Mrs. De Blasio, Chirlane McCray, Keeps Her Assistant Rachel Noerdlinger, Whose Boyfriend is a Convicted Killer

 I am always fascinated by disparate treatment, political cronyism and other such corrupt practices. The public needs to know these events, and assess their elected officials based upon how these leaders resolve the issues.

Here, we have the wife of the Mayor and the Mayor of New York City, not disciplining the Assistant hired at $170,000+ to assist the mayor's wife after the media finds out that the assistant did not disclose that she is living with a convicted killer and cop basher.

In 2004 when our current Chancellor Carmen Farina was working with the Bloomberg Administration,  Diana Lam, Deputy Chancellor for Teaching and Learning for the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”), was found to have put her husband in a position at the DOE without going through the Conflicts of Interest Board first. Lam resigned, and General Counsel Chad Vignola was let go.

The De Blasio administration is not going to do anything about this.

You decide whether or not he should.

Betsy Combier



Rachel Noerdlinger

McCray aide spared discipline for failing to disclose romance

De Blasio defends top aide despite relationship with cop-hating killer

By Carl Campanile, Tara Palmeri and Yoav Gonen

Mayor de Blasio on Friday defended the hiring of his wife’s chief of staff, Rachel Noerdlinger, despite her long live-in relationship with convicted killer and cop-hater Hassaun McFarlan.
“I have full faith in Rachel,” de Blasio said on Friday at City Hall.
“You don’t fire people because of something their boyfriend said. That’s ludicrous.
“I have absolute faith in her and I know what I value and she values the same thing.”
McFarlan, who has been Noerdlinger’s beau for six years, has a long criminal history. He pleaded guilty to manslaughter for shooting an 18-year-old rival over a down jacket when he was 15, an official source confirmed.
He was sentenced to four years in prison on interstate cocaine trafficking charges in Bristol County, Mass., and was released in 2007.
McFarlan was charged with marijuana possession in 2012 and spent seven days in jail in 2011 for driving with a suspended license, records state.
His most recent brush with the law was last November, when he pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct, after he was accused of running a cop off the road in Edgewater, NJ,. with Noerdlinger’s Mercedes.
McFarlan, 36, also has made his hatred for cops clear, calling them “pigs” on Facebook many times.
PBA President Patrick Lynch called for Noerd­linger’s firing, out of “serious concern” the information that she hears at high-level NYPD CompStat sessions could be passed along to a hardened felon.
But de Blasio stood by Noerdlinger, 43, a former press aide to the Rev. Al Sharpton who makes $170,000 as First Lady Chirlane McCray’s top adviser. He swatted away questions over whether he should dismiss her as guilt by association.
“Respectfully, I think the question you’re asking is the wrong question. We don’t care what someone’s boyfriend said, we care what the public servant’s about,” he said.
“She’s very dedicated to the work of bringing police and community together and that’s what we care about.”
Some political insiders see a double standard.
Last year, during his transition period, de Blasio canned Lis Smith as his spokeswoman after The Post revealed she was dating the still-married and disgraced ex-Gov. Eliot Spitzer.
McFarlan’s criminal history was not news to the mayor and McCray, according to a City Hall aide.
“Rachel was very candid from the beginning,” the aide said.
Additional reporting by Kathleen Cullitonand Aaron Feis

McCray aide didn't disclose killer beau in background check

By Carl Campanile and Joe Tacopino



Rachel Noerdlinger, Bill DeBlasio, Chirlane McCray, and Al Sharpton
Inset: Noerdlinger and Hassaun McFarlan

First lady Chirlane McCray’s chief of staff, Rachel Noerdlinger, did not disclose that she was living with convicted killer Hassaun McFarlan when she submitted her Department of Investigation background check to the city, The Post has learned.

Noerdlinger, a top adviser and close confidante to Mayor Bill de Blasio’s wife, omitted that she was living with McFarlan — who has been caught posting violent and misogynistic screeds online.

According to the DOI questionnaire, omissions could lead to disciplinary actions or even criminal charges.

The DOI has opened an investigation into the matter.

A City Hall spokesman said “no action” has been taken against Noerdlinger, who lives in Edgewater, NJ, with McFarlan and her teenage son.

“She comes to work every day committed to serving the people of our city across the five boroughs on the critical issues that matter,” spokesman Phil Walzak said.

The new revelations were blasted by police union head Patrick J. Lynch, who said public servants should be held to the same standard as others.

“If it is found that she committed a lie of omission during the investigation, then she should be fired,” Lynch, president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, said in a statement.

“The standards that apply to hiring police officers should apply equally to hiring high-ranking, influential staff members.”

De Blasio, meanwhile, has come under a firestorm of criticism for keeping Noerdlinger on the payroll despite her boyfriend’s criminal past.

“I have full faith in Rachel,” the mayor said last week at City Hall.

“You don’t fire people because of something their boyfriend said. That’s ludicrous.”

McFarlan has a rap sheet that includes homicide, conspiring to run a cocaine operation and nearly running a police officer off the road near Noerdlinger’s home in Edgewater last year.

In the incident with the officer, McFarlan pleaded down to disorderly conduct.

The ex-con also wrote sickening comments on the blog Hip Hop News 24-7 that talked about violence and demeaned women.

“Trying to find the right black woman with a mean [oral sex] game is like trying to find a black woman with good credit,” he wrote in March 2011.

He also repeatedly referred to cops as “pigs” on social media

It was also revealed this week that although Noerdlinger won special approval to live in New Jersey by claiming her son was injured, the strapping young man had fully recovered and even played linebacker for his high school football team.

Noerdlinger — who did not reply to a request for comment — claimed her 17-year-old son, Khari, suffered devastating injuries in two cars crashes.

But the aspiring rapper played nine games and racked up 41 tackles and two sacks during the last school year’s season.

Additional reporting by Yoav Gonen and Larry Celona
Chirlane aide used son's injury to live in NJ, despite his recovery

De Blasio's wife, teen son attended internal NYPD meetings

NYC's first lady, Chirlane McCray, plays politics in city gall

Sharpton aide named chief of staff for de Blasio’s wife

  March 5, 2004

Hon. Joel I. Klein
Chancellor
New York City Public Schools
Department of Education
52 Chambers Street, Room 314
New York, NY 10007

                                                                                       Re:    Diana Lam
                                                                                                SCI Case #2003-2206

Dear Chancellor Klein:

        An investigation conducted by this office has found that Diana Lam, Deputy Chancellor for Teaching and Learning for the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”), assisted her husband, Peter Plattes, in gaining employment with the DOE in the position of a Regional Instructional Specialist (“RIS”).   When Plattes lost that position because a conflict of interest issue was raised, Lam then supported his decision to apply for a teaching position.  In both instances, Lam failed to request the appropriate waiver or obtain approval.  Our investigation revealed that there was no public waiver document issued by the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board.

        In August 2003, this office initiated the investigation into a possible conflict of interest in the employment of Plattes after newspaper articles reported on his DOE position and his relationship to Lam.

Plattes as a RIS

        As Deputy Chancellor for Teaching and Learning, Diana Lam supervises all instructional staff, including RISs.  To review the circumstances of the alleged employment of her husband by the DOE, investigators examined documentary evidence and interviewed a number of employees involved in the process.

        Judith Chin, who is the Regional Superintendent for Region 3 and reports directly to Lam, was among the first individuals whom Lam approached regarding her husband’s employment.  According to Chin, sometime in 2003, Diana Lam asked her to explain the procedures one needed to follow in order to become a teacher and/or an administrator in the New York City public school system.   Chin stated that while discussing the necessary steps with Lam, the Deputy Chancellor indicated that her husband was interested in gaining such employment.   Chin and Lam decided that Lam would have her husband call to arrange a meeting with Chin who agreed to assist Lam’s husband with the application and certification processes.   As a result, when Lam’s husband, Peter Plattes, came to her office on March 26, 2003, Chin had her staff assist him.   According to Chin, a number of weeks later she provided Plattes’s resume to Laura Rodriguez, Regional Superintendent for Region 2.  Chin explained that she had filled all her RIS positions and had already sent a personnel list to one of Lam’s assistants and possibly to Lam herself.  However, during an exchange of candidates’ resumes amongst the various regional superintendents, she came upon Plattes’s and handed it to Rodriguez because she was aware that Rodriguez was looking to fill a bilingual position.  Chin stated that she advised Rodriguez of Plattes’s relationship to the Deputy Chancellor.  Chin indicated that she would have felt uncomfortable if she had interviewed the husband of her immediate supervisor. 

        Investigators examined Plattes’s DOE employment application, which indicated that Chin had approved it.   However, Chin stated that she did not place her authorization signature on Plattes’s application.  Instead, she suspected that one of her staff members, Jean Ruchala, former Deputy Director for the Office of Recruitment, must have done so since Chin had requested that Ruchala assist Plattes in processing his paperwork.   Chin explained that her approval was necessary because Plattes’s application indicated that he was requesting a teaching license in the area of social studies, which was not a shortage area.   Moreover, Plattes apparently did not possess sufficient credentials to obtain a bilingual teaching certification, which was considered a shortage area.   Chin explained that an application for non-shortage areas would be held in abeyance and not processed until there was such a shortage or it had been otherwise approved.

        Laura Rodriguez, Superintendent for Region 2, who was hired for her current position by Lam, interviewed Peter Plattes for a RIS position, which paid approximately $102,000 per year.   Rodriguez explained that she submitted Plattes’s name, along with those of others she wished to hire, to Lam and Chancellor Joel Klein for their approval and that, at a meeting of regional superintendents, Klein informed her that all submitted candidates were acceptable.   Rodriguez stated that Plattes was then offered the RIS position, subsequently accepted it, and officially began his employment with the DOE on July 1, 2003. 

        Rodriguez stated that just prior to August 1, 2003, Chad Vignola, General Counsel for the DOE, advised her that there was a possibility that Plattes would no longer be working for the DOE.   According to Rodriguez, shortly after her conversation with Vignola, Plattes advised her that he could not continue working as a RIS.

        Superintendent Rodriguez along with Eric Nadelstern, Deputy Regional Superintendent for Region 2, interviewed Plattes for a paid position.   According to Nadelstern, Plattes was hired for the RIS position and he was assigned to work with Lorraine Skeen, a Local Instructional Superintendent (“LIS”) for Region 2.  Nadelstern stated that around August 1, 2003, Rodriguez informed him that Plattes would no longer be working at Region 2.

        LIS Lorraine Skeen confirmed Plattes’s employment.  She provided investigators with a number of documents relating to Plattes, including: a Region 2 RIS roster listing Plattes’s name, home address and phone number as well as his office extension; a Region 2 telephone directory containing Plattes’s name and indicating his position as a RIS; a Region 2 summer calendar contact sheet containing Plattes’s name; a Region 2 workshop agenda containing Plattes’s name; and several inter-office e-mails sent to Plattes.  According to Skeen, Nadelstern advised her that she and Plattes would be working together and that Plattes is Lam’s husband.  Skeen stated that she began working with Plattes sometime in June or July of 2003 and that they were involved in the training of Region 2 principals.

        Dr. Joyce Coppin, former Chief Executive of the Division of Human Resources for the DOE, also was approached by Lam.  According to Coppin, sometime in July 2003, Lam handed her an envelope bearing Plattes’s name and stated “these are my husband’s.  Can you take them back [to the Human Resources offices] with you?”   Coppin stated that she turned the envelope over to JoAnn Molter-Fuentes, Director of the Office of Supervisory Support Staff.   Coppin added that a few weeks later Lam requested that she deliver a second envelope to Molter-Fuentes.   According to Coppin, Lam stated “these are Peter’s papers, I think everything is there.” 

        Coppin stated that around the first week of August 2003, she participated in a conference call with Laverne Srinivasan, Deputy Chancellor of Operations for the DOE, and Chad Vignola, General Counsel for the DOE.  According to Coppin, Srinivasan questioned “has Peter Plattes been processed for payroll yet?” and then directed “if not, put it on hold.”  Coppin stated that she instructed Molter-Fuentes to stop the payroll process immediately and then advised Srinivasan and Vignola that the paperwork had been halted.  Coppin added that Srinivasan then questioned “has [Plattes] been paid yet?” and “will the system show that he was being paid?”  According to Coppin, she advised Srinivasan and Vignola that Plattes’s information had not been entered into the system, therefore his name would not appear.

        Coppin told investigators that two or three days later Lam approached her and stated, “I am sorry that you and your office had to be put through this thing…I sent an e-mail to Chad [Vignola] regarding [my husband’s employment] to find out if there would be any issues.”   Coppin stated that on a subsequent occasion at the Tweed Courthouse Building, she returned Plattes’s application and related documents to Lam.

        JoAnn Molter-Fuentes explained the RIS application process to investigators.  According to Molter-Fuentes, applications for the RIS position were submitted both through the mail and over the Internet and that the documents then were sorted and distributed to the various Superintendents’ Offices.   Molter-Fuentes stated that once an applicant accepted the position, payroll documentation, including a vacancy control form (“VCF”) and a 9902 form, was processed.   According to Molter-Fuentes, she received an envelope from Coppin which contained Plattes’s paperwork, including his application and transcripts.  Molter-Fuentes explained that Plattes could not be placed into the payroll system until he either was certified or was deemed eligible for certification as a school administrator by the New York State Education Department (“SED”).  Molter-Fuentes stated that when she contacted the SED in order to determine the status of Plattes’s school administrator’s certification, she was advised that one college transcript had to be submitted to complete the process.   In anticipation of Plattes receiving his certification, Molter-Fuentes instructed Maria Quinones, Human Resources Manager for Region 1 and 2, to enter a VCF and 9902 in order to expedite his placement on the payroll.   However, on or about August 1, 2003, Coppin contacted her and directed her not to process Plattes’s payroll documents.   Molter-Fuentes stated that she then contacted her Deputy Administrator for the Office of Supervisory Support Services, Carol LaBozzetta, and instructed her to delete Plattes’s VCF from the system and to retrieve his 9902 form.

        Maria Quinones also was involved in processing Plattes’s paperwork.  According to Quinones, sometime in July 2003, she received an e-mail from Molter-Fuentes directing her to place Plattes on the payroll, therefore, she instructed her staff to complete a VCF and a 9902 form.   In the e-mail, Molter-Fuentes advised Quinones that Plattes is Lam’s husband.   Quinones interpreted this information to mean that Plattes should be entered into the payroll system immediately so she made certain that her staff completed the necessary paperwork without delay.   According to Quinones, within a day or two she was contacted by someone from Molter-Fuentes’s office and directed not to process Plattes’s payroll paperwork.  As a result, she disposed of her copy of Plattes’s paperwork. 

        Carol LaBozzetta explained her involvement with Plattes’s paperwork.  According to LaBozzetta, sometime between the end of July 2003 and the beginning of August 2003, she entered a VCF into the system under Plattes’s name and sent the 9902 form for processing.   However, the following day, Molter-Fuentes directed her to retrieve the 9902 form and delete the VCF information from the system.   According to LaBozzetta, she recovered Plattes’s paperwork and placed it in Molter-Fuentes’s office.

        David Schacher, Ethics Officer for the DOE, was not contacted about Plattes’s position with the DOE, instead Lam told him about her husband’s employment almost as an afterthought.   Schacher explained that during a July 18, 2003 meeting with Lam to discuss an unrelated matter, she mentioned to him that her husband was hired at one of the Regional Operations Centers and that she had supervisory authority over him.  According to Schacher, Lam claimed that she had no involvement in the hiring of her husband and she asserted that no one was aware of their relationship.  During the conversation, Lam failed to provide her husband’s name or his work site and Schacher neglected to request the information.  However, following the meeting, Schacher examined Lam’s disclosure documents and discovered that her husband’s name was Peter Plattes.  He then conducted a check of the DOE e-mail directory system which revealed that Plattes was a RIS in Region 2.  Schacher immediately advised Vignola via e-mail of the information he had uncovered.

        Chad Vignola confirmed learning about Plattes’s position with the DOE from Schacher.  Although he had two brief conversations with Lam, Vignola stated that he was unaware that Plattes had even applied for a job.  Instead, Lam suggested that her husband might be interested in seeking employment with the DOE, to which he replied that he did not foresee a problem, but that there was a process that had to be followed because she could not supervise him.   Vignola stated that on July 18, 2003, he first learned from Schacher that Plattes had been hired in Region 2 as a RIS and he later learned that Plattes had been working for several weeks.  Although Lam claimed that she had nothing to do with her husband’s hiring, Vignola was advised by Coppin that Lam had directed her to deliver Plattes’s paperwork to the Human Resources office.

        Vignola asserted that on July 24th or 25th he and Srinivasan advised Lam that her husband could not hold the RIS position.   However, no apparent steps were taken to achieve that end – including notifying Laura Rodriguez – until July 31st, the date of the media inquiry.

        In an interview with investigators, Peter Plattes stated that Diana Lam is his wife.  Plattes acknowledged that Lam assisted him in his quest to gain employment with the DOE by providing him with Chin’s name and telephone number and instructing him to meet with her.

        Plattes confirmed that Rodriguez and Nadelstern interviewed him for a RIS position in Region 2, he was offered the position, and he accepted it.   Thereafter, he attended optional meetings/training sessions in order to prepare himself for his official start date of July 1, 2003.  Plattes acknowledged that when he started working as a RIS on July 1, 2003, he expected to receive compensation from the DOE effective that date.

        Plattes claimed that he was unaware that his wife submitted documents on his behalf to the DOE and asserted that he had submitted his transcripts directly to the SED and not through the DOE.  Although Plattes declared that he did not utilize DOE staff to channel his transcripts to the SED, Molter-Fuentes had advised Plattes that she would send those documents to the SED to complete his certification application.  Therefore, on July 23, 2003, Plattes faxed his transcripts to Molter-Fuentes who, in turn, faxed them to the SED.  Moreover, Plattes sent a note to Molter-Fuentes, dated August 14, 2003, which stated that he had decided not to pursue an administrative position at this time, but would still like to obtain his supervisory certification.  Plattes enclosed an additional transcript for Molter-Fuentes to forward to the SED.   According to Plattes, his social studies certification to teach was the only one that he received from the SED, adding that he did not receive an administrator’s certification because he failed to submit one transcript.

        In an interview with investigators, Lam stated that her husband is Peter Plattes.  Lam asserted that after her husband advised her that he wished to pursue employment at the DOE she contacted Vignola.   Lam stated that she probably had another conversation with Vignola after Plattes was offered the position, but she did not remember the details of the discussion.
        Lam admitted that she contacted Chin on her husband’s behalf and that, as a result, Plattes went to see Chin.  Lam acknowledged that she asked Coppin to deliver her husband’s documents to the Human Resources offices.  However, she denied receiving Plattes’s paperwork back from Coppin. 

        Lam stated that she sent Chancellor Klein an e-mail indicating that her husband had been selected for employment as a RIS with the DOE, but admitted that she did not receive a response to her e-mail and failed to discuss the issue with Klein.

        Lam maintained that she first learned that there might be a problem in the supervisory chain after she advised Schacher of her husband’s employment.  Thereafter, Srinivasan and Vignola told her that Klein was uncomfortable with Plattes’s employment as a RIS.  Lam claimed that when she informed her husband of the Chancellor’s feelings, Plattes expressed that he was no longer interested in the paid administrative position, but wanted to continue without compensation.  According to Lam, Plattes did not “quit,” since he had not received a written notice that he had been hired.  Instead, Lam maintained that she advised Vignola and Srinivasan that Plattes had “reconsidered taking the offered position.”

        Lam later acknowledged that, although there was no written notification, Plattes had received a phone call in which he was offered the RIS position.  She admitted that Plattes accepted the paid position, attended a number of optional training sessions in June, began working July 1st, and expected to receive compensation for his work.  Lam agreed that she disclosed her husband’s employment to Schacher in a July meeting.  She also conceded that Plattes vacated the RIS position only after she was advised of the Chancellor’s opinion.

Plattes as a Teacher

        In the course of investigating the employment of Plattes as a RIS, we discovered that, after leaving that position, he was hired by the DOE as a teacher.  Consequently, we expanded our investigation to examine the circumstances surrounding that action.

        In September 2003, investigators conducted a background check on Plattes, which found that on August 31, 2003, he was listed in the DOE computer system as a teacher assigned to the Bronx Guild High School (“Guild”).  The review also showed that on September 8, 2003, the computer system was adjusted to reflect that Plattes would no longer be teaching.  However, a DOE payroll check was automatically generated for Plattes for the period covering September 1, 2003 through September 15, 2003.

        Peter Steinberg, Director of the Bronx New Century High Schools, was instrumental in Plattes’s placement at the Guild.  Steinberg explained that in the middle of August 2003, Principal Michael Soguero contacted him regarding a vacancy at the Guild and Steinberg provided Plattes’s information to Soguero.   According to Steinberg, after he learned that Plattes was hired as a teacher he informed Nadelstern and a few days later Nadelstern advised him that Plattes would have to vacate the position.  

        Soguero confirmed that in middle to late August 2003, he contacted Steinberg regarding a teaching vacancy.  According to Soguero, Steinberg suggested that Plattes could fill the position.   Soguero stated that he hired Plattes for a teaching position and that Plattes attended optional professional development meetings the last week of August 2003.  Soguero explained that on August 28, 2003, Plattes informed him that he could no longer work at the school because “the Chancellor’s Office was worried about the appearance of a conflict of interest.”

        Dino Martinez, Supervising School Aide at the Guild, confirmed Plattes’s intention to work at the school.  He reported that Soguero hired Plattes in late August 2003, to fill a teaching position and that thereafter Plattes attended staff development meetings held during the week of August 25, 2003.  According to Martinez, on September 2, 2003, Soguero advised him that Plattes would not be returning to the Guild and that the school would have to fill his vacancy.  Martinez stated that he received Plattes’s paycheck, dated September 15, 2003, at the school.  Martinez turned over this paycheck to investigators from this office.  

        Sharon Dawkins, Personnel Team Member for Region 1 and 2, was involved in processing Plattes’s paperwork for the Guild position.  She explained that on August 21, 2003, Soguero sent an e-mail nominating Plattes for employment as a social studies teacher.  According to Dawkins, Plattes’s information was then entered into the computer system in order to process his payroll.  Dawkins stated that sometime in early September 2003, she received a telephone call from Martinez who stated that “Plattes cannot work here because it’s a conflict of interest, take him off.”

        In late September 2003, during an interview with investigators concerning Plattes’s employment as a RIS, Vignola first learned that Lam’s husband had been hired as a teacher for the DOE.   According to Vignola, Lam never informed him that her husband had obtained a paid teaching position.  Instead, Vignola reported that at some point, probably during the 3rd or 4th week of August, Lam told him that her husband was “volunteering” as a teacher, with an eye toward obtaining a position.  Vignola stated that he reminded Lam that she needed to check with the Chancellor before Plattes could pursue that type of position with the DOE even though it would be unpaid.  Vignola conceded that volunteers do not get paychecks from the DOE and agreed that if Plattes had been issued a paycheck that would have meant that the DOE had hired him.  Vignola acknowledged that it would be a waste of resources for Plattes to continue to seek a position within the DOE until a decision as to the propriety of such employment had been made.

        Deputy Chancellor of Operations Laverne Srinivasan also was surprised to learn of Plattes’s employment as a teacher.  According to Srinivasan, Lam was advised that a teaching position might be appropriate, but she was not told to pursue such an avenue.

        Srinivasan was unaware until after this investigation began that Plattes had accepted a teaching assignment and that a DOE paycheck had been generated.

        Plattes asserted that Lam informed him that he had approval to pursue a teaching position.  Plattes received Soguero’s name from Steinberg and contacted him.  In anticipation of starting to teach on September 2, 2003, Plattes attended optional training sessions.  However, a few days before he expected to begin working, his wife told him that a teaching position also was unacceptable.  He explained that he then notified Soguero that he would be unable to work as a teacher at the Guild.

        Lam stated that it was her understanding that a teaching position was acceptable for her husband to pursue.  Lam claimed that Srinivasan or Vignola later advised her that her husband could not hold a teaching position.

        Chancellor Joel Klein was not informed that Plattes had been hired as a teacher.  According to the Chancellor, when Lam inquired as to the possibility of her husband gaining employment as a teacher, he told her to check with the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board.  He explained that he was unaware that Plattes had actually applied for and been offered a teaching position before such a conferral had occurred.

Plattes as a Volunteer

        After DOE officials determined that Plattes’s employment by the DOE was inappropriate, the issue became how to explain the situation given the media inquiry.  A decision was made to remove Plattes’s information from the DOE’s Human Resource system, have him “donate” his services, and label him a “volunteer.”  Nevertheless, the facts remain clear that Plattes was hired by the DOE as a RIS.

        Chin stated that at the time she assisted Plattes, she headed the employee recruitment department, not the volunteer department, and that she did not believe that Plattes would have been required to complete the paperwork in her office in order to be a volunteer.

        Rodriguez explained that she hired Plattes to be a RIS.  According to Rodriguez, Plattes performed the duties that were expected of him, she expected him to be compensated for the work he performed, and at no time was there a discussion that he was volunteering for the position.  Rodriguez maintained that she had hired Plattes as a paid employee.

        Srinivasan stated that Rodriguez clearly offered Plattes a job, which he clearly accepted, but that she was advised by Coppin that Plattes’s paperwork had not been fully processed.   After a discussion with Vignola, Srinivasan instructed Coppin to stop Plattes’s paperwork and therefore it was halted.

        Srinivasan explained that it was Chancellor Klein’s position that Plattes’s employment as a RIS was inappropriate.   Consequently, Srinivasan and Vignola explained to Lam that it was ill-advised for her husband to hold the position.  According to Srinivasan, it was decided that in light of the fact that Plattes’s paperwork had not been fully processed, the time that the Deputy Chancellor’s husband had worked should be considered volunteer time.  Moreover, it was agreed that Plattes would forego his earnings for the period that he worked.  She explained that, through Lam, they asked Plattes to donate the time worked in order “to remove the specter of anything inappropriate.”

        It remained unclear to Srinivasan whether the DOE had ever employed Plattes as a RIS, nevertheless, she acknowledged that Plattes had not intended to be a volunteer when he began working.   When she was shown the e-mail Vignola sent to her on July 31, 2003, which stated that “Peter agreed to help out as a volunteer back in June,” Srinivasan stated that the e-mail was not accurate.  Instead, she explained that after it was determined that he could not keep the position, Plattes’s work for the DOE was deemed to be volunteer time because Plattes agreed to forego the pay he was entitled to receive.

        In Vignola’s view, because Plattes’s information had not been put into the payroll system, he was not an employee, even though he was offered the RIS position, accepted the position, and was performing the duties associated with the position.  According to Vignola, Rodriguez first learned that Plattes would no longer be working in Region 2 when he told her on July 31st.  At that time, Rodriguez advised Vignola that Plattes’s paperwork had already been sent to Human Resources for processing.  On that same date, Vignola was informed by Coppin that Plattes’s final paperwork was at her office and he and Srinivasan instructed her to cease processing it.  According to Vignola, “you are not an employee until we complete the hiring process.”   Consequently, at his direction, the media was told that Plattes had been a volunteer.

        Vignola acknowledged that Rodriguez, Plattes, and Lam believed that Plattes was an employee.  Vignola also conceded that Plattes clearly did not intend to donate his time when he began working for the DOE in July.  Vignola stated that had the hiring process for Plattes as a RIS been completed he would have gotten paid retroactively to July 1, 2003.  Vignola maintained that when it was determined that the hiring process had yet to be completed, it was decided that Plattes’s work time in July should be considered volunteer time.  Vignola added that, on Plattes’s behalf, Lam agreed that the time that Plattes had worked for the DOE would be deemed volunteer time and that Plattes would forego his earnings for the period of July.  Vignola continued that he was unconcerned with the status of the paperwork after his discussion with Lam.

        According to Chancellor Klein, either Vignola or Srinivasan informed him that Plattes was volunteering as a RIS at one of the Regions.  He stated that he told Lam that Plattes could not work in such a position.

        Plattes stated that sometime in the middle of July 2003, he got the impression from his wife that Chancellor Klein was uncomfortable with him holding the RIS position.  Plattes claimed that in the middle of July 2003 he decided to quit the RIS position but that he kept “volunteering” until the middle of August 2003.   Plattes also claimed that it was his idea that he would start volunteering.  Nevertheless, Plattes conceded that he accepted the RIS position, was not volunteering on July 1, 2003, and expected to receive compensation.  However, according to Plattes, he later advised his wife, “I really do not care if I get paid.”

        Plattes acknowledged that he delayed in notifying Rodriguez that he would be resigning.  In fact, he stated that the subject came up in the middle of an unrelated conversation with Rodriguez.  Plattes stated that he informed Rodriguez that he would continue until Skeen returned from her vacation.

        Lam asserted that she played no role in the response to media inquiries about her husband’s employment status.  However, Lam acknowledged that when her husband decided not to continue at Region 2 as an administrator, it was agreed that he would be called a volunteer.  According to Lam, since Plattes was not going to be permitted to continue in the RIS position, he did not want to get paid for the period that he had been working.  Lam conceded that the information that her husband had “considered” taking the job, which was provided to the media, was not accurate and Plattes “actually” had taken the position.  Moreover, Lam refused to say that Plattes “quit” and instead insisted that Plattes “reconsidered” taking the job after he learned of the Chancellor’s discomfort with him holding the position.

Conclusion

        Based on the testimony of witnesses and documentary evidence gathered during this investigation, it is clear that Diana Lam made a concerted effort to obtain employment for her husband with the DOE.  Lam contacted DOE employees on her husband’s behalf and submitted paperwork in support of his application.  Subordinate employees who tried to expedite Plattes’s hiring flatly contradict Lam’s assertion that no one was aware of their relationship.  We are forwarding our findings for your information and review.  In addition, Lam’s conduct may constitute a violation of Chapter 68 of the New York City Charter, which is administered by the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board.

        We are forwarding a copy of this report to the Office of Legal Services.  We are also sending our findings to the State Education Department.  Should you have any inquiries regarding the above, please contact Eileen Daly, the attorney assigned to this case.  She may be reached at (212) 510-1407.  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                                                                                        Sincerely,

                                                                                        RICHARD J. CONDON
                                                                                        Special Commissioner
                                                                                        of Investigation for the
                                                                                        New York City School District



                                                                                        By:     __________________________
                                                                                        Regina A. Loughran
                                                                                        First Deputy Commissioner


RJC:RAL:ss
c:    Chad Vignola, Esq.
       Theresa Europe, Esq.
       Rick Stewart, Auditor General

The Story About How Teacher Deb Fisher Helped Student Aaron Philip Proves That Tenure Must Stay

Re-posted from Parentadvocates.org:

Bureaucracy Turns a Hero Into a Rogue

This is a story of an almost unfathomably mindless school bureaucracy at work: the crushing of an occupational therapist who had helped a young boy build a record of blazing success. The therapist, Deb Fisher, is now serving a suspension of 30 days without pay for official misconduct. Her crime? She raised money on Kickstarter for a program that she and the student, Aaron Philip, 13, created called This Ability Not Disability. An investigator with the Education Department’s Office of Special Investigations, Wei Liu, found that Ms. Fisher sent emails about the project during her workday at Public School 333, the Manhattan School for Children, and was thus guilty of “theft of services.”





Aaron Philip



The story posted here about how teacher Deb Fisher helped Aaron Philip, a student with cerebral palsy, published in the New York Times will disgust and disturb you.

The corruption and malicious prosecution of the New York City Department of Education is oozing from the walls of secrecy behind which the United Federation of Teachers (UFT) ,Council of Supervisors and Administrators (CSA), theSturmabteilung "brown shirts" -Department of Investigation,Office of Special Investigations, Special Commissioner of Investigation, and Office of Equal Opportunity have hidden their collaboration and approval.

This website and other blogs such as NYC Rubber Room Reporter,New York Court Corruption, and National Public Voice have highlighted the actions of these groups and the individuals within them, such as Chancellors Joel Klein, Cathie Black, Dennis Walcott,Carmen Farina, the Gotcha Squad (here and here) and the attorneys - Adrienne Austin and Jade Fuller, Arbitrator attorneys Haydee Rosario, Doyle Pryor, just to name a few - who convict people without facts or the law behind them. Particularly disturbing is the tainted actions of the investigators who should be honest and fair in their investigations, and are not, deliberately and maliciously. The stories of teachers Natalya Sokolson, Glenn Storman, Lucienne Mohammed,Glen Fox, and countless others have been written about on this website and the blogs mentioned above. Their lives were destroyed for no reason, and I know each of their cases extremely well. This is again evident here in the story about Aaron Philip, posted below from the article in the New York Times.

I want to add that I have a disdain for bloggers and reporters who ignore wrong-doing in order to please their political allies. In particular, historian Diane Ravitch and blogger Norm Scott would rather take down their respective blogs than mention any article or story ever seen on any of my blogs. Where have both of you been as the investigators, Joel Klein, Cathie Black, Dennis Walcott, and Carmen Farina destroy the lives of excellent, caring teachers and staff since 2002?

As it seems that they have suddenly awakened from a long sleep while too many educators were harmed, and are now looking at the corruption inside the NYC DOE is, I believe, disingenuous, and I don't care how many people bombard me with comments about their ignoring the limitless badness for so many years, and not writing about it simply to ignore my work and that of other bloggers with whom they may have animosity toward for some reason. Let's chat?. We all must expose all the corrupt acts of those who take public money and then attack innocent people, and not let bias get in the way.

Anyway, the story of Aaron Philip and Deb Fisher must be distributed, and we all must take notice that Deb Fisher was wrongfully suspended, yes....and that she would have been fired if she did not have the protection of tenure.

We need to protect the public school teachers like Deb Fisher, and keep tenure rights in New York City, just as we need to get rid of the brown shirts and leadership of the NYC Department of Education. The NYC DOE is not interested in putting the needs and achievement of children above the false charges against innocent people who challenge their fraud and corruption.

Betsy Combier

Bureaucracy Turns a Hero Into a Rogue
LINK

This is a story of an almost unfathomably mindless school bureaucracy at work: the crushing of an occupational therapist who had helped a young boy build a record of blazing success.

The therapist, Deb Fisher, is now serving a suspension of 30 days without pay for official misconduct.

Her crime?

She raised money on Kickstarter for a program that she and the student, Aaron Philip, 13, created called This Ability Not Disability. An investigator with the Education Department’s Office of Special Investigations, Wei Liu, found that Ms. Fisher sent emails about the project during her workday at Public School 333, the Manhattan School for Children, and was thus guilty of “theft of services.”

The school system has proved itself unable to dislodge failed or dangerous employees for years at a time.

Ms. Fisher’s case seems to represent just the opposite: A person working to excel is being hammered by an investigative agency that began its hunt in search of cheating on tests and record-keeping irregularities. It found nothing of the sort. Instead, the investigation produced a misleading report, filled with holes, on the fund-raising effort.

By omitting essential context, the report wrongly suggested that Ms. Fisher was a rogue employee, acting alone and in her own self-interest.

In fact, the entire school, including the principal, was involved in the Kickstarter project, with regular email blasts counting down the fund-raising push. And the money was to be used not by Ms. Fisher, but by Aaron, who is writing a graphic book and making a short film about Tanda, a regular kid who is born with a pair of legs in a world where everybody else has a pair of wheels.

Aaron has cerebral palsy and uses a wheelchair to navigate the world. Ms. Fisher has worked with him since kindergarten.

“It’s beyond measure, the greatness, of how she has exposed Aaron to so many things,” Aaron’s father, Petrone Philip, said.

Aaron writes a lively Tumblr blog called Aaronverse. He has addressed all the employees of Tumblr as a guest of David Karp, who created the platform. He was taken under the wing of Fred Seibert, the founder of a hugely successful animation studio, Frederator, who had mentored Mr. Karp when he was a teenager inventing Tumblr. On his blog, Aaron urged Good Housekeeping to make sure that its research arm included disabled children in its testing of toys.

All of this was possible because he is a powerful presence, and he had Ms. Fisher at his side, according to the boy’s father. “She goes above and beyond the call of duty,” Mr. Philip said.

During a brief period of unemployment for Mr. Philip, the family moved to a homeless shelter. Learning this by chance, Ms. Fisher began a relentless campaign to get them permanent housing in an accessible building. She helped set up swimming lessons for Aaron. Ms. Fisher, 55, is passionate and hard-driving; her phone calls and emails can be like buckshot. She and another therapist started “Master Arts” for children with disabilities, devising tools to help their painting efforts. She received a mayoral commendation.

Last year, when Aaron wanted to create the book and the film, he and Ms. Fisher realized he was too young to run his own Kickstarter drive. Instead, Aaron told the investigators, they created an organization to help children like himself.

“We are all very excited to share our partnership with ThisAbilityNotDisability.org,” P.S. 333’s principal, Claire Lowenstein, wrote in an email on Jan. 11.

The goal was to raise $15,000. The school’s office regularly sent out updates like these: “7th Grader Aaron Philip is Almost 2/3 of the Way to His Goal”; “Aaron Philip is $1,621 Away From His Goal.”

In the end, he raised $16,231. The school celebrated at a town hall session.

In the meantime, a co-worker with whom Ms. Fisher had had continuing disagreements made a series of charges against her. Ms. Fisher had complained that the co-worker was physically bullying and taunting her. The special investigators found that none of the serious allegations against Ms. Fisher were true, but said she was guilty of fund-raising for “her own charity.”

The report made no mention that the entire building had been involved with the effort, nor did it try to determine whether Ms. Fisher would profit from it in any way. She was suspended on Sept. 15 until the end of October.

The school disciplinary system is often said to be broken. The case of Ms. Fisher would seem to prove the point.

The Education Department did not comment on the case.

Correction: October 3, 2014
An earlier version of a picture caption with this column misstated what grade Aaron Philip is in at school. He’s in the eighth grade, not the seventh.

Email: dwyer@nytimes.com

Twitter: @jimdwyernyt

Chaz' School Daze Post on the UFT Contract, ATRS, and Ebola: A Must-Read

A Must-read for all people anywhere is the new post on Chaz' School Daze blog.

I am re-posting here, but go to the original and read the comments which I am sure will continue to be entertaining.

Chaz is my favorite blogger, he gets it right.

Betsy Combier

Friday, October 03, 2014

Ebola, ATRs, And The 2017 Teachers Contract.

Now that we have a contract, its time to look ahead to 2017 and see how the UFT and the City will finally resolve the more than decade long ATR crisis that wastes talent and money.  

In 2017 New York City finds itself with an Enola outbreak and with close to a 50% mortality rate, its important that the City develop a vaccine as quickly as possible.  How will they get the volunteers to help? However, help is on the way in the form of the 2017 teachers contract.

The provisions of the new 2017 teachers contract will allow the DOE to "force place" ATRs into the City's voluntary Ebola vaccine trials. Any ATR who refuses to participate in the voluntary trials will have been considered to have voluntarily to have resigned.  Moreover, any ATR who refuses to be infected with the Ebola virus in the trials will be charged by the DOE with "problematic behavior"and terminated after receiving an expedited one day show trial by a DOE appointed hearing officer.

The expectation is that of the 2,000+ ATRs, half will be removed from the City payroll either by death, resignation, or termination.  In the New York Teacher Paper UFT President Michael Mulgrew calls this new ATR procedures a victory in draining the ATR pool of 50% of its members.

The DOE wants the surviving ATRs to be fired since they are infected with the Ebola virus and cannot be exposed to the students.  However, in a joint press conference with the new Mayor, Michael Mulgrew stated that the surviving ATRs will be put on a disability pension and receive 33% of their final average salary.  Mr Mulgrew further stated that its a win-win for all parties as he hugs the Mayor, Eva Muscowitz. Not only does the 2017 contract end the ATR crisis but increases educator salaries by the inflation rate and lengthens the school year to 225 days and increases the school day to 9 hours.

Yes, the new 2017 teachers contract is a win for the UFT leadership and the City and we all know that's the only thing that really matters.

How To Stop Paying For The UFT Political Action Committee, COPE

Are the UFT political statements and campaigns annoying you?
 
You should opt out of COPE, or The Committee on Political Education, which is the UFT political action committee.
 
How you can choose not to donate: Fax a letter  to 212-510-6435 with your name, school, file #, and state that you want to opt out of COPE as of the day you fax it. Sign the letter.
 
You will receive a cancellation notice and you should send this to the NYC DOE payroll office. 
 
Below you can read the UFT urging all members to sign up and pay for COPE, and below that I have re-printed a post from January 21, 2014 on the BECK Amendment and the movement away from compulsory payment of union dues.

The movement argues that as long as leaders of a union do not fairly represent members, dues should not be paid.

This country is founded upon "no taxation without representation", right?

Betsy Combier

COPE

Politics is union business.

In hard economic times, political action is needed more than ever.

Every member needs to enroll in UFT/COPE.

What COPE is

The Committee on Political Education (COPE) is the UFT’s political action arm. It covers the expenses of meeting with and educating legislators, and helps elect officeholders who respect our members, support education and work for union goals. With COPE, we work for laws and policies that further education and safeguard our rights; we back candidates who back us; and we support public officials who get things done for our members, parents and students.

In recent years, teachers and teacher unions have become the new favorite punching bag for politicians and policy makers. And labor continues to be the number one target of anti-worker politicians. The UFT’s record – on both legislativematters and in elections – would be impressive under any circumstance, but under these conditions it is truly extraordinary. It is made possible by the incredibly hard work of thousands of UFT members and by the funding that COPE provides. None of this would be possible without COPE, and COPE is not possible without you.

Download the brochure »

Why COPE needs you

COPE is entirely funded by voluntary contributions. We do not use any union dues money for political action. In these hard economic times, it is critically important that you contribute to COPE. COPE enables us to continue to fight for lower class sizes and additional funding for the classroom, and it will help us make sure that the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes by extending the millionaires’ tax. Thanks to COPE we are able to make sure that our voice is heard loud and clear.

Thanks to UFT/COPE, we get results.

We need your support to continue this vital political work.

See your chapter leader to sign up or contact COPE at 212-598-7747.

Movement Starts: Toward an End To Involuntary Payment of Dues to the UFT

The BECK Amendment deals with the issue of members' dues to their union, and where to draw the line. It's an issue that needs to be addressed, especially in New York City and particularly with teachers, paras, and other members who pay UFT BIGs - Mike Mulgrew, Leroy Barr, Ellie Engler - a lot of money basically to do nothing.

Communications Workers of America v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988) is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that, in a union security agreement, unions are authorized by statute to collect from non-members only those fees and dues necessary to perform its duties as a collective bargaining representative. The rights identified by the Court in Communications Workers of America v. Beck have since come to be known as "Beck rights," and defining what Beck rights are and how a union must fulfill its duties regarding them is an active area of modern United States labor law.^{[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]}

And the worst part of this is, UFT members do not have a choice; in blunt language, if you join the UFT you MUST pay your dues. Paying is not voluntary. Doesn't this leave the BIGs to do whatever they want, from helping someone to doing nothing, as they will get your dues money anyway?

Time to do something about this:
1) make paying dues voluntary
2) permit a member to pay their dues money to benefit THEIR welfare, not that of UNITY folk who couldn't care less what classroom or rubber room you are in.

Betsy Combier

Free the teachers from automatic dues

By Post Editorial Board

, NYPOST, Jan 21, 2014

AFT President Randi Weingarten and UFT President Mike Mulgrew

LINK

A favorite talking point for the teachers union is that charter-school operators earn more than the schools chancellor.

Funny thing: As the United Federation of Teachers’ own spending reports show, at least five UFT executives earn more than the chancellor’s $212,614 base salary; union president Mike Mulgrew makes $250,000.

More interesting is that the source of this money is force. While everything about charters is voluntary — no one forces children to attend, teachers to teach there or foundations to pay executive salaries — it’s the opposite for the rest of the system.

For the salaries of Mulgrew and Co. come courtesy of an automatic payroll deduction from every teacher’s paycheck that goes for dues. And the city does it for them. Thus, Mulgrew is spared the expense of having to persuade the UFT members he’s worth the dues he asks. And taxpayers underwrite public-sector unions that then use their dollars to buy political influence to extract even more money from the public till.

 

 

Teachers’ union boss spent $18K in Bond-like HQ spy sweep

By Carl Campanile

, NYPOST, Jan 20, 2014

LINK

Something’s bugging teachers-union boss Michael Mulgrew — or, at least, he thinks so.

The United Federation of Teachers president blew a huge wad of union cash to play out a paranoid James Bond fantasy when he paid $17,849 for a security team to sweep his headquarters for bugs, documents show.

A crew from Protective Countermeasures & Consulting Inc. was hired to sweep for listening devices at the UFT’s offices at 52 Broadway, a review of union spending reports reveals.

The payments were made in January and March of last year, just as the union leadership grappled with key strategic decisions such as labor-contract negotiations and who to support as the next mayor.

The union would not say if any surveillance devices were found.

Some union members thought it was unlikely anyone would bug the union — and that it was ridiculous that Mulgrew is using Cold War tactics to play a game of “Tinker, Teacher, Soldier, Spy” in the UFT headquarters.

“I have no idea why they’re doing it. It’s very odd,” said James Eterno, a dissident UFT member who ran against Mulgrew for president in 2010. “I didn’t know we were like the CIA and have to keep secrets. I didn’t think we were that important. It’s not like someone is going to get killed if something leaks out.”

Protective Countermeasures, a New Rochelle-based firm, specializes in identifying security threats such as “corporate eavesdropping” and helps craft “counter espionage” plans.

Its Web site says it uses equipment that “neutralizes” bugs. The sweep also checks the electric grid, light fixtures and walls for video transmitters, infrared recorders and laser technology.

Eterno wondered if Mulgrew was looking for the UFT version of Edward Snowden. “I don’t think there’s any worry about me or anyone else planting a bug in Mike Mulgrew’s office,” he said.

A UFT spokesperson would say only that it pays for “routine security services.”

The anti-spy initiative was just one of the entries listed in the UFT’s $190 million spending report covering its massive empire, fueled by $50 semimonthly union dues paid by rank-and-file teachers. The UFT also poured nearly $4 million into political campaigns through its super PAC, United for the Future, and spent an additional $4.2 million on TV and radio ad blitzes and advocacy.

The teachers union defended its spending as appropriate.

“The UFT’s financial report covers funds spent on our 200,000 members, including refreshments, reimbursement for transportation and parking and other expenses, along with routine security services,” a union spokesperson said.

“We are proud of every dollar we spend on our members and on advocacy groups fighting for better schools.”

$tate of the union

• 54 union reps and staffers got salaries of more than $100,000. The average was $144,000 — triple the starting teacher salary of $45,000.
• Five UFT officials were compensated more than the $212,614 base salary for the schools chancellor. UFT chief Michael Mulgrew makes $250,000.
• $264,000 to groups that campaign against charter schools, including the rebranded ACORN, now called New York Communities for Change.
• More than $1.7 million on food, including conferences at the Hilton and Waldorf.
• $150,000 for tickets to movies, the Radio City Music Hall Christmas show, Mets and minor-league baseball games, and union swag such as mugs and tote bags.

 

The Newest 3020-a Arbitration Scam By The DOE and UFT: Termination For Non-Attendance at Professional Development

Here is a new way to find yourself without a job.

Over the past year, I have seen the decisions of arbitrators on the Teacher Performance Unit (TPU) subtly change.

Now, many arbitrators who decide not to terminate the educator (for various reasons, but the main one is that the Department of Education did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the charges were valid) include in their decision as penalty some sort of professional development or classes.

Here are some of the decisions handed out in the past couple of months:

* "As a condition of his continued employment with the Department, Respondent shall be required to successfully complete twenty (20) hours of professional development within one (1) year of the date of this Opinion and Award. The Department shall be responsible to pay for the professional development and shall have the exclusive right to determine what type of professional development Respondent must complete."

* "At the Department's discretion, Respondent shall be required to complete additional training to address her pedagogical issues."

* "During his suspension without pay, Respondent shall enroll and successfully complete courses, approved by the Department,  to achieve the goals and objectives contained in _____'s action plan..."

* "Respondent is to attend courses on the topics of Planning, Classroom Management and Delivery of Instruction, to be paid for by the Department."

These are just a few of the Awards given, in addition to a fine.

How did this penalty of taking PD and paying a fine become so common? At the same time, no less, that the Teacher Effectiveness Program became the new Gotcha Squad?

Were arbitrators told something by the Department and NYSUT that allows these types of penalty? Why I am asking these questions is because I know several of these cases, and it is doubtful that these teachers needed any PD.

The DOE Attorney Jade Fuller is one of the prosecuting attorneys who are on the TPU panel, and she wants all teachers terminated no matter what the allegation is. She always wears an elephant pin. Different elephants.

Jade Fuller



Here is her background:

Adjunct Professor

Corinthian Colleges

October 2011 – Present (3 years 1 month)Everest College-Online

Litigation Attorney

New York City Department of Education

January 2011 – Present (3 years 10 months)

Partner

Giaimo Associates, LLP

January 2007 – January 2011 (4 years 1 month)

Associate

Giaimo Associates, LLP

September 2004 – December 2006 (2 years 4 months)

St. John's University School of Law

Juris Doctorate, Law

2001 – 2004

North Carolina Central University

Bachelor of Arts, Political Science

1997 – 2001

Activities and Societies: Alpha Lambda Chapter, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.

 

The TPU now has the arbitrators ordering classes for the allegations they have "proven", even if the charge has not been documented or testified about. The classes are given by OTE, office of Teaching Effectiveness, and are held from 4-7. If the arbitrator orders professional development of any kind "at the discretion of the Department", you have to go. If you don't, cant, or forget, you will be terminated.

Immediately. Without any hearing or due process.
 

I heard from a teacher ordered into these classes that the OTE PD instructor said that all instructors were told that if a person did not show up and complete all classes, this person would be immediately terminated from the Department of Education. Tenure rights no longer exist, it seems.

 

All calls to the UFT have been unanswered.