Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Laurel Sturt: Arrest Commissioner King and Chancellor Tisch

 

Wake Up Call For New York's Gov. Cuomo

Posted: 01/10/2014 5:28 pm
LINK


Laurl Sturt

In a recent New York state public forum about the Common Core with Education Commissioner John King and state Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch in Manhattan, the room was rife with rancor, as it had been in previous forums all over the state. Late in the evening, when it finally came my turn to speak, I sought to enliven the soporific atmosphere with a surprising declaration. Along with the rest of the shills for corporate education, I announced, Commissioner King and Chancellor Tisch should be arrested on several counts: Educational neglect, child abuse, armed robbery (the theft of an authentic, quality education from our children), assault with a deadly weapon (their power and forcing a fake education on our kids), murder in the first degree (the killing of our children's spirit and their innate love of learning); and treason -- they are traitors to our children and the nation's future, and their destructive actions endanger our global status, posing a threat to our national security.
Only half tongue-in-cheek, given the current climate, my declaration was met with widespread and resounding approval. In New York state, demoralized students, furious parents and disgusted educators are fast reaching critical mass with unpopular education initiatives. In early January, education activists are staging a long overdue assault on Governor Andrew Cuomo, who's so far stayed off the radar and made Education Commissioner John King take the heat in irate public forums. The statewide protests are timed to take place around Cuomo's annual State of the State Address.
High-stakes testing is one of the rallying points for the spreading dissent. In 12 years of a destructive focus on test prep and testing, no New York legislative body has challenged this catastrophic education policy. Yet just last month, the New York City Council passedResolution 1394, calling for the elimination of high-stakes testing in New York City schools. As such, it joins thousands of school districts across the country, including the vast majority of those in Texas, where the obsession with testing originated. Vast numbers of people are saying no to the replacement of quality education with a shallow measure, testing, which indicates neither students' achievement nor that of their teachers. Yet New York's Education Commissioner John King has responded to this outcry, so resounding that tens of thousands of children are being opted out of the tests by parents, with his embrace of the Common Core State Standards, which actually double down on high-stakes testing.
The increased emphasis on testing is a natural consequence of the Common Core, designed overwhelmingly by education businesses who stand to profit from the new mandates, many of them testing companies. Filling the coffers of these testing businesses, to the tune of billions of dollars, has been deemed more important than actually testing the Common Core. As much as it emphasizes testing, the Common Core itself has never been tested, but rushed into implementation by special interests. Imagine if pharmaceutical drugs were not tested in this way, and any poison could be forced on the public, because the bottom line of the drug company is more important than the safety of consumers. In any other field, we would never validate untested, unresearched theories -- let alone use them on our most valued treasure and national resource, our children. Yet Commissioner King and other education "leaders" across the country have seen fit to exploit our children as guinea pigs in a vast experiment, while exploiting public dollars for private profit.
The focus on testing is just one part of the systematized destruction which stands in for education these days. And the tests, moreover, have become, overnight, absurdly harder, guaranteeing the kids' failure and that of their teachers, whose job ratings, thanks to Race to the Top mandates, are tied to them. But worse, when they're not prepping for tests or taking them, our kids are being subjected to curriculum several years in advance of what they are developmentally capable. The entire school day has become a grueling obstacle course, capped off with mountains of homework so obtuse, their parents are not even able to help with it.
Kids are feeling like failures everywhere, screaming, crying, throwing tantrums -- literally banging their heads on the desk. Vast numbers of kids who used to love school are now refusing to attend. After a morning of testing, entire classes are spending the afternoon in tears. School administrators have had to call the state and ask, "What do we do when there's vomit on a student's test answer sheet?"
Gov. Cuomo has exacerbated the conflict over education by supporting the collection of students' private information, 400 points of data to be shared with private education businesses to further extract money from parents, kids and districts. Nine states originally signed up for this ill-conceived and astoundingly intrusive facet of the Race to the Top grant competition, yet all, but New York dropped out of the program because of valid privacy concerns. So this is yet another battle for beleaguered parents and educators to fight in New York state.
Governor of a state home to Sleepy Hollow and slumbering Rip Van Winkle, Andrew Cuomo's about to be jolted from his long winter's education nap. An awakened citizenry is sounding the alarm, and for state officials in New York, the snooze button's no longer an option.
-
-
Laurel M. Sturt, a former New York City public school teacher, is the author of the book 'Davonte's Inferno: Ten Years in the New York Public School Gulag.'

Saturday, January 25, 2014

On the issue of Retaliation, the Investigators of OSI, SCI, and OEO, and Why It Is Important to Fight

Friday, January 24, 2014

Campaign Leader Tara Heidinger Asks For Cameras in Special Needs Classrooms



Tara Heidinger campaign leader
To: President Barack Obama an all State Governors 
Cameras in special needs classrooms for safety
Dear Mr. President and all State Governors : 
My name is Tara Heidinger. My son Corey has autism. I have started a campaign to have audio/video cameras placed in all special needs classrooms for the safety of our nonverbal/little verbal, special needs children. Recently, my son came home from school upset because of an incident that had taken place in which the aide in his classroom physically and mentally assaulted him. Another student in his class witnessed this event and being verbal, this student was able to tell me what happened. When I brought this to the school's attention, I was told there would be an investigation. The conclusion of their investigation was the boys told them it didn’t happen and that my son was making it up. My son had visible marks on his body from the assault and the boys continue to tell me to this day that this incident happened. The boys still tell me till this day it happen. They said they were punished for saying it happen. Had there been cameras in the classroom, this incident might have never happened or at least the aide would be held accountable for her actions. As a parent, could you imagine your girls not being able to express to you what others might be doing to them? It's a permanent worry in the minds of parents of special needs children.
My story is only one of the many of both physical and verbal abuse as well as neglect taking place in special needs classrooms all over the country. But cameras would not only serve as protection for our children, they would also serve as protection for teachers and aides against false accusations and retaliation from within their own districts. Cameras would serve as a wonderful training tool as well.
I have taken the initiative to create a Facebook pagehttps://www.facebook.com/CamerasInSpecialNeedsClassrooms and a petition addressed to you, Sir, asking that special needs classrooms be equipped with cameras to protect our most vulnerable and precious children. You can also listen to my own personal story on YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISfTx01BrBk&feature=youtu.be
I am asking that you please support my efforts to make this happen. With technology advancing every day, this is something that must inevitably happen. We need your positive leadership to move this campaign forward. Please feel free to contact me with questions or concerns. Thank you for all you do for us every day. taraheidinger@netzero.com 
Sincerely, Tara Heidinger/Cameras In Special Needs Classrooms


A grassroots movement to put cameras in classrooms, driven by the parents of special-needs students, is simmering across the country. It's a personal crusade for many of the parents who say their children have suffered abuse at the hands of teachers and classroom aides with unsatisfying consequences.

Parents in states such as Ohio, Texas, Michigan, New Jersey and Tennessee have taken to the Internet to promote their cause with petitions, videos, Facebook pages and letters to the president. Many of their children either cannot speak or have difficulty with verbal communication.

Tara Heidinger describes son Corey, 8, as "the happiest boy in the world." He loves all sports -- basketball is his favorite -- and is quick to beat most of the video games he gets. He's shy around kids, but comfortable around adults.

He is also autistic and can become "hysterical" if faced with change in his schedule or day-to-day routine in their hometown of Lakewood, Ohio.

When Corey arrived home from school May 10, he was "very sad," Heidinger said.

"He's usually happy and joyous, but this day he was very sad and he said, 'The teacher [was] mean to me,'" Heidinger said. "I really didn't think anything of it because teachers can tend to be 'mean' to get their point across."

But later on, some of Corey's more verbal classmates told Heidinger that the teacher's aide had "grabbed Corey by the arm really hard" and "screamed in his face" to stop his crying when he became upset.

Heidinger, 34, said Corey had visible marks on his skin from an alleged physical and verbal assault, so she went to the school and confronted the principal.

"I was scared out of my mind. She didn't believe the story I was telling her," Heidinger said. "They tried to say the boys made up the story, that it could be their autism."

When school officials told Heidinger there was no proof of the alleged attack, she asked whether they had cameras in the classrooms or in the hallways. The answer was no.

"There should be cameras in these classrooms because so many of these children don't speak at all," she said. "Any safety issues for children should override any privacy issues for staff."

So Heidinger decided to take matters into her own hands and make it her personal mission to get cameras in the classroom, focusing first on classrooms with children who cannot speak or who have low verbal communication abilities.

She sent a letter to President Obama and she has about 4,000 supporters between her Change.org petition and her Facebook page.

Florida psychologist and special education attorney Katie Kelly has been in frequent contact with Heidinger, calling her a "relentless" advocate for the cause.

Kelly is the mother of a child with Asperger's syndrome and represents many clients whose special-needs children have been abused at school. "It's just horror story after horror story," Kelly said.

She is contacted several times a month by parents from across the country who say their developmentally challenged children have been abused physically, verbally or sexually.

The parents are connecting online and slowly organizing their cause.

"This movement has come directly from parents who have been affected by having their children be abused at school," Kelly said. "One by one, in different states, people have seen that and it's resonated in them and they've taken up the call.

"There's a national dream that all families are happy and all schools and classrooms are happy and you really don't want to open the door and see that it's really ugly in there," she said.

Google alerts on Kelly's computer for abuse stories are "a daily occurrence" and she is continually "stunned" at how many cases are reported, as well as the ones she imagines are not reported.



"I think what we see is the tip of the iceberg," she said. "When you're dealing with kids who can't talk or who have very low verbal skills and you're seeing this amount of reporting, it seems to me that there are more parents out there who aren't discovering it."

The National Association of Special Education Teachers did not respond to request for comment, but the association's executive director, George Giuliani, has expressed uneasiness with the perceived rise in parents' using audio and video equipment to make their own secret recordings. He indicated that it might be time to consider a more formal method of supervision, according to The Associated Press.

"In classrooms where children are nonverbal, unable to communicate, defenseless, we should start to have a discussion of whether cameras in the classroom are necessary," Giuliani told the AP in April.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) did not immediately respond to request for comment, but its Virginia branch supported earlier this year a pending state bill that would prohibit closed-circuit cameras in schools to monitor students, "unless it is necessary to protect the physical safety and security of students."

As for the parents who discover any abuse, the fight is tough. Without evidence, it is often the disabled child's word versus a school's denial. Kelly said that when parents don't have photographs or video of the alleged abuse, there is often not much they can do.

"I'm absolutely a proponent of cameras in the classroom," she said. "I think when you have many vulnerable children together, it provides safety not only for the children, but for the staff. Accusations can go both ways."

Kelly said that case law has shown that privacy rights do not extend to the classroom. Many common spaces in schools, like cafeterias, have cameras, as do school buses. She said case law has only shown that cameras are prohibited in areas such as bathrooms and locker rooms.

"Schools are very hesitant to look for abuse because it opens them up to potential litigation," Kelly said. "They don't want to open that can of worms so they just deny, deny, deny."

Kelly acknowledges that while abuse is never the answer, teachers and schools are faced with a "perfect storm in education" of increasingly challenging factors including overcrowding in classrooms, diminished resources and low pay.

"I think that's what's leading to a meltdown," she said.

The abuse stories that make it into headlines are often the ones where parents take on the role of detective and expose the abuse with video or audio recordings.

A New Jersey dad who suspected something was "horrifyingly wrong" at school when his autistic son began acting violently had the boy wear a digital recorder and discovered teachers verbally abusing him.

When the dad, Stuart Chaifetz, listened to the recordings, he heard the teacher and aide calling his son Akian names, making fun of him, yelling at him and having inappropriate conversations in front of the children.

"He's the best human being I've ever met and these people were taking it away because they were crushing his spirit," Chaifetz said of his son. "If I had not spoken out and released that video, it would have been like it never happened, except to Akian because it happened to him and he knows it."

School officials were "shocked and horrified" by the audio, Chaifetz said. The aide was fired but the tenured teacher could not be fired and was moved to another school.

Chaifetz has received thousands of emails of support, many of which have been from parents' pushing for cameras in classrooms, which Chaifetz supports.

"Nobody wants anyone to see what's going on in some of these rooms," Chaifetz told ABCNews.com. "Let's stop just saying that schools are about the kids and let's actually make them about the kids. It's not going to hurt anyone that's doing a good job."

But not everyone is so certain that cameras in the classroom are the way to go, and Sara Gelser of the National Council on Disability calls the push for cameras in classrooms "a symptom of a larger problem."

"I don't know that cameras in the classroom themselves are the answer to the problem," Gelser said. "I think what we really need to be looking at is better regulation."

Gelser said she understands the frustrations of families, but can see why schools might be reluctant to undergo the constant supervision.

"I worry about issues of privacy in terms of filming people. Many of us don't like the idea of being filmed," she said. "I understand why people are raising the issue. These families are desperate and there are very few choices that are left to them."

Her National Council on Disability is the independent federal agency that recommends disability policy to the president, Congress and all other federal agencies.

Whether cameras in classrooms will be a solution parents and educators agree on, it is clear to all parties involved that something must be done to protect special-needs children.

"We shouldn't be putting the onus on the parents to become Sherlock Holmes or Nancy Drew to figure out what's going on during the school day," Gelser said. "No one should have to protect their child from school."
 
 

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Accountability: Holding People Accountable For Their Actions

Re-posted from my blog National Public Voice, which is posting editorials and article that help my Foundation, The E-Accountability Foundation, hold people accountable for their actions on the web:

Bob Lenz: Authentic Assessment Heightens Accountability

LINK

Bob Lenz, CEO and Co-Founder, Envision Schools, San Francisco

How Authentic Assessment Heightens Accountability in Our Schools
EDUTOPIA,DECEMBER 5, 2012
How do we foster intrinsic motivation, for both teachers and students, to work towards high performance? Can we create a system of accountability that will drive this performance? At Envision Education, we answer with a resounding,yes. However, our accountability is not driven by a system of rewards and punishments; it is driven by an authentic system of accountability driven by making the work of students, teachers, and the school public.
Envision uses several strategies systematically to open the learning to the broader community which drive more rigorous outcomes at every level of our school system.
Over the last few weeks I have observed some of these strategies at work at Envision Academy of Arts and Technology High School (EA) in Oakland, CA. Here is a little background data on EA:

·         More than 70 percent of the students qualify as low income and will be the first in their family to graduate from college
·         100 percent of the students in the class of 2012 graduated with all courses required for California public university system entrance, compared with 40 percent of students statewide
·         95 percent of students in the class of 2012 were accepted to a four year or two year college, compared to 48 percent of students statewide
·         For EA's first two graduating classes (2010 and 2011), the college persistence rate from the first to second year of college is 72 percent (compared to the national average of 55 percent)

How do we use authentic accountability to drive this high performance at Envision Academy?
Public Exhibition of Work
At least twice a year, Envision students and teachers present their learning to the broader community. At Envision Academy, I had a chance to listen to ninth and tenth grade students debrief their fall exhibition. The ninth graders presented their learning through digital media telling their own story as learners and as people. They presented in semi-formal attire at an evening performance at school. They shared their poems and artwork -- not just to their teachers but also to their parents, siblings, grandparents, and other guests. During the class reflections, a teacher shared a story of one parent's tears of joy as she watched her son present his project.
The tenth graders were celebrating with "Academy Awards" for their performance of short, theatrical public service announcements on social and medical issues from their biology classes. The principal shared with me that two of the winners for best male actor were students who came to EA struggling with skill gaps and low motivation. Clearly, they had become motivated by the project and the public performance.
How does this type of public performance drive authentic teacher accountability? If the students are not prepared or they produce low quality work, it is not hidden in this type of system. Not only do your teaching colleagues and school leader witness the quality and rigor of the student work product, the entire school community including the students' parents see the work. There is no place to hide. As a teacher, you become committed to the success of all your students because you do not want to see them publicly fail or falter.
Instructional Rounds
A couple weeks later, I spent a day as part of our Envision Professional Learning Community conducting "Instructional Rounds." Based on the work of Dick Elmore from Harvard and the medical school concept of rounds, Envision teachers, school leaders, network leaders, board members, and community members from other schools and organizations gather at each school in the Envision network twice a year to help each school investigate a "problem of practice." The school opens all of its classroom doors for observation from the group assembled in the morning. In the afternoon, the group works with the school to move from observations to action -- concrete next steps. Envision Academy asked the question, "How are teachers moving students towards more independent learning?"
Using the evidence gathered by their "critical friends," Envision Academy gained insights into where they were using strategies that led to greater student independence and places where there is room for growth. The school leadership team used this data to create an immediate plan of action to begin improving their collective practice. Imagine the level of commitment towards high performance it requires as a school principal and as teachers to open up every classroom in your school for observation when no outside authority is driving you to do so (e.g. accreditation visits). Like the students in the exhibition, the public nature of this practice drives the leader and teachers towards improvement intrinsically and not with an external reward or punishment based solely on a standardized test score.
In my next post, I will describe how Envision Learning Partners uses a process called Design Studios to open up our schools as a place for colleagues from other schools, districts, and networks to learn and plan the redesign of learning at their own schools.
Let's start a conversation through the comments: How does your school hold you and students accountable? How does your district or charter management organization hold your school accountable? Is it working? How do you know?
·      BOB LENZ'S BLOG
7
Comments (7)
Comment RSSSIGN IN OR REGISTER TO POST COMMENTS
http://cdn3.edutopia.org/sites/all/themes/hextopia/images/comments/default-avatar.jpg
Posted on 2/4/2013 5:30am
0
We have the International Baccalaureate Program in our school and therefore, teachers and students are extremely accountable. For instance,50% the course I teach is graded externally. I grade the rest of the course, however, it is moderated externally. Having this system holds us all accountable and most certainly raises the level of student learning.
http://cdn3.edutopia.org/sites/all/themes/hextopia/images/comments/default-avatar.jpg
Posted on 12/10/2012 7:16pm
0
I love the idea having the students present their own work in front of an audience. I believe that would keep them accountable for their work and make them want to do their very best. It is also a good way to show their peers what they have learned and to learn from each other.
I taught 4th grade last year, and in an effort to mix it up, I broke up my classroom into groups of 4. I then made them accountable for reading a section of their Social Studies book on the different regions of the US. They then made a billboard trying to persuade new settlers to come to their region giving examples from the text. They then presented their billboard to the rest of the class. I really felt that giving them ownership of a section of material made them more accountable for their learning and the teaching of their peers.
It is awesome to give students a voice!
http://cdn3.edutopia.org/sites/all/themes/hextopia/images/comments/default-avatar.jpg
Posted on 12/10/2012 6:47pm
0
I am really impressed with the stats from Envision Academy. I too teach students with low income and many of them will be the frist to graduate from high school or college in their families. It is exciting to see how well the students do in college. I have not used a public performance in my classroom, but I can see how it would motivate both the students and the teachers to be prepared and successful. I have not heard of instructional rounds before. I feel that they could be beneficial to schools because the school woudl gain feedback from others outside of the system. Does the school invite certain people to come and visit, or is it more of an open invitation to be a part of this process?
http://cdn3.edutopia.org/sites/all/themes/hextopia/images/comments/default-avatar.jpg
High School Math Teacher from Minneapolis, MN
Posted on 12/10/2012 6:43pm
0
I've taught in two different schools with two different views on the matter. One school was very open to having the public come in and see what your classroom is like. It took a while for the students (and myself) to get used to strangers walking in during class. After a while, it was almost expected and the students were no longer distracted. As a teacher, that was the hardest part to get used to. How will this affect my ability to maintain my students' attention? The more it happened, the easier it got. As for the second school, there really isn't any school or district accountability. It's almost like a "no news is good news" philosophy. I think they would be open to allowing the public in for visits, but it isn't encouraged as much as the first school.
I love the idea of the public exhibitions! What a great way to hold everyone accountable.
http://cdn4.edutopia.org/files/imagecache/profile_picture_list/profile_pictures/DSC01996.JPG
Junior and Senior Language arts Teacher, North Dakota
Posted on 12/10/2012 6:28pm
0
I enjoyed your ideas on how to make assessment authentic. Public exhibitions and instructional rounds are two interesting ideas. I have utilized public exhibitions in my classroom before, going to far as having community members come in to interview and view the students' work; however, I have not heard of instructional rounds before. I like the idea of opening the classroom to the public as it would give non-teachers a real glimpse of what teaching entails. It would also motivate teachers to be at their best.
I would be interested to know how this process begins.
http://cdn3.edutopia.org/sites/all/themes/hextopia/images/comments/default-avatar.jpg
High School English Teacher
Posted on 12/9/2012 8:09am
0
I really like your concept of the performance assessment here where students summarize and present their learning for a more public audience, not just of their peers, but of parents, siblings, grandparents, other parents, and administration. I think knowing that they will be showing off their learning to others in a non-traditional classroom setting really does encourage them to go the extra mile to make sure their learning is "good" and authentic. Students (and their teachers) don't want to appear unprepared in front of others, especially since this type of assessment is public and would be very clear in displaying their amount of effort.
Just out of curiosity, how well attended are the open-house nights for these presentations? I think they are a great idea, but wonder if it is difficult in our busy lives to get parents to come in.
http://cdn3.edutopia.org/sites/all/themes/hextopia/images/comments/default-avatar.jpg
Kindergarten Teacher from Otsego, Minnesota
Posted on 12/7/2012 1:16pm
0
Wow! I have to say that it would take a LOT to get teachers in my school to open their classrooms to the public or even to other teachers at times to come and observe them and their students. So many teachers seem to be 'scared' when the principal has to come observe them formally every 3 years and formally 3x/year for the first three years until tenure. I have been observed several times and admit I would get nervous when the principal would come in, but mostly it was in the anticipation of her coming. If she just showed up, I should be doing the same thing whether she is there or not. I think this attitude is what is needed throughout the schools. I also think it is helpful if teachers are open to suggestions instead of feeling like they know everything and shouldn't have anyone else telling them how to teach or what to change. We need to change, that is part of education! The formal observations are how teachers are held accountable.
As far as how our school holds students accountable, it seems to be through standardized testing. I do not think it is working since so many parents and students do not care about the tests and some students don't even read the questions before answering. I think a lot of the attitude comes from home. If the parents care about their students score or grades, then the student is more likely to care. If the parents don't care, neither does the parent. How do we get parents attitudes to change along with students? How do we get teachers to want to learn more and be excited about changing things or trying new things in their classrooms to teach the students instead of sticking to the things they've been doing for 30 years whether they work or not?