Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Patrick Walsh on Education, the Evening News, and Getting His Name Right

Patrick - I think I got your name right!

Betsy Combier

Raginghorseblog


NBC News: How Can You Trust A News Agency To Get its Facts Straight When It Can’t Even Get Your Name Straight?

February 28, 2014
LINK



Granted, at this point in time anyone who gets their nightly news from television is a damned fool and deserves whatever slop is dished out to them. And you can rest assured, whatever the subject, it will be slop. Still, one expects a modicum of something that somewhat resembles real journalism, even from NBC, producer of the risible weeklong billionaire backed infomercial for public school privatization called “Education Nation, ” featuring Goldie Hawn.
This afternoon, following in the wake of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s welcome announcement that NYC charter schools would no longer automatically receive whatever they asked for, as was the case under the endless reign of Mike Bloomberg, I was asked by my union to speak to the press, in this case, NBC News. This I did, trying to articulate as best I could the miserable and degrading experience of “co-locating “ in a building with Eva Moskowitz’s Harlem Success Academy. Indeed, my school has the unfortunate distinction of being the host in which Success Academy first began to metastasize. Soon, of course, Eva’s chain was spreading all over the city even as it slowly devoured our building, taking at first a few rooms here and there and then swallowing up an entire floor. In this painful process we lost our music room and with our music program. (It’s impossible to gauge such a loss in the life of a child but know it is immense. ) Gone was our computor room. Occupational therapy and physical therapy were soon delivered in hallways, stairways or rooms formerly known as closets. Whatever. Storage rooms were suddenly designated classrooms. I know. I had one. Lunch schedules were reconfigured so kids were forced to eat lunch soon after they arrived. Without a word to the parents and community of our school, the school yard was rendered largely useless by the imposition of a strange, completely impractical astroturf section. An entire school and thus an entire community was distorted and contorted almost beyond recognition to make room for Eva’s rapacious hunger for ever more space and Mike Bloomberg’s mad delight in delivering it at whatever the cost to the dignity of the students of our school. The atmosphere was instantly poisonous and, despite the good will and good intentions of a couple of Harlem Success business managers who seem to run the show, remains so. From the beginning, we were treated like unwelcome guests if not out right intruders in our own building, an attitude that was not lost on the children of either camp.
This did not come of thin air but from the top.
Year after year there was more and more encroachment; more and more often would the students of Harlem Success Academy be eerily marched by the children of my school without as much as looking at them, as if the act of making eye contact with such riff raff would somehow contaminate the charter school “scholars.” (Note: Eva ignorantly insists her teachers address their students as “scholars”, apparently not realizing that the two words mean very different things. ) Far more often than not, the refusal to recognize the common humanity of another was also shared by Eva’s ever-transient teaching brigade. It is unnerving, I assure you, to be treated as if you are invisible.
And soon enough began the annual ritual of receiving those students who Harlem Success Academy deemed not up to snuff, so out the door they went, and in our door they came.
As a truly public school we labor under the ethical obligation of educating every student, regardless of how difficult, troubled or torn.
Not so the charter school that have the luxury of bouncing whom they will when they. And bounce they do.
One can go on and on but I trust you get the point.
None of this would you have any chance of knowing from NBC’s ad for Harlem Success Academy which portrays the chain, not as the spoiled child that can afford to pay Moskowitz almost half a million dollars a year in salary, and spend more than a million dollars a year on super slick recruitment propaganda, but as a suddenly “homeless” orphan punished by a thoughtless and cruel mayor, bent on punishing them for their success. Note: Like thousands and thousands of New York parents, my daughter received in the mail a slick, professionally produced glossy postcard enticing her to enter into a brand new Success Academy that was to open in my downtown neighborhood. (It didn’t.) My daughter was five years old at the time. The Department of Education thought it a fine idea to give her address and the addresses of thousands of children out to help build Ms. Moskowitz’s burgeoning empire.
Anything for Eva.
From the beginning, a public relations campaign plowed on in several fronts, one slicker than the next. There was the full-length documentary, The Lottery. Then there was the egregious book Class Warfare in which author Steven Brill, pitting one school against another, praised Harlem Success Academy to the heavens as the same time he disgraced himself by writing of a teacher no teacher in my school had ever known. No problem!
But O, those tests scores, you may say! Do they not make up for everything ? Of that consider this timelypiece.
Back to NBC News. With a few annual exceptions or in emergencies, it has been many years since I have watched “the news” on TV on a regular basis. Still, I am very aware of its effects, mostly horrific, on many of my fellow citizens. We are, after, the nation that twice elected Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton and George W. Bush ( kind of ) and Barack Obama to the presidency of the United States, a feat of political imbecility unimaginable without TV.) Because of its sponsoring of the insidious Education Nation, NBC News seems especially contemptible to me, especially when it came to education.
Still, tonight’s “reporting” on De blasio’s decision — “The War on Charter Schools “ — was so preposterously lopsided as to be absurd, even by the absurd standards of the corporate media’s reportage on corporate education reform campaigns like that of Harlem Success Academy. The only word for it is “propaganda.” Here is my always-prescient friend and colleague NYC Educator’s take on the “report. ”
My twenty second cameo under a name not mine was meant to serve, apparently, as proof of giving both sides of the co-location story, regardless of the fact that the charter school advocates were given many, more times the time I or any other public school advocate was given.
What it really serves to prove, however, is the utter shoddiness of NBC News. Consider this: My name is Patrick Walsh, a name I clearly stated and even spelled out for the NBC reporter. In the report I am called Patrick Murphy, a fine name, to be sure, but one that does not belong to me nor I to it.
My question: how is it possible to trust a news agency to get their facts right when they not only produce slick, poisonous garbage like Education Nation, but when they can’t even get someone’s name straight ?

Saturday, March 1, 2014

Clarification of Freedom of Information Law by NYS Committee on Open Government Director Robert Freeman



July 6, 1998Mr. Gregory P. Klibansky
52 Jamaica Ave.
Holtsville, NY 11742
The staff of the Committee on Open Government is authorized to issue advisory opinions. 
The ensuing staff advisory opinion is based solely upon the information presented in your
correspondence.
Dear Mr. Klibansky:
Your letter of June 17 addressed to Governor Pataki has been forwarded to the
Committee on Open Government. The Committee, a unit of the Department of State, is
authorized to provide advice concerning the Freedom of Information Law.
In brief, you described a series of difficulties and delays in your attempts to gain
access to records from the Office of the Suffolk County District Attorney. As I understand
the matter, you requested any files maintained by that agency pertaining to you, and you
expressed particular interest in a claim made by an individual in a judicial proceeding that you
"surreptitiously faxed him some type of material." That individual also contended that the
incident was investigated by a detective, and you requested the name of the detective and
records relating to the contention and its investigation. Despite repeated attempts made by
phone and in writing to the Office of the District Attorney, it appears that you had received
no substantive response as of the date of your letter to the Governor.
From my perspective, several issues are pertinent to an analysis of the matter. In this
regard, I offer the following comments.
First, in an initial response to your request, it was stated that you did not "reasonably
describe" the records sought as required by the Freedom of Information Law [see §89(3)]. 
To meet that standard, an applicant is required to supply sufficient detail (i.e., names, dates,
indictment, index or docket numbers) to enable agency staff to locate and identify the records. 
I point out that it has been held by the Court of Appeals, the State's highest court, that to
deny a request on the ground that it fails to reasonably describe the records, an agency must
establish that "the descriptions were insufficient for purposes of locating and identifying the
documents sought" [Konigsberg v. Coughlin, 68 NY 2d 245, 249 (1986)].
The Court in Konigsberg found that the agency could not reject the request due to its
breadth and also stated that:
"respondents have failed to supply any proof whatsoever as to
the nature - or even the existence - of their indexing system: 
whether the Department's files were indexed in a manner that
would enable the identification and location of documents in
their possession (cf. National Cable Tel. Assn. v Federal
Communications Commn., 479 F2d 183, 192 [Bazelon, J.]
[plausible claim of nonidentifiability under Federal Freedom of
Information Act, 5 USC section 552 (a) (3), may be presented
where agency's indexing system was such that 'the requested
documents could not be identified by retracing a path already
trodden. It would have required a wholly new enterprise,
potentially requiring a search of every file in the possession of
the agency'])" (id. at 250).
In my view, whether a request reasonably describes the records sought, as suggested by the
Court of Appeals, may be dependent upon the terms of a request, as well as the nature of an
agency's filing or record-keeping system. In Konigsberg, it appears that the agency was able
to locate the records on the basis of an inmate's name and identification number.
While I am unfamiliar with the record keeping systems of the Office of the District
Attorney, to extent that the records sought can be located with reasonable effort, I believe
that the request would have met the requirement of reasonably describing the records. On
the other hand, if the records are not maintained in a manner that permits their retrieval except
by reviewing perhaps hundreds or even thousands of records individually in an effort to locate
those falling within the scope of the request, to that extent, the request would not in my
opinion meet the standard of reasonably describing the records. If you were not a party to the
proceeding in which the issue of the fax arose, it is questionable in my view whether a request
for records pertaining to you, without additional detail, would meet the requirement of
reasonably describing the records.
Second, assuming that the records of your interest can be located, the Freedom of
Information Law is based upon a presumption of access. Stated differently, all records of an agency are available, except to the extent that records or portions thereof fall within one or more grounds for denial appearing in §87(2)(a) through (i) of the Law. Several of the grounds for denial might be relevant in determining rights of access.
You did not indicate the outcome of the case. If the charges against the accused were
dismissed in his favor, the records would be sealed pursuant to §160.50 of the Criminal
Procedure and, therefore, would be exempted from disclosure by statute in accordance with
§87(2)(a) of the Freedom of Information Law.
If there was a conviction, much of the information sought would likely be accessible. 
Insofar as the records were introduced or disclosed in a public judicial proceeding, they would
be available, even if one or more of the grounds would otherwise apply [see Moore v.
Santucci, 151 AD2d 677 (1989)]. If they were not introduced during the proceeding and are
not part of the public court record, the extent to which the records could be withheld would
be dependent on their contents. For example, if the records identify persons other than
yourself, such as witnesses or those interviewed as part of an investigation, of potential
relevance is §87(2)(b), which permits an agency to withhold records insofar as disclosure
would constitute "an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." Also of possible relevance
is §87(2)(e), which authorizes an agency to withhold records that:
"are compiled for law enforcement purposes and which
disclosed, would:
i. interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial
proceedings.
ii. deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or impartial
adjudication;
iii. identify a confidential source or disclose confidential
information relating to a criminal investigation; or

iiii. reveal criminal investigative techniques or procedures,
except routine techniques and procedures."
The extent to which the records of your interest could justifiably be withheld under the
provisions cited above would be largely dependent on the effects of disclosure.
Since you sought the name of a detective, I point out that public officers and
employees enjoy a lesser degree of privacy than others, for it has been found in various
contexts that those individuals are required to be more accountable than others. The courts
have found that, as a general rule, records that are relevant to the performance of the official duties of a public officer or employee are available, for disclosure in such instances would result in a permissible rather than an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy
[see e.g.,Farrell v. Village Board of Trustees, 372 NYS 2d 905 (1975); Gannett Co. v. County of Monroe, 59 AD 2d 309 (1977), aff'd 45 NY 2d 954 (1978); Sinicropi v. County of Nassau,76 AD 2d 838 (1980); Geneva Printing Co. and Donald C. Hadley v. Village of Lyons, Sup.
Ct., Wayne Cty., March 25, 1981; Montes v. State, 406 NYS 2d 664 (Court of Claims,
1978); Powhida v. City of Albany, 147 AD 2d 236 (1989); Scaccia v. NYS Division of State
Police, 530 NYS 2d 309, 138 AD 2d 50 (1988); Steinmetz v. Board of Education, East
Moriches, Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cty., NYLJ, Oct. 30, 1980); Capital Newspapers v. Burns, 67
NY 2d 562 (1986)]. Conversely, to the extent that items relating to public officers or
employees are irrelevant to the performance of their official duties, it has been found that
disclosure would indeed constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [see e.g.,
Matter of Wool, Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., NYLJ, Nov. 22, 1977, dealing with membership in
a union; Minerva v. Village of Valley Stream, Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty., May 20, 1981, involving
the back of a check payable to a municipal attorney that could indicate how that person
spends his/her money; Selig v. Sielaff, 200 AD 2d 298 (1994), concerning disclosure of social
security numbers].
It is also noted that in a recent decision, it was held that the names of investigative
employees of the New York City Department of Investigation must be disclosed. It was held
in Lewis v. Giuliani (Supreme Court, New York County, NYLJ, May 1, 1997) that:
"any effort by DOI to keep the names of its investigative
employees undisclosed under POL §89(2)(b)(iv) or (v) may
not succeed because information concerning the identities of
persons doing the agency's work is ‘relevant to the work of
the agency requesting or maintaining it' and is ‘relevant to the
ordinary work of such agency.' In addition, because the
purpose of the exemption is to prevent the ‘unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy' (emphasis added), DOI may not
engage in mantra-like invocation of the personal privacy
exemption in an effort to ‘have carte blanche to withhold any
information it pleases' (Kheel v. Ravitch, 93 AD2d 422, 426;
affd 62 NY2d 1), especially with respect to information about
its employees."

Next, in view of the delays that you have encountered, I point out that the Freedom
of Information Law provides direction concerning the time and manner in which agencies
must respond to requests. Specifically, §89(3) of the Freedom of Information Law states in
part that:
"Each entity subject to the provisions of this article, within
five business days of the receipt of a written request for a
record reasonably described, shall make such record available
to the person requesting it, deny such request in writing or
furnish a written acknowledgement of the receipt of such
request and a statement of the approximate date when such
request will be granted or denied..."
If neither a response to a request nor an acknowledgement of the receipt of a request is given
within five business days, or if an agency delays responding for an unreasonable time after it
acknowledges that a request has been received, a request may, in my opinion, be considered
to have been constructively denied. In such a circumstance, I believe that the denial may be
appealed in accordance with §89(4)(a) of the Freedom of Information Law. That provision
states in relevant part that:
"...any person denied access to a record may within thirty days
appeal in writing such denial to the head, chief executive, or
governing body, who shall within ten business days of the
receipt of such appeal fully explain in writing to the person
requesting the record the reasons for further denial, or provide
access to the record sought."
In addition, it has been held that when an appeal is made but a determination is not
rendered within ten business days of the receipt of the appeal as required under §89(4)(a) of
the Freedom of Information Law, the appellant has exhausted his or her administrative
remedies and may initiate a challenge to a constructive denial of access under Article 78 of
the Civil Practice Rules [Floyd v. McGuire, 87 AD 2d 388, appeal dismissed 57 NY 2d 774
(1982)].
Lastly, when an agency indicates that it does not maintain or cannot locate a record,
an applicant for the record may seek a certification to that effect. Section 89(3) of the
Freedom of Information Law provides in part that, in such a situation, on request, an agency
"shall certify that it does not have possession of such record or that such record cannot be
found after diligent search." If you consider it worthwhile to do so, you could seek such a
certification.
I point out that in Key v. Hynes [613 NYS 2d 926, 205 AD 2d 779 (1994)], it was
found that a court could not validly accept conclusory allegations as a substitute for proof that
an agency could not locate a record after having made a "diligent search". However, in
another decision, such an allegation was found to be sufficient when "the employee who
conducted the actual search for the documents in question submitted an affidavit which
provided an adequate basis upon which to conclude that a 'diligent search' for the documents
had been made" [Thomas v. Records Access Officer, 613 NYS 2d 929, 205 AD 2d 786
(1994)].
I hope that I have been of assistance. Should any further questions arise, please feel
free to contact me.
Sincerely,

Robert J. Freeman
Executive Director
RJF:tt
cc: Joanne V. Smith, Assistant District Attorney
f10905
10905
 
 

Dennis Walcott Joins University of the West Indies

Dennis Walcott


Dennis Walcott, the man who led America’s largest public school system Joins University of the West Indies
Will help work to link UWI and SUNY

by Tony Best
Dennis Walcott who ran America’s largest school system for three years is to spend the next 12 months helping to boost education in the Caribbean and link the region’s premiere tertiary level school to New York.
Six weeks after stepping down as the head of New York City’s Department of Education is doing something he often dreamed of accomplishing: living in the Caribbean and relating to University professors, administrators and students. He has been made an honorary distinguished fellow of the University of the West Indies, the same accolade recently given to Bruce Golding, a former Prime Minister of Jamaica.
 
                  “This is something I always wanted to do,” said Walcott, the grandson of West Indian immigrants who rose to become Chancellor of the City’s school system. “I always had a dream of going to Barbados to live and to be there with my best friend, my wife Denise.”
 
                  For almost three years ending on December 31st, when Michael Bloomberg’s three terms as mayor finally came to an end, Walcott, 62, was responsible for the education of 1.1 million students who attended 1,800 public schools in the five boroughs of Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens and Staten Island.
 
Walcott who was born and raised in Queens, became Chancellor in early April 2011 when Cathie Black, a prominent national magazine executive  with little or no experience in public school education, was appointed by  Bloomberg to the Chancellor’s position. However, she immediately became embroiled in a succession of controversial issues that raised serious questions about her suitability for the job. She was subsequently forced out after only three months in office and Walcott, at the time Deputy Mayor for education, stepped into the position which pays more than $ 212,000 annually and is considered one of the toughest positions in the country. In essence, he was the equivalent of a Minister of Education in a Caribbean country. He managed abudget of $ 24 billion, enough to run most Caricom countries.
 
                  “It was quite a challenge being responsible for a school system that was so diverse and demanding,” he told the Carib News before setting out for Barbados. He is to be attached to UWI’s Open Campus with headquarters in Barbados,
 
                  “This appointment recognizes Mr. Walcott’s prominent role within New York City,” said Prof. Nigel Harris, UWI Vice Chancellor. “His title with the University is quite suitable for someone of that stature. There is the possibility of him working with us as we seek to establish a much greater presence in New York, not only as it has to do with education but in terms of linking with influential persons whose relationship with us can be of great benefit to the University.”
                  Walcott is expected to be deeply involved in UWI efforts to establish relationships with U.S. tertiary level and other institutions, including the State University of New York, SUNY and its vast network of senior and community college campuses scattered across the state. SUNY has a student enrolment of 462,000 students, 20 per cent of whom are Black and Hispanic. Its board of trustees is headed by Carl McCall, a former New York State Comptroller, who once ran for Governor.
                  “We have been in discussions with SUNY which is sending a delegation to the Caribbean next month led by Mr. McCall to move the discussions further along,” Prof. Harris pointed out. “The delegation is going to Jamaica but we will use video-conferencing to involve all of our campuses, including the Open Campus in our deliberations.”
                  Walcott, a soft-spoken public official, said his stay in Barbados would “give me chance to learn something” about the region’s educational system but he will stay away from any of its controversial issues.
 
“In due course, I will get to know about the system there,” was all he would say.
 
Interestingly, Joel Klein, Mayor Bloomberg’s first Education Chancellor whose resignation led to Black’s ill-fated appointment and Walcott subsequent elevation to the position, often praised the approach of some Caribbean countries to the education of their public school students. Klein, a former Assistant U.S. Attorney-General during President Bill Clinton’s two terms, once told the Carib News that he would have been happy if New York City’s elementary students were reading at the level of Barbados’ students.
 
During Walcott’s tenure as Chancellor, he made a point of visiting schools across the City, going to more than 1,000 of them, usually meeting children and teachers in the classroom and the cafeteria to find out what was being served to the students. He had placed student health high on his list of priorities.
 
When asked just before leaving office about his major accomplishments, Walcott, who has four children and two grandchildren listed the introduction of a teacher evaluation program, getting the public schools up and running shortly after the disaster Hurricane Sandy left behind. It had forced the closure of the entire system for days. He also cited the opening of the school bus system for competitive bidding in the wake of a strike by drivers which had closed it for weeks.
The Chancellor’s position was the “best job in the world,” he said.
 
                  More than 75,000 teachers work in the City’s school system.

Friday, February 28, 2014

Fred Smith Offered Job as White Plains Principal Before a Background Check is Finished. Mistake.


New York State Administrator with Long Rap Sheet Offered Job as White Plains Principal Prior to Completion of Criminal Background Check
ShareThis
FredSmith.jpgConvicted Felon Fred SmithAccording to records obtained from the White Plains City School District under the New York State Freedom of Information Law, Freddie Dean Smith was hired prior to the completion of a fingerprint-based criminal background check by the New York State Office of School Personnel Review and Accountability.
Smith completed a BOCES Certified Employment Application on March 19, 2002 while a PhD. student at the University of Virginia.
Smith indicated that he had previously worked for the Charlottesville City Public Schools in Virginia and the Prince Georges County Public School in Maryland.
Smith applied for an administrative position with the White Plains City School District on March 26, 2003.
On April 11, 2003, Smith was extended a conditional offer to be Principal of the Post Road School in White Plains, NY.
The condition of the offer was that Smith satisfactorily complete an investigative background check by New York State and the New York State certification process.
On April 22, 2003, Superintendent Timothy Connors recommended Smith to the White Plains Board of Education which approved Smith's hiring.
On April 23, 2003, Smith signed a letter accepting his appointment to the professional staff of the White Plains Public Schools as Principal of the Post Road School.
In the letter, Smith certified that he had a Doctorate Degree (since revoked) and that understood he was required to meet the certification requirements of the New York State Education Department.
Smith began as the Principal at Post Road School on May 20, 2003.
On April 11, 2005, Smith submitted his resignation, effective June 30, 2005, as Principal of the Post Road School to Superintendent Connors.
Smith had accepted a position as Assistant Superintendent for the City School District of New Rochelle.
Neither the White Plains School District or the New York State Education Department has provided records demonstrating whether OSPRA was or was not aware of Smith's extensive criminal record or whether that information was provided to the school districts which hired Smith between 2003 and 2009 (White Plains, New Rochelle and Pocantico Hills).
Smith is currently employed as Assistant Principal at Leake & Watts, a private school in Yonkers.
News12 recently obtained a statement from Leake & Watts that they were not aware of Smith's criminal history but that he had been cleared through "the normal channels".
Commenting on this Blog entry will be automatically closed on April 28, 2014.

Former New Rochelle School Official Resigns 4 Weeks After Talk of the Sound Discloses Controversial E-mail Exchange

 
09A2EE11-A4A0-414C-A9A0-64216FC5F0A3.jpgFormer New Rochelle Assistant Superintendent Fred Smith has unexpectedly resigned his position as Superintendent of the Pocantico Hills Central School District. The surprise announcement came just four weeks after Talk of the Sound published an email from Fred Smith in which he disclosed the existence of a study that New Rochelle school officials have repeatedly claimed does not exist.
The Pocantico Hills school board's announcement offered no explanation for Smith's departure beyond citing "personal reasons" (full text of letter below). Pocantico Hills wasted little time removing the Fred Smith web page but we were able to grab a cached version of his page. Smith was forced out by the New Rochelle Board of Education in 2008 when the board refused to renew his contract, sources say.
The emails obtained by Talk of the Sound were sent using the district's email system and "signed" as Superintendent Pocantico Hills Central School District making them official communications from the head of the school district subject to school district policy on employee email communications.
Placed in chronological order, the email exchange with Smith makes clear that Smith was an active reader of Talk of the Sound and became alarmed when he realized Talk of the Sound had obtained copies of an email exchange in which he voluntarily discloses the existence of a report which compared the performance of New Rochelle High School students from Isaac E. Young Middle School and those from Albert Leonard Middle School. The Smith Report found a wide disparity in performance between students from the two middle schools that Smith described as "shocking".
=========== =========== =========== ===========
REDACTED 9/15/2008 6:44 AM >>>
Hey Freddie,
You made the paper.
http://www.lohud.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2008809150350
REDACTED
=========== =========== =========== ===========
On Sep 15, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Freddie Smith wrote:
Thanks REDACTED. I have been following the website. There are 2 New Rochelle's as far as achievement: I conducted a study looking at the achievement at the students that come from IEY vs those that come from ALMS and their performance at the high school and it was shocking.
F. D. Smith, Ph.D.
Superintendent -
Pocantico Hills Central School District
Sleepy Hollow, NY
=========== =========== =========== ===========
From: REDACTED
Date: September 15, 2008 10:43:25 AM EDT
To: Freddie Smith
Subject: Re: You made the paper.

Freddie,
REDACTED
I remember when you were collecting the data for the study. What you have just stated has been common knowledge. What has been missing is the empirical evidence. The City School District continues to deny that there is a two New Rochelles. How do i get a hold of your findings? As you already know, the findings of your report have tremendous implications for all our children, particularly our African American and Latino Students. Our children should not be denied justice any longer. Can you help?
REDACTED
=========== =========== =========== ===========
REDACTED 4/2/2009 5:04 PM >>>
Freddie,
I do not know if you have followed the site. A lot has happenned since
we first exchanged e-mails. Things are out of control within the City
School District. Our kids and our neighbors kids are getting cheated
and hurt. Silence for us is no longer an option. Let me know what you
want to do. I hope you can help.
PORTIONS REDACTED
=========== =========== =========== ===========
From: Freddie Smith
Date: April 3, 2009 10:52:50 AM EDT
To: REDACTED
Cc: Freddie Smith
Subject: REDACTED New Rochelle schools public records request

I no longer work for NR. I do not have copies of any documents because they are work products of the NR school district. I had no idea that you were sharing my emails without my consent to a third party. Please be inform that third parties can not share emails without the permission of the parties concern. My email went to you REDACTED and I was not informed that you were sharing them with a third party. I do not give you permission to share any of my emails without my consent.
F. D. Smith, Ph.D.
Superintendent -
Pocantico Hills Central School District
Sleepy Hollow, NY
=========== =========== =========== ===========
The "Smith Report" has been the subject of an ongoing legal dispute between Talk of the Sound and the City School District of New Rochelle. In a letter to the New York State Committee on Open Government, Schools Superintendent Richard Organisciak formally denied Talk of the Sound's appeal of the district's denial of a Freedom of Information Law request for copies of any reports matching the description of the report Smith described in an email obtained by Talk of the Sound.
In his "determination letter" sent to me and to State officials dated November 5, 2008, Organisciak writes:
Let me assure you that, to use the words of your original request, we are not aware of "any data, research, analysis, studies, investigations, reports, or documents that were prepared, compiled, drafted or published by any school principal, Assistant Superintendent, Superintendent or other district personnel as well as any outside counsel or outside consultant from that past ten years that considered, examined, studied, compared, or otherwise evaluated the performance of students at New Rochelle High School based on their sub-district of origin within the City School District of New Rochelle, based on which elementary schools the students attended, based on which middle school the students attended or any other similar breakdown of performance at the high school level based on where the student attended school prior to entering the high school. (emphasis added)
The letter notes that "as required by law" Organisciak sent a copy of his denial of the FOIL appeal to the NYS Committee on Open Government and is "cc'd" to Robert A. Freeman, Esq., Executive Director, NYS Department of State Committee on Open Government.
A comparison of the Smith emails and Organisciak's letter clearly shows Schools Superintendent Richard Organisciak made false statements under oath in a determination letter filed with the State of New York.
Smith's web page has been removed from the Pocantico Hills Central School District web site. The school board has published a letter announcing Smith's resignation but provides little detail.
The Pocantico Hills Board of Education issued the following statement.
MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT
November 5, 2009
Dear Parents and Staff:
The Pocantico Hills Board of Education has the responsibility to inform the community and staff that effective November 4, 2009 Dr. Freddie D. Smith has decided to resign as Superintendent of the Pocantico Hills Central School District for personal reasons. As a Board of Education we wish Dr. Smith success in his future endeavors.
We are very pleased to announce that Mr. Jay Scotto-Friedman, our outstanding Assistant Superintendent has accepted the appointment as Interim Superintendent.
Mr. Scotto-Friedman has faithfully served our community since July 2005 as our Assistant Superintendent for Finance and Support Services. Mr. Scotto-Friedman’s accomplishments include:
The development and successful implementation of a district wide communication plan relating to the school budget and reconstruction bond
The improvement of our student’s educational environment and extracurricular opportunities.
Mr. Scotto-Friedman’s extensive background and experience with capital projects and community interaction will significantly contribute to the District’s leadership as we begin the construction project.
The Board of Education has complete confidence in Mr. Scotto-Friedman’s ability to successfully implement the initiatives of the Board of Education and the community, and to meet the needs of our students. We ask that you join us in our support of Mr. Scotto-Friedman as the Interim Superintendent and wish him well as he takes on this role in addition to his other duties within our School District.
Katherine Yu, President
David Wilens, Vice President
Robert W. Balog, Trustee
John Conrad, Trustee
Maurice Curran, Trustee
Katherine Yu, Board of Education President
 

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Sabrina Milo Sues the NYPD For Arresting Her As a "Terrorist"

 This is so outrageous. Ms. Milo should win her lawsuit, the so-called "investigators" need to get trained.

Betsy Combier

Teacher who threatened to pull a ‘Columbine’ sues NYPD


LINK
First, she threatened to pull a “Columbine” on her own school. Now, a former Brooklyn high-school teacher is suing the NYPD for $6 million for arresting her over the “terroristic threat” — a charge that was later dropped.
“If I had a trench coat and a shotgun, it’d be Columbine all over again,” a seething Sabrina Milo, 35, blurted out in a Fort Hamilton HS teacher’s lounge in March 2011 after a run-in with administrators, according to her Brooklyn federal court suit. She insists she was just kidding.
Milo — who received an award for classroom excellence in 2007 — was angry that her bosses had sided with a student in a classroom confrontation and began venting to colleagues, according to the suit.
“Plaintiff used this figure of speech as a way to express how irritated she was,” the suit states. “Plaintiff was not being literal or serious and had no history of making threats or behaving violently.”
But word of her Columbine comment spread, and Milo was arrested at the school several days after the outburst on the terror-threat charge, according to her lawsuit.
“Why are you being such a crybaby? You’re a terrorist,” an arresting officer told Milo as she was hauled off the school grounds, the lawsuit claims.
“When plaintiff was brought into Central Booking, other prisoners taunted plaintiff and screamed ‘terrorist!’ while they clanked on metal cell bars,” according to her suit.
Milo was so distraught after a judge set her bail at $100,000 and dispatched her to Rikers Island that she was placed on suicide watch, court papers claim.
She made bail four days after her arrest, and the charges against her were dropped when a grand jury refused to hand up an indictment on the “terroristic threat” charge.
“They arrested an art instructor who teaches children for terrorism for venting to colleagues in a teacher’s lounge,” said Milo’ s attorney, Daniel Neveloff. “They had no probable cause to arrest her — they acted too quickly and recklessly.”
Her career and reputation in ruins, Milo is now seeking to nail the NYPD and arresting Officer Greg Evert for $6 million over various civil-rights violations stemming from the arrest.
Neveloff said that his client was coerced into giving up her teaching license after the incident and that she remains unemployed.
“It’s been a very difficult road for her,” he said. “It’s not easy when your name is Googled and these stories come up. Imagine getting arrested whenever you say something like ‘I’m going to kill my kids’ or ‘I want to strangle my husband.’ ”
The NYPD did not immediately return a call for comment.

Jury won't indict teacher who threatened to bring machine gun to school and repeat Columbine

Updated: Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 6:29 PM

 

A grand jury has refused to indict the Brooklyn teacher who threatened to smuggle a machine gun into school and stage "Columbine all over again."

Sabrina Milo, 34, was cleared after dozens of parents, students and fellow teachers vouched for her to the court, praising her as a "free spirit" and a great educator who would never hurt anyone.
"I'm sure her harmless outbursts were meaningless," said Linda Wu, a former student at Fort Hamilton High School in Bay Ridge. "I've known her to be outspoken, witty and never violent."
"She is well-loved and an incredible teacher," wrote former student Michelle Farkouh. "There is a reason such a multitude of students are pouring out support for her. It saddens me to know this might damage her teaching career. She had such a positive influence on me and my fellow students' lives."
Milo was arrested April 1 after three teachers said they overheard her sobbing and threatening to "settle some scores."
Exactly 12 years ago Wednesday, two students dressed in trench coats killed 13 classmates at Columbine High in Colorado.

Milo, an art teacher who lives in Staten Island, says she was just venting in the private confines of the lounge.
However, she was arrested on charges of making terrorist threats - a felony that carries up to five years in jail.
The 10-year veteran of city schools was out on $100,000 bail when charges against her were dismissed on April 15, according to her lawyer, Andrew Stoll.
"My client is very happy, but she's still anxious to get back to the classroom. It's not over until she's back in class," Stoll said Wednesday.
He praised the "courage" of the grand jurors who found no basis for charges against his client.
The Department of Education is still weighing disciplinary charges. Stoll said that would be "unfortunate."
Students described Milo as a quiet, well-liked teacher known for her quirky sense of humor.
Stoll had predicted the charges would be dismissed and Milo - who has no guns - would be freed.
"She is no threat to anybody," Stoll told the News three weeks ago. "She needs to be medicated."
Her husband, 64-year-old Lee Anderson, is a JROTC teacher at the same school as his wife.

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

De Blasio Fails To Stem Criticism of SPEEDGATE

No one is happy with De Blasio right now. Why doesn't he just admit an error was made?


This Time, de Blasio Confronts S.U.V. Issue Head-On