Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Principals and Sex in NYC Public Schools - The DOE Must Fire Anne Seifullah

Principal Anne Seifullah changes her image so that she can keep her job amidst sexting and trysts in the school, Robert Wagner Secondary School of Arts and Technology in Long Island City. Take a look at the new picture published in the POST, the second picture below.

In order to keep to their standards of zero tolerance for this kind of activity, the NYC DOE must fire her. The nexus to her job is that she is a role model for all the people in her building, and she decided to have sexual relations, using her power to "influence" other principals, employees and even a parent to do her whatever.

Get rid of her.... And Assistant Principal Dany Velazquez, an assistant principal at PS 5.

Betsy Combier


Principal Seifullah

The "New" Principal Anne Schmutz Seifullah


 

Second principal booted amid school sex probe



LINK

A Bronx assistant principal has been booted from his post for traveling to a Queens school allegedly to have sex with the principal there — as sexts between the pair surfaced Tuesday.
Dany Velazquez, an assistant principal at PS 5, has been reassigned pending a city Education Department probe into his alleged sexcapades with Annie Schmutz Seifullah, which were first reported by The Post.
Seifullah, principal of the Robert Wagner Secondary School of Arts and Technology in Long Island City, had already been reassigned amid the shocking allegations that she had sex with two men, including Velazquez, at her school during class hours.
Seifullah’s ex-boyfriend, the dad of a student at her school, described for The Post alleged raunchy texts between Seifullah and Velazquez, including one in which he wrote, “Next time I want to f–k you in the office.’’
Seifullah allegedly responded, “First you have to [perform oral sex],’’ the ex said.
Seifullah told The Post on Tuesday that she’s simply the victim of her ex, who used her money and then exposed her kinky hobbies when she quit paying his way.
NYC Rubber Room Reporter, May 4, 2014 
Thanks to reporters who write about DOE employees, we can get information about people -Anne Schmutz Seifullah, Anissa Chalmers-Reilly, Joe Baranello - who believe
they are "role models", and who are anything but that, yet keep their jobs.
 
Betsy Combier
 
Anne Schmutz Seifullah
 
 

Principal probed over sex in school during class hours

May 4, 2014
A Queens principal was yanked from her school amid shocking allegations she had sex with a guard, an assistant principal and a parent, had trysts in school while classes were in session, and had photos of her sexcapades on department laptops.
Annie Schmutz Seifullah, 35, principal of the 7th- to 12th-grade Robert Wagner Secondary School of Arts and Technology, in Long Island City, was escorted from the school Thursday as investigators seized computers and other electronics from her office and home, The Post has learned.
“We are appalled by these disturbing allegations and acted swiftly to remove the principal while the matter is under investigation,” a Department of Education spokesman said. “This type of alleged behavior is completely unacceptable for any DOE employee.”
Her sudden removal comes after a romance-gone-bad with a student’s dad. The angry ex turned over three DOE laptops he obtained while living with Seifullah, including MacBooks containing photos of herself in racy lingerie and in various sex acts, including a threesome, he told The Post.
He also gave investigators a video and audio tape in which a woman he identified as Seifullah acknowledged engaging in oral sex with an NYPD school-safety agent in the school security office, and with a visiting assistant principal in a book-storage room during school hours.
“I don’t know what I was thinking. I don’t know why I thought it was OK,” she tells the furious dad in the taped conversation, after he accuses her of cheating on him.
“You gave him [expletive deleted] while my child was in the building,” he roars at one point.
The dad, a fortysomething entrepreneur, also gave excerpts from a letter he says Seifullah wrote, admitting she hooked up twice with an “old lover.”
“The second [time] was a visit to my school that led to a sexual encounter which included brief oral sex in a hidden location,” the letter states.
The dad, whose name is being withheld to protect his child’s privacy, said he came forward because Seifullah — the mom of a toddler son — “played me for a fool.”
“Ms. Seifullah clearly used her power and position as principal to . . . seek several sexual partners at her school,” he charged.

This racy photo of Seifullah was found on her school computer.
The principal helped the dad financially, once giving him $10,000, plus $500 and $300 money orders, records show. Her salary is $136,959.
On April 11, 2013, she testified in Queens Family Court as a character witness for the dad in his custody fight. She spoke as both his child’s principal and as “his girlfriend.”
“So far our relationship has been discreet and people don’t know about it,” she testified, insisting that his child would get no special treatment.
City policy does not forbid educators to date colleagues or the parents of students. However, if favoritism or mistreatment occurs, the employee could be cited for a conflict of interest. Having sex inside a school or placing sexual images on school equipment could lead to misconduct charges.
An insider said it was “highly unusual” for a principal to be removed pending a probe, and indicates allegations of “extreme misconduct.”
But on Facebook last July, she posted a photo of herself with the father, naming him and declaring with a heart icon: “A single dad walked in the office of my school and swept me off my feet.”
Seifullah took down her Facebook page after The Post called to ask about the scandal. “I can’t talk without permission,” she said.
Seifullah filed for divorce last summer and moved in with the student’s father. They split up in March and her divorce is pending.
From Betsy Combier:
Thanks to Susan Edelman for continuing to show how the NYC Department of Education allows certain people to make the DOE "look bad" and not others.
 
Thanks, Sue and the NY POST!
 
-Nothing
DOE Attorney Joseph Baranello

 
-Nothing
 

NYS Education Department Gags Principals From Saying How Bad Standardized English Tests Were In April 2014

Principal Bob Bender
 

LINK

A Conversation About Tests That Educators Want to Have, but Can’t



Let’s talk about testing.

“I want to,” said Bob Bender, principal of Public School 11 in Chelsea. “I want my voice to be heard about how outraged I was about the exam.”

So by all means, speak up.

He sighed.

“I can’t go against the state embargo,” Mr. Bender said.

By state order, teachers and principals may not disclose any contents of the three days of standardized English tests that were given at the beginning of April.

Under many circumstances, this might be considered a favor to humankind: Few subjects are as fraught as standardized testing, with no end to the crossed wires of ideology, self-interest and strong opinions about arcane matters (how many “plausible distractors” — wrong answers that look as if they could be right — should be included in the multiple choices?) and ultimately, what is, or ought to be, at stake.

But it is hard to ignore an uprising by 37 principals from schools in Manhattan, as well as others from Brooklyn, who say they are not opposed to accountability or testing, but have spoken in blunt terms about the design and quality of this year’s state English tests. Among them was Mr. Bender.

“The third-grade test was atrocious,” he said.

While 40 or so principals come from just a fraction of the city’s schools, that is more schools than most districts in the country have. And most striking is who is sounding the alarm: Public school principals, as a group, are generally not militant.

“In some ways the city is having a conversation, but nobody knows what they’re really talking about because they can’t see it,” said Mark Federman, principal of the East Side Community High School, which goes from sixth to 12th grade. “We’re talking about a document that is under lock and key.”

P.S. 118 principal Elizabeth Garraway (left) with P.S. 321 principal Liz Phillips at an open house for P.S. 118
last year. Phillips has said she'll help guide the new school, which holds its ribbon cutting on Sept. 21.


Elizabeth Phillips, the principal of P.S. 321 in Park Slope, Brooklyn, for 15 years, wrote an essay critical of the tests that was published in The New York Times last month. It began: “I’d like to tell you what was wrong with the tests my students took last week, but I can’t.”

Ms. Phillips blamed the order on a contract between the state and the test’s publisher, Pearson, but a spokesman for the New York Education Department says that isn’t the case.

“Pearson did not do it,” said Tom Dunn, the department’s spokesman. “It’s our policy that does not allow teachers to talk about the test questions.” The purpose is to preserve much of the test for use in future years and to avoid encouraging schools to use it as a blueprint for preparations. In the past, when the state made the exams public within a few days, he said, “the test became the curriculum.”

Sometime over the summer, the state will release at least 25 percent of the questions and answers, along with annotations explaining why answers were right or wrong. John B. King Jr., the state education commissioner, said he has found the criticism baffling.

“Folks are avoiding having the conversation about the actual items,” Mr. King said.

How can they have that conversation if the test won’t be out for months?

“We have posted 25 percent of the test from last year, the questions, the possible answers,” Mr. King said. “We give a narrative explanation of why the correct answers were correct, and the incorrect answers were incorrect.”

That is far more than most states release, Mr. Dunn said. And few put materials on their tests’ design online, as New York does at engageny.org. “One of my frustrations with the way the discourse has played out is that there hasn’t been a lot of discourse about the design criteria,” Mr. King said.

Mr. Federman said principals were more interested in discussing the specifics of this year’s test than what happened last year, and the release in the summertime of a portion of the questions and the answers is no particular help to teachers and students in finding out what they need to work on. The Common Core curriculum adopted in New York is intended to encourage students to get a strong grip on the meaning of a piece of writing. Yet, Ms. Phillips said, too much of the test focused on small details and structure rather than its overall meaning.

In a joint statement issued by the 37 principals, they noted that “there were product placements (i.e. Nike, Barbie) woven throughout the exam.” But Mr. Dunn, the spokesman, said that any brands mentioned had been written into the original articles used in the exam. “There are no product placement deals between us, Pearson or anyone else,” he said. “No deals. No money.”

These people need to start talking to one another, with everyone looking at the same pages — in the same school year.

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

NYC Will Pay Teachers To Quit?

 Chalkbeat:
Union President Michael Mulgrew and Mayor Bill de Blasio didn't disclose all details of a plan to
reduce a pool of teachers without full-time jobs.

UFT contract deal includes a “buyout” for out-of-work teachers

 The city will pay jobless teachers to quit if they aren’t interested in working in schools, according to an internal Department of Education memo explaining the provisions of the proposed teachers union contract agreement.
The plan, likely to be controversial with some teachers union members, was not mentioned in any of the public announcements about the deal by the union or city officials. But it would be another way for the city to reduce a pool of 1,200 out-of-work teachers who are still on the city’s payroll.
 United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew has previously said he is open to negotiating financial incentives for the city’s excessed teacher pool, called the absent teacher reserve. But some UFT members see it as a move to maneuver teachers out of the system even if they haven’t been removed through termination proceedings.
“When you start setting up different tiers within the union, I think that gets into really dangerous territory and impacts solidarity,” said Julie Cavanagh, a special education teacher at P.S. 15 in Red Hook and former candidate for UFT president.
But city officials acknowledge that some teachers in the pool aren’t motivated to find full-time jobs. Sixty-one percent of teachers in the ATR pool hadn’t applied for teaching positions during last summer’s hiring season, Department of Education officials told arbitrators who were mediating the UFT contract dispute last year.
A solution is to offer “a buyout to encourage people who really aren’t interested in teaching to leave the profession,” according to the department memo.
It’s unclear how, exactly, the city will look to incentivize teachers to leave. Several sources said the city would only offer a cash-based severance package to resign, though the department’s use of the word “buyout” could suggest that teachers would also receive years of pension credit to retire early.
In 2012, proposals ranged from $14,000 to $25,000, or from 20 percent to 25 percent of a teacher’s annual salary, according to conflicting accounts shared by the city and the union released after private talks broke down.
The contract agreement also limits teachers in the ATR pool to two trial periods in schools looking to fill full-time vacancies, and provides for an expedited termination process for the teachers whose principals bring them up on misconduct charges.
A spokeswoman for the union declined to comment on whether a buyout or severance proposal was part of the contract. A department spokeswoman also declined to comment on the memo. 
The new details, obtained by Chalkbeat, emerged on Monday as the UFT’s  89-member executive board approved the proposed contract, which will now be sent to the union’s delegate assembly. The 3,400-member assembly is set to discuss the agreement at a meeting on Wednesday, though a final contract still hasn’t been drafted.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Making the DOE Look Bad: Principal Anne Schmutz Seifullah

Thanks to reporters who write about DOE employees, we can get information about people -Anne Schmutz Seifullah, Anissa Chalmers-Reilly, Joe Baranello - who believe
they are "role models", and who are anything but that, yet keep their jobs.
 
Betsy Combier

Anne Schmutz Seifullah

Principal probed over sex in school during class hours

May 4, 2014
A Queens principal was yanked from her school amid shocking allegations she had sex with a guard, an assistant principal and a parent, had trysts in school while classes were in session, and had photos of her sexcapades on department laptops.
Annie Schmutz Seifullah, 35, principal of the 7th- to 12th-grade Robert Wagner Secondary School of Arts and Technology, in Long Island City, was escorted from the school Thursday as investigators seized computers and other electronics from her office and home, The Post has learned.
“We are appalled by these disturbing allegations and acted swiftly to remove the principal while the matter is under investigation,” a Department of Education spokesman said. “This type of alleged behavior is completely unacceptable for any DOE employee.”
Her sudden removal comes after a romance-gone-bad with a student’s dad. The angry ex turned over three DOE laptops he obtained while living with Seifullah, including MacBooks containing photos of herself in racy lingerie and in various sex acts, including a threesome, he told The Post.
He also gave investigators a video and audio tape in which a woman he identified as Seifullah acknowledged engaging in oral sex with an NYPD school-safety agent in the school security office, and with a visiting assistant principal in a book-storage room during school hours.
“I don’t know what I was thinking. I don’t know why I thought it was OK,” she tells the furious dad in the taped conversation, after he accuses her of cheating on him.
“You gave him [expletive deleted] while my child was in the building,” he roars at one point.
The dad, a fortysomething entrepreneur, also gave excerpts from a letter he says Seifullah wrote, admitting she hooked up twice with an “old lover.”
“The second [time] was a visit to my school that led to a sexual encounter which included brief oral sex in a hidden location,” the letter states.
The dad, whose name is being withheld to protect his child’s privacy, said he came forward because Seifullah — the mom of a toddler son — “played me for a fool.”
“Ms. Seifullah clearly used her power and position as principal to . . . seek several sexual partners at her school,” he charged.

This racy photo of Seifullah was found on her school computer.
The principal helped the dad financially, once giving him $10,000, plus $500 and $300 money orders, records show. Her salary is $136,959.
On April 11, 2013, she testified in Queens Family Court as a character witness for the dad in his custody fight. She spoke as both his child’s principal and as “his girlfriend.”
“So far our relationship has been discreet and people don’t know about it,” she testified, insisting that his child would get no special treatment.
City policy does not forbid educators to date colleagues or the parents of students. However, if favoritism or mistreatment occurs, the employee could be cited for a conflict of interest. Having sex inside a school or placing sexual images on school equipment could lead to misconduct charges.
An insider said it was “highly unusual” for a principal to be removed pending a probe, and indicates allegations of “extreme misconduct.”
But on Facebook last July, she posted a photo of herself with the father, naming him and declaring with a heart icon: “A single dad walked in the office of my school and swept me off my feet.”
Seifullah took down her Facebook page after The Post called to ask about the scandal. “I can’t talk without permission,” she said.
Seifullah filed for divorce last summer and moved in with the student’s father. They split up in March and her divorce is pending.
From Betsy Combier:
Thanks to Susan Edelman for continuing to show how the NYC Department of Education allows certain people to make the DOE "look bad" and not others.
 
Thanks, Sue and the NY POST!
 
-Nothing
DOE Attorney Joseph Baranello

 
-Nothing
 

Friday, May 2, 2014

Get Principal Ron Smolkin Removed - Sign the Petition


Ron Smolkin

SIGN THE PETITION TO REMOVE RON SMOLKIN FROM PUBLIC SERVICE

Independence High School Principal Ron Smolkin Sent Hate Mail To Teacher Michael McPherrin
Ron Smolkin, Principal of Independence High School in Manhattan is the author of hate mail targetting teacher Michael McPherrin and his partner, according to McPherrin, who had the handwriting on the letter analyzed. Let's hope that the penalty handed down by prosecutors of this heinous act by Smolkin is equal to the harm he has caused, and he does not get off with a slap on the wrist like Iris Blige did.

    Here is a link to the story in New York Teacher:

    www.uft.org/feature-stories/manhattan-principal-under-investigation-smearing-chapter-leader

Principal Ron Smolkin’s relations with staff at Manhattan’s Independence HS were always frosty, teachers say. But they turned arctic last spring after the school’s faculty leadership team made a series of ambitious recommendations on safety, teaching, guidance, consensus and collegiality.
The team never got a reply or even an acknowledgment from the principal. As Chapter Leader Michael McPherrin put it, “Smolkin refuses to discuss plans and leadership style. He even takes suggestions as a personal affront. He goes after those he sees as disloyal; questioning his policies is to enter a world of pain.”
He also apparently plays payback — as a sequence of events reported by the media in late March suggests.
McPherrin, a leading member of the faculty leadership team, got a big surprise when his co-op board received an anonymous letter charging him with sex and drug crimes. With copies sent to Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security as well as the FBI and the IRS, the letter declared that McPherrin and his “undocumented” partner were engaged in “spreading disease” and “unsafe sex with underaged boys.”
An independent handwriting analyst hired by McPherrin found it “highly likely” that the author of the hand-addressed envelope was Smolkin.
In late summer, McPherrin got a second surprise, when his classroom at the West Midtown campus was trashed. It was the only classroom in the school so destroyed, McPherrin said. Since December, McPherrin has received five letters in his file. Prior to last spring, he had received none.


UFT District 79 Representative Marc Korashan (left) with Chapter Leader Michael McPherrin
 
Now Smolkin is under investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for aggravated criminal harassment, and the state’s Human Rights Commission is also conducting a probe. McPherrin has filed a harassment complaint against Smolkin under Article 23 of the contract.
As the New York Teacher went to press, McPherrin reported that Smolkin had filed 3020a dismissal charges against him for unprofessional conduct.
Smolkin has been principal at the two-campus transfer alternative high school (a smaller campus is housed in the West Village) since the spring of 2004. The school educates 425 overage, under-credited students who have aged out of their class cohort or dropped out.
McPherrin says the principal’s relationship with the staff is “poisonous.”
“He’s the biggest obstacle to the school’s success,” McPherrin says. “He operates in terms of who’s in and who’s out.”
The six other teachers at Independence HS interviewed for this article, all on condition of anonymity because they feared retaliation, confirmed that Smolkin is widely viewed as remote, divisive and vindictive.
McPherrin and other staffers said the school is not safe for students and staff alike. There is gang activity and drugs are used openly, said the chapter leader, “usually near the LYFE center,” which houses infants and toddlers of students.
McPherrin and others accuse Smolkin of underreporting safety incidents and not enforcing discipline. “He won’t take a stand because he’s afraid that if he does, attendance will drop,” one teacher said.
Since December, McPherrin has filed five union safety complaints, charging Smolkin with having no meaningful student removal process, making no effort to deter student texting in class, not supervising the school’s vendor-run after-school program, and refusing to hold safety committee meetings for his school.
Staffers say it’s no coincidence that the academic performance of the students is suffering. Independence HS received another C on its most recent School Progress Report, but there is a widespread belief among faculty that Smolkin fiddled with the parent survey results to avoid an F. The school received an F in student performance and a C in student progress, but somehow pulled off a near-perfect score on the Learning Environment Survey to earn an A in school environment. Staff noticed that the returns showed the number of parent responses exceeded the number of parents who picked up surveys.
Smolkin keeps parents at arm’s length, too. He has done as little as he can to create a school leadership team. Only after staff complained to the superintendent did he move the team meetings to a time more convenient to parents.
Marc Korashan, the UFT’s alternative high schools district representative, blasts the DOE for not riding herd on Smolkin. In an email letter to Manhattan HS Superintendent Elaine Gorman, Korashan said that the principal “continues to make veiled threats about reorganizing the school and putting people out of jobs. His attitude toward staff remains dismissive or threatening. It seems clear that [the principal] does not want an active parent body or an effective SLT looking at what is happening in the school.”
Korashan’s email letter concludes: “The question remains: When does administration step in to support the school and not the principal?”
Gorman and a representative from network leader Sumita Kaufhold’s office met in February with 12 staff members at their request, but so far neither official has intervened.
“This kind of support for a principal who is leading a school to fail is something we’ve seen time and again with this DOE,” said Korashan. “If Independence HS is put on the Persistently Lowest Achieving list, it will certainly not be the fault of the teachers who have tried to create a collaborative, student-centered culture at the school only to be stymied by this principal.”
Independence High School Principal Ron Smolkin Sent Hate Mail To Teacher Michael McPherrin
Ron Smolkin, Principal of Independence High School in Manhattan is the author of hate mail targetting teacher Michael McPherrin and his partner, according to McPherrin, who had the handwriting on the letter analyzed. Let's hope that the penalty handed down by prosecutors of this heinous act by Smolkin is equal to the harm he has caused, and he does not get off with a slap on the wrist like Iris Blige did.

NY1 Exclusive: City Principal Investigated In Retaliation Probe

By: Lindsey Christ, NY1
LINK


A veteran public school principal is under investigation for allegedly attempting to smear one of his teachers through a hate-filled letter. NY1's Lindsey Christ filed the following report.

Last June, an anonymous letter was sent to the managers of Michael McPherrin's co-op. It contained ugly allegations against McPherrin, a public school teacher, and his longtime partner Andre Lopes.

"As you read, your jaw just keeps dropping because it just gets worse," McPherrin said.

There were private details, like the couple's HIV and immigration status, as well as allegations of drug use and pedophilia. It said, in part:

"The talk of the building is that both Mike and illegal immigrant Andre suffer from full blown AIDS and have no problem infecting others including the underage boys they bring to the apartment."

"This was an attempt to destroy our lives and me professionally," McPherrin said.

The writer claimed to represent concerned residents, but the building management called it "anonymous hate mail" and wrote McPherrin that, "our records indicate there are no complaints against you or your partner."

McPherrin says he knows who sent it: his boss, Ron Smolkin, the principal of Independence High School in Manhattan.

Since the addresses on the anonymous letters were handwritten, McPherrin hired a handwriting analyst who found it "highly likely" they matched samples of handwriting McPherrin said were Smolkin's. Then, there was the information in the notes.

"That we are HIV positive. That Andre has an outstanding immigration issue. That we have a second residence. The social security number. That information could’ve only been gotten from my personnel file," McPherrin said.

McPherrin says his trouble with Smolkin started after he became the teacher's union rep and organized staff members concerned about Smolkin's leadership.

"He has a history of retaliatory vindictive actions," McPherrin said.

Other staff members at the school make the same charge. In one case, a judge ruled Smolkin falsely accused a school aide of an assault inside the building and fired her without benefits. A former assistant principal says Smolkin had her removed on trumped-up charges after they hadn’t been getting along. Current staff members also gave NY1 other examples -- off the record -- saying they were afraid of further retaliation.

The Manhattan district attorney's office, state Human Rights Commission and teachers union are all investigating the anonymous letter. But Department of Education lawyers argue there is "no evidence of a hostile work environment" and have asked the human rights commission to drop the case.

Smolkin would not speak with NY1 on the record but through a lawyer says he denies the allegations. Also, the DOE and the groups investigating him all have policies against speaking on the record about ongoing cases.

Meanwhile, McPherrin says the principal continues to target him and has slapped him with four disciplinary charges this school year. He says they're the first in his 23 years of teaching.

From Betsy Combier:

Below is a letter that Mike McPherrin sent the DOE in 2013:


Office of School Personnel Review
And Accountability
New York State Education Department
89 Washington Avenue, Room 981 EBA
Albany, NY 12234

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed please find the complaint I am submitting to you regarding the unethical and immoral actions of Principal Ron Smolkin of Independence High School, located at 850 Tenth Avenue, New York, NY  10019. It is an alternative high school in midtown Manhattan, District 2, Department of Education, City of New York. Its mission is to help over-aged, under credited students towards a high school diploma.

 I am a recently retired high school social studies teacher from Independence High School, where I taught for twenty-five years.   I enjoyed a wonderful career, and worked with many excellent teachers and principals. My professional record is replete with commendations from my supervisors, and my record of success in the classroom has been amply recognized, including laudatory praise from Mr. Smolkin throughout his first five years as my principal.

In the spring of 2010, I was elected UFT representative for our Local Chapter, and began asking some questions about the budget, and safety issues at school, including unchecked drug and gang activity, and upticks in physical threats to teachers by students. Teachers were developing a consensus on how to address these issues to discuss with the administration, but it appeared Mr. Smolkin interpreted this as a personal attack on him. (See Exhibit A)  I became a target for his retaliation at my home and at school.

On June 10, 2010, three “anonymous” hate filled letters arrived at my co-op building (to the building manager, co-op president, and a resident real estate broker) accusing me and my same-sex partner of “using our pets to lure underage boys to our apartment, where (we) infect them with AIDS.”  The letters, purportedly written by “Concerned Parents of Park Terrace Gardens,” urged the building management to evict me and my partner, for having sex parties with boys, using illegal drugs,  illegally harboring an illegal alien (my partner is a Brazilian national), and thus  lowering the property values of shareholders through these nefarious crimes.  The letters were copied to the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, IRS, and the Local Police Precinct 36. (See Exhibit B)

After obtaining the hand-addressed envelopes of these three letters, I sent them for handwriting analysis, along with a sample of Mr. Smolkin’s handwriting, and the examiner found the samples to be “highly likely” written by the same hand. (See Exhibit C)  I reported this case to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for Special Prosecutions, and they conducted a five-month independent forensics investigation of my claims, including obtaining samples of Mr. Smolkin’s handwriting by subpoena.  In March of 2011, I received a call from ADA Amy Justiniano (212-335-3339), who informed me that the results of the investigation confirmed Smolkin’s handwriting.

Although the District Attorney’s Office declined to charge Mr. Smolkin under hate crimes statutes, Mr. Wornum suggested I pursue civil claims for libel and defamation.  I am currently suing Mr. Smolkin in New York State Supreme Court, and lawyers for the City have used every tactic available to shield Mr. Smolkin from accountability. Our claim was filed in May of 2011.  This case may still be dismissed, or  Corp Counsel has indicated they may be willing to offer a settlement, including a “Confidentiality Agreement” which would preclude my ability to speak to a reporter, or anyone else about this case forever.  They have made it clear that removing Mr. Smolkin from his position is not under consideration. My lawyer is Matt Taub of the Taub Law Firm (646-484-5020).

It is my position that anyone who engages in such behavior demonstrates a lack of the moral compass required of a state-licensed principal or teacher.

For your information, Mr. Smolkin is being sued by two other former subordinates.  The most recent case concerns another “anonymous” letter to Mr. Smolkin from a “concerned parent” that the teacher was a pedophile. (See Exhibit D)  She was “U” rated based on this letter, and was forced out of her position at Independence High School. She is being represented by Mr. Taub as well, in a separate civil claim.  In the other case, Mr. Smolkin fired a school aid without benefits claiming she “broke the wrist of her DC37 Representative during a break in a disciplinary meeting.”  This claim was contradicted by a secret recording made by the school aide, and played in court. (Ms. Adrian Floyd: 646-329-6957)  The judge sternly admonished Mr. Smolkin and his DOE lawyer, and restored the benefits to the school aid. Mr. Smolkin was never called to account for these actions, including perjuring himself under oath.  Mr. Smolkin was found to have misused school funds by paying his secretary from school funds to edit and type his graduate school research papers, according to the Conflict of Interest Board. (See Exhibit E)  He was fined and had to return the money. It is truly stunning to anyone familiar with these cases, that Mr. Smolkin has not been removed.

Please see Exhibit F for another anonymous letter found in my personnel file, purporting to be a disgruntled female student. The letter contains gay-baiting, and is written in “Ebonics”.  The handwriting expert compared the writing with the original Smolkin samples, and found it highly likely” that the authors are the same.

Please see Exhibit G  Business cards of investigators involved in this case

Please see Exhibit H for the arbitrator’s award regarding the 3020a charges against me brought by Mr. Smolkin, and the dismissal of those charges as a reason to fire me.

Please contact me if you would need more detail on any of the above, or if you would like further documentation.  If you Google “Smolkin/ McPherrin”, you can discover what has already been reported in the media. (See Exhibit I for samples)

 Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Michael P. McPherrin