Join the GOOGLE +Rubber Room Community

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Parent Activist Patrick Donohue Sues the NYC Department of Education For Neglecting Special Needs Kids During COVID-19

Patrick Donohue (Credit: Brigitte Stelzer)
Parents were furious with the NYC DOE way before the pandemic created a firestorm for special needs kids.

And this extreme frustration occurs nationwide.

Children with special needs must have supporting services and providers, often for every minute of the school day. The providers of these services - i.e. occupational and/or physical therapy, ABA, TEACCH, 1:1 paraprofessional, etc. - cannot and have not been effectively used or provided for the past 5 months (and decades), in schools throughout America. Often it is only after the parent(s) have spent every penny they have with paying for lawyers or tuitions for private schools, that the mandated services are given.

As a parent advocate who does Impartial Hearings, IEP review meetings, and anything else that  I need to do to get a child all the services and resources needed, I know what a culture of lies the NYC DOE promotes in order to not have to pay for the support these kids are mandated by law (U.S. Department of Education’s Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, "IDEA") to receive.

During COVID-19 there have been severe shortages of providers and thus service implementation of programs and resources to these kids.

Mr. Donohue is right to make a Big Thing about this.


If you believe you have a claim, see below for contact information:


National Class Action lawsuit to force the schools to reopen and provide services to students with special needs as well as compensate the parents for them doing the job of the school districts for the past five months (and the students getting compensatory services to make up for their missed services).

There are over 200 families that have already signed up from more than 20 states (and it is growing by the hour). Families can either go directly to the website to enroll: www.BrainInjuryRights.org or call the toll-free hotline: 888-927-4332 (888-927-IDEA).
 

or,

Alicia Alba <alicia@pabilaw.org>

3:20 PM (48 minutes ago)
to me
Hi Betsy,

I am the parent coordinator for the class action lawsuit.  We are currently still accepting eligible children (any child with a disability/IEP).  If you would like to take part or would like to share the information with your advocacy groups, you can find our online form at: 
For the direct link to the online form you can use this link:

If you have any questions, please let me know.

With Kind Regards,
Alicia



Alicia Alba | Program Associate
300 East 95th Street, Suite #130
New York, New York 10128
Tel. 646.850.5035 | Cell 917.545.5055
Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ Blog
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials 


Lawsuit rips schools for abandoning special needs kids amid COVID-19 pandemic
Selim Algar, NY POST, July 16, 2020

School districts across the country have abandoned special education kids amid the coronavirus crisis, according to a class action Manhattan federal lawsuit slated to be filed Friday.
The case argues that districts ignored federal law by failing to provide legally mandated services to kids who suffer from mental and physical deficits after the closure of schools in March.
“These school districts violated the rights of 6.7 million students across the country by altering their educational programs,” said parent and activist Patrick Donohue. “They put the burden on parents to do the job of these school districts.”
The case names Mayor Bill de Blasio, Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza, and districts across the country as defendants.
Backers of the suit will release radio ads in New York to draw attention to the ongoing plight of special education parents.
Two hundred families in 10 states have signed on as plaintiffs so far, arguing that remote learning models have been inadequate for special education kids who often require one on one assistance.
“These programs are federally protected,” Donohue said.
The case is demanding the resumption of full-time in-person special education for impacted kids, fresh evaluations for badly regressed children, compensation for parental expenses incurred during remote learning, and funding for additional staff.
If programs don’t fully resume, the case is pushing for districts to give parents a “blank check” to provide adequate independent services for their children.
“The districts have totally abandoned these families,” said Donohue, who has a disabled teen daughter and has frequently warred with the DOE over her education.
He noted that the city furnished learning centers for the children of emergency workers during the prior school year but made no similar accommodation for special education students.
“There are horror stories from across the country,” Donohue said, highlighting a mother with two autistic kids who was forced to quit her job in order to take care of her kids after in-person services were suspended.
He also ripped remote learning for disabled kids as wholly ineffective.
“In many cases, the local school districts failed to even provide live synchronous service to these students while they were home,” he said.  “Instead, the responsibility for ‘remote learning’ landed squarely on the shoulders of parents across America.”
A DOE spokeswoman said the department prioritized health concerns when it shuttered schools and was compelled to move to remote learning.
“We quickly moved to remote learning, including special education services in order to provide students with disabilities with continuity of services during the pandemic,” said Danielle Filson. “This summer, we are offering in-person related services for our students with disabilities. We are acting in the best interests of our students while following health guidance and will review the lawsuit.”

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

I’m a class scheduler in NYC. Here’s what I need to know to do my job.

Stephen Lazar


First PersonFirst Person is where Chalkbeat features personal essays by educators, students, parents, and others trying to improve public education.


I have been the scheduler at my small New York City public high school for the past five years. This means I create the schedule of when and where classes meet and teachers teach, and I assign students to all of their various class periods.
Scheduling is often a thankless job that takes me away from the work I love most, teaching students. But there is satisfaction in getting all the pieces of the scheduling puzzle to all fit together just right. And there are a lot of pieces. There will be even more this fall — particularly given that different classrooms will be able to safely hold different maximum numbers of students.
Last fall, for each of the 437 students at our school, I needed to make sure that they are taking the classes they need to graduate, try to give them electives of their choice, and consider any required special education or English language support. I need to make sure each class has the right number of students and that our team-taught special education classes, which are 50% of our core classes, have no more than 12 students with special education needs and that those students make up no more than 40% of the total students. (Yes, there are computers involved in this process.)
Now, to reopen schools, the most pressing question we need to answer is how we will do this safely. The second most pressing question for working parents citywide, including many teachers, is what they will do for child care on the days their children are not in school. My City Council representative, Brad Lander, recently offered some thoughtful suggestions to help resolve this challenge. These questions need to be answered, but we do not need answers to them in order to start making schedules for the fall.
For families to make informed decisions about whether to send their students for in-person instruction in September, schools need to be able to give them a sense of our plans and we still cannot do this with the information that the city’s education department issued last week. For meaningful planning to begin, schools need the following four sets of questions answered:
What will happen with teachers who cannot safely work in person? As many as 20% of the teaching force could fall into this category. If our 12th grade English teacher cannot work in person, do we have to do 12th grade English entirely remotely? Or will we need a new teacher to teach 12th grade English in person? If we need a new teacher, what will the current teacher do and do they still work at our school?
How will we provide both in-person and remote instruction every day? Regardless of whether we have two or three in-person cohorts, on any given day, we’ll need 100% of teacher capacity to teach the students who are in the building. Who will provide instruction and support for the students not there and for the fully remote cohort? A solution to this problem would be to shorten the school day for in-person instruction, giving time in the afternoon to support remote learning. Will we be allowed to do this?
How do we account for special education mandates? Will the requirement to have no more than 40% of students who require special education services in a single class still exist if we can only safely have 12 students in a classroom? Will students who get push-in or pull-out supports all have to be scheduled on the same day to optimize teachers’ time in providing services?
Finally, if parents can opt into in-person instruction on a quarterly basis, does that mean that we might have to reschedule all our students each quarter? Let’s say my school can safely accommodate 200 of our 437 students at a time and that 50 students opt for fully remote learning. We could then begin the school year with two in-person cohorts. But if 14 of those students decide to come back in November, we would then need to shift to a three-cohort model. If this is the case, maybe we should start with the three-cohort model just in case, even though that means students get fewer days in school?
Scheduling takes immense time, consideration, and care. Before teachers can know what they will teach in the fall and begin the far more challenging and daunting task of preparing to teach for our new hybrid reality, we will need answers to these questions. When it comes to schedules, there are always a lot of moving parts; this year, amid the pandemic, the variables are overwhelming.
Stephen Lazar teaches students social studies and English at Harvest Collegiate High School in Manhattan. He has taught in New York City for 14 years. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in history at the CUNY Graduate Center.

Thursday, July 9, 2020

Email Addresses For the NYC Department of Education During COVID-19




From the NYC Department of Education:


Temporary Closure of 65 Court Street Walk-in Center
The health and safety of all of our employees and partners is our first priority. To keep everyone safe as the COVID-19/coronavirus situation continues to develop, we are closing the 65 Court Street walk-in center for the time being. We ask all visitors to 65 Court Street to virtually contact our offices so that we can help you as quickly and effectively as possible. Please see the details on how to reach us below.
If you need to:
Get fingerprinted: Please email OPIINFO@schools.nyc.gov
Verify your I-9: please email HRConnect@schools.nyc.gov
More Information for:
Current DOE Employees:
Use the HR Connect Web Portal (Open external link)to find answers to human resources-related questions, including:
Benefits
Leaves of absence
Certification
Payroll
Personal and tax data changes
New Employees:
Please visit the New Employee section of the DOE InfoHub for information about completing the steps to begin work with the DOE, including:
Accessing the Applicant Gateway
Fingerprinting and I-9s,
Background and certification checks
Former Employees:
Please visit the Former Employees section of the InfoHub for information about:
Unemployment insurance
Claim, determination, and hearing procedures
Separation-related payroll forms
Transitioning to retirement
DOE retirement systems
Contacting Individual Offices:
For questions you are unable to resolve using the channels on the front of this page, you can reach out to individual DOE offices below:
HR Connect (for inquiries re: leaves, benefits, & general HR questions): HRConnect@schools.nyc.gov
Board of Education Retirement System (BERS): Brespon@bers.nyc.gov
Office of Appeals and Reviews: jrabot@schools.nyc.gov
     718-935-2991; fax: 718-935-2983
     Joanne Rabot, Deputy Director
Office of the Auditor General (OAG):
General inquiries: audit@schools.nyc.gov
Custodial inquiries: SNEUM@schools.nyc.gov

Civil Service Management Unit:
If you received a Civil Service List Notice of Hiring Pool and have questions, you may contact civilservicelistresponse@schools.nyc.gov
Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) https://www.nycenet.edu/oeo(Open external link)

Office of Field & Information Services (OFIS):
Salary Services: 
Certification/Licensing: 
Other OFIS inquiries: OFIS@schools.nyc.gov
Division of Financial Operations:
Payroll Check Management Unit: Call (718) 935-2219
Office of Accounts Payables: accountspayables@schools.nyc.gov
Office of Non-Public School Payables (NPSP):

Office of HR School Support:
Full-time paraprofessionals: 
Paraprofessional Milestone for Certification: Para_Milestones@schools.nyc.gov
DASA workshop information: DASA_Workshop@schools.nyc.gov
Substitute Disciplinary Unit: SubstituteDisciplinaryUnit@schools.nyc.gov
Office of Personnel Investigation (OPI): OPIINFO@schools.nyc.gov
Office of Special Investigation (OSI):
Complaints: 

Substitutes:
General SubCentral inquiries: 
Substitute Teacher Applicants: substituteteacherjobs@schools.nyc.gov
Sub Paraprofessional Applicants: 

If you are unsure which office can address your question, please email OPIINFO@schools.nyc.gov.
If you are a DOE employee and you have specific questions about COVID-related issues, please email COVIDTIMEKEEPING@schools.nyc.gov.


Sunday, July 5, 2020

Dear Mayor Bill: Do NOT Transfer School Safety Agents To the NYC Department of Education


Teamsters Local 237 President Greg Floyd
On the issue of transferring the oversight and funding for school safety agents from the NY Police Department to the NYC Department of Education, 

We must not let this happen.

Why am I saying this?

I have experience as the mom to four children, all of whom graduated from the NYC Department of Education. For 9 years I was a volunteer advocate, helping parents with Superintendent Suspension Hearings and Impartial Hearings (which I still do). I've been a parent advocate for 22 years, assist educators charged with 3020-a for 17 years, and every day I research cases filed in state and federal courts as well as NYSED that have been important to any constituent since the mid-late 1990s.

Veronica Nesmith, far left, with Greg Floyd and Sharon Jefferson.
Local 237 Newsline, 2009
Now as a teacher/parent advocate, I speak with SSAs all the time. I can say that most SSAs are caring professionals who want children to be safe. By the way, most are Black and brown women. When I was PTA President as well as a parent at MS 54 on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, SSA Veronica "Ronnie" Nesmith was a friend, colleague, and just an awesome partner in keeping all the students in line. Love you, Ronnie!! Her picture is posted above.

Since the MS 54 Principal (Larry Lynch) could not discipline, fire or harm Ronnie who was under the NYPD, she helped guide me and gave me information about the principal's theft and fraud which enabled me to investigate and then get back to the PTA a stolen check for more than $13,000 that we had raised at a fundraiser. Larry told us that he had given the money to District 3 Superintendent Pat Romandetto. 

I have posted the fraudulent acts of the DOE for many years on my blogs and websites, hoping to fix the Department VIPs' malicious intent of hiding facts to protect the money. I call this issue a matter of national security, and wrote that article in 2004, calling the NYC DOE the "Tweed Pentagon"

In 2005 I wrote:
 Corruption and Secrecy in the Politico-Educational Complex is a Costly Combination

I also scanned in, for the first time online, the reports on the DOE titled "The Gill Commission" and the second report, "Investigating the Investigators" which informed the public of the wrong-doing inside the NYC DOE. Everyone should read these two studies in corruption. After these reports, James Gill was instrumental in establishing the new Department of Investigation and the new position of "Special Commissioner of Investigation" which was supposed to be independent of the NYC DOE. However, after the death of its' first Commissioner, Edward Stancik in 2002 the independence went out the window. SCI agents are paid by the NYC DOE and their so-called "investigations" are not at all fair or unbiased. Their goal, it seems to me, is to make sure that all complainers become the guilty party in order for the NYC DOE to protect itself from whistleblowers. A look at their 2019 budget gives any reader concern for the lack of proper oversight. My source, formerly inside SCI, tells me work is drastically underfunded, and investigations extremely mismanaged.

School safety is an issue that is at the top of every parent's list of important concerns when his or her child walks into a school building every morning. Parents must have some degree of trust to say goodbye at the door of a building, knowing that their children will be under the care and supervision of strangers, or people with whom they have had little personal contact. If parents do not feel that their child or children are safe in their schools, then public education fails. No one will send their children to a public institution of any kind if they do not believe that the school personnel will protect them while they are inside.

Thus School Safety Agents ("SSAs") must be trustworthy and they must take their responsibilities for the health, safety, and welfare of the students in their building seriously. These agents are members of Teamsters Union Local 237. Greg Floyd is President.


President Gregory Floyd presents Local 237ʼs demands to the Housing Authority and is flanked, from left, by
Edmund Kane, chief negotiator; Allen Brawer, Policy Research Group; and Barry Peek, lead attorney.

I met Greg many times when I was asked to write several speeches for him in 2007. He is a powerful speaker and a dedicated public official, and I think he is good for the Local 237 members because he seems to really care about them.

Greg Floyd is very sure that transferring his SSAs to be supervised by the Department instead of the NYPD is a terrible idea, and I agree. See Greg talk about this with Errol Louis on NY 1. In 1998 the SSAs were part of the Department, and this was a 'disaster':     

Municipal Workers Union President on Potential Layoffs and Changes for School Safety Agents
By Inside City Hall New York City
PUBLISHED 10:52 PM ET Jun. 26, 2020


Teamsters Local 237 President Greg Floyd joined Errol Louis to discuss the city’s budget negotiations, including Speaker Johnson’s calls for cuts to school safety agents and Mayor de Blasio’s warning of potential layoffs.

David A. Hay
Greg urges parents to be outraged by the proposed transfer back to the DOE. He talks about how the Department was in control of the SSAs in the 1990s, and the NYC DOE hired felons, pedophiles, and other miscreants, basically because the vetting of personnel at the NYC DOE is lax, underfunded and unable to assess qualifications adequately. See the case of  David A. Hay, a convicted pedophile who was hired to work with Chancellor Richard Carranza.

On November 19, 2018, the NY Daily News published a story about Mayor Bill de Blasio firing Mark Peters, Department of Investigation (DOI) Commissioner. Mr. Peters claimed he was terminated because "the mayor and top aides regularly pressured the Department of Investigation to drop probes damaging to City Hall and describing the mayor in particular as vindictive and at times unhinged in his fury."

A few days ago the media picked up how disgusted de Blasio's own staff is with his mismanagement.

I know that I feel the same, but I called several of my teacher friends to find out what they thought. Everyone I spoke to said that they thought the transfer back to the DOE was dangerous, misguided, and wrong. Two of the teachers recalled being in the DOE when they were younger in the 1980's-1990's and saw the Safety Agents assaulting children, doing nothing when kids were fighting, and in general lending no assistance to violence in the school. I've seen in my cases a massive coverup and malicious prosecution of anyone who speaks up about student-to-student or student-teacher violence. Teachers who are assaulted in a classroom and report it to the principal are then charged with causing the harm that occurred in the first place. It's their fault, not the fault of the student with the brick/knife/weapon in his/her hand. 

See the story of Eileen Ghastin (pictured below):


The Partnership of Bully Power and Media Can Convict a Teacher at 3020-a


In fact, I have in my files many arbitration decisions where the educator "Respondent" is charged with calling the police on students who were harming them and/or fellow students in their class. Here is an excerpt from the decision of Arbitrator Daniel McCray, Esq., June 20, 2019:

"The Department argues Respondent is guilty of Specification 10, in that she called 911 as a form of discipline against J.B. The Department recognizes that this Specification was proffered after the initial set of charges. However, the Department asserts that this is permissible under the Collective Bargaining Agreement, which expressly permits the Department to bring charges within three years of the alleged misconduct. Moreover, the Department asserts there is a presumption that charges against a Respondent should be consolidated in a single 3020-a proceeding. Therefore, there is no dispute the Department could proceed separately with this charge. Moreover, the additional Specifications address the same series of events already charged and Respondent had ample time to prepare her defense. Therefore, Respondent was not prejudiced by the inclusion of the additional Specifications. The Department insists, as a result, the arbitrator should not believe Respondent's testimony that she called 911 because she feared for her physical safety and was requesting a Level III safety officer. It is undisputed that student J.B. was nowhere near Respondent when she stepped out of the hallway and called 911. Transcript at page 504. As a result, the Department insists I cannot conclude that she was reporting an emergency or crime requiring immediate police intervention.

Rather, according to the Department, the record evidence demonstrates Respondent was violating Chancellor's Regulation A-411, which requires behavioral crisis de-escalation and intervention first. This regulation clearly states when 911 may be called: "where a student's behavior poses an imminent and substantial risk of serious injury to himself or others and the situation cannot safely be addressed by school staff the Principal or designee must call 911." However, the regulation makes crystal clear that "in no circumstances should 911 be called or employed as a disciplinary response or disciplinary measure because of the student's behavior.''

According to the Department, Respondent's own testimony of why she wanted a Level III safety officer was because, according to her, only they were able to provide the appropriate type of corrective action with the student. Transcript at page 511-512. Thus, in Respondent's own words she was calling 911 to discipline the student. In addition, the Regulation goes on to state that if an employee has to call 911 without following the above procedure they must notify the Principal or his or her designee. However, it is undisputed Respondent did not do this. In fact, Principal Keane testified that she became aware that the police had been notified when they reported to the school. As a result, the Department insists it has proven Specification 10. For the same reasons, the Department argues it has proven Specification 11, that by calling 911 to discipline J.B., Respondent unreasonably and substantially interfered with his mental, emotional and/or physical well-being; and Specification 12, that it substantially interfered with J.B.'s ability to participate in or benefit from an educational program or other aspects of his education."

Arbitrator McCray found the charge substantiated, and terminated Respondent.

I have done several cases where the Respondent was charged with calling the police after a student created a situation of extreme danger in his/her classroom. How does this charge make sense unless the NYC DOE wants to stop anyone from reporting anything? By the way, just try to get your Freedom of Information request answered within a year. Good luck.

I think what needs to happen is:

1. Keep the School Safety Agents under the control and funding of the police department NYPD.
2. Set up training programs on Restorative Justice, conducting fair investigations, handling out of control students.
3. Establish procedures inside schools that allow immediate assistance if needed, including calling the police in to help if there is any perceived danger of harm or death in a classroom.
4. Monitor save rooms, make sure that the students who are being held there get counseling.
5. Give SSAs and Guidance Counselors time to get together to discuss students at risk.
6. Give SSAs the right to discuss students with the school nurse and to see records, with a confidential lock on the reports on a need-to-know basis.
7. Set up a chain of custody for reports of student violence that does not - and cannot - be made into charges against the reporter/educator/staff member.
8. Fund independent school monitors inside the police department, maybe 1 in each of the 32 school districts in NYC. Do not allow any coverups or attacks on those who file reports.
9. Remove the responsibility for creating financial reports and budgets from the principal, give to a District business officer hired to do accounting, tax assessments, and everything else. Principals have enough to handle already, and their focus should be on the students.

These are just some of the corrections I see, but certainly, many more are probably needed.

But what is not needed, is any movement of the SSAs to the NYC Department of Education. 

The safety of our children is at stake.

Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ Blog
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials 


Saturday, July 4, 2020

The Mayor's Incompetence and the Chancellor's Neglect and Lack of Skills Leave Parents On Their Own For September

NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio
According to parents, many NYC Department of Education teachers are not doing their jobs remotely and kids are just getting written assignments without any live teaching.

And according to UFT President Michael Mulgrew (UFT= United Federation of Teachers, the teachers' union), teachers will not be going back anytime soon:


Teachers will return in the fall if...
The city’s teachers union boss explains the COVID protection conditions for going back to school
By Michael Mulgrew, 
June 26, 2020
Opinion

This leaves parents, students, staff and employees wondering what will happen when September rolls in. This is not good. We are seeing two powerful men (Michael Mulgrew + NYC Chancellor Richard Carranza) battling for the $34 Billion dollars handed to the NYC DOE last year. It's always about money. Remember that.

This is the beginning of the end for the patterns and practice of the NYC DOE for the past two decades since Mayoral control took over, and changes were made to the UFT contract in 2005 (an example: in 2005 Randi Weingarten removed from the teachers' collective bargaining agreement the right to grieve letters to file). 

This is a good thing. In my opinion, the incompetence of Bill de Blasio points to the very obvious need to undo Mayoral control, elect all the members of the school board (the Panel For Educational Policy), and give parents once again the right to be heard and not pushed aside as trash.

Parents and teachers are not the only people who are frustrated with NYC's Mayor Bill:

Wiley Norvell (right), City Hall communications director, and Freddi Goldstein, the mayor’s
press secretary (Twitter)

City Hall ‘demoralized’ by de Blasio as staffers jump ship

Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ Blog
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials 

by Harry Siegel, NY Daily News, July 3, 2020

“We’re full steam ahead,” says the mayor.

“Schools will be opening in September. Each school will have a maximum number of kids that can be in that school with social distancing, using every conceivable space in that school” so that at least “some schools will be able to have all of their kids.”

But then the governor’s office says that “all such decisions are made by state government and not local government,” and that “the public should not be confused.” Confusingly, he hasn’t said a thing about his own policy — just that he alone has the power to make it.

And the teachers union says that “new federal funds, now being held up in Washington, are the only possible way New York City will be able to invest in the protective measures and staff required for schools to safely re-open in September — even on a limited basis.”

The union also says, more quietly, to teachers that they aren’t required to do synchronous instruction (you know, actual classroom teaching).

And Trump says, “I think we’re going to be very good with the coronavirus. I think that at some point that’s going to sort of just disappear, I hope.”

Man proposes and God disposes, of course, but no one is seriously proposing much here. The federal government hasn’t given any real guidance to the states. New York State hasn’t given any real guidance to local governments. (As Errol Louis noted: “New Jersey has a 104-page plan for reopening schools. New York has the usual petty power-play BS from Albany. And no plan.”) The city hasn’t offered any guidance to parents that they have any reason to trust.

Sure, Trump is a jackass and a menace, and yes, the fish stinks from the head. But “leaders” at every level of government keep talking about how they’re going to get things going again, without clearly defined rules and guidance. Everyone keeps outsourcing responsibility, so that it falls on parents to figure things out for themselves.

As The News noted, de Blasio has continued to put off hard budget choices even as tax revenue has plummeted. If Washington leaves a big hole in Albany’s budget, as it well might, there’s little doubt that Cuomo will pass that hole on to the city and the rest of the state’s local governments. Everyone keeps passing the buck, while talking about their leadership.

Hours after de Blasio’s big talk about reopening on Thursday, UFT boss Michael Mulgrew told NY1′s Jillian Jorgensen that City Hall “has refused to engage on any sort of how-to plan” about reopening schools. He added that for the mayor “to just pop up today and say ‘I’m opening schools’ is not going to give any comfort whatsoever.”

It was one thing to close schools through June in April, but quite another to have no plan for September in July. There’s still no evidence that Zoom school works for students. There’s no question that it’s been a disaster for working parents, and children with special needs, and a huge obstacle to restarting the economy or anything else.

The first four examples of child neglect provided by New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services are “failure to support a child’s educational need…failure to provide adequate food, clothing, or shelter, failure to provide medical or mental health care…and leaving a child alone who is not developmentally able to be left alone without adequate supervision.”

With the CARES Act unemployment benefit due to end later this month and New York City’s eviction courts back open again, many parents are facing a terrible choice between breaking the second rule of neglect, or breaking the first, third and fourth. Who wants to choose between supporting their children and neglecting them?

For parents who have the luxury of working from home, the same fundamental dynamic applies. Who can afford to lose their job — and their health insurance — now?

If you leave a 7-year-old in their room all day, every day, that’s child neglect. It’s also what the government is effectively telling parents to do.

harrysiegel@gmail.com