Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Cindy Mauro and Alini Brito Get Their Jobs Back, Rules Appeals Court

James Madison High School
Cindy Mauro (left) and Alini Brito (right)
 Court Orders City to Rehire Teachers in Misconduct Case
It was a November night in 2009 when Alina Brito, a Spanish teacher at James Madison High School in Brooklyn, and Cindy Mauro, a French teacher there, went out with a colleague to a neighborhood restaurant for dinner, and a cocktail or two.

They returned to watch a student musical performance in the auditorium, but they did not stay long. Before the first intermission, Ms. Brito and Ms. Mauro left the show, walking up two flights to Room 337, a classroom Ms. Mauro often taught in.

“They had left the door to the room unlocked, and the lights were out. What were they doing?” asked a judge in an animated court ruling in 2012.

A custodian heard noises, peered inside and, he said, saw a woman on the floor, topless. He alerted security. A school safety agent then barged into the room, the judge wrote, and “saw a brunette woman (Brito is dark haired) completely naked, lying on the floor” and “a blond woman (Mauro is light haired) also naked on top of the brunette.”

They instantly became the most famous teachers in New York City, winning their school the tabloid nickname of “Horndog High.” But though it all might have sounded like the stuff of overheated high school fantasy, it had some very grown-up consequences: They were fired.

Their case has gone through a series of twists, the latest this week, when an appeals court ruled, more than four years after the episode, that Ms. Brito and Ms. Mauro must be put back on the city’s payroll.

Given that they were consenting adults, that no students were harmed as a result of their actions and that they broke no laws, the appellate division of the State Supreme Court in Manhattan ruled that terminating their employment was “shockingly disproportionate” to the misconduct. Their “behavior demonstrated a lapse in judgment,” it continued, but “there is no evidence that this incident was anything but a one-time mistake.”

The five-judge panel added, “Indeed, lesser penalties have been imposed where a teacher had an ongoing relationship or engaged in inappropriate behavior with a student.”

During the initial arbitration process, Ms. Brito and Ms. Mauro argued that there had been no impropriety whatsoever. Ms. Brito — who had required medical attention in the past — said she was suffering from reactive hypoglycemia, and Ms. Mauro was attending to her by laying her down, getting her sugar packets and elevating her feet, they said. Other than a sweater, which had been repurposed as a pillow for Ms. Brito, they said they were both fully dressed. They lost.

When they appealed their dismissal in court, the judge overseeing Ms. Brito’s case ruled that her offense did not warrant termination. The judge also ruled that Ms. Brito had been deprived of due process, because a surveillance tape showing the hallway outside the classroom, which could have shed light on the witnesses’ account, had been erased.

The judge overseeing Ms. Mauro’s case came to the opposite conclusion, however, upholding the arbitrator’s decision that she should be fired.

Barring an appeal, this week’s ruling, reported Friday by The New York Post, means both teachers’ cases will be sent back to arbitration for a lesser penalty, which could include a reprimand, suspension or fine.

In a statement, the city’s Law Department said lawyers were considering their options.

Both women are off the payroll, though they are likely to receive back pay if the ruling stands. An Education Department spokesman could not say if the teachers would be allowed back into classrooms.

Michael A. Valentin, a lawyer for the women, did not respond to messages left Friday.

Teachers caught in topless lesbian romp get their jobs back at 'Horndog High'

  • The two language teachers were fired in 2012 over an alleged lesbian tryst in a classroom
  • Cindy Mauro and Alini Brito deny there was any such tryst
  • The pair appealed the school's decision to fire them
  • Judges in the appeal found firing the two women to be 'shockingly disproportionate' to their alleged misconduct
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER 

Disgraced teachers Alini Brito (left) and Cindy Mauro are allowed to teach again following an appeal
after being fired for 'lesbian tryst'


Two teachers who were fired from a New York City high school in 2009 after an alleged lesbian tryst in a classroom are getting their jobs back after an appeals court in Manhattan ruled in their favor in a decision handed down Thursday. 
Cindy Mauro, a 34-year-old French teacher at Brooklyn’s James Madison High School, was caught half naked in a classroom, 'kneeling between the legs' of a topless fellow teacher, an independent arbitrator found.
Mauro and her alleged lover, 32-year-old Spanish teacher Alini Brito, had vehemently denied allegations of a 'lesbian lovefest.' The 34-year-old claimed that she was only helping Brito deal with her diabetes by bringing her some candy to raise her blood glucose levels.


Even if the allegations of sexual misconduct are true, the five-judge Appellate Court ruled that firing the two women was 'shockingly disproportionate to (their) misconduct.'
'While (Brito’s) behavior demonstrated a lapse in judgment, there is no evidence that this incident was anything but a one-time mistake,' the panel ruled.
In their decision, the justices ruled that even if the reports are true, 'consensual sexual contact' was not grounds to fire them.
The justices also noted the 'unblemished disciplinary records' of each teacher, as well as their 'consistently satisfactory teacher ratings.'
In Brito's case, her supervisor once described her as 'one of the best teachers she had ever worked with,' according to the report, first obtained by the New York Daily news.
The court sent the case back to city education officials with instructions to impose a less-severe penalty.
Sine the allegations first arose - on the word of a janitor who claimed he saw the two women engaged in sexual activity - both teachers denied they were ever naked, alleging that the custodian who walked in on them during a school talent show had a vivid imagination.


The scandal earned the school a suggestive nickname: Horndog High.
Lawyers representing the city said in court documents that the teachers’ alibi was hard to believe because no medical equipment was found in Room 337, where the pair allegedly was busted. 
The city also pointed out that Brito and Mauro had climbed six flights of stairs before arriving at their destination, passing multiple classrooms and more than one bathroom — unlikely behavior for someone suffering from low blood sugar.
Judge Robert Torres apparently agreed, upholding an arbitrator’s decision in 2012 to fire Mauro as ‘rational and with plausible basis.’


The ruling came less than two weeks after another judge allowed Brito to return to the classroom after she had successfully sued the Department of Education.
Judge Alice Schlesinger wrote in her opinion that Brito's punishment was ‘excessive and shockingly severe,’ the New York Post reported. 
‘We have children who are deprived of a first-class, caring teacher, and a teacher who, due to one sensational, publicly exploited incident where she exhibited extremely poor judgment, is deprived of continuing a career she loves and excels at.
‘That is not a good balance, in the opinion of this court. In fact, the imbalance is shockingly bad,’ Schlesinger wrote.
The judge criticized the city for destroying a surveillance tape supposedly documenting the act, which she said had deprived the teacher of due process.
Denial: Brito and Mauro claim nothing inappropriate went on and that witnesses let their imaginations
get the best of them

Brito’s lawyers claimed it was a crucial piece of evidence that could prove witness accounts to be false.
The married teacher was fired in January, 2012, following the release of a report that claimed Mauro had lured her away from a student song-and-dance competition with promises of sugar and candy.
In her lawsuit, Brito claimed that the account of the witness to the events was not reliable because he never entered the classroom and a 300-pound janitor was blocking his view through a small opening in the door.
'There were no shenanigans,' said her lawyer Michael Valentine.
'He sees through this other custodian, who's 6'4" or 6'5", and sees a partially naked body lying on the floor.'


Valentine offered a much more innocent version of events, claiming: 'Upon immediately entering the classroom, Brito's knees buckled, at which point Brito laid down off to the right but at the foot of the classroom door. 
'Mauro assisted Brito by placing Brito's sweater under her head and elevated her legs in a chair. Mauro also obtained a couple of sugar packets from her desk and gave them to Brito.'
It's unclear when - or if - the women will be returning to their jobs at James Madison High School.
 

'Horndog High' teachers fired after sexy romp get their jobs back: court

A Manhattan appeals court ruled language teachers Alina Brito and Cindy Mauro — who were accused of having a same-sex romp on school grounds in November 2009 while students and staff were at a singing competition — can have their jobs back at James Madison High School in Midwood, Brooklyn, because the pair has ‘unblemished’ discipline records and had a ‘lapse in judgment’ on the day in question.


NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Thursday, March 20, 2014, 1:50 PM
Get ready for a reunion at Horndog High.

Two randy Romance language teachers fired for their lesbian grope session in a darkened classroom at James Madison High School are entitled to get their jobs back, an appeals court ruled Thursday.

Spanish teacher Alini Brito and French instructor Cindy Mauro won their long legal battle to return to the classroom — although perhaps not the darkened one where they were spotted in November 2009.

“The penalty of termination of unemployment is shockingly disproportionate to (their) misconduct,” the five-judge Manhattan Appellate Division panel declared in a sharp rebuke of city education officials.

The judges noted the two women were consenting adults who were not inside the Brooklyn school in any official capacity when they were caught with their pants on — and their shirts off. 
“I can tell you one thing for sure: My clients will be happy to be back in the classroom doing a job they love,” said their lawyer, Michael Valentine of the firm Altman Schochet.
“They were both good at what they did,” he added.
“The record showed they were extremely competent professionals.”
Valentine suggested the pair, in addition to getting their jobs back, are entitled to back pay.

The two tenured teachers were yanked from the classroom at the Midwood school once the headline-making allegations went public.
The case was kicked back to city education officials to impose a less-severe penalty.
Officials would not say if they planned to appeal the decision or what sanctions the pair could face.
“We are disappointed with the decision and are considering our options,” said Education Department spokesman David Pena

Mauro, 38, and Brito, 34, were fired in January 2011 by Education Department officials after a janitor insisted he stumbled upon the pair getting busy during the annual school singing competition.

A report by investigators found the pair slipped away to Room 337, where one was seen naked from the waist up and the other was on her knees.

The night of lust started with the teachers going to a bar and knocking back drinks.

Brito had a shot of tequila and a martini, the investigators alleged.

The two teachers denied any hanky-panky, insisting they went to the classroom because the diabetic Brito needed some candy to stabilize her blood sugar.

The appeals court — made up of justices Angela Mazzarelli, Richard Andrias, Leland DeGrasse, Helen Freedman and Judith Gische — appeared to believe the janitor’s version, but ruled that “consensual sexual contact” was not enough to merit firing.

“While (Brito’s) behavior demonstrated a lapse in judgment, there is no evidence that this incident was anything but a one-time mistake,” the panel ruled.

Brito, the judges wrote, “was described by her supervisor as one of the best teachers she had ever worked with.”

In a separate decision, the same judges noted that Mauro boasted an “unblemished disciplinary record and consistent satisfactory teacher ratings.”

The pair’s escapades were only the first in a long line of sexual shenanigans at the school.

Erin Sayar pleaded guilty last year to having sex with a 16-year-old male student. Sayar received 10 years’ probation.

In 2009, social studies teacher Allison Musacchio was probed for having an inappropriate relationship with a male student. The investigation was ultimately closed because the teen was above the age of consent and had left the school.

With Ben Chapman

Schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña attempting to block 'Horndog High' teachers fired for romp from returning to school

Former James Madison High School instructors Cindy Mauro and Alini Brito were caught in a darkened classroom in November 2009, and fired in January 2011. An appeals court recently granted them the right to return to work, but schools boss Fariña is trying to stop that from happening.


NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Friday, March 21, 2014
 
Carmen Farina
Not so fast, Horndogs. City Education officials are searching for a way to block the reinstatement of two randy teachers who were fired for a having a lesbian romp at their school but won their jobs back on appeal Thursday.
Former James Madison High School instructors Cindy Mauro and Alini Brito were caught having a grope session in a darkened classroom in November 2009. The pair was fired in January 2011 after a lengthy investigation and legal battle.
But the two Romance language instructors, who have steadfastly maintained their innocence, were granted the right to return to work in city schools, after a judge decided they deserved lesser punishment.
Schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña wants to stop that from happening. “We have zero tolerance for this kind of behavior from our professionals and in our schools,” Fariña said. “So we are pursuing all options going forward and if we have a legal basis for this we will certainly appeal.”
Mauro, 38, and Brito, 34, were fired after a janitor told administrators he accidentally walked in on the pair doing some hands-on instruction during a school singing competition.
Investigators said the pair got drinks at a nearby bar before they were caught in a darkened classroom, where one was spotted topless and the other on her knees.
The two denied the charges and said they slipped off to the classroom alone because diabetic Brito needed a candy fix to aid her blood sugar.
The appeals court that granted their reinstatement appeared to buy the janitor’s story, but ruled that “consensual sexual contact” between the two wasn’t a fireable offense.
City officials wouldn’t give any details of what the appeal of the disgraced educators’ reinstatement might look like, but said the city could argue the case again.
Their lawyer Michael Valentine didn’t return calls for comment.
With Barbara Ross

Friday, March 21, 2014

Peace Brokers May Make Co-Location More Amicable

I still remember the day that Courtney Ross walked into my youngest daughter's school, NEST+M, and with her entourage in tow, walked up and down the hallways telling her assistant which rooms she wanted to take for her new charter school, the Ross Global Academy. We were in the district of Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, who we contacted and we also sued the New York City and New York State Education Departments for trying to put a charter school into our building. We won.


Our Principal, Celenia Chevere, was suddenly replaced by Olga Livanis, to "pay us back" for our successful challenge. No charter school ever walked our building again.

Fight the thugs!!

Anyway, I think Carmen is right to lend the sharing business a few people who can put rationality into the mix and maybe, just maybe, charters and public schools can co-exist in the same place. Maybe. Did I say maybe? But maybe not.

Betsy Combier

Schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña at a City Council budget hearing on March 20, 2014 

New Schools Squad Will Try to Broker Peace

Thursday, March 20, 2014 - 05:28 PM

The Department of Education will try to broker the peace between schools that share the same building.
“Starting within the next two weeks, the first protocol that we're putting in place is that schools will not be fighting each other in a building," Schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña told the City Council's education committee Thursday. She said the D.O.E will be sending "campus squads" to settle questions such as who gets what room on what floor in a shared school, and how to use the rooms.
The D.O.E. portrayed this as much more intensive than the previous administration's approach, when officials would walk through buildings to see if there was enough space for different schools to exist side by side. 

The chancellor said she is particularly interested in finding ways for schools to share space and resources more effectively. For example, she envisioned middle schools sharing foreign language teachers who are often in short supply. Or if one high school has Advanced Placement classes but other small schools in the building don't, it could offer seats to students from the other schools.

"I think we have to create a culture of collaboration and share, which has not been the culture," she said.

Space battles in co-located buildings increased during former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration, when hundreds of new schools and privately managed charter schools opened — often in the same buildings as regular public schools. Nearly half of the system's 1,800 public schools now share buildings. 

Sometimes they get along just fine. But other times, "the dysfunction is mind blowing," said Mary Conway Spiegel, whose Partnership for Student Advocacy raises money for schools, including Christopher Columbus High, which is being phased out after several other schools opened in its Bronx campus.

Principals have complained that it cam be difficult to schedule students from different schools in the same classes, because their schools have different schedules. But they often share sports teams and after-school clubs. 

The D.O.E.'s new campus squad has four members including Kevin Moran, the agency's Executive Director for the Division of Operations. He said they will be responding to current and future-co-locations as problem-solvers. 

"We're there to support principals," added his squad-mate, Laura Feijoo, a senior superintendent who has worked in the school system for 25 years. 

Sonia Hampton, a parent leader at PS/IS 149 in Harlem, call the squad "a beautiful idea." The city blocked a Success Academy charter middle school from opening this fall in her child's school building. It already shares space with another Success Academy charter school and a program for children with special needs. Hampton, however, said she wasn't sure the charter would want to share its block room or classes.

"I know that charter leaders are eager to look for ways to make this work," said James Merriman, C.E.O. of the New York City Charter School Center. The former lawyer added, "If we keep the lawyers out of the room, we'll find a way."

The co-location squad was described during a council hearing about the school system's $25 billion proposed budget for the next fiscal year.
In other developments:

• Chancellor Fariña said in fiscal year 2015 there is a shortfall of $2.7 billion of outstanding school aid the state owes the city from the lawsuit that was settled in 2007. 

• Daniel Dromm, the council's education committee chair, said funding for the next year is essentially flat because the additional $1.2 billion Mayor Bill de Blasio has proposed relies on hundreds of millions of dollars in state aid for pre-kindergarten that has not yet materialized, and much of the rest will be used for growing expenses. He predicted class sizes will rise.
• If the pre-K funds come through, the Chancellor said the city will need to hire an extra 1,000 teachers.
• The Chancellor also said she intends to hire more reading intervention specialists throughout the system.

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Carmen Applewhite Wins Her U-Rating Appeal in the Appellate Division First Department

When the UFT decides to fight a violation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), policy or procedure concerning observations and rights, they can and do win.

Great job, Lori!!!

Betsy Combier

Matter of Applewhite v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y.
2014 NY Slip Op 01501
Decided on March 6, 2014
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 6, 2014 
Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Freedman, Feinman, JJ.

11191 113474/11 

[*1]In re Carmen Applewhite, Petitioner-Appellant, 

v

Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, et al., Respondents-Respondents.

Richard E. Casagrande, New York (Lori M. Smith of counsel), 
for appellant. 
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Fay Ng 
of counsel), for respondents. 

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered on or about August 10, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, granted respondents' cross motion to deny the petition to annul petitioner teacher's unsatisfactory annual performance rating (U-rating) for the 2007-2008 school year, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied, the petition granted, and the unsatisfactory rating annulled.
Respondents' determination to sustain petitioner's unsatisfactory performance rating was not rationally based on administrative findings that petitioner acted in an insubordinate manner and refused to adhere to the directives of the principal during the 2007-2008 school year (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 231 [1974]). Petitioner established that respondents violated their own rules, procedures and guidelines contained in their human resources handbook "Rating Pedagogical Staff Members" by placing certain disciplinary letters in petitioner's personnel file which neither contained her signature acknowledging receipt of the letters nor a witness' statement attesting to her refusal to sign (see Matter of Kolmel v City of New York, 88 AD3d 527 [1st Dept 2011]; and see Matter of Friedman v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 109 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2013]; compare Matter of Cohn v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 102 AD3d 586, 587 [1st Dept 2013]). We note that neither the principal who made the allegations nor any other witness testified at the hearing.
Under the circumstances presented here, remittitur to Supreme Court for service of an answer is not warranted, as the facts have been fully presented in the parties' papers and no [*2]
factual dispute remains (see Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. Of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100, 102 [1984]; Matter of Camacho v Kelly, 57 AD3d 297, 298-299 [1st Dept 2008]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER 
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: MARCH 6, 2014
CLERK

In the case below, the U-rating was sustained:

Matter of Cohn v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y.
2013 NY Slip Op 00418 [102 AD3d 586]
January 29, 2013
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, February 27, 2013


In the Matter of Mitchell Cohn, Appellant,
v
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
[*1] Richard E. Casagrande, New York (Ariana A. Gambella of counsel), for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Fay Ng of counsel), for respondents.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered October 27, 2011, which denied the petition seeking, inter alia, to annul the determination of respondents denying petitioner's appeal of an unsatisfactory rating (U-rating) for the 2006-2007 school year and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner has failed to show that the U-rating was arbitrary and capricious, or made in bad faith. The detailed observations in reports prepared by the principal and two assistant principals, describing petitioner's poor performance in class management, engagement of students, and lesson planning, provided a rational basis for the rating (see Matter of Murnane v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 82 AD3d 576 [1st Dept 2011]; Batyreva v New York City Dept. of Educ., 50 AD3d 283 [1st Dept 2008]). While petitioner complains that he did not receive pre-observation conferences prior to every classroom observation, he has not demonstrated that the U-rating was made in violation of lawful procedure or any substantial right (see Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of the City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 89 AD3d 486 [1st Dept 2011]; Matter of Munoz v Vega, 303 AD2d 253, 254 [1st Dept 2003]; compare Matter of Kolmel v City of New York, 88 AD3d 527 [1st Dept 2011]). To the contrary, the record demonstrates that, after petitioner received a U-rating at the end of the prior school year, he was provided with a professional development plan at the start of the 2006-2007 school year and, throughout the year, received professional support and had a [*2]series of classroom observations by the principal and two assistant principals, each one documented by a detailed letter to him noting areas of improvement and making specific recommendations for addressing continuing deficiencies. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
 

Familiar Consultants Hired by the de Blasio’s Pre-K Drive

NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio
LINK
Mayor Bill de Blasio’s privately financed campaign to offer prekindergarten to all 4-year-olds in New York City spent nearly $236,000 in January and February, spreading much of the money among the same core group of political consultants behind his winning campaign last year, according to records released on Wednesday.
Those consultants, who were paid not by the city but by a new nonprofit, the Campaign for One New York, includedBerlinRosen, a public affairs firm that took in $43,950 in fees and expenses, and an affiliate of Hilltop Public Solutions, which was paid a $16,500 “management fee,” according to a filing with the state’s Joint Commission on Public Ethics.

Hilltop hired Bill Hyers, the manager of Mr. de Blasio’s mayoral campaign, in December, the same month Mr. Hyers established the Campaign for One New York, which quickly branded itself as UPKNYC.

Genova Burns Giantomasi Webster, a law firm that worked on Mr. de Blasio’s mayoral run, was paid $23,467 in fees.

Acres, the media production firm that helped mold Mr. de Blasio’s campaign commercials — including a pivotal advertisement featuring his son, Dante — was paid $16,900, according to the filing.

Jessica Singleton, who was digital director of the de Blasio campaign and now works for the mayor, received $2,500 in fees for “brand design” and “digital strategy” before she joined the administration.

The nonprofit also paid $40,000 to the North Star Fund, a foundation that supports grass-roots organizations, which added money of its own and spent it promoting “the need for high-quality, universal pre-K and after-school and the UPKNYC plan to pay for these critical investments” within “grass-roots communities,” Dan Levitan, a vice president at BerlinRosen, said by email.

For all those efforts, the campaign has fallen significantly short of persuading state leaders to go along with the mayor’s desire to increase taxes on high-earning city residents to pay for universal prekindergarten and after-school programs. But Mr. de Blasio’s allies argue that the effort has ignited a conversation that could still give the mayor the money he needs to expand those programs.

“UPKNYC has developed a robust grass-roots campaign to make sure that 73,000 children have access to quality, universal, full-day pre-K and 120,000 middle school students have access to after-school programs that will help them succeed,” Mr. Levitan, who was also the spokesman for Mr. de Blasio’s mayoral campaign, said.

Though Mr. de Blasio’s team said weeks ago that it would voluntarily release a list of donors in the coming weeks, Mr. Levitan would not reveal how much money had been raised, or from whom.

The campaign has boasted of a long list of millionaire developers, entrepreneurs and philanthropists, in addition to celebrities like the actresses Cynthia Nixon and Olivia Wilde, among its supporters.

“UPKNYC is supported by individuals, organizations and foundations committed to expanding high-quality early education and after school for all New Yorkers and will fully disclose all donors and amounts beyond what is required by law,” Mr. Levitan said.

Though more than $125,000 went to pay consultants and staff members, including $14,000 in compensation for Joshua Gold, a labor organizer Mr. de Blasio put in charge of the school campaign, the drive has also spent money demonstrating grass-roots support.

Buses to Albany for a rally cost $26,419.

And more than $5,000 was paid for thunder sticks emblazoned with a succinct appeal to lawmakers on behalf of Mr. de Blasio’s push for the tax on high earners: “#LetNYCdoit.”


Thomas Kaplan contributed reporting.

Monday, March 17, 2014

SCI Made An Error Charging Francesco Portelos, They Say. "So Sorry"

ok, so let's get this straight. The Special Commissioner of Investigation accuses Francesco Portelos with doing some real estate business on his desktop, which as one of the charges which brought him to a 3020-a hearing.....and now they say it was an error, and SORRY??? After this poor man's life has been altered, thousands of dollars have been paid to lawyers, and an arbitrator, they say sorry?

There are thousands of other cases they should be sorry for as well, all false claims made by administrators from hell. When do we get people with integrity to do this job, Mr. Mayor???

Betsy Combier

From Francesco's blog:

SCI 9 – Commissioner Suddenly Finds “Errors” in their Investigation

We continue with the The SCI Files
There has to be a professional and adult way of saying “Told you so!”  Sit down and grab some popcorn again, because the craziness never ends here with this saga. I feel like I’m writing fiction or a John Grisham novel. I also felt as I was running low on material, but they keep giving me more!
Do you remember these headlines that came out after SCI published a vague report in April 2013? SCI stated that they found “real estate” related files on my desktop after former UFT Chapter Leader Richard Candia made up allegations about seeing me do real estate work while I had a class in session. Well, two years after SCI confiscated the desktop, it turns out they did not find files on my computer! (Dun-dun-dun)
Headlines:

Report substantiates misuse of school property accusations against ‘rubber roomed’ teacher – NY Daily News

Ax looming for Staten Island teacher, a tech gadfly – SILive.com

City moving to fire teacher who blogged his “rubber room” days – Chalkbeat.org

E-fury at rubber teach – NY Post

Laura Brantley esq., who is the director of the DOE’s Administrative Trials Unit (ATU), wasted no time in going for the termination. No, I’m serious…no time. The ink from the report was still drying on the 6th floor of Chamber Street when she sent the email below at 3:50 PM. The SCI Report came in at around 2 PM.
Pay attention to who was emailed and how DOE Legal holds the hand of the administrators when going after the teachers. Also, keep in mind that NYS Education Law 3020-a states that a school board must meet in executive session to determine if there is probable cause to bring a teacher up on charges. That obviously didn’t happen here.
Laura Brantley 3020-a consent
So what happened now? What changed? Well, on the two year anniversary (February 28, 2014) of the confiscation of my DOE devices, I wrote this post on how I believe files were planted, SCI Part 8 – Planting Files and Confiscating Computers. In addition to that post being shared across various social media, I decided to send the post to Special Commissioner of Investigation Richard Condon as well. Almost as if saying “What’s up with this?
————
From: Francesco Portelos <mrportelos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Mar 5, 2014
Subject: SCI Part 8 – Planting Files and Confiscating Computers
To: rcondon@nycsci.org, thomas fennell <tfennell@nycsci.org>, “Regina A. Loughran” <rloughran@nycsci.org>
Good afternoon,
     I would like the information contained within this post investigated. I feel as though someone, in possession of confiscated equipment, deliberately falsified information.
Francesco Portelos
Parent
Educator
IS 49 UFT Chapter Leader
educatorfightsback.org
Mrportelos.com
———————-
 I did not know this, but while I was laying on a cold dirty jail cell floor (My 33 Hours Behind Bars), SCI sent the following memo stating there was an “error” in their investigation and they “apologize for any inconvenience this has caused“:
 



 

City and teachers union resuming multiyear contract talks: sources

City is seeking an unusal, nine-year pact with the teachers union that would last through 2018, according to sources.

Comments (16)


The city and teachers union will resume talks over a multiyear teachers union contract this week, said sources familiar with the negotiations, but experts say an agreement is still probably months in the making. The city is seeking an unusual, nine-year pact with the powerful teachers union that would last from 2009 — when the last contract expired — until 2018.

A nine-year agreement would allow the city to spread out, over several years, the payment of back raises sought by the union for the years when teachers did not get pay hikes but other municipal workers did, sources familiar with the situation said.
RELATED: CITY, UNION CONTRACT TALKS BEGIN WITH POSITIVE START

“It’s still early in negotiations, but the city’s position is an indication they’re willing to be creative to reach an agreement,” said Ed Ott, City University of New York labor lecturer and former executive Director of the New York City Central Labor Council.

Since February, union and city officials have met to work on the contract whenever their schedules permit, sources said — often at the Proskauer Rose law firm in Manhattan or at union offices. Sometimes union president Michael Mulgrew is present at the negotiations, sometimes his deputies attend, sources said.
RELATED: TEACHERS FLEE CITY SCHOOLS FOR SUBURBS: UNION

The city and the union are hammering out aspects of the expired contract ranging from pay to work rules.

Among the issues discussed is a request from schools boss Carmen Fariña for a policy change to allow for a different use of the current school day scheduling, said sources familiar with the talks.
RELATED: CUOMO, CHARTER SCHOOL ELITES GANGING UP ON BLAZ

The key issue is teacher pay. The union has been operating under an expired contract since November 2009. Teachers missed out on two years of 4% raises that other city unions received.

Mulgrew has said he seeks those back raises for the city’s 75,000 teachers. The payout would cost the city $3.2 billion.

Labor experts said the city could ease the pain of a payout by spreading it over multiple years.

Union officials wouldn’t comment on the specifics of negotiations. But a union spokesman said contracts of various lengths have been mentioned in negations.
bchapman@nydailynews.com