Lopez, a 15-year-old girl at M.S. 224 in the Bronx, alleged that a school safety agent verbally and physically assaulted her in a hallway monitored by video cameras. The agent claims that Sky actually attacked her, and has filed a suit against the girl in Family Court. When Sonia Lopez, her mother, learned the hallway was under surveillance, she asked Mar to procure the footage. A few weeks after the incident, Mar was provided with 45 minutes of video recorded immediately after the time of the incident. When he submitted a second request for the correct footage, the principal of M.S. 224 informed him that, to the best of her knowledge, the video had been erased. The girl's family plans to sue the city for false arrest.
“If I hadn't gone back to the school and argued for the video every day, I wouldn't have the tape in my hand,” said Sonia Lopez. While she was thankful that the video Mar obtained helped clear her daughter because it contradicted sworn statements by the safety agent, she believes schools are using the cameras punitively. “They're supposed to [protect students], but they don't use them for good because when things happen in school, they erase their own evidence, and I don't think it's fair.”
There have been other instances of students accusing DOE of editing footage, such as the widely-publicized arrest and suspension of then-junior Biko Edwards at Samuel Tilden last summer. Biko was pepper-sprayed, roughed up, and arrested by safety agents while rushing to class. Suspended and slapped with five criminal charges, Biko and his mother say the video footage of his incident was heavily edited. Even the timestamp was changed. (See Students On Camera: Schools Under Watch, City Limits Weekly #582, April 9, 2007.)
In another suspension case, this one at the Bronx High School of Business, Mar was denied crucial footage for technical reasons. A Dec. 6 e-mail from DOE Information Technology staffer Peter Lombardo explains that the requested video is unavailable “due to excessive amounts of storage being consumed by cameras falsely recording sensor noise triggering motion at night and on weekends.”
Weiner of DOE maintains that IPDVS cameras are “functioning as designed,” and are serviced regularly by DOE's Information Technology staff. He did acknowledge some difficulty with server storage capacity. “We are aware that we are not successful in all cases of meeting this target, and our IT division is working towards that goal,” he said. Regarding edited video, Office of School and Youth Development chief executive officer Elayna Konstan said that schools don't have the ability to erase or edit footage, nor is it DOE's policy to edit or erase footage. Konstan's office is in charge of the IPDVS program.
Regardless, attorney Mar thinks DOE is potentially exposing itself to litigation by denying video or providing incorrect footage for suspension hearings. “This is potentially exculpatory evidence, so they can't dispose of it,” he said. “That's obstruction of justice.”
~ 
System Error
The errors that caused camera malfunctions at Bronx High School of Business may just be the tip of the iceberg regarding technical problems with IPDVS. A veteran of the security camera industry, who wished to remain anonymous to maintain his contracts on DOE projects, maintains that the “hybrid” analog-to-digital system is not as state-of-the-art as “true” network-based systems, which dominate the industry.
The industry veteran explained it this way: “Instead of putting in [digital] cameras running CAT-6 cables running directly to a computer, they put in a special jack that took an analog camera, converted it to a [digital] camera, and interfaced it” with the network that transmits footage to storage servers. The hybrid design, he said, required the installation of “unnecessary equipment” for the analog-to-digital conversion by another contractor known as a systems integrator.
The industry veteran says IPDVS is not working as planned. Some schools have been wired wrong by School Construction Authority-approved electrical contractors, and will need to be rewired. A second industry insider, who also wished to remain anonymous because his company works with IPDVS, called the Authority's bidding process a “double-edged sword” because it's required by law to employ the “lowest responsible bidder” from a list of approved contractors.
“DOE can't find competent contractors,” he said. “Some of the workmanship has been horrible.” DOE and SCA contracting arrangements continue to be a subject of scrutiny.
At Jamaica High School, a 1,700-student institution designated an “Impact School” almost a year ago because of high violence rates, IPDVS installation has wreaked havoc on other electrical systems in the school since it began this October. According to James Eterno, the United Federation of Teachers representative for the high school's faculty, the bell signaling period changes works only in parts of the building. Furthermore, Eterno says the public announcement system is all but inoperable, and believes the malfunction is linked to camera installation: “Our principal said the PA system is semi-operational, but I haven't heard anything beyond, 'testing, 1,2.'” (Eterno and other staff also disagree with the Impact designation: “There's a lot of good going on here,” he says.)
Furthermore, the crucial jack that makes this hybrid system work by converting analog footage to digital, manufactured by Glenview, Il.-based Anixter, is so faulty that the part has been discontinued. However, the School Construction Authority's standard specifications for IPDVS cameras as of Feb. 2007 include the Anixter jack, which is used on every one of the approximately 6,000 cameras installed throughout New York City public schools.
“At some point, they're going to have to redesign the system,” said the industry veteran. “If they had gone with a true network system that would have been open architecture, they could have used anybody's equipment,” he added. The second insider who has worked extensively on IPDVS confirmed that the Anixter jack has been discontinued. However, third party replacements are still available.
DOE denies that IPDVS is experiencing technical issues, however. “There have been absolutely no problems with the technical aspects of this system,” said Weiner, though he's aware of the discontinued Anixter jack. As for a system redesign, Elayna Konstan says DOE is not currently weighing such as option.
“At this time, we are not considering such a step, but technology evolves, it changes and grows and we have to adjust to that,” she said. DOE is currently testing out a true IP-based camera system, which was installed during the present school year and is in its initial phases, at an undisclosed pilot school.
The industry veteran believes the hybrid system was not the Authority's first choice. “They had been given specs and demonstrations of real network-driven systems. They wanted to go that way, but were forced to go with a hybrid” because of cost concerns, he said.
The second insider thinks DOE chose a hybrid system because vandalism-proof digital cameras were prohibitively expensive when IPDVS was designed in 2003. Technological advances have led to cheaper digital video cameras, which the second insider says DOE will install as older analog cameras fail “through attrition.” He added that camera upkeep would be a consistent annual expense, something that DOE's capital plan does not include in its budget for IPDVS.
Elayna Konstan maintains that the IPDVS camera system was put out to a competitive bidding process, and the current contracts are sound.
Councilman Vallone, the sponsor of Local Law 52, which enshrined the camera program as an amendment to the city charter, is not aware of technical problems with the system. “In my discussions with DOE, I have not come across anyone who has a bad thing to say about cameras,” Vallone said. A former prosecutor, Vallone vowed to look into the issue this year, expressing particular concern about potential exculpatory evidence being denied to students. He said he was not aware of a potential redesign, and declined to comment on that.
The possibility of an IPDVS overhaul alarmed Councilman Jackson, who took issue with the School Construction Authority's decision to proceed with a system that wasn't cutting-edge. “If they know it was faulty and went forward with it, a full investigation as to how that contract was made should be conducted by a special investigator,” Jackson said.
Roads Not Taken
At John F. Kennedy High School in the Bronx – one of the city's largest campuses, with 4,000 students divided into several schools – Assistant Principal Scott Arbuse says security cameras have been an asset.
“They do work. They are an excellent tool,” said Arbuse, giving graffiti as an example. If graffiti is found in a particular area of the school, safety agents can monitor video of that area more closely. “We've caught several kids doing graffiti that way,” he said.
To Ken Trump, president of the Cleveland-based National School Safety and Security Services the pros and cons of cameras should be weighed as a potential tool – “a supplement to, but not a substitute for, a more comprehensive school safety program.”
“Cameras do serve as a deterrent to the many who are deterrable, but they also provide evidence for those who are not,” Trump said.
But video surveillance is a relatively new technology, and doubts exist about the future ramifications of retaining footage of student activity without proper supervision. “There are also concerns about data retention: will this follow people for the rest of their lives?” asked Melissa Ngo, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a Washington, D.C.-based research center that focuses on civil liberties and electronic monitoring. “As technology changes and people use it more and more, it creates the ability for every mistake you make to follow you throughout your life.”
Especially when doubt exists as to cameras' real deterrent effect, some wonder whether it's worth taking those risks. In England, one of the world's most heavily-videoed societies, a study by the Home Office showed that surveillance cameras do not significantly reduce violent crime.
Meanwhile, other methods of reducing school violence and increasing safety for students and teachers have proven effective in other school districts – and at a fraction of the cost of video surveillance.
Proactive mediation efforts known as “positive behavioral support” underway in select city schools and have reduced incidents of school crime and misconduct, said NYCLU field organizer Chloe Dugger, citing larger programs in Los Angeles and Chicago public schools as models.
Mentoring programs, adult and student mediators, and other behavioral support programs not only examine root causes of school violence and misconduct, but they are also less costly and confrontational, Dugger said. This August, U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin, and U.S. Rep. Phil Hare, all Illinois Democrats, introduced into Congress the Positive Behavioral for Effective Schools Act, which would secure resources to expand programs across the nation that led to 38 percent decreases in suspension rates in some suburban Chicago school districts.
Ngo of EPIC condemned the IPDVS program as a waste of taxpayer money and limited school funding. “New York Ciy is spending $120 million on unproven camera systems, on something that will not secure the schools,” she said. “It's not as if school budgets are unlimited.”