Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Saturday, May 6, 2023

Special-Education Teacher Marina Golfo Gets 3-Months of Paid Sick Leave While In Federal Prison Camp For Fraud

Special-ed teacher Marina Golfo tricked her DOE bosses into paying sick leave
during her three-month prison stint for fraud
Twitter

Special Education teacher Maria Golfo evidently was found guilty of defrauding the Department of Education, and then was put into Federal prison for 3 months, but got paid by the NYC DOE for "sick leave". See the article posted below that was published in the NY Post.

 When I think about all of the wonderful, decent, honest teachers, Assistant Principals and Principals who have been charged with misconduct and then forced into a 3020-a and terminated, and then read a story like the one below, I get upset that the NYC DOE is so random and arbitrary when dealing out fines, suspensions and terminations as punishment for wrong-doing.

The Special Commissioner of Investigation Unit, SCI, is largely responsible for punishing the wrong person, or not punishing the right person.See Veronica Hernandez Case. The so-called "investigators" are anything but that, and tout themselves as "independent" from the DOE yet get paid heaps of money by the NYC DOE. Whenever someone gets a lot of money from their employer, do you really believe that they would go against what the employer wants? No.

For example, consider Gerald Conroy, Deputy Commissioner of the Office of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District. He filed an Affirmation in the Supreme Court in a case I worked on, and he wrote in that Affidavit that he "believed" that anyone who went to Wild Child was guilty of fraud and deceit when they handed in vaccination cards 'without' (he wrote) actually getting the shot.  He was never able to prove anything against these people, and now everyone accused by him are back to work (except several who resigned and moved on to other jobs). 

Gerald Conroy's salary 2020-2021, SCI (Seethroughny.net/payrolls). In 2022 he made $190,554.

Yet no one at the NYC DOE caught Marina Golfo and her three months of sick pay while in jail?

There you are, proof of incompetency, political dumbness, whatever.

Betsy Combier

betsy@advocatz.com

Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ Blog

NYC special-ed teacher collected 3 months of sick pay from prison

By Matthew Sedacca and Susan Edelman, NYPOST, April 22, 2023

A special education teacher tricked her clueless bosses at the city Department of Education into giving her three months of paid sick leave — while she served a federal prison sentence for defrauding taxpayers and stiffing students, The Post has learned. 

Golfo spent three months at Federal Prison Camp Alderson in West Virginia.


Speech therapist Marina Golfo, 49, collected $24,367 in salary last year while sitting in a cell at West Virginia’s all-women’s, minimum-security Federal Prison Camp Alderson, the Special Commissioner of Investigation for city schools found. 

“You’ve got to admire her nerve, if you don’t admire her stupidity,” said Ellen McHugh, a member of the Citywide Council on Special Education.

In October 2018, Brooklyn federal prosecutors charged Golfo and seven other employees with defrauding the Early Intervention Program, which serves developmentally challenged children and is overseen by the state Department of Health.

Golfo, a Long Islander, was accused of bilking taxpayers of $156,000 over the prior three years by submitting fake treatment notes and invoices for more than 1,500 therapy sessions she never provided. Many sessions were scheduled to occur in the homes of children or caregivers.

She pleaded guilty in July 2021 to healthcare fraud, was sentenced to three months in prison and ordered to pay restitution for all the money disbursed, according to court documents. But she inexplicably remained on the DOE payroll.

Weeks after entering the clink in September, Golfo submitted an online request to her DOE managers for paid sick leave. She included a doctor’s note explaining that she was too ill to come into the office and should remain at home.  

Golfo also submitted requests to prison and court officials for “compassionate release” due to health risks she faced from COVID-19, along with her elderly parents’ need for a caretaker, according to court records. She was denied on Oct. 6, with US District Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto writing that neither her health conditions nor her parents warranted a reduced sentence.

On Nov. 1, the brazen educator asked DOE for an extension of her sick leave through Dec. 1, which was two days after the end of her prison term.

Shockingly, the city approved the request, apparently not realizing its employee was a jailbird. In total, she raked in a quarter of her $97,469 annual salary from behind bars.

But the DOE was initially well aware of her criminal case, which was jointly announced in 2018 by the city Department of Investigation and the US Attorney’s Office. A week after she was charged in Brooklyn federal court, DOE even rubber-roomed Golfo — reassigning her to a Committee on Special Education office in the Bronx while awaiting trial, according to SCI and a letter from a former colleague. 

The DOE’s Human Resources division told SCI investigators it was unaware that Golfo was requesting time off from the slammer — despite her 2018 arrest having been widely reported — because she never informed the agency or her managers about her sentencing.

Delivering a lesson in unabashed chutzpah, Golfo told SCI investigators she did not know she had violated DOE sick-leave rules, claiming that she did not think her location mattered because she could not have come into the office, regardless, due to her illness. She suffered complications from shingles, court records show.

Golfo did not return messages from The Post.

SCI said it first received a complaint about Golfo’s improper use of sick pay from a tipster in December 2022. The DOE finally fired her on Jan. 31 — about a month before SCI gave its findings to schools Chancellor David Banks on March 6.

It’s unclear whether Golfo returned to work for the two months between her prison release and her firing. The DOE would not answer any questions.

Special Commissioner Anastasia Coleman recommended that DOE require Golfo to return the pay she pocketed while incarcerated. She also said DOE should bar her from any further work with the department. 

“Her actions were clearly more deliberate than she acknowledged to investigators,” Coleman wrote. 

Ken Girardin, a fellow with the Empire Center for Public Policy, a government watchdog, blasted the DOE for failing to keep track of an employee’s incarceration — and enabling Golfo to collect her salary on top of it. 

“In the private sector, three days of sick leave raises concerns. Three months should’ve been setting off flashing red lights and sirens,” Girardin said.  

DOE’s wasteful spending on Golfo’s salary outraged special education activist Fatimi Geidi, who ripped the city for failing “the students that need the most support” — even as it warns of cuts in public-school spending

“Everybody involved needs to be ashamed,” said Geidi, 37, the mother of two developmentally challenged students, one of whom attends public high school. “We’re arguing about the budget and you’re literally throwing it at somebody that committed fraud.”

Former Queens Superintendent Jennifer Carreon Sues the NYC DOE For Racist Policies and Discrimination

 What is going on at the NYC Department of Education?

On March 4, 2023 the NY POST did a story on District 31 Superintendent Dr. Marion Wilson who allegedly sent out racist text messages to Chancellor Banks and others, vowing to "get rid of white principals" and “clean up this island”

See:   City probing anti-white texts linked to black superintendent

Dr. Marion Wilson [photo: Jason Paderon]

And the current news from District 31 (Staten Island) is that there is chaos going on. PS 46 Principal Heather Jansen (who is white) was removed on May 1, 2023. MUCH more about that in a future post.

Never a dull moment, folks.

Betsy Combier

betsy@advocatz.com

Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ Blog


Jennifer Carreon has filed a $20 million discrimination lawsuit against the city Department of Education.Helayne Seidman

By Susan Edelman, NY POST, May 6, 2023

A Filipino-American woman replaced as a Queens superintendent by her black male deputy has filed a $20 million race and gender discrimination suit against the city Department of Education, The Post has learned.

Jennifer Carreón, 45, contends Chancellor David Banks demoted her to install her less-experienced No. 2, David Norment, out of desire to elevate black males.

The Manhattan Supreme Court suit, filed this week, is the first to legally challenge Banks’ choice of superintendents since he made all 45 reapply for their jobs last year in what he called “a shakeup.”

One of 12 removed, Carreón was assigned a lesser bureaucratic role.

The Asian-American Pacific Islander attended NYC public schools from K to 12, growing up in subsidized housing in Lower Manhattan. She started working for the DOE as a teacher in 2002, rising to principal, assistant superintendent, and acting superintendent. She was appointed District 27 superintendent in 2019 by then-Chancellor Richard Carranza.

Carreón told The Post that she hired Norment as her deputy, and took him under her wing. “I was fostering and nurturing his leadership,” she said.

She even encouraged him to become a superintendent.

“When the process opened, he did tell me that he wanted to apply for the Bronx, because that’s where he lives. I said, ‘Oh, good luck, Let me know what I can do to support you.’” 

To her surprise, the DOE invited Norment to a District 27 town hall to compete with his boss for her job.

Norment, an ex-principal at PS 140 in Jamaica, told the Community Education Council that he’d be the best leader to “turn around” schools with low test scores.

Carreón claimed that she was replaced by David Norment because Chancellor David Banks wanted to elevate black males.
district27nyc.org

“I have been a good fit,” Carreón argued at the town hall, saying she connected with immigrant parents and upheld high expectations for students.

In a final blow, Banks introduced the winners at a City Hall press conference.

“I didn’t have any clue,” Carreón said. “Everyone was texting me, “Why aren’t you here? Why is your deputy here?’

“It was a huge shock. I was devastated, because I was succeeding. I was highly effective. That was my last evaluation.”

Banks made all 45 superintendents reapply for their jobs last year.
Matthew McDermott

Desmond Blackburn, Bank’s since-departed deputy chancellor for leadership, had previously praised her 20-minute PowerPoint pitch — in which she described her accomplishments and plans — to remain in the post.

After her ouster, she said, Blackburn gave no explanation except, “The chancellor decided to go in a different direction.”

“It’s not a different direction because they hired my deputy,” Carreón said. “I taught him how to do things, and he needed some work. He needed more growth and was not as experienced, or ready to take on the largest district in Queens and one of the largest in the city.

Carreón originally hired Norment (second from right) to be her deputy.
Twitter D27NYC

District 27 covers 50 schools with 41,500 students in southern Queens and the Rockaways. The students are 41% Hispanic, 21.9% Asian-American, 20.6% black, and 9.9% white.

Banks bowed “to the discriminatory push by certain members of the community to select Norment solely because of his race,” the suit charges.

Lisa Johnson Cooper, president of District 27’s Community Education Council, a panel of parents who interviewed the candidates, told The Post she got personal Facebook messages from residents urging support for “the brother,” referring to Norment.

Cooper, who is black, wrote back: “Y’all vote by party line and by color. That’s crazy to me and no, I’m not getting ‘the brother’ in.”

In an orientation for the newly-installed superintendents last July, Carreón heard from colleagues that a member of the chancellor’s team commented openly, Look around the room – what do you notice? There’s a black male at every table,” the suit says.

Carreón, like several other displaced superintendents, accepted a newly created title, executive director of School Support and Operations, in Lower Manhattan’s District 1, at the same salary, $187,400. The appointed superintendents got raises to $215,000 or $230,000.

“I feel degraded,” she said. “I’ve worked so hard my entire career, did everything you’re supposed to do, and exceeded expectations. Everything was always pointing upwards.” 

Carreón’s lawyers, Davida Perry and Brian Heller, also have pending race-discrimination suits against the DOE on behalf of four white women and a white male who all claim that ex-Chancellor Carranza demoted and replaced them with less-qualified people of color.

DOE and city Law Department officials would not comment.

Wednesday, April 12, 2023

Editorial: Reply To Chad LaVeglia


 When an Attorney violates their code of ethics in any way, it is bad for everyone in the judicial system.

Many readers of this post have wondered what happened that made Chad Laveglia turn on me as seen below. Let me tell you my thoughts. 

In October 2022 when I was quoted in the media about the "fake vaccination cards" case, Chad blew up, saying that HE was the only one who could speak for the Petitioners, "his" clients, and paralegals - i.e. me - cannot practice law, as I was doing by speaking about the case. Here is what he wrote in an email to a reporter: " I AM THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING 30 TEACHERS.  Paralegals cannot practice law...please do not attribute comments to my clients without speaking with me. I am the only one authorized to speak for them." Huh? That came out of the blue. He never made that a term of engagement. Moreover, he never spoke with any of the Petitioners, but I did, 24/7, whenever they called me to ask about writing an email to the UFT, getting benefits while off salary, etc. 

Chad then followed up with another email: "Betsy is amazing. And is more knowledgeable about disciplinary matters than almost anyone....I am to criminal law what Betsy is to education law." 

Thanks Chad!!! Then, in February 2023 after thanking Chad for using the papers I ghostwrote for a teacher appealing his case to the Court of Appeals, I received the emails posted below. I honestly was honored to have him use the papers.

Unbeknownst to me at the time, my position in Chad's eyes as a lowly paralegal who knew nothing about due process rights - or had no right to know - threatened his "I am much better than you" level. My goal was then and is now to assist people in getting their due process, and making sure that everyone can enjoy their rights to life, liberty and justice. 

People who assist or judge individuals based on their perceived social-financial status level is not my way or the right way.

Just sayin'....

I believe that everyone deserves a chance, and I gave Attorney Chad LaVeglia every chance to be professional. He has continued his bully tactics with several of his clients. Therefore, I am posting my reply to his emails sent to me in February which should never have been sent.

Re-posted from Advocatz Op-Ed: MY REPLY TO CHAD LAVEGLIA

Dear Chad,

I debated not answering your venom-filled email sent to me and your new “Chief Executive/client” Monique Parsons  (Index No. 206973/2022) – who I don’t know, and never spoke to – but I see no other way to protect your future clients from the confusion and distress you have caused in the case I worked with you on, the “fake vaccination card” case. I believe no hate-filled bully such as you should be allowed to spread lies about anyone, at any time,  and I will do whatever I can to stop your destruction of people’s trust and lives.

The email you sent your client Mrs. Parsons and me on February 16, 2023 is posted in full below.

Everything I write in this Op-Ed is my opinion, and I am not an attorney, as you very well know. I could have been one. My dad, an Assistant Attorney General for the State of New York for 20+ years under AG Louis Lefkowitz, the people you hate, wanted me to go to law school and he would have paid for it. But I became an investigative reporter instead. Life happens.

In June 2022 when I asked if you would work with me (at Petitioners’ request) on the case of teachers who were erroneously and unlawfully accused of defrauding the City of New York and the NYC Department of Education by allegedly “buying” a COVID vaccination card instead of getting the shot, you told me that you knew nothing about Education Law. I said this is a due process case, and I could contribute information on Education Law 3020-a, the tenure law protecting teachers’ rights. I told you about my experience as a non-Attorney participating in 3020-a arbitration since 2003. We also discussed the untenured teachers’ rights to due process. You agreed to work on the case and told me to keep the Petitioners aware of the case but not to contact you, and keep the Petitioners away as well. If needed, I would email you. I did exactly as you requested. Indeed, before February 11 2023 you told me that I did a great job.

I know you HATED the fact that I was quoted in the media, and you believe that YOU should be the only person quoted. I chose to ignore your incredibly absurd outburst. And when we won the case, I emailed you that I was very happy that you used a paper I wrote for a Plaintiff who presented it to the Court of Appeals. All was good.

On December 30, 2022 Judge Gina Abadi in Kings County Supreme Court granted the Petition, giving the Petitioners their jobs back, and backpay.

Then on Feb. 6, 2023, the City appealed point #4 in Abadi’s order, that they must never again place “tenured Petitioners on leave without pay or reassigning them to reassignment centers without the DOE first commencing disciplinary procedures pursuant to EL 3020 and 3020-a”

See ORDER OF JUDGE ABADI

Neither I nor any of the Petitioners heard from you about whether you were going to submit an Opposition to the Reargument, so I and a Petitioner wrote you on February 11, asking whether you were doing the argument, because you had told me that you do not do appeals.

Your answer on Feb. 13:

“Hi Betsy,
Good to hear from you! And thank you for the kind words. I briefly read their motion. It’s pretty silly. 
I had intended on reaching out. As an aside, I’ve been back and forth with corp counsel. I can respond, and have no problem doing so, just need to work out the logistics i.e., payment”
Then we asked the substance of the communication with the Corporation Counsel. I guess that was our mistake. You despise questions.
You answered on Feb 14, 2023:

“Hey Betsy,

Our conversations revolve around getting the administrative mess between DOE and UFT settled. 
Their motion has nothing to do with backpay or reinstatement. they’re really misinterpreting the 4th grant of relief. 
I don’t have time to speak. I also insist on an agreement upon which I am compensated before performing any further work. 
My Chief Executive is cc’d on this email. Please address further correspondence to her. 
thank you”
We emailed you and Mrs. Parsons asking if you were helping get backpay (we have no information on your help with this), and how much you would charge for the Reargument and Appeal. We were never trying to get any of your time for free. But dont you have to tell your clients how much you want to be paid?
You replied:
“Hi Betsy,
I’m going to explain something quick as a courtesy. This isn’t personal but take it as you like. 
I am no longer spending a single second of my time performing any legal services—directly or indirectly—unless I’m getting paid; like every single other business in the world. I am now extremely stringent with my time. My services are OVER per the engagement agreement. My job is done. I already got backpay for everyone, I won the case. It’s over. It is remarkable to me that not a single Petitioner was able to work this out internally with payroll. 
It is not my problem that the UFT and DOE are too stupid to figure out simple backpay. I was trying to expedite/facilitate getting the teachers backpay. I was generously giving up my time to help others for nothing in return. No more. 
I specifically told you to email Mrs. Parsons, and you just ignored me. That’s just disrespectful and inconsiderate of my time. I’m not dealing with it.” 

Chad, you got backpay for nobody.

Then on Feb. 15, 2023 at 3:59pm, you emailed all the Petitioners in our case, and cc to Mrs. Parsons, his client (but for some unknown reason you did NOT send it to me):

“Hi all, 

Unrelated- I am not dealing with Betsy going forward. I admire Betsy’s dedication to helping teachers, her fortitude, knowledge, and accomplishments. She has as good heart and means well. There is no drama here. I just don’t have the time,  or the patience. I could always charge my hourly fee and bill for every second of mine Betsy consumes.”
The Petitioners answer to me:   ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ we appreciate you! ❤️ ❤️ ❤️
On February 16 a Petitioner in the case sent your email to me, reluctantly, after I asked her if she had heard from you and she told me everyone had, but were very upset with your email.
I sent you an email asking you why you did not send the email to me, and to cease and desist from writing about me without my knowing, and making up false statements such as I spoke with you too much and wasted your time. You know this is not true.
Very soon after I sent my email, you sent this to me and your client Monique Parsons:
“Betsy, you are so out of your depth here. And your timing is horrible.  This is what I said-
“Unrelated- I am not dealing with Betsy going forward. I admire Betsy’s dedication to helping teachers, her fortitude, knowledge, and accomplishments. She has as good heart and means well. There is no drama here. I just don’t have the time,  or the patience. I could always charge my hourly fee and bill for every second of mine Betsy consumes. “
Where is the attack on your integrity and work ethic or maligning of your name? Please point it out to me. Because those words are called compliments. Either you live in a different reality, or don’t comprehend the English language. Which one is it? And you’re so damn selfish and thin skinned that you have the audacity to come at me again—at a time when I am scrambling to help hundreds of employees? What is wrong with you? I certainly have no respect for you now, not as a person or a professional.  You want to see what an ultimate insult looks like Betsy? Here we go. 
This is the second time; you pulled this fake victim card. I have no tolerance for your bullshit. You talk too much and waste my time. Time, I don’t have to give.  And certainly not for free. It’s that simple.  You brought nothing to the table as far as the law or legal strategy. You go off on tangents. But you are extremely shortsighted and only care about yourself. Hence this second, absurd email. I let you get away with it the first time. but no more.  
In fact, you seem to think you’re special. You’re not. I’d say you have balls for emailing me, but it’s stupidity.  Further, I don’t give a shit what you drafted, or for who you drafted it for. You’re not a lawyer. Accept that. Stop trying to be one. And stop expecting to be treated like one. It seems like you think we’re on the same level. You’re delusional. Your administrative accolades are equivalent to me being the MVP of little league baseball. I fight every day for the plight of the little guy. But you’re not the little guy. You have a nice cushy place in NYC. You have nothing in common with the working class. You’re a phony.  I could go on, but I’m bored. You’re insignificant to me. Truly, insignificant. Your cease-and-desist bit is hilarious btw 🤡.  I’m going to block you now Betsy. Good riddens. 


I hate to admit it, but I cried all night of the 16th. Your words really stung. But let your bully pulpit go unrecognized for what it is? Never.


You say you fight every day for the “little guy”? So do I. But I am available to anyone 24/7, i.e. every day, all day (unless I am in a 3020-a or a Court mediation) for free. Ah, I know what you say to that. I’m not an attorney, so I do not know anything, and people shouldn’t speak to me because what I say has no value. Ok, why not let them decide?  Thank goodness many people do not believe you. For those who do, I wish them godspeed. They will need it. I play the victim card? Never have, never will. Is this a feeble attempt to intimidate me? I dont fall for stuff like that.

You say I live in a cushy place in NYC? How do you know? I do not believe that you have ever been here.  Did you judge my location as on the Upper East Side, so everyone lives a ‘cushy’ lifestyle.? You have no idea what my life is like, but let me tell you, it is a happy place, with items left from the happy school days of my four daughters, teen purple hair, rescue puppies, blind white labrador retriever, my guinea pig sophie, beanie babies and my Winnie-the- Pooh and Paddington Bear collections.


Chad, do you see the picture at the top of this Op-Ed? Do you see the man standing next to me and two of
my daughters, and in the picture below with my mom?
 

This person is my husband of 39 years, a nice man from Lima Peru who worked for the City of New York for 40 years, 37 years at Hunter College, as an electrician. Local Union No. 3 IBEW (“Local 3”). Is this the “little guy” I know nothing about? Isn’t my husband a working-class person with whom you say I have nothing in common? In my opinion, his respect for everyone on the planet – whether the person is black, white, purple or green, of any religion, gender, age, or financial position – makes him a better person than you. I dont know what level you are on that is so far above my level, but I couldn’t care less.

One more thing –
You ended your email to me on the 16th with “Good riddens “.
The correct way to write this is “Good riddance”.





I